Across the country, there is growing awareness of the dividends of early reading success and the stark consequences of early reading failure. A number of assessment studies in recent years have shown that the educational achievement of learners in South African schools is unacceptably poor. The 2011 Annual National Assessment results indicate a 35% literacy rate for South African learners in Grade 3 and a 30% literacy rate for learners in the North West Province of South Africa. According to Kanjee (2008), there is a growing trend in South Africa towards the use of assessment to improve learning. The aim of this study is to develop a school-wide progress monitoring assessment system for early literacy skills. In beginning literacy the development of this school-wide progress monitoring assessment system will be based on the premise that useful assessment of learner progress should be formative in its instructional effects and that it needs to focus teacher attention on data representing the results of their efforts. The development of a school-wide progress monitoring assessment system can help identify and strategically intervene before learners become part of the low South African literacy rate statistic. It is generally recognized that reading is developmental and acquired over time. From the convergence of more than 30 years of scientific research, researchers now have a solid scientific understanding of the core foundational skills in beginning reading. Foundational skills are prerequisite and fundamental to later success in a content area or domain. These skills differentiate successful from less successful readers and most important are amenable to change through instruction. One example of a comprehensive assessment system designed to assess these key foundational skills of early literacy for young learners is the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS). DIBELS measures, by design, are indicators of each of the Basic Early Literacy Skills. In this study, the aim is to collaborate with subject specialists (district level), school management teams (school level), and teachers (classroom level), in order to obtain an in depth understanding of assessment practices in general, and specifically progress monitoring assessment as well as the assessment support needs of teachers and learners. The collaborative aim is to establish a school-wide progress monitoring assessment system that will not only enhance the assessment practices of teachers, but also the system-wide decisions that need to take place so that effective instructional decisions can be made at all levels, and most importantly at the classroom level. In this study I chose to conduct a 16 month action research project in one primary school (i.e., the Happy Valley School) in one specific district (i.e., the Cloudy District) in the North West Province. From the data it is clear that ANA dominates conversations related to assessment, especially in foundation phase. Both at district and school level there is no clear indication that the information generated from assessments is key evidence to continuous improvement in teaching and learning. The data also indicates that the government documents play a crucial role in guiding the actions of the stakeholders. The data indicates that progress monitoring relates specifically to “showing” or “proving” improved learning in language/literacy as measured by ANA. In addition to ANA, and at classroom level, teachers monitor progress fairly “randomly”; they can decide what to ‘look’ for, usually by using their summative assessment marks, when deciding whether a learner is making progress or not. It is possible, therefore, that no two teachers will look at the same foundational literacy skill when deciding whether the learner is making progress in a particular skill. There is also no guideline for teachers in terms of what to aim for in order to ensure that learners make progress in core foundational literacy skills that evidence-based research has shown to have a major effect on reading achievement. In this study, I used a metaphor to illustrate the core components of a progress monitoring assessment and support rocket system. The aim of the rocket is to ensure that all learners achieve “lift off” and hit the identified targets, at all grade levels, on the way to reading success. In order to ensure that the rocket is launched effectively, all stakeholders have to fulfil essential tasks or roles. The assessment and support rocket system implemented in this study was developed to provide a prevention-oriented, assessment and support decision-making system to pre-empt early reading difficulty and ensure progress step-bystep toward outcomes that result in reading achievement for all children. / PhD (Curriculum Development Innovation and Evaluation), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

Across the country, there is growing awareness of the dividends of early reading success and the stark consequences of early reading failure. A number of assessment studies in recent years have shown that the educational achievement of learners in South African schools is unacceptably poor. The 2011 Annual National Assessment results indicate a 35% literacy rate for South African learners in Grade 3 and a 30% literacy rate for learners in the North West Province of South Africa. According to Kanjee (2008), there is a growing trend in South Africa towards the use of assessment to improve learning. The aim of this study is to develop a school-wide progress monitoring assessment system for early literacy skills. In beginning literacy the development of this school-wide progress monitoring assessment system will be based on the premise that useful assessment of learner progress should be formative in its instructional effects and that it needs to focus teacher attention on data representing the results of their efforts. The development of a school-wide progress monitoring assessment system can help identify and strategically intervene before learners become part of the low South African literacy rate statistic. It is generally recognized that reading is developmental and acquired over time. From the convergence of more than 30 years of scientific research, researchers now have a solid scientific understanding of the core foundational skills in beginning