<p>Climate change, increasing demand and overuse have resulted in water stress, a condition where available water resources are not enough to meet needs, in many parts of the US. At the same time, increasing seasonal precipitation, and more intensive management practices mean subsurface drainage is expanding in the Midwest, which has resulted in significant nutrient loading to water bodies and changes to the hydrologic balance of river basins. To ensure the sustainability of water resources, it is crucial to understand how much water available, and how agricultural water use is impacted by changing weather, stress and legal conditions. Water use systems must be properly managed to ensure prosperous agricultural production, and secure water resources. The overall goal of this research is to evaluate the sustainability of groundwater resources in the US through better quantification of surface and groundwater use and the interactions with agricultural water management practices.</p> <p>Watershed-scale measures of surface water and groundwater stress were calculated to explore the spatial and temporal variability of water stress in the US. Much of the Western US, which has been in a water stress situation for 35 years (1985-2015), is shifting to increasing surface water use, but both groundwater stress and surface water stress are continuing to rise. An increase in groundwater stress has also been observed in isolated watersheds in the eastern United States. The pattern of rising surface water stress corresponds more closely to changes in water use, whereas the pattern of rising groundwater stress corresponds to changes in water supply. It has been observed that those watersheds that experienced water stress in 1985 have responded by increasing their water withdrawals from other sources, but they have not decreased their agricultural water withdrawals.  </p> <p>The decision to invest in groundwater irrigation depends on physical water availability and cost, as well as the right to use the water, as determined by groundwater doctrines. Overall, groundwater withdrawals for irrigation have increased in humid and temperate regions, and irrigation per unit area has also increased across the US. At the same time, the fraction of irrigation coming from groundwater is growing, suggesting a potential shift in the preferred water source. This is especially true in states following absolute ownership, correlative rights, and reasonable use doctrine. Correlative Rights doctrine prevalent in the western Corn Belt and Absolute Ownership doctrine (Indiana) appears to encourage increasing groundwater withdrawals during times of stress. These states increase their irrigation rate and the fraction of groundwater withdrawals for irrigation when less surface water is available.</p> <p>Subsurface drainage is common practice across vast areas of the US’ Corn Belt. Subsurface drainage can provide a better growing environment for crops, removing the excess water from the root zone and improving the trafficability of the soil. However, by lowering the water table, drainage has the potential to reduce groundwater recharge. Controlled drainage allows the user to control the water table by adjusting the height of the outlet to limit the subsurface flow during the non-growing season. To better understand the mechanism of how agricultural drainage practices influence aquifer recharge, the VIC model was utilized to represent subsurface drainage and groundwater storage in the Upper Wabash River basin. When using controlled drainage, the rate of recharge increased compared to the rate of free drainage. The mean annual difference between free drainage and controlled drainage was 16 mm/year for the 30 years study period (1983 to 2012). Controlled drainage also contributes greater stream baseflow, increasing low flows relative to free drainage. Despite excess seasonal water that requires the use of subsurface drainage, it is important to note that there have been local conflicts caused by well failures, in Indiana and neighboring states during times of drought, so the local impact of agricultural practices on groundwater is important. This dissertation increases understanding of the impact of agricultural drainage practices on water resource availability. </p>

No description available.

No description available.

Sustainable development as our joint global goal is consensus in the mainstream international arena, in the name of long-term well-being for all living creatures. However economic constraints often limit the choices available to local communities, forcing them to make trade-offs between immediate socioeconomic gains and the long-term sustainability of natural resources. Thus, economic interests parallel with biodiversity conservation create difficult positionings for individuals, which becomes even clearer in developing areas and biodiversity hotspots. Despite this conflict of interest, there is currently insufficient empirical evidence on how communities on microlevels – in areas of both environmental and developmental interests – understand and reason about this potential dilemma. A discrepancy between assumptions and empirics motivates an investigation of discourses from local perspectives. This thesis will therefore highlight local development and environmental discourses of forest and land use. The region of North Sumatra, Indonesia, functions as a paradigmatic case study on how community members reason who are appointed to two forceful narratives – resource extraction and biodiversity conservation. Through conducting semi-structured interviews and using discourse analysis, two environmental discourses and four development discourses were identified in the local understandings of forest and land use. This gives us indications of how the jungle is understood and valued from a bottom-up perspective. Exploring local perspectives of land use is essential for informed decision-making, promoting sustainable development, ensuring social equity, and fostering community engagement. Further research on the relationship and interactions between local communities and the natural world is called upon.

