Nous nous demandons constamment comment peut-on communiquer avec du parfum ? Ce langage sensoriel utilise le signe parfum dans un dispositif et comme une langue car le parfum est un système de signes qui forme une langue olfactive, dans la culture occidentale. Dans la première partie, nous confrontons cet argument à la culture chinoise, et nous observons que le parfum semble être un signe qui peut appartenir à un système de signes produisant du sens, de la signification, dans cette culture extrême-orientale. Le design, production occidentale, semble fortement influencé par la culture du signe extrême-orientale. La deuxième partie, étudie les manipulations de cette langue olfactive pour produire du sens : par le matériau, les images, la structure. Les clichés qui nous permettent de créer des projets de design olfactifs nous permettent de produire les codes d'un nouvelle langue, olfactive, pour produire un sens partageable, commun. Les formes de communication qui se dégagent de notre thèse sont l'écriture par le parfum, non pas sur un support, mais dans l'espace, et une forme pictographique et idéographique : une écriture imagée pour signifier une idée. Cette forme de communication logographique typique des écritures hiéroglyphiques et des sinogrammes, ne serait donc pas exotique. L'Occident aussi produit et manipule un tel langage, une telle écriture, mais pas uniquement sur une surface plane. Ceci s'applique au parfum, mais peut-être aussi à toute autre production de design. / We are constantly asking how can we communicate with perfume? This sensory language uses the sign perfume in a device and as a language because the perfume is a system of signs that form an olfactory language in Western culture. In the first part, we compare this argument to the Chinese culture, and we observe that the scent seems to be a sign that can belong to a system of signs producing meaning, in this far eastern culture. Design, western production, seems strongly influenced by the culture of the Far East sign. The second part studies the manipulations of the olfactory language to produce meaning: by the material, the images, the structure. The “clichés” that afford us to create projects of smell design allows us to produce the codes of a new language, olfactory, to produce a shareable and common meaning. Forms of communication that emerge from our thesis are written by the scent, not on a backing, but in space, and a pictographic and ideographic form: a pictorial writing to signify an idea. This form of communication typical logographic writing hieroglyphics and Chinese Character, would not be exotic. The West also produces and manipulates such language, such writing, but not only on a flat surface. This applies to perfume, but can also be any other production of design.

For many organisms the sense of smell is critical to survival. Some olfactory stimuli elicit innate responses that are mediated through hardwired circuits that have developed over long periods of evolutionary time. Most olfactory stimuli, however, have no inherent meaning. Instead, meaning must be imposed by learning during the lifetime of an organism. Despite the dominance of olfactory stimuli on animal behavior, the mechanisms by which odorants elicit learned behavioral responses remain poorly understood. All odor-evoked behaviors are initiated by the binding of an odorant to olfactory receptors located on sensory neurons in the nasal epithelium. Olfactory sensory neurons transmit this information to the olfactory bulb via spatially organized axonal projections such that individual odorants evoke a stereotyped map of bulbar activity. A subset of bulbar neurons, the mitral and tufted cells, relay olfactory information to higher brain structures that have been implicated in the generation of innate and learned behavioral responses, including the cortical amygdala and piriform cortex. Anatomical studies have demonstrated that the spatial stereotypy of the olfactory bulb is maintained in projections to the posterolateral cortical amygdala, a structure that is involved in the generation of innate odor-evoked responses. The projections of mitral and tufted cells to piriform cortex however appear to discard the spatial order of the olfactory bulb: each glomerulus sends spatially diffuse, apparently random projections across the entire cortex. This anatomy appears to constrain odor-evoked responses in piriform cortex: electrophysiological and imaging studies demonstrate that individual odorants activate sparse ensembles that are distributed across the extent of cortex, and individual piriform neurons exhibit discontinuous receptive fields such that they respond to structurally and perceptually similar and dissimilar odorants. It is therefore unlikely that olfactory representations in piriform have inherent meaning. Instead, these representations have been proposed to mediate olfactory learning. In accord with this, lesions of posterior piriform cortex prevent the expression of a previously acquired olfactory fear memory and photoactivation of a random ensemble of piriform neurons can become entrained to both appetitive and aversive outcomes. Piriform cortex therefore plays a central role in olfactory fear learning. However, how meaning is imparted on olfactory representations in piriform remains largely unknown. We developed a strategy to manipulate the neural activity of representations of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli in the basolateral amygdala (BLA), a downstream target of piriform cortex that has been implicated in the generation of learned responses. This strategy allowed us to demonstrate that distinct neural ensembles represent an appetitive and an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) in the BLA. Moreover, the activity of these representations can elicit innate responses as well as direct Pavlovian and instrumental learning. Finally activity of an aversive US representation in the basolateral amygdala is required for learned olfactory and auditory fear responses. These data suggest that both olfactory and auditory stimuli converge on US representations in the BLA to generate learned behavioral responses. Having identified a US representation in the BLA that receives convergent olfactory information to generate learned fear responses, we were then able to step back into the olfactory system and demonstrate that the BLA receives olfactory input via the monosynaptic projection from piriform cortex. These data suggest that aversive meaning is imparted on an olfactory representation in piriform cortex via reinforcement of its projections onto a US representation in the BLA. The work described in this thesis has identified mechanisms by which sensory stimuli generate appropriate behavioral responses. Manipulations of representations of unconditioned stimuli have identified a central role for US representations in the BLA in connecting sensory stimuli to both innate and learned behavioral responses. In addition, these experiments have suggested local mechanisms by which fear learning might be implemented in the BLA. Finally, we have identified a fundamental transformation through which a disordered olfactory representation in piriform cortex acquires meaning. Strikingly this transformation appears to occur within 3 synapses of the periphery. These data, and the techniques we employ, therefore have the potential to significantly impact upon our understanding of the neural origins of motivated behavior.

