No description available.

Öppna uppgifter kan generera flera lösningar och låter även eleverna utveckla sin problemlösningsförmåga. Syftet med undersökningen har varit att ta del av erfarenheter som lärare gjort genom att delta i ÄlMa, ett fortbildningsprojekt med fokus på öppna uppgifter. Undersökningens frågeställning är: Vad behöver lärare kunna för att arbeta med öppna uppgifter och hur har lärarna utvecklats genom att delta i projektet? Undersökningen har bestått av intervjuer där sex lärare som deltagit i projektet, beskriver sitt arbete med öppna uppgifter. För att arbeta med öppna uppgifter anser lärarna att de behöver kunskaper som flexibilitet, att läraren låter eleverna diskutera, att läraren vågar släppa kontrollen, samt att läraren har matematisk kunskap. I intervjuerna framgår att deltagarna saknar detta i sin lärarutbildning, utan har stället, fått utveckla dessa kunskaper genom erfarenheter i arbetslivet. Undersökningen synliggör även faktorer som påverkat lärarnas arbete med öppna uppgifter. Det handlar om arbete med öppna uppgifter i praktiken, lärarens egen kunskap och erfarenhet, kunskap om läroplanen, matematiska sammanhang, instruktioner, lärarnas syn på elevers förmåga att lösa problem, reflektion, samt läromedel. Deltagandet i projektgrupperna har lett till att lärarna har utvecklat praktikgemenskaper. De känner en ökad gemenskap och inser vikten av att ta del av andras erfarenheter. De har insett att för att kunna utvecklas i sitt arbete med öppna uppgifter behöver de få fortsatta möjligheter att träffas och diskutera. För att lärarna ska känna större säkerhet när de arbetar med öppna uppgifter, bör de få möjlighet att utveckla kunskaper för det, under sin lärarutbildning.

No description available.

Objective: The primary aim of the study was to examine the automated linguistic analysis of the open-ended problem (PQ) and life-effects (LEQ) questionnaires to understand the psychological effects of tinnitus. Design: The study used a cross-sectional design. Participants completed online questionnaires which included demographic questions, several standardised patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and two open-ended questions focussing on PQ and LEQ related to tinnitus. The response to open-ended questions was analysed using the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) software to identify the frequency of text on various linguistic dimensions relevant to tinnitus. Study sample: 336 individuals with tinnitus. Results: The study results point to two broad findings. First, although PQ and LEQ have some similarities with PROMs (e.g. the linguistic dimension negative emotions having a weak positive correlation with anxiety and depression), no correlation with the number of dimensions suggests that the open-ended questions identify additional elements that are not captured in PROMs. Second, more linguistic dimensions from the PQ correlate with PROMs compared to LEQ suggesting that the current PROMs are problem-oriented. Conclusions: The study results support the idea that the use of open-ended questions in addition to PROMs may help optimise the efforts in examining the effects of chronic conditions such as tinnitus.

Multilingual natural language processing (NLP) is increasingly recognized for its potential in processing diverse text-type data, including those from social media, reviews, and technical reports. Multilingual language models like mBERT and XLM-RoBERTa (XLM-R) play a pivotal role in multilingual NLP. Notwithstanding their capabilities, the performance of these models largely relies on the availability of annotated training data. This thesis employs the multilingual pre-trained model XLM-R to examine its efficacy in sequence labelling to open-ended questions on democracy across multilingual surveys. Traditional annotation practices have been labour-intensive and time-consuming, with limited automation attempts. Previous studies often translated multilingual data into English, bypassing the challenges and nuances of native languages. Our study explores automatic multilingual annotation at the token level for democracy survey responses in five languages: Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Russian, and Spanish. The results reveal promising F1 scores, indicating the feasibility of using multilingual models for such tasks. However, the performance of these models is closely tied to the quality and nature of the training set. This research paves the way for future experiments and model adjustments, underscoring the importance of refining training data and optimizing model techniques for enhanced classification accuracy.

