• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 3
  • Tagged with
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Skundų dėl ikiteisminio tyrimo metu priimtų ikiteisminio tyrimo pareigūnų, prokurorų nutarimų nagrinėjimas / Examination of appeals against the decisions of pre-trial investigation officers and public prosecutors

Pronina, Evanželina 23 December 2014 (has links)
2007 m. birželio mėn. 28d. priimtas įstatymas dėl Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodekso 62, 63, 64, 65 bei kitų straipsnių pakeitimo bei papildymo. Priėmus šį įstatymą iš esmės pasikeitė ir visas baudžiamojo proceso kodekso trečiojo skyriaus penktasis skirsnis - apskundimas ikiteisminio tyrimo metu, kuriame reglamentuota bendroji apskundimo ikiteisminio tyrimo metu tvarka. Įstatymų leidėjas šiame skirsnyje įtvirtino dvipakopę apskundimo sistemą, t.y. proceso dalyvis ar asmuo, kuriam pritaikytos procesinės prievartos priemonės, turi galimybę skundą paduoti dviem instancijom. Ikiteisminio tyrimo pareigūno proceso veiksmus ir priimtus nutarimus pirma apskųsti ikiteisminį tyrimą kontroliuojančiam ir jam vadovaujančiam prokurorui, o pastarojo sprendimus dėl skundo – aukštesniajam prokuroui. Panaši situacija yra ir su prokuroro proceso veiksmų ir priimtų nutarimų apskundimu, t.y. pirma jie turi būti skundžiami aukštesniajam prokurorui, o pastarojo sprendimai dėl skundo – ikiteisminio tyrimo teisėjui. Tuo tarpu ikiteisminio tyrimo teisėjo veiksmai gali būti skundžiami tik aukštesniajam teismui. BPK numatyti net penki galimi ikiteisminio tyrimo subjektų proceso veiksmų bei priimtų sprendimų apskundimo terminai, skaičiuojant juos tai nuo sprendimo priėmimo momento, tai nuo sprendimo nuorašo gavimo momento. Taip pat pažymėtina, kad nors BPK 64 straipsnyje reglamentuota skundų nagrinėjimo tvarka ikiteisminio tyrimo metu, šio straipsnio nuostatos taikomos ir tais atvejais, kai... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / The law replacing and amending articles 62, 63, 64, 65 and other articles of the Penal process code of the Republic of Lithuania was enacted on June 28th, 2007. After this amendment the whole third section of chapter five of penal process code – appeal procedure during pretrial investigation, where general appeal procedure during pretrial investigation is regulated - has undergone material changes. Two-tier appeal system has been introduced by the legislator: participant of the procedure or a person to whom procedural coercive measures have been applied has a right to make an appeal in two instances. First the public prosecutor investigates the appealed decisions of the pretrial investigation officer. And the higher ranking public prosecutor investigates the appeals on the actions of public prosecutor. The same situation exists with the decisions of the public prosecutor – first the higher ranking public prosecutor investigates the appealed decisions of the public prosecutor, and pretrial judge investigates the latter appeals. Meanwhile, the decisions of the pretrial judge can be appealed to the higher court. There are five terms of appeals of the pretrial process subjects in the penal process code. It should be also mentioned that though article 64 of the penal procedure code regulates the examination procedure of appeals during the pretrial process, the same provisions are applied in the situations when pretrial process is refused or when it is complete.
2

Ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimo, vadovavimo ir kontroliavimo teisinis reguliavimas ir taikymo praktika / The pre-trial investigation’s organization, command and control legal regulation and the application of the law