Animals have evolved sensory systems that afford innate and adaptive responses to stimuli in the environment. Innate behaviors are likely to be mediated by hardwired circuits that respond to invariant predictive cues over long periods of evolutionary time. However, most stimuli do not have innate value. Over the lifetime of an animal, learning provides a mechanism for animals to update the predictive value of cues through experience. Sensory systems must therefore generate neuronal representations that are able to acquire value through learning. A fundamental challenge in neuroscience is to understand how and where value is imposed in brain during learning. The olfactory system is an attractive sensory modality to study learning because the anatomical organization is concise in that there are relatively few synapses separating the sense organ from brain areas implicated in learning. Thus, the circuits for learned olfactory behaviors appear to be relatively shallow and therefore more experimentally accessible than other sensory systems. The goal of this thesis is to characterize the representation and function of neural circuits involved in olfactory associative learning. Odor perception is initiated by the binding of odors onto olfactory receptors expressed in the sensory epithelium. Each olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) expresses one of 1500 different receptor genes, the expression of which pushes the ORN to project with spatial specificity onto a defined loci within the olfactory bulb, the olfactory glomeruli. Therefore, each and every odor evokes a stereotyped map of glomerular activity in the bulb. The projection neurons of the olfactory bulb, mitral and tufted (M/T) cells, send axons to higher brain areas, including a significant input to the primary olfactory cortex, the piriform cortex. Axons from M/T cells project diffusely to the piriform without apparent spatial preference; as a consequence, the spatial order of the bulb is discarded in the piriform. In agreement with anatomical data, electrophysiological and optical imaging studies also demonstrate that individual odorants activate sparse subsets of neurons across the piriform without any spatial order. Moreover, individual piriform neurons exhibit discontinuous receptive fields that defy chemical or perceptual categorization. These observations suggests that piriform neurons receive random subsets of glomerular input. Therefore, odor representations in piriform are unlikely to be hardwired to drive specific behaviors. Rather, this model suggests that value must be imposed upon the piriform through learning. Indeed, the piriform has been shown to be both sufficient and necessary for aversive olfactory learning without affecting innate odor responses. However, how value is imposed on odor representations in the piriform and downstream associational areas remain largely unknown. We first developed a strategy to track neural activity in a population of neurons across multiple days in deep brain areas using 2-photon endoscopic imaging. This allowed us to assay changes in neural responses to odors during learning in piriform and in downstream associative areas. Using this technique, we first observe that piriform odor responses are unaffected by learning, so learning must therefore impose discernable changes in neural activity downstream of piriform. Piriform projects to multiple downstream areas that are implicated in appetitive associative learning, such as the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Imaging of neural activity in the OFC reveal that OFC neurons acquire strong responses to conditioned odors (CS+) during learning. Moreover, multiple and distinct CS+ odors activatethe same population of OFC neurons, and these responses are gated by context and internal state. Together, our imaging data shows that an external and sensory representation in the piriform is transformed into an internal and cognitive representation of value in the OFC. Moreover, we found that optogenetic silencing of the OFC impaired the ability of mice to acquire learned associations. Therefore, the robust representation of expected value of the odor cues is necessary for the formation of appetitive associations. We made an important observation: once the task has been learned with a set of odors, the OFC representation decays after learning has plateaued and remains silent even when mice encounter novel odors they haven’t previously experienced. Moreover, silencing the OFC when it was not actively engaged during the subsequent learning of new odors had no effect on learning. These sets of imaging and silencing experiments reveal that the OFC is only important during initial learning; once task structure has been acquired, it is no longer needed. Task performance after initial task acquisition must therefore be accommodated by other brain regions that can store the learned association for long durations. We therefore searched for other brain regions that held learned associations long-term. In the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), we observe that the learned representation persists throughout the entire course of training. Unlike the OFC, not only does this representation encode the positive expected value of CS+ odors, it also encodes the negative expected value of CS- odors in a non-overlapping ensemble of neurons. We further show through optogenetic silencing that this representation is necessary for task performance after the task structure has already been acquired. Therefore, while the OFC representation is required for initial task acquisition, the mPFC representation is required for subsequent appetitive learning and performance. Why would a learned representation vanish in the OFC and betransfered elsewhere? We hypothesize that the brain may allocate a portion of its real estate to be a cognitive playground where experimentation and hypothesis testing takes place. Once this area solves a task, it may unload what it has learned to storage units located elsewhere to free up space to learn new tasks. We further imaged another associative area, the basolateral amygdala (BLA), and found a representation of positive value that appears to be generated from a Hebbian learning mechanism. However, the silencing of this representation during learning had no effect. This suggests that while multiple and distributed brain areas encode cues that predict the reward, not all may be necessary for the learning process or for task performance. In summary, we have described a series of experiments that map the representation and function of different associational areas that underlie learning. The data and the techniques employed have the potential to significantly advance the understanding of learned behavior.

