Thesis (doctoral)--Venia Ampliss Philos. Upsaliae, 1860. / Filmed with: Walter, K. / Emendationum in Sophoclis fabulas specimen -- Wandinger, C. / Pomponiana Graecina : Tac. Ann. XIII. 32 -- Walther, G.H. / Observationum in C. Cornelii Taciti opera conscriptarum specimen alterum -- Warren, M. / On the enclitic ne in early Latin -- Wasmansdorff, E. / Luciani scripta ea, quae ad Menippum spectant, inter se comparantur et diiudicantur -- Zellmer, W. / De lege Plautia quae fuit de vi -- Zijnen, F.B.J.S. / Specimen historico-philosophum, quo Plutarchi de nonnullis Chrysippi placitis judicium examinatur -- Waldfogl, C. / Ueber den Platonischen Dialog der Sophist oder vom Sein -- Waller, W. / Excursus criticus in P. Papinii Statii Silvas -- Wallrafen, W. / Einrichtung und kommunale Entwicklung der rm̲ischen Provinz Lusitanien -- Walther, E. / De dativi instrumentalis usu Homerico -- Walther, F. / Studien zu Tacitus und Curtius -- Widmann, H. / De Gaio Vettio Aquilino Iuvenco carminis evangelici poeta et Vergilii imitatore -- Werner, J. / Quaestiones Babrianae -- Wernicke, J.C. / De Pausaniae Periegetae studiis Herodoteis -- Wessig, H. / De aetate et auctore Philopatridis dialogi -- Wetzell, C. / De usu verbi substantivi Tacitino -- Werder, C.F. / De Platonis Parmenide -- Stamer, A. / Engkuklios paideia in dem Urteil der griechischen Philosophenschulen -- Sexauer, H. / Sprachgebrauch des Romanschriftstellers Achilles Tatius -- Stamkart, J.A. / Specimen litterarium inaugurale exhibens commentarium in Plauti Mostellarium -- Seibel, M. / Klage um Hektor im letzten Buche der Ilias -- Siegismund, A.J. / Quaestionum de metathesi Graeca particula I -- Tanzmann, J.J. / De C. Plinii Caecilii Secundi vita ingenio moribus quaestio -- Teetz, F. / Beitrg̃e zur Rhythmopoiie des Sophokles ... -- Siemering, F.O. / Quaestionum Lucretianarum particula I et II -- Thedinga, F. / De Numenio philosopho Platonico -- Theissen, W. / De Sallustii, Livii, Taciti digressionibus -- Schemann, L. / De legionum per alterum bellum Punicum historia quae investigari posse videantur -- Natorp, P. / Quos auctores in ultimis Belli Peloponnesiaci annis describendis secuti sint Diodorus Plutarchus Cornelius Iustinus -- Olsen, W. / Quaestionum Plautinarum de verbo substantivo specimen -- Partsch, J.F.M. / Darstellung Europa's in dem geographischen Werke des Agrippa. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Bryn Mawr, 1918. / Vita.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Bryn Mawr, 1918. / Vita.

Thesis--Louvain. / Without thesis statement. "Thèses": leaf inserted. Includes bibliographical references.

A temática do presente trabalho perpassa a discussão sobre as relações de poder estabelecidas entre os setores subalternos e seus superiores hierárquicos da sociedade romana, a partir das obras filosófica e literária de Lucius Anneus Seneca. Do ponto de vista estrutural, o trabalho dividiu-se em três partes principais: 1) A construção dos setores subalternos pela historiografia contemporânea, na qual expusemos e criticamos a construção historiográfica contemporânea de que a plebs romana seria ociosa e, sobretudo, a viabilidade de utilizar Sêneca como fonte documental; 2) A trajetória social, política e textual de Sêneca, em que analisamos o período histórico vivido por Sêneca e suas idéias; 3) A visão sóciopolítica dos setores subalternos nas obras de Sêneca, com a qual abordamos a maneira com que Sêneca construiu a imagem dos setores subalternos (e.g. ingenui, alipius, gladiator) e como desenvolviam estratégias de afirmação social com seus superiores, apresentando dessa maneira, uma realidade social muito mais conflituosa do que aquela interpretada pela historiografia. / The aim of the present study goes through the discussion on the power relationships established between subaltern sectors and his hierarchical superiors in the Roman society, based upon the Lucius Anneus Seneca\'s philosophical and literary composition. From a structural point of view, the work is divided in three mains parts: 1) The construction of the subaltern sectors by the contemporary historiography, in which we introduce and criticize the current historiography construction of the Roman plebs as being idleness, and above all, the practicability of using Seneca\'s work as documental source; 2) The social, political and textual Seneca\'s career, where we analyze the epoch when Seneca lived and its assumption; 3) The social-political view of the subaltern sectors at the Seneca\'s composition, with which we approach the way Seneca constructed the image of the subaltern sectors (e.g. ingenui, alipilus, gladiator) and how these classes used to develop strategies for a social affirmative with their superiors, and then exposing a more conflicting social reality than that presented by the historiography.