reading. Foundational skills are prerequisite and fundamental to later success in a content area or domain. These skills differentiate successful from less successful readers and most important are amenable to change through instruction. One example of a comprehensive assessment system designed to assess these key foundational skills of early literacy for young learners is the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS). DIBELS measures, by design, are indicators of each of the Basic Early Literacy Skills. In this study, the aim is to collaborate with subject specialists (district level), school management teams (school level), and teachers (classroom level), in order to obtain an in depth understanding of assessment practices in general, and specifically progress monitoring assessment as well as the assessment support needs of teachers and learners. The collaborative aim is to establish a school-wide progress monitoring assessment system that will not only enhance the assessment practices of teachers, but also the system-wide decisions that need to take place so that effective instructional decisions can be made at all levels, and most importantly at the classroom level. In this study I chose to conduct a 16 month action research project in one primary school (i.e., the Happy Valley School) in one specific district (i.e., the Cloudy District) in the North West Province. From the data it is clear that ANA dominates conversations related to assessment, especially in foundation phase. Both at district and school level there is no clear indication that the information generated from assessments is key evidence to continuous improvement in teaching and learning. The data also indicates that the government documents play a crucial role in guiding the actions of the stakeholders. The data indicates that progress monitoring relates specifically to “showing” or “proving” improved learning in language/literacy as measured by ANA. In addition to ANA, and at classroom level, teachers monitor progress fairly “randomly”; they can decide what to ‘look’ for, usually by using their summative assessment marks, when deciding whether a learner is making progress or not. It is possible, therefore, that no two teachers will look at the same foundational literacy skill when deciding whether the learner is making progress in a particular skill. There is also no guideline for teachers in terms of what to aim for in order to ensure that learners make progress in core foundational literacy skills that evidence-based research has shown to have a major effect on reading achievement. In this study, I used a metaphor to illustrate the core components of a progress monitoring assessment and support rocket system. The aim of the rocket is to ensure that all learners achieve “lift off” and hit the identified targets, at all grade levels, on the way to reading success. In order to ensure that the rocket is launched effectively, all stakeholders have to fulfil essential tasks or roles. The assessment and support rocket system implemented in this study was developed to provide a prevention-oriented, assessment and support decision-making system to pre-empt early reading difficulty and ensure progress step-bystep toward outcomes that result in reading achievement for all children. / PhD (Curriculum Development Innovation and Evaluation), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

Background: Group CBT approaches have been shown to be equally as effective as individual CBT for reducing depressive symptoms and preventing relapse; however, the predictors of response are poorly understood. The primary objective of the studies presented in this thesis was to further examine the formal and process factors within group CBT for depression that contribute to various treatment outcomes. The first study investigated the relationship between group CBT for depression and changes in interpersonal distress, as well as the process mechanisms that might influence this relationship. The second study assessed whether formal feedback provided to therapists and clients derived from the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45), a robust measure of client functioning, would enhance group processes and treatment outcomes. Method: Study 1: Secondary data from clients having received individual CBT for depression at a community-based mental health training centre constituted one condition (18 clients). Data for the group condition (12 clients) were collected from clients attending group CBT for depression at a tertiary care facility. Relationship distress, as measured by the OQ-45 relationship distress subscale score, was assessed at intake and termination. Group participants also completed process measures at the start and end of treatment. In study 2, participants were recruited from a tertiary care facility to participate in a CBT group for depression. Participation involved completing brief questionnaires assessing psychological and process variables before and after treatment, as well as the OQ-45 at every session. Three groups (21 clients) received standard CBT and two groups (12 clients) received enhanced CBT, which included feedback about their progress from the OQ-45. Results: Results of study 1 suggest that clients who participated in group CBT experienced a significantly greater reduction in relationship distress across time than clients who participated in individual CBT. Results also indicate that therapeutic alliance, and not group cohesion, mediates the relationship between pretreatment relationship distress on posttreatment relationship distress in group CBT. Results of study 2 indicate that participants in the enhanced condition experienced greater improvements in quality of life, dysfunctional beliefs, and therapeutic bond at termination, relative to participants in the standard condition. Trends also suggest a greater reduction in depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Group CBT for depression may be more effective than the individual modality for reducing interpersonal distress. Furthermore, therapeutic alliance plays a significant role in improving interpersonal distress within a structured group CBT protocol. Feedback from the OQ-45 may help improve client outcomes and enhance therapeutic bonding with facilitators in group CBT for depression.

