Ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimas – tai ne tik įstatymais apibrėžta procesinė veikla, bet ir įvairių bendravimo bei bendradarbiavimo veiksmų kompleksas, kuris gali būti paaiškintas remiantis kitų visuomenės mokslų žiniomis. Ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimo, jam vadovavimo, kontroliavimo sistemą sudaro ikiteisminio tyrimo pareigūnas, prokuroras, ikiteisminio tyrimo teisėjas. Pagrindinis ikiteisminio tyrimo proceso organizatorius, vadovas ir kontrolierius - prokuroras. Ikiteisminio tyrimo pareigūnas (tyrėjas) privalo vykdyti visus prokuroro nurodymus bei jo nustatytu laiku pranešti apie ikiteisminio tyrimo eigą. Ikiteisminio tyrimo teisėjas atlieka tik jam priskirtus procesinius veiksmus ir tik gavęs prokuroro prašymą. Esminiai ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimo principai: teisėtumas, vienasmeniškumas, veiksmų koordinavimas, mobilumas, intensyvumas, mokslo ir technikos panaudojimas, dinamiškumas ir vykdymo kontrolė bei uždaviniai skirti operatyviai ir išsamiai išaiškinti nusikalstamas veikas, sudaryti kiekvienoje byloje sąlygas teisingai taikyti įstatymą, kad kiekvienas nusikaltimą padaręs asmuo būtų teisingai nubaustas ir nė vienas nekaltas asmuo nebūtų patrauktas baudžiamojon atsakomybėn, užtikrinti nusikalstamą veiką padariusio asmens padarytos materialinės žalos atlyginimą arba ją atlyginti, sudaro vieną iš ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimo pagrindų. Tačiau vienas svarbiausių, be ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimo principų ir uždavinių, pagrindų yra procesinis, kurį sudaro... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Organization of the pre-trial investigation - is not only defined by law procedural activities but communication and cooperation between different set of operations which can be explained by other social science research organization of the pre-trial investigation, his leadership; the monitoring system consists of pre-trial investigation officer, prosecutor, investigating judge. The main organizer of investigative process, supervisor and controller - prosecutor. Pre-trial investigation officer (investigator) must comply with all instructions and prosecutor in due time to the pre-trial proceedings. The pre-trial judge assigned to him only by the proceedings and only after the prosecutor's request. Key pre-trial organization principles: legality, coordination, mobility, intensity of use of science and technology, dynamics and control performance as well as the targets for rapid and comprehensive interpretation of criminal offenses, consisting in each case for correct application of the law so that every offender would be justly punished and no innocent person is not prosecuted, to ensure the offender of material damages or compensation, is one of the pre-survey in the grounds. However, one of the most important, in addition to investigating the principles and objectives of the organization, the framework is procedural, which are the Republic of Lithuania Code of Criminal Procedure and other legislation. Proper pre-trial planning is essential in ensuring the success of the... [to full text]

Constitution provides inviolability of human rights and freedoms as fundamental value of modern civilization. Human rights and freedoms, however, should not be treated as absolute or immovable category. What should be realized and always emphasized is that any person has not only rights, but also obligations, which means that interests of individual can be lawfully defended only with due regard to the relevant rights of another person. If someone fails to respect and violates human rights of another person, then he renounces relevant part of his rights. And this may become a legitimate ground for restriction of the rights of offender. This paper doesn’t refer to restriction of human rights as a result of the effective judgment of conviction, but to situations, where the person is in detention, under arrest or his other rights are restricted because of being reasonably suspected of the criminal offence or there are reasonable grounds to believe that the person who committed criminal offence might flee or impede investigation, i.e. refers to measures of compulsion exercised by the State. One of such measures of compulsion are measures of constraint. This is the strictest form of compulsion exercised by the State in respect of individual, on whom punishment has not yet been imposed. This paper doesn’t make any detailed analysis of the grounds for or procedure of infliction thereof, as they are thoroughly and clearly regulated by the law on criminal procedure. This paper seeks... [to full text]