Krivickas, Andrius 26 January 2012 (has links)
Ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimas – tai ne tik įstatymais apibrėžta procesinė veikla, bet ir įvairių bendravimo bei bendradarbiavimo veiksmų kompleksas, kuris gali būti paaiškintas remiantis kitų visuomenės mokslų žiniomis. Ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimo, jam vadovavimo, kontroliavimo sistemą sudaro ikiteisminio tyrimo pareigūnas, prokuroras, ikiteisminio tyrimo teisėjas. Pagrindinis ikiteisminio tyrimo proceso organizatorius, vadovas ir kontrolierius - prokuroras. Ikiteisminio tyrimo pareigūnas (tyrėjas) privalo vykdyti visus prokuroro nurodymus bei jo nustatytu laiku pranešti apie ikiteisminio tyrimo eigą. Ikiteisminio tyrimo teisėjas atlieka tik jam priskirtus procesinius veiksmus ir tik gavęs prokuroro prašymą. Esminiai ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimo principai: teisėtumas, vienasmeniškumas, veiksmų koordinavimas, mobilumas, intensyvumas, mokslo ir technikos panaudojimas, dinamiškumas ir vykdymo kontrolė bei uždaviniai skirti operatyviai ir išsamiai išaiškinti nusikalstamas veikas, sudaryti kiekvienoje byloje sąlygas teisingai taikyti įstatymą, kad kiekvienas nusikaltimą padaręs asmuo būtų teisingai nubaustas ir nė vienas nekaltas asmuo nebūtų patrauktas baudžiamojon atsakomybėn, užtikrinti nusikalstamą veiką padariusio asmens padarytos materialinės žalos atlyginimą arba ją atlyginti, sudaro vieną iš ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimo pagrindų. Tačiau vienas svarbiausių, be ikiteisminio tyrimo organizavimo principų ir uždavinių, pagrindų yra procesinis, kurį sudaro... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Organization of the pre-trial investigation - is not only defined by law procedural activities but communication and cooperation between different set of operations which can be explained by other social science research organization of the pre-trial investigation, his leadership; the monitoring system consists of pre-trial investigation officer, prosecutor, investigating judge. The main organizer of investigative process, supervisor and controller - prosecutor. Pre-trial investigation officer (investigator) must comply with all instructions and prosecutor in due time to the pre-trial proceedings. The pre-trial judge assigned to him only by the proceedings and only after the prosecutor's request. Key pre-trial organization principles: legality, coordination, mobility, intensity of use of science and technology, dynamics and control performance as well as the targets for rapid and comprehensive interpretation of criminal offenses, consisting in each case for correct application of the law so that every offender would be justly punished and no innocent person is not prosecuted, to ensure the offender of material damages or compensation, is one of the pre-survey in the grounds. However, one of the most important, in addition to investigating the principles and objectives of the organization, the framework is procedural, which are the Republic of Lithuania Code of Criminal Procedure and other legislation. Proper pre-trial planning is essential in ensuring the success of the... [to full text]
3

Kardomųjų priemonių sistema baudžiamajame procese: lyginamasis aspektas / System of the measures of constraint in criminal procedure: comparative aspect

Kursevičius, Marijus 19 December 2006 (has links)
Constitution provides inviolability of human rights and freedoms as fundamental value of modern civilization. Human rights and freedoms, however, should not be treated as absolute or immovable category. What should be realized and always emphasized is that any person has not only rights, but also obligations, which means that interests of individual can be lawfully defended only with due regard to the relevant rights of another person. If someone fails to respect and violates human rights of another person, then he renounces relevant part of his rights. And this may become a legitimate ground for restriction of the rights of offender. This paper doesn’t refer to restriction of human rights as a result of the effective judgment of conviction, but to situations, where the person is in detention, under arrest or his other rights are restricted because of being reasonably suspected of the criminal offence or there are reasonable grounds to believe that the person who committed criminal offence might flee or impede investigation, i.e. refers to measures of compulsion exercised by the State. One of such measures of compulsion are measures of constraint. This is the strictest form of compulsion exercised by the State in respect of individual, on whom punishment has not yet been imposed. This paper doesn’t make any detailed analysis of the grounds for or procedure of infliction thereof, as they are thoroughly and clearly regulated by the law on criminal procedure. This paper seeks... [to full text]

Page generated in 0.083 seconds