The purpose of this study was to explore the response v of coyotes (Canis latrans) to certain olfactory and visual stimuli. It was assumed that the findings would be of value in refining techniques used in sampling and controlling coyotes. The specific objectives were to determine (1) if coyotes were more likely to approach and remain in the vicinity of a familiar than unfamiliar scent, (2) if the response to olfactory and visual stimuli differed, (3) if positively reinforcing an approach to the stimuli differentially altered the response to visual and olfactory stimuli, and (4) if the response differed with sex and social rank. The results failed to reject each of the null hypotheses implicit in the four objectives. Two factors that may have contributed to these findings were that subjects were too accustomed to "novelty" and there was a lack of behavioral control during the tests. On the basis of the results of this study, it is suggested that coyotes are so sensitive to their surroundings and so accommodating in their behavior that behavioral test results may simply reflect their responses to specific captive and test conditions.

One of the major limitations in drug development and gene therapy for brain diseases is the natural defensive structure called the blood brain barrier (BBB), which prevents therapeutic polypeptide drugs and viral vectors from entering the brain. Intranasal delivery of therapeutic gene products into the brain offers a non-invasive alternative towards a feasible gene and protein therapy for neurological diseases. From recent studies involving axonal transport, it is tempting to speculate that therapeutic macromolecules including neurotrophic factors and viral vectors can be delivered into the brain by peripheral neurons, such as olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs), which span the BBB. It is thought that the nasal pathway into the brain involves two general mechanisms; intracellular (intraneuronal) or extracellular routes of transport. However the pathways involved have not yet been fully characterized. In this study I firstly investigated the temporal and spatial localisation pattern of both biotinylated and I125 labelled ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) following nasal delivery into Sprague-Dawley rats. Results showed that intranasal delivered CNTF was transported to several brain regions by both intracellular axonal pathway through ORNs and the extracellular trigeminal pathway. Excess unlabelled CNTF competed for receptor binding in the olfactory mucosa confirming receptor mediated intracellular transport to the olfactory bulb via ORNs. Denervation of the olfactory mucosa prior to CNTF delivery failed to prevent CNTF transport to trigeminal and hypothalamic brain regions. Intranasal delivered CNTF was biologically active, resulting in activation of the STAT3 signalling pathway in the thalamus and hypothalamus. To examine the functional activity of intranasal delivered CNTF, I conducted a weight loss trial using an obese Zucker rat (OZR) model to test whether CNTF treatment caused body weight loss. Intranasal administration of CNTF resulted in reduced body weight in the CNTF treated OZR group compared to the BSA control group during the 12 day trial and for 3 days after. Intranasal delivery of CNTF may be a valuable method for the treatment of obesity. In the second study, I investigated the temporal and spatial expression of Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein (EGFP) transferred by a single nasal delivery of either a recombinant adenovirus vector (Ad5CMV-EGFP) or an adeno-associated virus vector (AAV2-EGFP) into Sprague-Dawley rats. Adenovirus mediated EGFP expression was localized in ORNs throughout the olfactory epithelium after 24 hours. EGFP in the ORNs appeared to be anterogradely transported along their axons to the olfactory bulb and transferred in glomeruli to second-order neurons. EGFP was transferred to several brain regions including the cortex, hippocampus, and brainstem after 7 days. EGFP expression co-localized with Olfactory Marker Protein and was confirmed with EGFP immunofluorescence labelling and western blotting. AAV expressed EGFP localized in similar olfactory and brain regions 6 weeks after delivery. mRNA levels suggested that the AAV-EGFP construct was only incorporated into olfactory mucosa cells and the viral vector was not present in olfactory bulb and brain regions. In conclusion, this simple and non-invasive polypeptide and gene delivery method provides ubiquitous macromolecule distribution throughout the rodent brain and may be useful for the treatment of neurological disorders.