The continuously low productivity growth in the construction industry is frequently attributed to inadequate methods of knowledge management. The issue is often linked to the industry’s project-oriented structure, where temporary project organizations result in teams “reinventing the wheel” rather than learning from previous projects. Previous studies have identified that improvement in productivity can be achieved through further development of knowledge management within organizations. Knowledge management regarding progress monitoring of projects can be a crucial method to develop and implement within an organization to achieve positive project outcomes. Therefore, it should be of interest to the construction industry to improve methods for knowledge management, as it can lead to increased productivity and various benefits related to time and cost, while it also contributes to market competitiveness. This study investigates current methods for knowledge management and progress monitoring within construction projects during the production phase, focusing on how digital tools can support and systematize these methods. Furthermore, the study aims to identify the necessary requirements for implementing digital knowledge management methods and to investigate the incentives companies might have to share knowledge and benefit from previous projects. The study is conducted through a combination of a literature review, qualitative interviews, and quantitative surveys. The results indicate that the industry is characterized by insufficient knowledge management which leads to mistakes being made repeatedly in projects. The lack of systematic methods for collecting, managing, and processing knowledge, combined with the project-oriented structure of the industry, are contributing factors to the current situation. To develop and implement a systematic digital method, the study highlights that key factors and conditions to consider are related to the organization and the use of digital tools and methodologies for data collection and management. The results also show that a combination of digital maturity, organizational support, and standardized methods are crucial for the successful implementation of digital tools. The study emphasizes that a well-developed structure for data collection and management is essential to facilitate knowledge management and to achieve higher productivity and efficiency in the construction industry. Finally, the study emphasizes that management needs to integrate knowledge management into their overall strategies and long-term goals to create incentives for knowledge sharing across the whole organization. / Den kontinuerligt låga produktivitetsutvecklingen inom byggbranschen är något som återkommande lyfts kopplat till bristande arbetssätt med kunskapsåterföring. Den bristande hanteringen av kunskap sätts i relation till byggbranschens projektorienterade uppbyggnad med tillfälliga projektorganisationer, där projektgrupper återkommande tvingas “uppfinna hjulet på nytt” i stället för att dra lärdom av tidigare projekt. En produktivitetsutveckling har i tidigare studier identifierats kunna ske med hjälp av en utvecklad kunskapsåterföring inom organisationer. Kunskapsåterföring med avseende på produktionsuppföljning av ett projekts framdrift, det vill säga framdriftsuppföljning, kan därmed vara ett viktigt arbetssätt att utveckla och implementera i en organisation för att uppnå positiva resultat i projekt. Ett förbättrat arbetssätt gällande kunskapsåterföring bör därför vara av intresse för samtliga aktörer i byggbranschen. Detta då det långsiktigt kan leda till en ökad produktivitet och därtill flera tillkommande fördelar kopplat till tid- och kostnadsaspekter samtidigt som det även kan bidra till en konkurrenskraft på marknaden. Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka hur kunskapsåterföring och framdriftsuppföljning fungerar inom anläggningsprojekt under entreprenadfasen i nuläget, med särskilt fokus på hur digitala verktyg kan stödja och systematisera arbetssätten. Studien fokuserar även på att identifiera vilka förutsättningar som krävs för implementering av arbetssätt med digital kunskapsåterföring samt undersöka vilka incitament man som företag kan ha för att dela kunskap och dra nytta av erfarenheter från tidigare projekt. Det undersöks genom en kombination av litteraturstudie, kvalitativa intervjuer och kvantitativa enkätundersökningar, där de nuvarande arbetssätten, hinder och förutsättningar som finns för effektiv kunskapsåterföring i byggbranschen identifieras. Studiens resultat visar att nuläget inom branschen kännetecknas av bristande dokumentation och delning av kunskap, vilket leder till