Ce résumé étendu prend son origine a par tir de la thèse “L'écran de Charon: la traversée du sujet du langage dans la narration cinématographique” réalisée en régime de cotutelle entre les universités de Brasília, Brésil, et Nice Sophia Antipolis, Fance. Il s'agit d'une synthèse de l'investigation psychanalytique concernant deux styles narratifs: moderne et classique. Ils sont pensés, avant tout, par rapport la production cinématographique. Dans le présent rapport, nous discutons de la question de la jouissance à partir de l'amalgame signifiant des mots français jeu et jouissance. Ainsi, notre mot-valise - “la jeuïssance” - nous permettra d'articuler la jouissance du sujet du langage à la production narrative. Il sera évoqué les catégories engendrées dans le Triskel lacanien, à savoir: la jouissance de l'Autre, la jouissance du sens et la jouissance Phallique. Elles sont articulées sur la logique borroméenne avec les productions narratives moderne, classique et classique-industrielle. Avec un montage de notre triskel, nous identifions dans la figure du trompe-l'oeil la fonction de l'objet petit a du champs narratif. Pour notre traversée des inferos lacaniens, nous pensons avoir trouvé dans la figure de jeuïssance un dispositif pour analyser la narration, composé exclusivement de matériel psychanalytique. Ainsi, dans n'importe quelle production narrative du sujet de langage, les narrations sont enterrées dans la supposée terre-ferme de la science ou de la religion, ou bien dans les sables mouvants des arts. Ce voyage psychanalytique nous fera atteindre un champs bien delà du principe du plaisir. / This extended summary originates from the thesis "The screen of Charon: the crossing of the subject of language in the cinematographic narrative" carried out under collaboration between the universities of Brasília, Brazil, and Nice Sophia Antipolis, Fance. It is a synthesis of psychoanalytic investigation concerning two narrative styles: modern and classical. First and foremost, they are concerned with film production. In this report we discuss the issue of pleasure from the amalgam formed by the French words “jeu” (game, play) and “jouissance” (the act of experiencing pleasure). Thus, our “mot-valise” "jeuïssance" (“playsure”) will allow us to articulate the experience of pleasure undergone by the subject of language with the narrative production. The categories created in the Lacanian Triskel will be evoked, namely: the pleasure of the Other, the pleasure of meaning and the pleasure of the Phallic. They are articulated on a borromean logic with modern, classical and classical-industrial narrative productions. By creating our triskel, we identify, in the figure of the trompe-l'oeil, the function of the small object as the narrative field. By crossing the lacanian inferos, we believe to have found in the figure of “playsure” a device for analyzing narration, composed exclusively of psychoanalytic material. Thus, in any narrative production of a subject of language, narratives are either buried in the supposed firm land of science or religion or in the moving sands of the arts. This psychoanalytic journey will take us far beyond the principle of pleasure.

O presente trabalho se ocupa das questões relativas à noção de estrutura no escopo teórico da psicanálise de Jacques Lacan (1901-1981), em específico sobre o objeto de estudo definido por estruturas clínicas, segundo a divisão clássica neurose, perversão e psicose. A questão que norteou a pesquisa foi: Como definir a noção de estruturas clínicas na obra lacaniana? Diante da hipótese de permanência teórica do conjunto estrutural na obra de Lacan, o objetivo da tese foi definir as estruturas clínicas por meio da correlação de tais conjuntos com os três registros Real, Simbólico e Imaginário (RSI) e suas escritas topológicas pelos enodamentos possíveis do Nó-borromeano. O método proposto foi estruturado em quatro capítulos: (1) Análise das bordas epistemológicas para o conceito de estrutura em Lacan, desde o estruturalismo, com a linguística com Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) e Roman O. Jakobson (1896-1982), a antropologia com Claude Lévi-Strauss (1908-2009) e a lógica e a matemática com Aristóteles (384 a.c. -322 a.c.), Gottlob Frege (1848 1925) e indicações gerais da topologia; (2) Proposição da noção de estruturas clínicas, a partir das três principais teorias da constituição do sujeito em Lacan, teoria do estádio do espelho (1949 1964), teoria do complexo de édipo (1950-1970) e teoria da alienação (1964 1970), das quais é possível extrair as indicações dos três registros RSI; (3) Desenvolvimento das operações primordiais Bejahung e Verwerfung - de inscrição no campo da linguagem e seus efeitos de retorno em operadores estruturais específicos a cada conjunto, tais quais na divisão ser, sujeito e eu na montagem da estrutura pelo corte significante; (4) Considerações sobre os arranjos particulares definidos por neurose - o efeito do suporte simbólico ao significante, perversão - posição de recobrimento Imaginário do objeto e psicose - a função imaginária de borda para o Real. Portanto, a tese defendida está pautada numa proposição estrutural da subjetividade pela articulação de operações fundamentais de inscrição no campo da linguagem, e de operadores específicos pela amarração dos três registros RSI, escritos nos enodamentos do Nó-Borromeu RSI, que se atualizam sob transferência enquanto hipótese diagnóstica na particularidade de um tratamento / The present work deals with the questions related to the notion of structure in the theoretical scope of the psychoanalysis of Jacques Lacan (1901-1981), specifically on the object of study defined as clinical structures, according to the classic neurosis, perversion and psychosis division. The question that guided the research was: How to define the notion of clinical structures in the Lacanian work? In view of the hypothesis of theoretical permanence of the structural set in Lacan\'s work, the aim of this thesis was to define the clinical structures by means of the correlation of such sets with the three registers Real, Symbolic and Imaginary (RSI) and their topological writings by the possible intertwinement of the Borromean knot. The proposed method is structured in four chapters: (1) Analysis of epistemological edges to the concept of structure in Lacan, from the structuralism, with Linguistics with Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) and Roman O. Jakobson (1896-1982), anthropology with Claude Lévi-Strauss (1908-2009) and logics and mathematics with Aristotle (384 BC-322 BC), Gottlob Frege (1848-1925) as well as General topology; (2) Proposal of the concept of clinical structures, from the three main theories of the constitution of the subject in Lacan, theory of the mirror stage (1949 1964), theory of the Oedipus complex (1950-1970) and theory of alienation (1964-1970), from which it is possible to extract the indications of three registers RSI; (3) The development of main operations - Bejahung and Verwerfung - on the inscription in the field of language and their returning effects on specific structural operators to each set, such as in the division being, subject and I in the assembly of the structure by the signifier cutting; (4) Consideration of the particular arrangements defined as neurosis - the effect in the symbolic support to the signifier, perversion - position of the imaginary object covering and, psychosis - the imaginary function of edge for the Real. Therefore, the thesis defended is based on a structural proposition of subjectivity by the articulation of fundamental operations of inscription in the field of language, and of specific operators in the tying of the three RSI registers, written in the intertwinements of the Node-Borromeo RSI, that are updated under transfer while diagnostic hypothesis in the particularity of a treatment