Characterization and assessment of liquefaction potential of gravelly soil in a reliable cost-effective manner has always been a great challenge for the geotechnical engineers. The typical laboratory investigation techniques have proven to be ineffective for characterizing gravelly soil due to the cost and difficulty of extracting undisturbed sample from gravelly deposits. The traditional in-situ tests like SPT or CPT are not very suitable for gravelly soil because of interference with large size gravel particles which can artificially increase the penetration resistance. The Becker Penetration Test, well known for gravelly soil characterization, is cost-prohibitive for routine projects and is not available in most of the world. The Chinese dynamic cone penetration test (DPT) with a larger diameter probe compared to the SPT or CPT, can be economically performed with conventional drilling equipment. Besides the penetration testing, in-situ measurement of shear wave velocity (Vs) is another alternative of characterizing gravel liquefaction. Probabilistic liquefaction triggering curves were developed by performing both DPT and shear wave velocity test at the Chengdu Plain of China where massive gravel liquefaction took place during 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. These curves have significant uncertainty as they were developed from a single event database. As a part of this study, both DPT and Vs tests have been performed at various sites around the world where gravelly soil did or did not liquefy in various past earthquakes. These newly collected data have been added to the existing Chinese dataset to form a large database on gravel liquefaction case histories for both DPT and Vs. Based on this larger database, new magnitude dependent probabilistic liquefaction triggering procedures have been developed for both DPT and Vs. The larger database has significantly improved the triggering curves by reducing the spread and constraining the curves at both the higher and lower end. New Magnitude Scaling Factor (MSF) curves have been developed for both DPT and Vs which were found to be consistent with existing MSF curves. Further, an instructive comparison has been drawn between the performance of CPT and newly developed DPT triggering procedure the liquefaction potential of gravelly deposits CentrePort in Wellington. Results showed that both DPT and CPT performed reasonably well in liquefaction assessment of the gravelly fill. However, the CPT-based CRR profiles contain intermittent spikes due to the interaction with gravel particles whereas the DPT resistance appear to be relatively smooth. Similar comparison has been presented between the DPT and BPT in performing liquefaction assessment of gravelly soil at the Borah Peak sites in Idaho. It is found that both DPT and BPT successfully evaluate the liquefaction potential of the loose critical layers but the medium dense to dense layers are identified as non-liquefiable by the DPT whereas the same deposits are identified as liquefiable by the BPT. Lastly, an investigation has been carried out to observe the effect of hydraulic conductivity and in-situ drainage on the liquefaction triggering in gravelly soils based on field data along with a group of numerical analyses. It is found that the hydraulic conductivity of gravelly soil reduces with sand content which eventually may cause liquefaction during earthquake shaking. Low permeability cap layer may also impede the drainage path to generate excess pore pressure to trigger liquefaction in the gravelly strata.

Soil liquefaction can cause devastating damage and loss and is a serious concern in civil engineering practice. One method for evaluating liquefaction triggering potential is a risk-targeted probabilistic approach that has been shown to provide more consistent and accurate estimates of liquefaction risk than traditional methods. This approach is a “performance-based” procedure which is based off of the performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) framework developed by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center. Unfortunately, due to its complexity, performance-based liquefaction assessment is not often used in engineering practice. However, previous researchers have developed a simplified performance-based procedure which incorporates the accuracy and benefits of a full performance-based procedure while maintaining a more simplistic and user-friendly approach. Until now, these simplified performance-based procedures have only been available for the SPT (Standard Penetration Test). With the increasing popularity of the CPT (Cone Penetration Test), a simplified procedure is needed for CPT-based liquefaction assessment. This thesis presents the derivation of a simplified performance-based procedure for evaluating liquefaction triggering using the Ku et al. (2012) and Boulanger and Idriss (2014) models. The validation study compares the results of the simplified and full performance-based procedures. The comparison study compares the accuracy of the simplified performance-based and traditional pseudo-probabilistic procedures. These studies show that the simplified performance-based procedure provides a better and more consistent approximation of the full performance-based procedure than traditional methods. This thesis also details the development of the liquefaction loading maps which are an integral part of the simplified method.

Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests for LiquefactionEvaluation of Gravelly SoilsMichael H. TalbotDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, BYUDoctor of PhilosophyIn North American practice, the Becker Penetration Test (BPT) has become the primary field test used to measure penetration resistance of gravelly soils. However, this test is expensive and uncertainties exist regarding correlations and corrections for rod friction. As an alternative, the dynamic penetration test (DPT) developed in China has recently been correlated with liquefaction resistance in gravelly soils. The DPT equipment consists of a 74 mm diameter cone tip driven by a 120 kg hammer with a free fall height of 100 cm using 60 mm drill rod to reduce friction. The DPT is a very rugged, economical device, capable of penetrating dense gravel layers. During DPT field investigations following the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China, liquefaction resistance was correlated with DPT blow count.Dynamic Cone Penetration tests (DPT) tests were also performed adjacent to Becker Penetration test (BPT) sites at Pence Ranch, Whiskey Springs, and Larter Ranch in Idaho where gravel liquefaction was observed during the 1983 Mw6.9 Borah Peak earthquake. Companion DPT tests were performed using an automatic hammer at two energy levels, namely the energy specified in the original Chinese standard and the energy typical of SPT testing which would be easier to use in practice. Companion testing was undertaken to determine if the cone could be driven in gravelly soil with more standard drilling equipment available to geo-professionals. The second energy level also offers the potential to provide more resolution on the soil layering. PDA measurements were made to determine the energy transferred to the cone rods and the statistical variation in the energy transferred.Additionally, companion DPT tests were undertaken at the downstream toe of Millsite Dam near Ferron, Utah, where gravelly soils are predicted to liquefy in an earthquake. Two energy levels were used, one using an automatic hammer and the other a manual donut hammer. The blow counts from the BPT and DPT correlated reasonably well for gravels using the automatic hammer, but poor correlation was obtained with the donut hammer. Liquefaction resistance for the BPT and DPT soundings were also in reasonable agreement for gravel layers suggesting that the DPT can provide liquefaction hazard evaluations more economically than the BPT using direct correlations with field performance.Correlations suggest that the standard energy corrections developed for the SPT can be used for the DPT. In general, the liquefaction resistance from the BPT and DPT correlated reasonably well when using the 30% probability of liquefaction resistance curve developed for the DPT.Keywords: Michael H Talbot, liquefaction, Chinese dynamic penetration test, gravelly soils.

京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(地球環境学) / 甲第25469号 / 地環博第255号 / 新制||地環||51(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院地球環境学舎地球環境学専攻 / (主査)教授 勝見 武, 准教授 高井 敦史, 教授 安原 英明 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Global Environmental Studies / Kyoto University / DGAM

No description available.

The Cone Penetration Test (CPT) was developed originally in Holland in the 1930’s as a device which provides a small scale model of a pile foundation. Early versions were simple cone points for which the only measurement was the thrust required to push the point through the ground. Over the past 20 years, the cone was standardized to a tip area of 10 cm², and an electrical version was produced, which allows for continuous measurement of the cone tip resistance and sleeve friction along with a computer-based data acquisition system. The electrical cone represents a significant step forward for the CPT, since it provides a continuous profile of information that can be used to identify soil type and define important engineering parameters. More recently, the CPT has shown considerable potential for calculation of settlements of footings on sand, determination of pile capacity, assessment of ground pressures, and evaluation of liquefaction potential for cohesionless soils. Along with the widening application of the CPT, new varieties of cone penetrometers have appeared, with different sizes than the standard. Smaller cones are used for instances where relatively small depths of soil need to be penetrated, and larger cones have been developed for penetrating dense and gravelly soils. With the introduction of the new cones, there has been a tendency to assume that the methods for reducing CPT data for the standard sized cone can be extrapolated to the other sizes of cones. That is, it is assumed that there are no scale effects in cones of different sizes. While this may be true, to date, little direct evidence has been produced to support this view, and the issue is an important one from two points of view: 1. The present data analysis technology is based on that primarily from testing with a standard cone. lt is important to know if any changes are needed in this approach, or if the existing methods can be used with confidence for any size cone. 2. If it can be shown that no scale factor exists, then this will allow the use of new, smaller cones in experimentation in modem calibration chambers with the knowledge that the test results are applicable for the cones that a.re more widely used in practice. The smaller cones offer several advantages in this type of work in that they facilitate the research considerably by reducing the effort involved in sample preparation, and they are less likely to produce results influenced by boundary conditions in the chamber. One of the major objectives of this research is to develop an insight into the issue of the scale factor caused by the use of different sizes of cones. This is accomplished through an experimental program conducted in a new large scale calibration chamber recently constructed at Virginia Tech. Many of the latest developments in cone penetration testing have been forthcoming from testing done in calibration chambers where a soil mass can be placed to a controlled density under known stress conditions. To conduct the experimentation of this work, it was necessary to design, fabricate, and bring to an operational stage a calibration chamber. The Virginia Tech chamber is one of the largest in the world. A significant portion of the effort involved in this thesis research was devoted to this task. In particular, attention was devoted to the development of a system for placement of a homogeneous soil mass in the chamber, and the implementation of a microcomputer-based data acquisition unit to record and process the test results. The scale effects investigation was performed using three different sizes of cone penetrometers in a test program conducted in the calibration chamber. Of the three cones, one is smaller than the standard with a tip area of 4.23 cm², one was a standard cone with a tip area of 10 cm², and one was larger than the standard cone with a tip area of 15 cm². A total of 47 tests were carried in the chamber using two different levels of confining stress and two different sand densities. The test results show that while a scale factor might exist, the degree of its influence on interpreted soil parameters for a practical problem does not appear significant. / Ph. D. / incomplete_metadata

