Spelling suggestions: "subject:"bnetwork responsibility"" "subject:"conetwork responsibility""
1 |
ARCA e Fundação o Boticário [manuscrito]: uma perspectiva sobre o movimento ambientalista contemporâneo (1980-2000) / ARCA e Fundação o Boticário [manuscrito]: uma perspectiva sobre o movimento ambientalista contemporâneo (1980-2000) / ARCA Foundation and the Apothecary [manuscript]: a perspective about the contemporary environmental movement (1980-2000) / ARCA Foundation and the Apothecary [manuscript]: a perspective about the contemporary environmental movement (1980-2000)BORGES, Rafael Gonçalves 17 April 2009 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-07-29T16:17:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertacao Rafael Borges Historial.pdf: 871990 bytes, checksum: c5c400865ad9fb5b9f5c6ef5f46f28e3 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009-04-17 / The work proposed herewith, entitled ARCA and Fundação O Boticário: a perspective about
the environmental movement contemporary , is an analysis which aims to examine the
consolidation of environmental discourse over the last two decades of the twentieth century
through a study of the environmental movement in its main characteristics, putting in
discussion the insertion of it in the context of substantial changes occurred in the period,
concerning to civil associations in network and the scientific-technical development, which
form the basis for the emergence of an ethical imperative of responsibility and of a defense of
a biological and environmental identity. / O trabalho que ora se apresenta, intitulado ARCA e Fundação O Boticário: uma perspectiva
sobre o movimento ambientalista contemporâneo (1980-2000) , é uma análise da
consolidação do discurso ambiental nas duas últimas décadas do século XX, a partir de um
estudo do movimento ambientalista em suas principais características, problematizando a
inserção do mesmo no contexto das mudanças ocorridas no período, referentes ao
associativismo civil em rede e ao desenvolvimento técnico-científico, lançando as bases para
o surgimento de um imperativo ético calcado na noção de responsabilidade e da defesa de
uma identidade biológica e ambiental.
|
2 |
Collaborative learning and the co-design of corporate responsibility : building a theory of multi-stakeholder network learning from case studies of standardization in corporate responsibilityMcNeillis, Paul Matthew January 2009 (has links)
This thesis examines the collaborative development of corporate responsibility (CR) standards from the perspective of organisational learning theory. The author proposes that standards development projects can be understood as Network Learning episodes where learning is reflected in changes in structures, interpretations and practices accompanied by learning processes. Network Learning alone is seen as insufficient to reflect the diverse contributions and outcomes in the special case of CR standards. Concepts from multi-stakeholder learning like the role of dissensus in learning and the empowerment of weaker stakeholders are therefore used to create a synthesis of the two theories in a single conceptual framework. This framework is then tested against a pilot case and three case studies of corporate social responsibility (CSR) standards including the development of the new ISO international standard on social responsibility (SR). The data validates and extended this framework to yield a Multi-Stakeholder Network Learning theory capable of describing the how participants and non-participant stakeholders learn in this context. New concepts are generated from the data, like dislocated learning, which demonstrate how participants in the process and those they represent can experience quite different learning outcomes. Stakeholders whose learning is aligned with the learning of their participant representatives truly have a stake in these influential standards. However, where representatives fail to learn from those represented, the latter's stake is diminished. By shedding light on the mechanisms of effective collaborative learning this work contributes to learning theory, the practice of standardization and the normative stakeholder empowerment agenda.
|
3 |
Collaborative Learning and the Co-design of Corporate Responsibility. Building a Theory of Multi-Stakeholder Network Learning from Case Studies of Standardization in Corporate Responsibility.McNeillis, Paul Matthew January 2009 (has links)
This thesis examines the collaborative development of corporate responsibility (CR) standards from the perspective of organisational learning theory. The author proposes that standards development projects can be understood as Network Learning episodes where learning is reflected in changes in structures, interpretations and practices accompanied by learning processes. Network Learning alone is seen as insufficient to reflect the diverse contributions and outcomes in the special case of CR standards. Concepts from multi-stakeholder learning like the role of dissensus in learning and the empowerment of weaker stakeholders are therefore used to create a synthesis of the two theories in a single conceptual framework. This framework is then tested against a pilot case and three case studies of corporate social responsibility (CSR) standards including the development of the new ISO international standard on social responsibility (SR). The data validates and extended this framework to yield a Multi-Stakeholder Network Learning theory capable of describing the how participants and non-participant stakeholders learn in this context. New concepts are generated from the data, like dislocated learning, which demonstrate how participants in the process and those they represent can experience quite different learning outcomes. Stakeholders whose learning is aligned with the learning of their participant representatives truly have a stake in these influential standards. However, where representatives fail to learn from those represented, the latter¿s stake is diminished. By shedding light on the mechanisms of effective collaborative learning this work contributes to learning theory, the practice of standardization and the normative stakeholder empowerment agenda. / British Standards Institution
|
Page generated in 0.0598 seconds