The purpose of this study is to summarize the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for renal stones following failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), and to investigate the effect of previous SWL on the performances and morbidities of subsequent PCNL. Sixty-two patients with a history of failed SWL who underwent PCNL on the same kidney (group 1) were compared to 273 patients who had received PCNL as first treatment choice (group 2). Patient demographics, stone characteristics, operative findings, and complications were documented and compared. Groups 1 and 2 had similar patient demographics and stone characteristics. Mean time to establish access was comparable in both groups (10.5 ± 4.2 vs. 9.6 ± 4.5 min, p = 0.894). Time required to remove stones and total operative time were longer in group 1 (71.5 ± 10.3 vs. 62.3 ± 8.6 min, p = 0.011 and 95.8 ± 12.0 vs. 80.6 ± 13.2 min., p = 0.018, respectively). Group 1 had lower clearance rate compared to group 2 (83.9 vs. 93.4 %, p = 0.021), while postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Scattered stone fragments buried within the tissues made the procedure more difficult for stone fragmenting and extracting, which lead to longer operative time and inferior stone free rate. However, the PCNL procedure was safe and effective in patients with failed SWL. The risk of complications was similar and clearance rate was encouraging.

The purpose of this study is to summarize the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for renal stones following failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), and to investigate the effect of previous SWL on the performances and morbidities of subsequent PCNL. Sixty-two patients with a history of failed SWL who underwent PCNL on the same kidney (group 1) were compared to 273 patients who had received PCNL as first treatment choice (group 2). Patient demographics, stone characteristics, operative findings, and complications were documented and compared. Groups 1 and 2 had similar patient demographics and stone characteristics. Mean time to establish access was comparable in both groups (10.5 ± 4.2 vs. 9.6 ± 4.5 min, p = 0.894). Time required to remove stones and total operative time were longer in group 1 (71.5 ± 10.3 vs. 62.3 ± 8.6 min, p = 0.011 and 95.8 ± 12.0 vs. 80.6 ± 13.2 min., p = 0.018, respectively). Group 1 had lower clearance rate compared to group 2 (83.9 vs. 93.4 %, p = 0.021), while postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Scattered stone fragments buried within the tissues made the procedure more difficult for stone fragmenting and extracting, which lead to longer operative time and inferior stone free rate. However, the PCNL procedure was safe and effective in patients with failed SWL. The risk of complications was similar and clearance rate was encouraging.

A population based cross-sectional time series analysis was conducted using three Ontario administrative databases, to assess trends over time in the surgical management of kidney stone disease. All kidney stone treatments performed with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy between July 1, 1991 and December 31, 2010, were included. Time series modeling with exponential smoothing and autoregressive integrated moving average models demonstrated a significant increase in the utilization of URS over time (23.69% to 59.98%, p<0.0001), with a reciprocal significant decrease in the utilization of SWL (68.77% to 33.36%, p<0.0001). As a result of this shift in treatment paradigm, time series modeling also demonstrated an associated significant decrease in the need for ancillary treatment over time (22.12% to 16.01%, p<0.0001) and a significant increase in the need for hospital readmission (8.01% to 10.85%, p<0.0001) or emergency room visit (7.58% to 9.95%, p=0.0024) within 7 days following treatment.

A population based cross-sectional time series analysis was conducted using three Ontario administrative databases, to assess trends over time in the surgical management of kidney stone disease. All kidney stone treatments performed with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy between July 1, 1991 and December 31, 2010, were included. Time series modeling with exponential smoothing and autoregressive integrated moving average models demonstrated a significant increase in the utilization of URS over time (23.69% to 59.98%, p<0.0001), with a reciprocal significant decrease in the utilization of SWL (68.77% to 33.36%, p<0.0001). As a result of this shift in treatment paradigm, time series modeling also demonstrated an associated significant decrease in the need for ancillary treatment over time (22.12% to 16.01%, p<0.0001) and a significant increase in the need for hospital readmission (8.01% to 10.85%, p<0.0001) or emergency room visit (7.58% to 9.95%, p=0.0024) within 7 days following treatment.

