Submitted by Simone Maisonave (simonemaisonave@hotmail.com) on 2016-11-30T12:03:40Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Bruno Souza Garcia_Dissertacao.pdf: 1798886 bytes, checksum: 146bb3a31b5258bc40dfc93e35435b7e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-30T12:03:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Bruno Souza Garcia_Dissertacao.pdf: 1798886 bytes, checksum: 146bb3a31b5258bc40dfc93e35435b7e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-07-08 / Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul - FAPERGS / Esta dissertação tem como objeto de pesquisa as eleições suplementares ocorridas nos munícipios brasileiros entre os anos de 2013 a 2015. O objetivo geral é analisar se esses pleitos estão relacionados com um determinado perfil socioeconômico dos municípios, e, concomitantemente, como afetam o comportamento do eleitorado e dos partidos dessas localidades. A metodologia utilizada consiste em um trabalho exploratório sobre as eleições suplementares, com a intenção de coletar, organizar e analisar dados sobre esses processos. As fontes pesquisa foram as seguintes: o banco de dados do site da Justiça Eleitoral (especialmente, o do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, TSE) e em outras fontes de informação, como o Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) e o Atlas Brasil. / This dissertation research subject supplementary elections held in Brazilian municipalities between the years 2013 to 2015. The overall objective is to analyze whether these claims are related to a particular socio-economic profile of the municipalities, and, concomitantly, to affect voter behavior and parties these locations. The methodology consists of an exploratory work on supplementary elections, with the intent to collect, organize and analyze data on these processes. Sources survey were the following: the Electoral Court website database (especially the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, TSE) and other sources of information, such as the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) and the Atlas Brazil.

The aim of this research was to find out whether or not the use of the veto by one or more of the permanent members in the UNSC had an impact on the behaviors of the warring parties by looking at the interventions that would be imposed by the Council. Much of the research on this topic looks at what it takes for a conflict to get to the UNSC and what happens after sanctions are put into place, but what about if the resolution does not receive support and is not adopted? Two cases are looked at using the structured focused comparison method in relation to two conflict periods in the Kosovo conflict, before the veto (during-UNSC) and after the veto (post-UNSC) asking the question how can the use of the veto in the UNSC by one, or more, of the permanent members of the Security Council impact a conflict? The evidence collected shows that the hypothesis was not supported due to there not being a large change in the behavior of the warring parties from one conflict period to the next. The conclusion shows that the impact by the UNSC on the conflict was not severe.