[Truncated abstract] This research has studied the penetration and extraction resistance profiles of different types of penetrometers in soft clay. The penetrometers of interest include the cone, T–bar, ball and plate. Effects of the surface roughness and aspect ratio of the T–bar penetrometer on its resistance have also been investigated. Undrained shear strength, Su, profiles derived from the penetration tests are compared with the shear strengths measured from field vane shear tests and laboratory (triaxial and simple shear) tests. Both in situ and centrifuge model penetration tests were undertaken for the research. In addition, ‘undisturbed’? tube samples were retrieved from both the field and the centrifuge strongbox samples (after completion of the centrifuge tests) for laboratory testing. The in situ testing was carried out in Western Australia, at the Burswood site near Perth, with tests including cone, T–bar, ball and plate penetrometer tests, and vane shear tests. Interestingly, the T–bar, ball and plate (‘full-flow’) penetrometers showed a narrow band of resistance profiles both during penetration and extraction, with a range of around 15 % between the highest and lowest profiles and standard deviation of 15 %. However, the cone penetrometer gave similar resistance at shallow depths but increasingly higher penetration resistance at depths greater than 7 m – a phenomenon that is also common in offshore results. During extraction, the cone penetrometer gave a higher resistance profile than the full–flow penetrometers for much of the depth of interest. The Su profile measured directly from the vane shear tests falls within the Su profiles derived from the penetration resistances of the full–flow penetrometers, using a single bearing factor, N = 10.5 (the value originally suggested in the literature for a T–bar penetration test). Again, the cone penetrometer demonstrated diverging results, requiring two separate values for the cone factor, Nkt (10.5 initially increasing to 13 for depths below 10 m) in order to give Su similar to the vane shear tests. This highlights the possible variability of the cone factor with depth. Cyclic penetration and extraction tests were performed at specific depths for each fullflow penetrometer. These tests comprised displacement cycles of ±0.5 m about the relevant depth, recording the penetration and extraction resistances over five full cycles. The results may be used to derive the remoulded strength and sensitivity of the soil. Laboratory tests such as triaxial and simple shear tests were performed on ‘undisturbed’ tube samples retrieved from the same site to evaluate the in situ shear strengths in the laboratory. However, the resulting Su data were rather scattered, much of which may be attributed to variable sample quality due to the presence of frequent shell fragments and occasional silt lenses within the test samples. In general, N factors for the full–low penetrometers, back–calculated using Su values measured from the simple shear tests, fell mainly in a range between 9.7 and 12.8 (between 10.4 and 12.2 for the standard size T–bar (250 mm x 40 mm))

The knowledge about the shear strength of a soil is important because it is a key parameter that is used in many calculations in construction engineering. Some examples of what’s possible to calculate are slope stability, the soil pressure against retaining walls and the carrying capacity of building foundations. Great economic losses or, in the worst case scenario the risk for human lives, could be the result if the geotechnical properties of the soil are ignored. This report considers the undrained shear strength of clay from Uppsala. There are different methods based on empirical experiences which are used to determine the undrained shear strength of a clay. In this project the methods and the results in undrained shear strength are compared between CPT-probing, which is carried out in-situ, and the drop cone test which is done in a laboratory. The reason for this comparison is that they usually don’t show the same results.The tests had already been made before this project started and therefore it is only the comparison of the results between the methods that has been done. The comparison was done by creating charts in Excel where the results from CPT and the drop cone test from was put together from the same point. The shear strength values from the methods were also statistically analysed with a t-test to see if they show the same hypothetical expected value with 95 % significance in every test point / Kunskap om skjuvhållfastheten är viktig då den används för beräkningar inom byggoch anläggningsbranschen. Exempel på vad som kan beräknas är släntstabilitet, jordtrycket mot en spont eller bärförmågan hos en byggnadsgrund. Stora ekonomiska förluster och i värsta fall fara för människoliv kan bli resultatet om jordens geotekniska egenskaper ignoreras. Denna rapport tar upp den odränerade skjuvhållfastheten i Uppsalalera. Det finns olika metoder som bygger på empiriska erfarenheter som kan användas för att ta reda på den odränerade skjuvhållfastheten i lera. I föreliggandeprojekt jämförs metoderna och resultaten i odränerad skjuvhållfasthet mellan CPT-sondering som utförs in-situ och fallkonförsök som utförs på lerprover i ett laboratorium. Anledningen till studien är att metoderna inte alltid ger samma mätvärden. Undersökningarna utfördes innan projektet började. Jämförelsen har gjorts genom den statistiska jämförelsen t (student)-test. Resultatet från t-testet visar att skjuvhållfasthetsvärdena från CPT respektive fallkonförsöken från samma undersökningspunkt och från samma nivå har samma hypotetiska förväntade värde på 95 % signifikansnivå. Genom sammanställda grafer syns att metoderna i de flesta fall överensstämmer till ett djup på minst 20 m.