att misstag ofta upprepas återkommande i projekt. Avsaknaden av systematiska arbetssätt för insamling, hantering och bearbetning av kunskap i samband med den projektorienterade uppbyggnaden visar sig även vara bidragande faktorer. För att utveckla och implementera ett systematiskt digitalt arbetssätt lyfter studien att viktiga faktorer och förutsättningar att beakta är kopplat till organisationen och användningen av digitala verktyg och metodiker för insamling och hantering av data. Resultaten visar även att en kombination av digital mognad, organisatoriskt stöd och tydliga rutiner är avgörande för framgångsrik implementering av digitala hjälpmedel. Studien betonar att en välutvecklad struktur för datainsamling och hantering är nödvändig för att underlätta kunskapsåterföring och uppnå högre produktivitet och effektivitet inom byggbranschen. Slutligen lyfter studien att det krävs att ledningen integrerar kunskapsåterföring i deras övergripande strategier och långsiktiga mål för att samtidigt skapa incitament för kunskapsdelning hos samtliga inom organisationen.

The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine the relationship between the reading intervention program Making Connections Intervention (MCI) and pre-intervention and post- intervention Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program (TCAP) reading scaled scores in one East Tennessee school district. Participants included 99 Tennessee students in grade levels six through nine who received reading intervention instruction through MCI and were frequently monitored following the requirements stipulated in the Tennessee Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTI2) Framework. This study assessed pre- and post-intervention data specific to gender, special education classification, Title I classification, and instructor classification through a series of t-tests. Findings indicated that although there were no significant differences in TCAP reading scaled scores for the grouping variables of gender, Title I classification, special education classification, and instructor classification, students’ TCAP reading scaled scores were significantly higher after participating in Making Connections Intervention.

[Truncated abstract] Physical healthcare uses a suite of tools for measuring response to treatment. However, reliable systems of regular patient monitoring are rare in mental healthcare. Mental health services often measure a treatment response from pre- to post- therapy, yet measurement between those occasions is less common. This omission is problematic since arguably there is a need for an alarm system in psychotherapy (Andrews & Page, 2005). A substantial minority of patients do not experience reliable change following treatment, and a small proportion deteriorates (Hansen, Lambert, & Forman, 2002; Newnham, Harwood, & Page, 2007). Without monitoring, it is not always possible to know which patients are progressing poorly. Since the publication of Howard and colleagues' (1996) proposal that patient progress be monitored routinely during therapy and the results fed back to clinicians to direct treatment, this monitoring regime has garnered attention in the United States and Europe (Lambert, 2007; Lutz, et al., 2006). Findings in outpatient psychotherapy have demonstrated that providing real-time feedback on patient progress to clinicians and patients significantly improves clinical outcomes for those patients demonstrating a negative response to treatment (Harmon et al., 2007; Lambert et al., 2001; Lambert et al., 2002). What is not yet apparent is how these processes would generalize to inpatient and day patient (i.e. patients attending hospital for a whole day of treatment) psychiatric care. Inpatients often present with greater severity and are treated in an intensive setting. ... Deviations from this expected pattern would highlight possible differences between inpatient and outpatient care. To develop an appropriate system for monitoring patient progress, it was important to first define clinically significant recovery in inpatient psychiatric care, and provide criteria for clinicians to judge outcome in routine practice (Newnham, Harwood, & Page, 2007). Second, a quick and easy-to-administer system of progress monitoring and real-time feedback was developed to enhance treatment decision making (Newnham, Hooke, & Page, 2009). Third, the system was evaluated to determine clinical effectiveness. Using the World Health Organization’s Wellbeing Index, a program for monitoring patient progress and providing feedback to clinicians and patients was established at Western Australia's largest private psychiatric service. The sample consisted of 1308 