<p>Participants claiming to be good at evoking vivid olfactory images are assumed to have better access to odor memory. It was hypothesized that this would be reflected in better odor naming and recognition task performance. Two extreme groups of participants high and low in self-reported olfactory imagery ability were exposed to familiar and unfamiliar odors in an incidental learning session. This was followed by an episodic odor recognition and odor naming task 20 minutes later. Imagery ability was unrelated to naming and recognition. This might indicate that if high imagers have a better access to odor memory, it is not due to a stronger link between language and odor memory or better incidental encoding.</p>

<p>Using a conditioning paradigm and an automated olfactometer, I investigated the olfactory sensitivity of five CD-1 mice for seven aromatic aldehydes. With two of the stimuli (3-phenylpropanal and canthoxal), the animals discriminated concentrations as low as 10 ppb (parts per billion) from the odorless solvent and with four of the stimuli (helional, cyclamal, lilial and lyral) they discriminated concentrations as low as 1 ppb, with single individuals even scoring better. All five animals yielded the by far lowest threshold value with bourgeonal and discriminated a concentration of 0.1 ppq (parts per quadrillion) from the odorless solvent. The detection threshold values for aromatic aldehydes were found to be affected by the type of functional groups and oxygen moiety attached to the benzene ring. A comparison of the present data with those obtained in other species found no clear correlation between olfactory sensitivity and the size of the olfactory receptor repertoire.</p>

Lygus hesperus is an important pest on different crops including cotton and alfalfa in the western U.S. Anaphes iole is a common parasitoid of Lygus spp. eggs in the U.S. and has potential as a biological control agent against L. hesperus in different crops. Its foraging behavior has been studied to a limited extent, but it is unknown whether A. iole females rely on plant volatiles to locate host habitats. L. hesperus feeding and oviposition are known to induce emission of plant volatiles in cotton and maize, but no studies have addressed the role of plant volatiles in the host searching behavior of A. iole. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the attraction of A. iole females toward volatiles derived from L. hesperus habitats and flight response of A. iole females toward cotton plants harboring L. hesperus eggs or treated with methyl jasmonate. Results from olfactometry bioassays showed that female wasps were attracted to odors emanating from different plant-L. hesperus complexes and from adult L. hesperus, while plants damaged by non-hosts or mechanically-damaged were not attractive. These findings suggested that A. iole females use specific plant volatiles released following L. hesperus feeding and oviposition to locate host habitats. In addition, in flight chamber tests A. iole females discriminated between cotton plants with moderate (41 eggs) and high (98 eggs) levels of L. hesperus infestations relative to uninfested plants, but not between plants with low (7 eggs) infestations compared to uninfested plants. In larger scale experiments conducted in the greenhouse, female wasps responded to L. hesperus-infested plants but not to methyl jasmonate-treated plants under similar conditions. Overall, results from this study revealed that A. iole females employ volatile signals to locate its host’s habitat and that they are attracted to plants damaged by L. hesperus feeding and oviposition. However, further research should seek to identify the chemical elicitors involved in the release of plant volatiles attractive to A. iole females.

