Thesis (M.A. in National Security Affairs)--Naval Postgraduate School, June 2002. / AD-A405 987. Includes bibliographical references (p. 63-65). Also available online.

Thesis (M.A. in National Security Affairs)--Naval Postgraduate School, June 2002. / Thesis advisor(s): Glenn F. Robinson, Harold D. Blanton. Includes bibliographical references (p. 63-65). Also available online.

Thesis (S.T.M.)--Trinity Lutheran Seminary, 1998. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 95-96).

Thesis (M.M.A.S.)--School of Advanced Airpower Studies, 1995. / Subject: This study attempts to determine whether Air Component Commands are capable of developing effective airpower strategy. Cover page date: June 1995. Vita. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--Naval Postgraduate School, 2005. / Title from title screen (viewed Jan. 31, 2006). "June 2005." Includes bibliographical references (p. 79-83). Also issued in paper format.

Thesis (M.A.)--Naval Postgraduate School, 2005. / Title from title screen (viewed Jan. 31, 2006). "June 2005." Includes bibliographical references (p. 63-67). Also issued in paper format.

Thesis (M.A. in Security Studies (Middle East, South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa))--Naval Postgraduate School, March 2010. / Thesis Advisor(s): Dahl, Erik J. Second Reader: Moran, Daniel J. "March 2010." Description based on title screen as viewed on April 28, 2010. Author(s) subject terms: Piracy, Maritime Security, Regional Security Cooperation, Cooperative Security, Middle East, Southeast Asia, Gulf of Aden, Straits of Malacca, Maritime Capacity. Includes bibliographical references (p. 103-116). Also available in print.

Thesis (M.A. in National Security Affairs)--Naval Postgraduate School, June 2005. / Thesis Advisor(s): Daniel Moran. Includes bibliographical references (p. 63-67). Also available online.

Thesis (M.A. in Security Studies (Defense Decision Making and Planning))--Naval Postgraduate School, June 2005. / Thesis Advisor(s): James A. Russell. Includes bibliographical references (p.79-83). Also available online.

La France et les Etats-Unis fascinent l' observateur des relations internationales par la complexité et les contradictions de leurs relations, tant est paradoxal et parfois détonant, le mélange d'amour­ haine ou peut être plus justement, d' attraction-répulsion ou d'amitié-tension qu'elles recèlent. Ce qui n'empêche pas les deux pays de se retrouver ensemble lorsqu'il s' agit de défendre la liberté. Contrairement à l'Espagne ou à la Grande-Bretagne, la France demeure le seul grand pays européen à n' avoir jamais été en guerre contre les Etats-Unis. Pourtant, elle est son allié le plus indocile. La France et les Etats-Unis sont donc les pires amis du monde. Aussi cette réflexion se donne-t-elle pour ambition d' analyser leurs relations avec l'Iran et l'Irak de 1972 à 1982, ainsi que les perspectives de coopération ou de compétition qui en ont résulté. Toutefois, on ne peut comprendre ces relations que si l' on admet au préalable qu'elles renvoient à une appréciation différente des situations internationales et des intérêts des deux pays. / France and the United States fascinate the observer of international relations by the complexity and contradictions of their relations, as is paradoxical and sometimes explosive, the love-hate mixing (or perhaps more accurately, attraction-repulsion or friendship-voltage) they contain. This does not prevent the two countries to get together when it cornes to defending freedom. Unlike Spain or Britain, France remains the only major European country to have never been at war against the United States. Yet it is his most unruly ally. France and the US are the worst friends. Also this reflection does the ambition to analyze their relations with Iran and Iraq from 1972 to 1982, as well as prospects of cooperation or competition that resulted. However, one cannot understand these relations only if we admit beforehand that they refer to a different assessment of international situations and interests of both countries.