201 |
Love, friendship and images citizenship and necessity in Thucydides and Plato /Templer, Rachel Marie. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
202 |
Proeve eener vergelijkende studie over Plato en Husserl. Bijdrage tot de transscendentale psychologie ...Schmidt Degener, Henri. January 1924 (has links)
Proefschrift--Utrecht. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
203 |
De "Nous" in het systeem van Plato's philosophie. Onderzoekingen betreffende de verhouding nous-psyche, de ontwikkeling der teleologische natuurverklaring en haar plaats in het system.Loenen, Johannes Hubertus Mathias Marie, January 1900 (has links)
Proefschrift--Amsterdam. / With summaries in English and in French. Bibliography: p. 293-297.
|
204 |
A reprise of rhetoric in the Gorgias : is Plato a master rhetorician?Tucker, Jiri Arthur Augustine. January 1997 (has links)
No description available.
|
205 |
Translation as a socially symbolic act : translations of the ancient Greek concept of 'democracy' in nineteenth-century BritainLianeri, Alexandra January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
206 |
The human body-soul complex in Plato's TimaeusBurgess, Scott Anthony January 2003 (has links)
No description available.
|
207 |
DIALOGOI : Plato and the English RomanticsKabitoglou, E. D. January 1987 (has links)
No description available.
|
208 |
The concept of mimesis in sixteenth century literary theorySomerville, James Alexander January 1994 (has links)
No description available.
|
209 |
Plato and the poets : epistemological, ethical and ontological arguments in the DialoguesMarušič, Jera January 2008 (has links)
The thesis focuses on Plato’s treatment of poetry in the Ion, Gorgias and Republic X. Although these discussions provide three quite different accounts of poets and their activity and have thus commonly not been associated, a similar objective may be detected in them: they all aim to disqualify poets, presenting them as incompetent in what they do or also (in the Gorgias and Republic X) as morally harmful. My aim is first to show how the three discussions differ from Plato’s other major discussions of poetry in Republic II-III and Laws II and VII: while the former provide (disqualifying) answers to the descriptive questions of whether poets have relevant knowledge and how they morally affect their public, the latter are concerned with the prescriptive questions of what poets should do in their envisaged role as political instruments (Chapter I). In the close study of the three discussions, my aim is to identify, critically examine and compare the ‘disqualifying’ strategies employed in them: I consider, on the one hand, how they substantiate the charges of poets’ incompetence or moral harmfulness and on the other hand, how they counter and account for the widely shared appreciation of Homer and other poets (Chapters II-V). Before discussing Republic X, however, I consider separately the notion of poets’ μίμησις (representation/ imitation), which in Republic X has a prominent role, but at the same time appears difficult to understand in itself as well as seemingly inconsistent with Plato’s other arguments about poets’ μίμησις, in particular in Republic III. Rejecting the widely accepted assumption of ‘narrower’ and ‘wider’ meanings of the term μίμησις respectively in Books III and X of the Republic, I analyse the notion of μίμησις in itself, and, following this I distinguish between three kinds of poets’ μίμησις and define in what elements they differ (Chapter IV). In the final overview of the three discussions, I reconsider how successful are their disqualifying depictions of poets.
|
210 |
Plato’s Meno : a commentary29 October 2014 (has links)
M.A. (Greek) / This text is divided into two basic parts. The first part gives an account of the function of the Platonic dialogue, how the dialogue attempts to fulfil this function, and consequently, how it should be read. The core idea is that the Platonic dialogue aims to be transformative, not informative; it aims to bring about an ethical reorientation of the reader rather than his acceptance of certain philosophical doctrines. The second part is a commentary on Plato’s Meno. It attempts to enact the account of the Platonic dialogue given in the first part. The proper way to engage with a Platonic dialogue is to become a commentator, to participate in the discussion, to use the discourse as a lever of philosophical learning and self-understanding
|
Page generated in 0.0154 seconds