Manual deployments of software is a tedious, repetitive and non-scaling method of deploying software.Continuous Delivery is a practice that enables automated deployment of software in a rapid fashion at the click of a button.When deciding whether to start using a new practice, software companies need to make an assessment from a cost-benefit perspective.This thesis compares automated deployments through Continuous Delivery with manual deployments from a cost perspective.The comparison is done at a small software company where two tools for Continuous Delivery are chosen based on requirements imposed by the company. The tools, Octopus Deploy and Azure DevOps, are cost efficient to different degrees.Octopus is cost efficient if several deployments per week are necessary, particularly if many deployment targets are involved.Azure DevOps is quickly cost efficient in most cases due to its pricing scheme, only needing roughly one deployment per week for few deployment targets, and a couple of deployments per year for many deployment targets.The initial cost of having a paid employee set up the tool needs to be paid off, but is easily done within a year using weekly deployments with a small number of deployment targets.