Este trabalho apresenta alguns parâmetros geotécnicos do solo arenoso na região litorânea de João Pessoa/PB, após a melhoria com estacas de compactação, instaladas pelo método denominado vibro-deslocamento. Esse procedimento é um método de melhoria de solos arenosos em que as estacas de areia e brita são introduzidas em solos de baixa resistência com o propósito de aumentar sua resistência e diminuir os recalques da fundação. Realizaram-se ensaios de cone, prova de carga em placa, sondagem SPT e anotação do diagrama de cravação das estacas, para se estudarem os efeitos da melhoria do solo arenoso por meio de estacas de compactação. São mostradas correlações entre o 'N IND.SPT', antes e após a compactação do solo, entre a resistência de ponta do cone e 'N IND.SPT', antes e após a compactação, bem como os resultados de provas de carga em placa, realizadas nos solos natural e compactado. Observou-se que a diminuição do espaçamento entre estacas aumenta a resistência do solo. Com base no 'N IND.SPT', é apresentada uma forma de previsão da capacidade de carga de fundações por sapata, instaladas em solo arenoso compactado com estacas de areia / This work presents some geotechnical parameters in sandy soil improved by compaction piles installed by vibro-displacement on the cost of the city of João Pessoa in Northeastern Brazil. Significant increases on bearing capacity can be achieved with this ground improvement technique allowing the use of shallow foundation, even in the case of high buildings. Forty eight sand piles with diameter of 0,30 m and 3,5 m long were installed on three different groups varying distance between the piles. Standard penetration tests, cone penetration tests and plate load tests were carried out before and after the installation of piles. The comparison between the tests allows quantify the benefit of soil improvement by compaction piles. Empirical relationships between 'N IND.SPT' before and after improvement, and relationships between qc and 'N IND.SPT' were established. These relations and results of plate load tests allowed an assessment of the influence of distance between the piles in the compacted soil. A prediction of bearing capacity of shallow foundations in sandy soil improved by sand piles, based on 'N IND.SPT' values is presented

Este trabalho apresenta alguns parâmetros geotécnicos do solo arenoso na região litorânea de João Pessoa/PB, após a melhoria com estacas de compactação, instaladas pelo método denominado vibro-deslocamento. Esse procedimento é um método de melhoria de solos arenosos em que as estacas de areia e brita são introduzidas em solos de baixa resistência com o propósito de aumentar sua resistência e diminuir os recalques da fundação. Realizaram-se ensaios de cone, prova de carga em placa, sondagem SPT e anotação do diagrama de cravação das estacas, para se estudarem os efeitos da melhoria do solo arenoso por meio de estacas de compactação. São mostradas correlações entre o 'N IND.SPT', antes e após a compactação do solo, entre a resistência de ponta do cone e 'N IND.SPT', antes e após a compactação, bem como os resultados de provas de carga em placa, realizadas nos solos natural e compactado. Observou-se que a diminuição do espaçamento entre estacas aumenta a resistência do solo. Com base no 'N IND.SPT', é apresentada uma forma de previsão da capacidade de carga de fundações por sapata, instaladas em solo arenoso compactado com estacas de areia / This work presents some geotechnical parameters in sandy soil improved by compaction piles installed by vibro-displacement on the cost of the city of João Pessoa in Northeastern Brazil. Significant increases on bearing capacity can be achieved with this ground improvement technique allowing the use of shallow foundation, even in the case of high buildings. Forty eight sand piles with diameter of 0,30 m and 3,5 m long were installed on three different groups varying distance between the piles. Standard penetration tests, cone penetration tests and plate load tests were carried out before and after the installation of piles. The comparison between the tests allows quantify the benefit of soil improvement by compaction piles. Empirical relationships between 'N IND.SPT' before and after improvement, and relationships between qc and 'N IND.SPT' were established. These relations and results of plate load tests allowed an assessment of the influence of distance between the piles in the compacted soil. A prediction of bearing capacity of shallow foundations in sandy soil improved by sand piles, based on 'N IND.SPT' values is presented