A temática do presente trabalho perpassa a discussão sobre as relações de poder estabelecidas entre os setores subalternos e seus superiores hierárquicos da sociedade romana, a partir das obras filosófica e literária de Lucius Anneus Seneca. Do ponto de vista estrutural, o trabalho dividiu-se em três partes principais: 1) A construção dos setores subalternos pela historiografia contemporânea, na qual expusemos e criticamos a construção historiográfica contemporânea de que a plebs romana seria ociosa e, sobretudo, a viabilidade de utilizar Sêneca como fonte documental; 2) A trajetória social, política e textual de Sêneca, em que analisamos o período histórico vivido por Sêneca e suas idéias; 3) A visão sóciopolítica dos setores subalternos nas obras de Sêneca, com a qual abordamos a maneira com que Sêneca construiu a imagem dos setores subalternos (e.g. ingenui, alipius, gladiator) e como desenvolviam estratégias de afirmação social com seus superiores, apresentando dessa maneira, uma realidade social muito mais conflituosa do que aquela interpretada pela historiografia. / The aim of the present study goes through the discussion on the power relationships established between subaltern sectors and his hierarchical superiors in the Roman society, based upon the Lucius Anneus Seneca\'s philosophical and literary composition. From a structural point of view, the work is divided in three mains parts: 1) The construction of the subaltern sectors by the contemporary historiography, in which we introduce and criticize the current historiography construction of the Roman plebs as being idleness, and above all, the practicability of using Seneca\'s work as documental source; 2) The social, political and textual Seneca\'s career, where we analyze the epoch when Seneca lived and its assumption; 3) The social-political view of the subaltern sectors at the Seneca\'s composition, with which we approach the way Seneca constructed the image of the subaltern sectors (e.g. ingenui, alipilus, gladiator) and how these classes used to develop strategies for a social affirmative with their superiors, and then exposing a more conflicting social reality than that presented by the historiography.

Thèse--Faculté des lettres de Paris.

This study intends to analyze the importance of institutional trust in the process of democratization. In this particular case, the period from 494 to 88 BC in the Roman republic is examined. The theories of Charles Tilly and Robert Putnam are utilized to more deeply examine the concepts and manifestations of trust and democratization. Using the ideas and theories of these authors together provides a unique insight into the means by which a population comes to trust that government is responsive, and further comes to expect increased responsiveness in the future. Institutional trust as an element of mutually binding consultation will be explored via proposed and successful plebeian legislation in the Roman republic. This study examines legislative actions, defined as proposed legislation (rogationes) alongside successful legislation (plebiscita and leges), which originated in the plebeian assembly, the concilium plebis, under the guidance of the tribunes of the plebs, the elected officials of the plebeian population at Rome. In all, 236 legislative actions between 494 and 88 BC are divided into four themes of democratizing action, termed equality, broadening of participation, protection and mutually binding consultation, and then further organized into one of nine sub-categories for each theme. Findings suggest that the final period of 192 to 88 BC, which is period of frenzied plebeian political activity through the concilium plebis and the tribunes of the plebs, is made possible by a marked increase in legislative actions related to mutually binding consultation in the pervious period (292 to 193 BC). These findings support the claim by Tilly and Putnam that democratization can occur only with increases in institutional trust.

No description available.

No description available.