A common characteristic in neurodegenerative diseases of the brain is death of specific neuronal populations. The lack of neuron proliferation and axon extension in most parts of the central nervous system leads to chronic loss of neurons in the case of injury or disease. Therefore it is essential to identify signals involved in neurogenesis and neuronal survival. A favorable model in which to study these events is the olfactory sensory neurons in the main olfactory epithelium and their target in the glomeruli of the olfactory bulb. In spite of constant regeneration, each olfactory sensory neuron maintain expression of one particular odorant receptor and the specificity of their axonal projections to the glomeruli. Most mammals also have an accessory olfactory system consisting of the sensory neurons in the vomeronasal epithelium and their target area the accessory olfactory bulb. Differential expression of receptors and other genes divides the olfactory and vomeronasal epithelium into zones, but the function and mechanisms underlying the establishment of these zones are still elusive. We identified four genes with graded expression patterns that correlated with the zones of the olfactory epithelium. One of the identified genes encodes a retinoic acid synthesizing enzyme, RALDH-2. We showed that RALDH-2 was expressed in a gradient in cells of the lamina propria underneath the olfactory epithelium, suggesting a possible retinoic acid regulation of zonally expressed genes in the olfactory epithelium. To investigate the role of retinoic acid in the olfactory systems, we generated a transgenic mouse strain that selectively expressed a dominant negative retinoic acid receptor in mature olfactory and vomeronasal neurons. We found that subsequent to the establishment of axonal projections, the neurons of both olfactory systems died prematurely by retrograde caspase-3 activation. In the main olfactory system the onset of apoptosis was associated with the appearance of incorrect heterogenous glomeruli with axons of more than one OR identity. Additionally, the activity regulated cell adhesion molecule kirrel-2 was down regulated suggesting an additional regulation of this gene by retinoic acid. Deficient retinoic acid signaling in olfactory sensory neurons could thus induce apoptosis by changing the parameters for axonal competition by neural activity and kirrel-2 expression. We found evidence for a selective neuronal death in the accessory olfactory system of the dnRAR mice, where only vomeronasal sensory neurons belonging to the basal zone died by retrograde caspase-3 activation. This implies that the two populations of sensory neurons in the vomeronasal epithelium differently depend on retinoic acid for their survival.

Nasal administration of analgesics for achieving rapid pain relief is currently a topic of great interest. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) restricts access to the central nervous system (CNS) for several central-acting drugs, such as morphine and dihydroergotamine, which results in a substantial effect delay. Evidence for the olfactory transfer of drugs from the nasal cavity to the CNS after nasal administration, bypassing the BBB, is available for both animals and humans. The aims of this thesis were to study the olfactory transfer of morphine to the CNS after nasal administration, and to compare the nasal transport of analgesic drugs across nasal respiratory and olfactory mucosa. In vivo studies in rodents demonstrated that morphine is transferred via olfactory pathways to the olfactory bulbs and the longitudinal fissure of the brain after nasal administration. Further, olfactory transfer of morphine significantly contributed to the early high morphine brain hemisphere concentrations seen after nasal administration to rats. Olfactory transfer was tracked by collecting and analysing brain tissue and blood samples after right-sided nasal administration and comparing the results to the situation after i.v. administration. The olfactory transfer was also visualised by brain autoradiography. In vitro studies indicated that the olfactory mucosa should not be a major barrier to the olfactory transfer of dihydroergotamine or morphine, since transport of these drugs was no more restricted across the olfactory mucosa than across the nasal respiratory mucosa. The in vitro studies were performed using the horizontal Ussing chamber method. This method was further developed to enable comparison of drug transport across nasal respiratory and olfactory mucosa which cannot be achieved in vivo. In conclusion, these analgesic drugs showed potential for olfactory transfer, and access to the CNS by this route should be further investigated in humans, especially for the drugs with central effects that are currently under development for nasal administration.