Introduction: Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are well-established techniques with little morbidity. The combined use of standard PCNL and the mini-PCNL or the RIRS technique was evaluated and compared to investigate their own role in the management of staghorn calculi in solitary kidney. Materials and Methods: 23 patients received combined standard PCNL and mini-PCNL (group 1), and 22 patients received combined standard PCNL and RIRS (group 2). The treatment results and complications were evaluated and compared. Results: The mean operation time was 128.8 ± 9.1 min in group 1 and 109.8 ± 10.7 min in group 2 (p < 0.001). The decrease in hemoglobin level in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (3.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.1 ± 0.5 g/dl, p < 0.001). The final stone-free rate was significantly higher (p = 0.038) in group 2 (90.9%) than in group 1 (65.2%). Conclusions: Combined standard PCNL and RIRS technique can extract the majority of staghorn calculi quickly by PCNL with EMS Lithoclast, and RIRS used simultaneously can reduce the need for multiple tracts and therefore reduce blood loss and potential morbidity related to multiple tracts, shorten the operation time and achieve a high stone-free rate.

Objectif : Estimer la contribution statistique des caractéristiques des hôpitaux et des caractéristiques liés aux patients sur la probabilité de réadmission des patients qui ont subi une PCNL, une procédure endoscopique à haut risque de morbidité, dans les hôpitaux aux États-Unis en 2014 et évaluer les prédicteurs des taux de réadmissions d’une PCNL. Méthode : Nous avons identifié tous les patients qui ont subi une PCNL dans les hôpitaux aux États-Unis en 2014 (janvier-novembre) en utilisant la banque de données nationale de réadmission (NRD). L’issue d’intérêt était une réadmission non planifiée 30 jours après une PCNL. À l’aide d’un modèle multi-niveaux à effets mixtes, nous avons estimé l’association statistique entre les caractéristiques hospitalières ainsi que les caractéristiques individuelles liés aux patients sur la probabilité de réadmission. Un effet aléatoire associée à l'hôpital a été utilisé pour estimer le taux de réadmission au niveau hospitalier. Un pseudo R-carré a été calculé pour évaluer la contribution de chaque catégorie de variables sur les taux de réadmission. Résultats : Notre échantillon pondérée était constitué de 6 974 personnes ayant subi une PCNL dans 485 hôpitaux aux États-Unis en 2014. Le taux de réadmission à 30 jours était de 8,5 % (IC à 95 % 7,4 – 9,7). Après ajustement, les caractéristiques hospitalières n’étaient pas associées à une probabilité accrue de réadmission. Le sexe féminin était associé à une diminution de la probabilité de réadmission (IC à 95% 0.54 – 0.93). Les hôpitaux individuelles n’ont contribué qu’à une infime partie à la probabilité d’être réadmis de leurs patients. Les caractéristiques liés aux patients expliquaient davantage la variabilité dans la probabilité de réadmission que les caractéristiques hospitalières (pseudo-R2 9.50% vs 0.03%). Conclusion : Le risque d’être réadmis après une PCNL varie énormément entre les hôpitaux. Une fraction minime de cette variabilité peut être expliqué par les caractéristiques hospitalières contrairement aux caractéristiques des patients. Ces résultats soulignent les limites potentielles de l’utilisation des réadmissions comme mesure de la qualité des soins. / Objective: Estimate the relative contribution of hospital and patient factors to readmission after a typical high-risk endoscopic procedure, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: We utilized the Nationwide Readmission Database to identify the patients who underwent PCNL in the United States hospitals in 2014 (January-November). The main outcome was unplanned 30-day readmission following a PCNL. Using a multilevel mixed-effects model, we estimated the statistical association between patient and hospital characteristics and readmission. A hospital-level random effects term was added to estimate hospital-level readmission. To assess the relative contribution of each group of variables on readmission rates, a pseudo-R2 was calculated to assess the contribution of hospital effects to the model of readmission. Results: We identified a weighted sample of 6,974 individuals who underwent PCNL at 485 hospitals in the United States in 2014. The 30-day readmission rate was 8.5% (95% CI 7.4 – 9.7). In our adjusted model, hospital characteristics were not associated with increased likelihood of readmission. Female sex was the only characteristic associated with decreased likelihood of readmission (95% CI 0.54 – 0.93). Individual hospitals contributed marginally to their patients probability of readmission. Patient level characteristics explained far more of the variability in readmissions than hospital characteristics (pseudo-R2 9.50% vs 0.03%). Conclusion: The risk of readmission after a PCNL is highly variable in between hospitals. The statistical contribution of individual hospitals and hospital characteristics to the probability of readmission following a PCNL was minimal compare to patient characteristics. These findings underscore the potential limitations of using 30-day post-discharge readmissions as a hospital-level quality metric.