Spelling suggestions: "subject:"processo dde incubado??o"" "subject:"processo dde incubada??o""
1 |
Processo de incuba??o de empresas de base tecnol?gica ? luz da gest?o de projetos: um estudo de casos m?ltiplosCruz, Rebeca Isabel Guill?n 30 November 2017 (has links)
Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2018-01-15T21:22:29Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
RebecaIsabelGuillenCruz_DISSERT.pdf: 2730880 bytes, checksum: 475d71a90ef76fce08b1fd6e1f35a219 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2018-01-17T12:32:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
RebecaIsabelGuillenCruz_DISSERT.pdf: 2730880 bytes, checksum: 475d71a90ef76fce08b1fd6e1f35a219 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-17T12:32:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
RebecaIsabelGuillenCruz_DISSERT.pdf: 2730880 bytes, checksum: 475d71a90ef76fce08b1fd6e1f35a219 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-11-30 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico (CNPq) / O objetivo desta pesquisa ? compreender como as incubadoras de empresas de base tecnol?gica desenvolvem seu processo de incuba??o ? luz da gest?o de projetos. A fim de cumprir o objetivo da pesquisa o estudo adotou uma abordagem qualitativa atrav?s de uma estrat?gia de estudo de casos m?ltiplos. Os dados foram coletados por meio de documentos e entrevistas semiestruturadas com os gestores de quatro incubadoras de empresas. A partir da revis?o de literatura foi delineado um quadro conceitual que possibilitasse classificar as incubadoras de empresas na tipologia geracional, identificar como desenvolvem seu processo de incuba??o e identificar as ?reas de conhecimento em gerenciamento de projetos adotadas pelas incubadoras no desenvolvimento do seu processo de incuba??o. Os dados da pesquisa mostram que as quatro incubadoras de empresas estudadas se classificam na tipologia de incubadoras de empresas de segunda gera??o. A oferta de servi?os destas incubadoras se resume em servi?os de estrutura f?sica e tecnol?gica e servi?os de suporte empresarial. Esses resultados s?o coerentes com a afirma??o de Lalkaka (2001 a) em rela??o a que este modelo de incubadoras de empresas ainda prevalece nos pa?ses em desenvolvimento. Esta pesquisa, corroborou que as incubadoras de empresas desenvolvem seu processo de incuba??o conforme as diretrizes do modelo CERNE. Esses resultados explicam e justificam a sua ado??o, lembrando que esse modelo foi desenvolvido com o intuito de disponibilizar boas pr?ticas de gest?o e ajudar ?s incubadoras de empresas do Brasil a se alinhar com o conceito de incubadoras de terceira gera??o. Foram encontradas evid?ncias que indicam que as incubadoras adotam as ?reas de conhecimento em gerenciamento de projetos, destacando gerenciamento da integra??o, escopo, tempo, comunica??es, recursos humanos e qualidade. O gerenciamento de custos e partes interessadas foi parcialmente identificado nas quatro incubadoras. Quanto ao gerenciamento de riscos e das aquisi??es n?o se encontrou evid?ncias que permitissem identificar a ado??o dessas ?reas de conhecimento nas incubadoras das empresas estudadas. E, por fim, conclui-se como verdadeira a declara??o te?rica desta pesquisa que afirma que as incubadoras de empresas de base tecnol?gica adotam as ?reas de conhecimento de projetos para desenvolver o seu processo de incuba??o de empresas. / The aim of this research is to understand how incubators of technology-based companies develop their incubation process in the light of project management. In order to meet the research goal, the study adopted a qualitative approach through a multiple case study strategy. The techniques of data collection used were documents and semi-structured interviews with the managers of four business incubators. From the literature review, a conceptual framework was designed to classify Business Incubators in the generational typology, to identify how they develop their incubation process and to identify the areas of knowledge in project management adopted by the incubators in the development of their incubation process. The evidence allowed classifying the four Business Incubators in the typology of second generation of BI. The services offered by these incubators are summarized in services of physical and technological structure and business support services. These results are consistent with Lalkaka's (2001a) statement that this incubator model still prevails in developing