Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:35:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ValdeciS.pdf: 571587 bytes, checksum: 5b1f79ea57b1f1783ecefd3cb316e648 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-09-18 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / This study - Biologist s formative speech about death. Nuances and metaphors from knowing that the subject of do not want to know - shows a marginal cognitive construction in scientific education from biologist - death. It considered as obvious that death is a theme that covers both the scientific education from biologist and the division of the subject, and concerns the splitting of the double life-death and the principles of inclusion and exclusion of the subject. Part of sensitive question: What is the epistemological weave who supports biologist's speech about death? It is constituted an object of study of the biologist s speech on death. It is advocated the thesis that: Death is an epistemological obstacle announcing for something always aims to escape from the perspective of knowledge, especially of scientific knowledge because, since it is understood as cognitive learning about the disruption of biological phenomenon life which is involved on weave of imaginary and symbolic constructions about the finiteness of life; it has constituted a metaphorical knowing - encouraged by the noisy silence - which does not allow to know in full, mobilizing hence subject in searching for transitional truths that reduce the ontological being-mortal anguish centered in subjective dimension involved in the act of knowing. From this movement of search that the object mental life after death wins a symbolic value that requires a real-looking multi-referential for the study of biology - life - and its implications: the finiteness of life, especially by moving the omnipotence of scientific objectivity expressed by signs and symbols that seek say the completeness of scientific knowledge-, signaling thus the existence of the dynamics of incompleteness implicit in subjectivity that supports knowledge relating to the double, life and death, and to the temporality of the existence of Homo sapiens sapiens, with the axis guiding the desire of the subject, do not want to know about death, implicit in the mechanisms objective-subjective founded by non-said of death is the epistemology of the existence of objective-subjective subject, whose core is the negation of death. The theoretical methodological knowing web is anchored in the multi-reference which favors a transit by theoretical current, as the Psychoanalysis, bachelardian philosophy, the epistemology of complexity, the Thanatology, the Social Psychology, and Etnocenology, and Understanding Interview. The unveiling of the study object from the analysis of oral speech of eleven biologists who serve in high school, from three main guiding: Death in the history of life,Death in biologist s academic education and, Conceptions about concepts / Este estudo - O discurso formativo do bi?logo sobre a morte. Matizes e met?foras do saber que o sujeito n?o deseja saber - evidencia uma constru??o cognitiva marginal na forma??o cient?fica do bi?logo - a morte. Considera como evidente que a morte ? um tema que abrange, simultaneamente, a forma??o cient?fica do bi?logo e a cis?o do sujeito, e diz respeito ? cis?o do duplo vida-morte e aos princ?pios de inclus?o e de exclus?o do sujeito. Parte da quest?o sensibilizadora: Qual a tessitura epist?mica que fundamenta o discurso do bi?logo sobre a morte? Constitui objeto de estudo o discurso do bi?logo sobre a morte. Defende a tese que: A morte ? um obst?culo epistemol?gico anunciador de que algo, sempre, escapar? na perspectiva objetiva do conhecimento, especialmente do conhecimento cient?fico, visto que, compreendida como a constru??o cognitiva sobre a ruptura do fen?meno biol?gico vida, est? implicada na tessitura de constru??es imagin?rias e simb?licas sobre a finitude da vida; constitui-se um saber metaf?rico fomentado pelo sil?ncio ruidoso -, que n?o se permite conhecer por inteiro, mobilizando, assim, o sujeito ? busca/procura de verdades transit?rias que reduzam a ang?stia ontol?gica de ser-mortal nucleada na dimens?o subjetiva implicada no ato de conhecer. ? nesse movimento de busca/procura que o objeto mental vida p?s-morte ganha um valor simb?lico-real que requer um olhar multirreferencial para o objeto de estudo da Biologia a vida e a sua implica??o: a finitude da vida, especialmente, por deslocar a onipot?ncia da objetividade cient?fica expressa por signos e s?mbolos que procuram dizer da completude do conhecimento cient?fico -, sinalizando, assim, a exist?ncia da din?mica da incompletude impl?cita na subjetividade que fundamenta a constru??o de saberes relativos ao duplo vida-morte e ? temporalidade da exist?ncia do Homo sapiens sapiens, tendo como eixo norteador o desejo do sujeito, de n?o desejar saber sobre a morte, impl?cito nos mecanismos objetivos-subjetivos fundamentados pelo n?o-dito da morte que constitui a epistemologia da exist?ncia do sujeito objetivo-subjetivo, cujo n?cleo ? a nega??o da morte. A teia epist?mica te?rico-metodol?gica ancora-se na Multirreferencialidade que favorece um tr?nsito por correntes te?ricas, como, a Psican?lise, a filosofia bachelardiana, a epistemologia da complexidade, a Tanatologia, a Psicologia Social, e a Etnocenologia, e na Entrevista Compreensiva. O desvelamento do objeto de estudo parte da an?lise dos discursos orais de onze bi?logas que atuam no Ensino M?dio da Educa??o B?sica, a partir de tr?s eixos norteadores: A morte na hist?ria de vida, A morte na forma??o acad?mica do bi?logo e, Concep??es sobre conceitos