The purpose of this study is to examine how members of the community, educators, legislators, and members of the academy organized and mobilized to bring Florida Statute 1003.42(h) into being. This Afrocentric case study policy analysis centers African people, educators, and policymakers as agents, actors, and subjects with agency who determined that such legislation was needed and necessary for the education of African American students and all students. Data, in the form of document analysis, websites in the states of New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and South Carolina with similar laws, and Florida’s Commissioner’s Task Force on African American History, newspaper accounts, and interviews with key people involved in the creation of the Florida legislation, were analyzed using an Africological methodology. Findings include several major themes that emerged about educational curriculum content, intent, needs, and analysis relative to why this legislation was sponsored and passed including: (a) inaccuracy and omission, (b) correction and inclusion, (c) consciousness and competence, (d) policy and priority, (e) power and precedence. The final product includes a theory of Selective Memory Manipulation and a Paradigm for Afrocentric Educational Policy Production and Analysis.

Research interrogating the development, implementation and enforcement of reactionary and conservative social and educational movements and policies has enabled us to show the con- tradictions and unequal effects and the disproportionate and disparate impacts on the lives of mi- nority students (Apple, 2009). This research study examined how the Board of Regents, Geor- gia’s higher education governing body, interprets and enforces the “lawful presence” require- ment set forth in USG Policy 4.1.6. The study gave primary consideration to Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients, who the data show have been systematically excluded from access to certain state colleges and universities without legal cause or justification. The study also examined the perceived impacts of Policy 4.1.6 on DACA students seek- ing admission to the state’s most selective colleges and universities. Data collected from partici- pant interviews of DACA students, along with data gathered through participant observation and documents analysis, were used to create a greater understanding of the impacts of Policy 4.1.6 on both DACA and undocumented students. The study is significant because it traverses matters of current legal import, while also contributing to the growing body of literature concerning access to postsecondary education for undocumented students. Using the methodological approach of critical theory, the study incorporated elements of critical race theory (CRT), critical Latino/a studies (LatCrit), and critical policy analysis in the exploration of the various narratives and counternarratives created by the enforcement of Policy 4.1.6. Using Interpretive Phenomenologi- cal Analysis (IPA) of the interview data, a critical assessment of the perceived impacts of Geor- gia immigration and education policy development and implementation is also provided. Finally, this study revealed the ways in which ‘race-neutral’ educational policies result in discriminatory practices against minorities, specifically undocumented students, the majority of who are Lati- no/a. The knowledge gained from this research gives policymakers on either side of this issue with analysis that can more effectively guide them in the interpretation of federal mandates and conflicting state laws that result in the subordination of significant segments of student popula- tions.

Catastrophic disaster represents a vital issue in emergency management for many countries in the European Union (EU) and around the world. Given the damage to human lives that different hazards represent, evacuation operations can be the only option available to emergency managers to mitigate the loss of life from catastrophic disaster. However, due to the amount of time needed to effectively evacuate a large area, the decision to evacuate must occur when there is a relatively low probability of the event. An explicit understanding of the evacuation decision can lead to better organisational preparedness in advance of catastrophic disaster events. This research represents work performed with 159 emergency experts and professionals across ten countries. The goal of this research was to create decision-making aids for evacuations in advance of a variety of catastrophic disaster scenarios. Traditional Decision Theory (DT) provides a rational approach to decision-making that emphasizes the optimization of subjective preferences combined with uncertainty. Within evacuation decision-making, DT and its respective outputs are appealing; however the analytical process can be difficult due to the lack of observed data to support quantitative assessments from catastrophic events and relative infrequency of evacuation operations. This research explored the traditional use of DT applied to catastrophic evacuation scenarios. Theoretical contributions to DT and emergency management include: 1) identification of evacuation decision criteria, 2) inter-model analysis between decision structures called Influence Diagrams (IDs), 3) complete application of quantitative decision analysis to support evacuation decision-making and 4) multi-criteria analysis for evacuation vulnerability using spatial data. Important contributions from this work include:1) An analysis of evacuation criteria for a variety of catastrophic disaster scenarios2) Inter-model analysis of evacuation scenarios (flooding, nuclear dispersion and terrorist attack) to identify common probabilistic structures to support multi-hazard strategy planning3) Quantitative decision models to support evacuation strategies, identify key uncertainties and policy analysis 4) Process to use spatial data to support multi-criteria evacuation vulnerability analysis 5) Organisational self-assessment for evacuation decision-making and spatial data use based on findings across all participating countries.