countries. This research corroborated that incubators of companies develop their incubation process according to the guidelines of the CERNE model. The evidence confirms that the incubators studied are homogeneous and do not show great differences in how to develop their incubation process. These results explain and justify the adoption of the CERNE model by the incubators to develop their incubation process, noting that this model was developed with the aim of providing good management practices and helping incubators of Brazilian companies to align with the concept of third generation incubators. We found evidence that incubators adopt the areas of knowledge in project management, emphasizing integration management, scope of time, communications, human resources and quality. The management of cost and stakeholders were partially identified. No evidence was found regarding the adoption of risk management and procurement management. Finally, it concludes as a truth to the theoretical statement of this research, which states that incubators of technology-based companies adopt the areas of project management in their incubation process
|
2 |
Sustentabilidade de empreendimentos econ?micos solid?rios: contribui??es e desafios do PITCPES/UFPA a partir da an?lise da Cooperativa dos Fruticultores de Abaetetuba - COFRUTASilva, Anderson Roberto Pires e 03 September 2010 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T13:53:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
AndersonRPS_DISSERT.pdf: 1287354 bytes, checksum: 556c2c1bb6db37862a1e6f9916b50fea (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010-09-03 / The study aimed to understand how the methodology of hatching contributes to the sustainability of economic enterprises in solidarity. For analysis, we developed a study on the social economy and the incubation methodology, based on the program of teaching, research and extension - Technological Incubator of Popular Cooperatives and Entrepreneurship Solidarity (PITCPES), and as the survey of the Cooperative of Fruit of Abaetetuba - COFRUTA. We started from the exploratory-descriptive approach in a qualitative and quantitative, in order to demonstrate the process of sustainability under the dimensions of different kinds such as: the economic dimension, social dimension, the political dimension, size and scale management training. Based on the analysis of these different dimensions was reached results as: first the recognition that the incubator contributes to the sustainability of COFRUTA, especially with regard to planning, control and the need to diversify production. However, there was suggestion of cooperative for training and technical assistance is continued, to the extent that the performance of projects under the base leaves gaps for the learning and application of social technologies required to the Incubator. It also concluded that the dissertation contributes to the team of the incubator can assess their strengths and weaknesses in their performance / O estudo teve como objetivo compreender como a metodologia de incuba??o contribui para a sustentabilidade de empreendimentos econ?micos solid?rios. Para an?lise, desenvolveu-se um estudo sobre a economia solid?ria e a metodologia de incuba??o, com base no programa de ensino, pesquisa e extens?o Incubadora Tecnol?gica de Cooperativas Populares e Empreendimentos Solid?rios (PITCPES), tendo como universo da pesquisa a Cooperativa dos Fruticultores de Abaetetuba (COFRUTA). Partiu-se da pesquisa explorat?ria-descritiva sob uma abordagem qualitativa-quantitativa e, tendo em vista demonstrar o processo de sustentabilidade sob as dimens?es de ordem diversa como: dimens?o econ?mica, dimens?o social, dimens?o pol?tica, dimens?o gest?o e dimens?o forma??o. Com base na an?lise dessas diferentes dimens?es chegou-se a resultados como: primeiro o reconhecimento de que a Incubadora contribui para a sustentabilidade da COFRUTA, principalmente, no que diz respeito ao planejamento, ao controle e ? necessidade de diversifica??o da produ??o. No entanto, houve sugest?o dos cooperados para que a forma??o e a assist?ncia t?cnica sejam continuadas, na medida em que, a atua??o sob a base de projetos deixa lacunas para a aprendizagem e aplica??o das tecnologias sociais ensejadas pela Incubadora. Tamb?m se chegou ? conclus?o que a disserta??o contribui para que a equipe da Incubadora possa avaliar suas fraquezas e virtudes na sua atua??o
|
Page generated in 0.044 seconds