No description available.

Freshwater mussels are particularly susceptible to injury from exposure to hazardous substances due to their sessile nature and filter feeding biology. There have been various Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration (NRDAR) cases in the United States involving injury to freshwater mussels due to releases of hazardous substances into rivers and streams. Restoration of mussels in these cases typically involves propagation of mussels at a hatchery facility and their subsequent stocking or release at restoration sites. However, determination of the services lost due to injury to mussel populations and the appropriate level of restoration (and associated costs) to recover those losses has varied among NRDAR cases. Standardized methods would facilitate injury determination and restoration planning for future cases involving injury to mussels. The purpose of this research was to use two of the earliest and largest NRDAR cases (Certus, Inc. and Lone Mountain Processing, Inc. (LMPI)) involving injury to mussels to: 1) determine whether restoration for these cases was sufficient and 2) analyze restoration efforts for application in future NRDAR cases (i.e., lessons learned and development of standardized methods). This study represents the first evaluation of mussel restoration efforts in a NRDAR context. In general, 4.8% to 6.1% of juvenile mussels that excysted from host fishes in the hatchery survived to be eventually released at restoration sites. Further, based on expected survival and recruitment rates of released mussels, monitoring of restoration sites found 43% to 15% of the expected number of mussels. Understanding reasons for this discrepancy between expected and estimated survival is critical for determining the level of restoration success. If released mussels are either establishing and/or recruiting outside of monitoring area but otherwise alive and breeding, then they should count towards successful restoration. In contrast, if released mussels have either high mortality over time or are dying shortly after release, then expected gains from these mussels should not count towards successful restoration. I developed a mussel-specific Resource Equivalency Analysis (REA) for use in future NRDAR cases that compares the loss of services, using Discounted Mussel Years (DMYs) as units, to the expected gain in services from restoration. Applying this analysis to the Certus and LMPI NRDAR cases suggests that mussel restoration was successful (i.e., expected DMYs gained are greater than those lost), even when it was assumed that 75% of released mussels were dying after being released at restoration sites. Finally, a cost analysis of two mussel propagation facilities found that the yearly cost per mussel released at a restoration site ranged from $4.36 to $96.48. The suite of species propagated each year varied. As some species are more difficult to propagate than others, the cost per mussel varied widely. These data will facilitate the determination of restoration costs in future cases. Together, this information provides a starting point for consistently estimating restoration effort and costs for future NRDAR cases involving freshwater mussels. / Doctor of Philosophy / Freshwater mussels provide numerous ecosystem services. Most importantly, they purify large volumes of water, and provide habitat and food for other animals. However, they are highly vulnerable to chemical spills because they cannot move long distances quickly and they are directly exposed to toxic substances if they filter water. There have been many cases in past decades where vulnerable mussel populations were exposed to chemical spills. When these populations are injured, the services they provide are lost until the population can be restored to pre-spill conditions. Restoration of mussel populations usually involves raising juvenile mussels in hatchery facilities and then releasing them in areas where populations were injured. Determining the appropriate level of restoration needed to restore populations has varied widely among cases. A standardized approach would facilitate determination of restoration and restoration costs. I used data from two cases (Certus, Inc. and Lone Mountain Processing, Inc.) where mussel populations were injured due to a chemical spill to: 1) determine whether restoration for these two cases was successful and 2) develop tools and draw insights for use in future cases where mussels are injured. This study represents the first evaluation of restoration success of freshwater mussels in a NRDAR context. On average, 4.8% to 6.1% of juvenile mussels produced at two Virginia hatchery facilities survived to be released at restoration sites. Further, of the mussels released, only 43% to 15% of the expected mussels were found in later years. These "missing" mussels are either leaving and/or breeding outside of their release areas, or they are dying and failing to provide important ecosystem services. Further study is needed to determine the degree to which each of these is the case. I also developed a mussel-specific method of determining how much restoration is needed to provide the amount of ecosystem services as pre-spill conditions (called Resource Equivalency Analysis or REA). Application of REA to these two test cases (Certus, Inc. and Lone Mountain Processing, Inc.), I showed that restoration for these cases was successful, even if as much as 75% of released mussels are dying after being released at restoration sites. Finally, I found that the cost of successfully releasing a mussel ranged from $4.36 to $96.48 per mussel. This information is useful for estimating the cost of restoration plans in future chemical spills that injure freshwater mussels.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.