The main aim of this diploma thesis is to find out, if the level of knowledge of German language at pupils at basic schools in the Czech Republic is increasing, stagnating or decreasing and what factors influence their results. In the theoretic part I am going to deal with testing of pupils in Europe and in the Czech Republic. After that there is introduced a list of all standard assessment tests of German language on level A1 and A2. Then there are compared standard assessment tests ?Fit in Deutsch? and ?Start Deutsch? with the tests of Czech School Inspection from 2012/2013. In the research part I focus on the development of pupils? knowledge of German language at basic schools. The research is based on the assigned tests from 2007, 2010 and 2013. On the basis of these tests and filled questionnaires I am trying to find answers on the set research questions and to check correctness of the set hypotheses or alternatively to find other factors that influence pupils? knowledge of German language.

Communication seems to play a pivotal role in any high school classroom. But it was found those classes or certain individual students shy away from engaging in effective communication during natural science lessons in Swaziland. One of the directives in the Swaziland National Education Policy states that syllabuses for studies in Form 4 and 5 should enable learners to develop essential skills which include communication and language skills. This study then, on realising that there was a gap between what was stated in the Education Policy and what was actually the case in the natural science classrooms, sought for a solution that would encourage effective communication in natural sciences. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to encourage active participation of high school students in natural science lessons. The main research question posed for this purpose was: Can student motivation enhance classroom discourse for the negotiation of science understanding? Five sub-questions emanated from the main research question: (a) How does classroom discourse relate to natural science understanding? (b) What effect does external motivation have on discourse during natural science lessons? (c) What is the effect of feedback during natural science learning? (d) How can feedback be enhanced in the natural science class? (e) Which teaching strategies improve interactions during natural science learning? The study is organised into five chapters. The first chapter summarises the whole study by giving the problem statement, research aim and objectives, definition of terms, as well as chapter divisions. Chapter two provides the background to the study through the discussion of education theories based on classroom discourse and motivation. The third chapter presents detailed information about the research design, methods of data collection and analysis, as well as a proposed method for motivating students. The fourth chapter presents the research results, analysis and discussion. The fifth and the final chapter presents research findings, concluding remarks drawn from the research findings, as well as recommendations for similar future research. The case study style uses a qualitative, descriptive and exploratory approach. The study concentrated on theories explaining learning and motivation. The sample comprised six purposefully selected students and their two physical science teachers. Data were collected using the standardised open-ended interview and non-participant lesson observation methods, and from documents. The data were collected in two phases, the pre-motivation phase and the motivation phase. The collected data was further categorised into two segments, with each segment being a unit of analysis. One of the segments was composed of oral interchanges, while the other was composed of students’ written work. The data was then transcribed, coded, analysed and discussed using the thematic discourse analysis approach. The principles of triangulation, reliability and validity ensured the credibility of the study remained intact. Research ethics were also observed by the researcher and there was trust, respect and autonomy during data collection. The ethics observed included informed consent, confidentiality, beneficence, anonymity and non-malificence. Permission to collect data was sought and obtained from all concerned. The motivation method helped the physics group improve more (55%) than the chemistry group (7%) in tests. In the overall performance the two groups improved more or less the same: the chemistry group improved by 4% while the physics group improved by 5%. There were three main findings for the study and they revolved around the purpose and the research question. The first major finding was that the motivation method used with the students instilled self-discipline in the students, resulting in self-regulated behaviour and better understanding of science concepts. The finding suggested that motivated students are self-disciplined and take ownership of their learning. The second major finding was that during the motivation phase of data collection interactions improved between the students and their science teachers. These interactions were in the form of classroom talk, submission of school work and feedback. It was inferred that motivated students communicate more effectively and with better understanding of the concepts taught. The third major revelation was that the students were motivated by learner-centred teaching strategies and the use of teaching aids in a science laboratory. A main finding for the first sub-question was that the more students interacted with each other, with their natural science teachers, and with their books the more they appreciated and understood science concepts. For the second sub-question the main finding was, the motivation method used with the students improved discourse during natural science lessons. The marks the students were awarded gave them the energy to engage more in science activities and to behave well. The main finding for the third sub-question was that prompt feedback and positive comments motivated students to engage more in science discourse and to understand science concepts better. An important finding from the fourth sub-question was that prompt and positive feedback enhanced feedback, as well as giving students tasks that were not too far above their abilities, enhanced feedback in the natural science class. For the fifth sub-question it was found that student-centred teaching methods as well as teaching aids and learning in science laboratories improved interactions during natural science learning. / Curriculum and Instructional Studies / D. Ed. (Curriculum Studies)