Thesis advisor: Claudia Olivetti / Injuries and violence are a major public health issue and represent a threat to individual wellbeing, productivity, and societal development at large. In recent years, the public health approach to reduce violence and injury has become crucial in guiding research and public policy. Governmental and nongovernmental organizations are strengthening data collection and surveillance systems to promote research and inform policy making. Yet the idea that violence and injuries can be prevented through systematic monitoring and research is still a novel one. The three essays that comprise this dissertation make advancements in this direction focusing on the United States. The first two chapters focus on child safety, examining the issues of bullying and firearm violence at school. The third chapter expands on the topic of gun violence examining the impact of firearm legislation on the broader problem of suicide deaths. From a methodological point of view, this dissertation combines economic models with a public health approach employing both structural estimation techniques and a quasi-experimental approach. While quasi-experimental methods are effective in uncovering broad causal relationships between legislative changes and outcome measures, structural estimation methods are essential when interested in recovering deep preference parameters and performing counterfactual policy analysis. As such, this dissertation represents an example of multidisciplinary work combining Economics and Public Health, and highlights the importance of employing diverse methodologies to uncover crucial behavioral patterns and their policy implications. The first essay, titled Is School Bullying Contagious?, uses a nationwide cross-section of students to uncover peer effects in adolescent bullying behavior at school. Victimization at school has been linked to a number of adverse effects for child development and well-being, including depression, higher drop-out risk, and lower earnings during adulthood. While understanding social interactions in bullying behavior is essential to designing effective policies, previous empirical work has overlooked the impact of classmates’ behavior on the individual inclination for bullying. This essay estimates a structural model of bullying with social interactions where the individual bullying effort depends on the average effort among classmates. The model controls for individual and family characteristics, classmates’ characteristics, as well as classroom unobservable factors. The results present strong evidence of peer effects in a large number of bullying behaviors. Considering a median classroom of 20 students with five bullies, the introduction of a new bully would spawn two additional bullies due to peer influences. This suggests that social interactions can be targeted to reduce the prevalence of bullying. In particular, counter-factual policy experiments indicate that schools may achieve sizable reductions in the number of bullies by spreading them out over classrooms. The second essay, titled Gun Laws and School Safety, is joint with Summer Hawkins and Christopher Baum. Motivated by the documented link between school safety and psychological well-being, this essay examines the impact of state-level gun control on adolescent school safety. The analysis uses data on 926,639 adolescents from 45 states in the 1999-2015 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys. Students self-reported on weapon carrying at school, the number of times they had been threatened or injured with a weapon at school, the number of school days missed due to feeling unsafe, and weapon carrying at any location. For each state and year, 133 gun laws were combined into an index of gun control strength. Difference-in-differences logistic regressions were used to evaluate the impact of stricter gun laws on binary measures of school safety. Each regression controlled for individual and state characteristics, as well as year and state fixed effects. An interquartile-range (IQR) increase in the index (i.e. a 15-point increase corresponding to a strengthening of gun control) was associated with a 0.8 percentage point decrease in the probability of weapon threats at school (p=0.038) and a 1.2 percentage point decrease in the probability of missing school due to feeling unsafe (p=0.004). While we did not find a significant impact of gun laws on weapon carrying at school, an IQR increase in the index was associated with a 2-percentage point decrease in the probability of carrying weapons at any location (p=0.002). Our results suggest that the adoption of stricter state gun laws may improve school climate and subjective perceptions of safety. The third essay, joint with Summer Hawkins and Christopher Baum, is titled Gun Laws and Firearm Suicides. Between 2005 and 2015, suicide rates have been steadily increasing in the US, with firearm suicides representing over half of all suicides and the primary cause of firearm mortality. As such, firearm suicides represent an urgent policy matter and a prompt policy response is required. Using a 10-year-long panel of the 50 states, we investigated whether stricter gun laws may reduce firearm suicides, possibly by reducing firearm availability. As a reduction in firearm availability may simply result in a substitution towards alternative suicide methods, we further explored whether stricter gun laws are associated with an increase in non-firearm suicides. We analyzed 2005-2015 National Vital Statistics System mortality files from the 50 states, with 212,804 firearm suicides and 206,795 non-firearm suicides. We measured the strength of state-level gun control using an index that combines 133 different laws. We conducted difference-in-differences regression models to assess whether changes in the index were associated with changes in the number of firearm and non-firearm suicides. We found that implementing an additional gun law would result in a decrease in the number of firearm-related suicides by 2 to 4 percentage points. In addition, significant interactions between the gun score and demographic characteristics suggest that the effectiveness of stronger gun laws is the highest among individuals age 20 to 49, but seems to be null among black individuals. Although we found no overall association between a stricter gun law environment and non-firearm suicides, stricter gun laws seem to increase non-firearm suicides among white and black individuals, suggesting that additional policy actions are required to prevent suicides in these groups. Our findings are robust to controlling for demographic characteristics, state time-varying characteristics, state and year fixed effects, as well as state-specific time trends. We also provide graphical evidence that trends in suicide rates were not dependent on the level of strength of gun control, supporting the parallel trend assumption and a causal interpretation of our estimates. / Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2018. / Submitted to: Boston College. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. / Discipline: Economics.

