Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-11-22T20:56:04Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MariaDoPerpetuoSocorroRochaSousaSeverino_TESE.pdf: 5405679 bytes, checksum: 33fdaee514b9e930abbff55ced8d0616 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-11-24T19:10:38Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MariaDoPerpetuoSocorroRochaSousaSeverino_TESE.pdf: 5405679 bytes, checksum: 33fdaee514b9e930abbff55ced8d0616 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-24T19:10:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MariaDoPerpetuoSocorroRochaSousaSeverino_TESE.pdf: 5405679 bytes, checksum: 33fdaee514b9e930abbff55ced8d0616 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-05-22 / Esta Tese inscreve-se na tem?tica da avalia??o de pol?ticas p?blicas. Demarcou como objeto de estudo o Programa Incluir: acessibilidade na educa??o superior, orientando-se pela seguinte pergunta de pesquisa: Como o Programa Incluir est? sendo implementado na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)? Estabeleceu como objetivo (geral) avaliar o processo de implementa??o do Programa Incluir na UFRN, e como objetivos espec?ficos: identificar os fatores que facilitam e os fatores que obstacularizam a implementa??o do Programa Incluir e que condicionam o alcance dos objetivos do mesmo na UFRN; conhecer os servi?os, recursos e apoios t?cnicos existentes e disponibilizados pela Programa Incluir na perspectiva de viabilizar a inclus?o educacional dos acad?micos com defici?ncia nessa IFES; detectar as barreiras (arquitet?nica, pedag?gica, de comunica??o e informa??o e atitudinal) que dificultam o processo de implementa??o do Programa Incluir na UFRN; identificar as estrat?gias de implementa??o do Programa Incluir nessa IFES. A hip?tese enunciada para nortear o estudo afirmou que O Programa Incluir implementa recursos, servi?os, apoios t?cnicos que minimizam as barreiras arquitet?nicas, pedag?gicas e de comunica??o e informa??o, viabilizando parcialmente a inclus?o educacional de acad?micos com defici?ncia na UFRN. Os procedimentos metodol?gicos utilizados para o alcance do objetivo proposto consistiram em revis?o da literatura, pesquisa documental, observa??o sistem?tica e pesquisa de campo. A pesquisa de natureza qualitativa utilizou para a coleta de dados entrevista semiestruturada aplicada aos sujeitos constituintes do quadro amostral, quais sejam: discentes com defici?ncia f?sica, auditiva, visual, intelectual e m?ltipla, professores, presidente e t?cnicos da Comiss?o Permanente de Apoio a Estudantes com Necessidades Especiais (CAENE), bolsistas e monitor. A tese conclui que o processo de implementa??o do Programa Incluir na UFRN efetiva apoios t?cnicos, servi?o de int?rprete de LIBRAS, recursos pedag?gicos em formato acess?vel, recursos financeiros sistem?ticos, os quais, associados a um conjunto de estrat?gias institucionais, como cria??o de normatiza??es relativas ? inclus?o educacional, instala??o de laborat?rios de acessibilidade, disponibiliza??o de tecnologias assistivas, materializa??o de parcerias intrainstitucionais, apoio da Reitoria, constituem fatores facilitadores do processo de implementa??o do programa avaliado. Por outro lado, constatamos desproporcionalidade na produ??o, adapta??o e disponibilidade de recursos did?ticos pedag?gicos em formato acess?vel em rela??o aos tipos de defici?ncia, certo desconhecimento/invisibilidade do Programa Incluir, multiplicidade de objetivos, p?blico-alvo distinto do preconizado no documento oficial, subestima??o da participa??o dos professores na condi??o de implementadores (in)diretos do Programa, o que, associado ao formalismo do parecer t?cnico emitido pela CAENE, sem a devida media??o entre t?cnicos da CAENE, professores e coordenadores de cursos, evidencia o que cunhamos como barreira burocr?tica. Essa coexiste com as remanescentes barreiras atitudinal, de infraestrutura, pedag?gica e de comunica??o e informa??o. Esses fatores inscrevem-se como obst?culos ? implementa??o do Programa Incluir na UFRN. A despeito dos mesmos, podemos inferir que o Programa Incluir contribui com o percurso de forma??o profissional e a participa??o parcial dos acad?micos com defici?ncia na UFRN. / This thesis is a part of the public policies evaluation. It is demarcated as study object the Include Program: accesibility in higher education, being guided by the following research question: How the Include Program is being implemented at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)? It established as (general) objective to evaluate the process of implementation of the Include Program at UFRN, and as specific objectives: to identify the factors that facilitate and the factors that obstruct the implementation of the Include Program, and that condition the achievement of its objectives at UFRN; to know the services, resources and technical support existing and made available by the Include Program in the perspective of enabling the educational inclusion of disabled students in this IFES; to detect barriers (architectural, pedagogical, communication and information and attitudinal) that hinder the implementation process of the Include Program at UFRN; to identify the implementation strategies of the Include Program in this IFES. The hypothesis enunciated to guide the study stated that the Include Program implements resources, services, technical support that minimize architectural, pedagogical and communication and information barriers, partially enabling the educational inclusion of disabled students in UFRN. The methodological procedures used to reach the proposed objective consisted of literature review, documentary research, systematic observation and field research. The qualitative research used for the data collection semistructured interview applied to the constituent subjects of the sample frame, namely: students with physical, auditory, visual, intellectual and multiple disabilities; teachers; president and technicians of the Permanent Commission to Support Students with Special Needs (CAENE); and scholarship holders and monitor. The thesis concludes that the implementation process of the Include Program at UFRN provides technical support, a LIBRAS interpreter service, pedagogical resources in an accessible format, systematic financial resources, which, together with a set of institutional strategies, such as creation of norms related to educational inclusion, Installation of accessibility laboratories, provision of assistive technologies, materialization of intra-institutional partnerships, support of the Rectory, are factors that facilitate the implementation process of the Include Program. Besides, we find disproportionality in the production, adaptation and availability of pedagogical didactic resources in relation to the types of disability, a lack of awareness/invisibility in the Include Program, multiplicity of objectives, different target audience from the official document, underestimation of the participation of teachers in the condition of (in)direct implementers of the Program, witch, together with the technical opinion formalism issued by CAENE, without proper mediation between CAENE technicians, teachers and course coordinators, shows what we have classified as a bureaucratic barrier. This coexists with the remaining attitudinal, infrastructure, pedagogical and communication and information barriers. These factors are inscribed as obstacles to the implementation of the Include Program at UFRN. Notwithstanding to this, we can infer that the Include Program contributes to the vocational training course and the partial participation of disabled academics in UFRN.