No description available.

M.P.H.(Health Policy and Management), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 2008 / The provision of rehabilitation services has received little attention within the context of health sector reforms in South Africa. This study explores the human resource (HR) management component of the National Rehabilitation Policy (NRP), formulated to improve access to rehabilitation services within the public health sector. Qualitative methodology was used to understand the alignment of policy to practice, with data derived from both the deductive approach (document reviews); and inductive approach (key informant interviews and focus group discussions). The findings reveal that there is a gap between policy and practice. Resistance to integration, problems with professional identity and capacity constraints at national, provincial and local levels hindered the implementation of an integrated rehabilitation service. In addition, polices and norms and standards that aim to guide HR in public health are not coherent. These directly influence HR performance, and have served to highlight the social and institutional phenomena impacting on service delivery.

"Kidogo Kidogo Inajaza Pot" ni hadithi moyo-joto kuhusu usugu na uamuzi wa kijana mdogo ambaye seti nje kujaza sufuria na maji na kuingiza kupitia tabia mbaya ya kupata kazi kufanyika. Yeye unaweka kukamilisha kile kinachoonekana kuwa kazi haiwezekani kwa kujaza sufuria kwa maji kidogo kidogo na kuwapa maji kwa watoto ambao walihitaji zaidi. Na changamoto nyingi juu ya njia yake na msaada wa Wasamaria wengi nzuri, thamani masomo juu ya ujasiri usugu, na uvumilivu ni alionyesha kwamba thrill, kuburudisha na kuimarisha mtoto wako au watoto. Kuja na sisi kama sisi kuanza safari hii thrilling ya kujaza sufuria kidogo kidogo na kufanya ndoto ya ajabu kweli kwa ajili ya watoto wengi. "Little by Little fills the Pot" is a heart-warming story about the persistence and determination of a boy who set out to fill a pot with water and to maneuver through odds to get the jobs done. He sets out to accomplish what appeared to be an impossible task by filling the pot with water little by little and giving the water to children who needed it the most. With many challenges and the assistance of so many good Samaritans, valuable lessons on patience, perseverance and persistence are demonstrated that will thrill, entertain and enrich your child. / https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu_books/1078/thumbnail.jpg

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.