consecutive inpatients and day patients whose primary diagnoses were predominantly depressive (67.7%) and anxiety (25.9%) disorders. Feedback to patients and clinicians was effective in reducing depressive symptoms (F (1,649) = 6.29, p<.05) for those patients at risk of poor outcome, but not effective in improving wellbeing (F (1,569) = 1.14, p>.05). The findings support the use of progress monitoring and feedback in psychiatric care to improve symptom outcomes, but raise questions about changes in wellbeing during psychotherapy. The effectiveness study was conducted as a historical cohort trial, consistent with quality improvement efforts, and replication with a randomized controlled design is warranted. Feedback of progress information appears to be an important process within psychotherapy, and further investigation of the means by which clinicians and patients use that information is necessary.

xv, 109 p. : col. ill. / The current study investigated variability in student performance on DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency (DORF) Progress Monitoring passages for third grade and sought to determine to what extent the variability in weekly progress monitoring scores is related to passage-level factors (e.g., type of passage [i.e., narrative or expository]), readability of the passage, reading rate for words in lists, passage specific comprehension, background knowledge, and interest in the topic of the passage) and student-level factors (e.g., the student's initial skill and variability across benchmark passages). In light of recent changes in IDEIA legislation allowing for the use of Response to Intervention models and formative assessment practices in the identification of specific learning disabilities, it was intent of this study to identify factors associated with oral reading fluency that, once identified, could potentially be altered or controlled during progress monitoring and decision-making to allow for more defensible educational decisions. The sample for analysis included 70 third grade students from one school in Iowa. Results of two-level HLM analyses indicated significant effects for background knowledge, interest in the passage, type of passage, retell fluency, readability, and word reading, with type of passage and readability demonstrating the largest magnitude effects. Magnitude of effect was based upon a calculation of proportion of reduction in level 1 residual variance. At level 2, initial risk status demonstrated a significant effect on a student's initial oral reading fluency score, while the benchmark variability demonstrated a significant effect on a student's growth over time. Results demonstrate support for readability as an indicator of passage difficulty as it relates to predicting oral reading fluency for students and suggest that consideration for the type of passage may be warranted when interpreting student ORF scores. Additionally, results indicated possible student-level effects of variables such as background knowledge and word list that were not investigated within the current study. Limitations of the study, considerations for future research, and implications for practice are discussed. / Committee in charge: Roland Good, Chairperson/Advisor; Laura Lee McIntyre, Member; Joe Stevens Member; Robert Davis, Outside Member; Scott Baker, Member

No description available.

The use of Response to Intervention, more commonly referred to as RTI has become more prevalent as school systems look to find ways of bridging the opportunity gap and provide support those students who are not successful in their attempts to access the general education curriculum. More research is needed in order to have a better understanding of not only how schools implement RTI, but also how they utilize data, monitor student progress and help to ensure fidelity of implementation. The purpose of this study was to examine and explain how one elementary school with a high quality RTI program implemented Response to Intervention while keeping all three essential components in consideration. The findings demonstrate that the subject elementary school combined several elements of Response to Intervention and in turn, created their own version of a hybrid RTI model that utilized components from both the standard protocol model and the problem-solving model. In order to monitor student progress, universal screeners were utilized several times throughout the year for both reading and math. Reading was also monitored through running records, PALS Quick Checks, Orton Gillingham assessments, and exit tickets, whereas Math utilized formative assessments, anecdotal notes, and exit tickets to track student progress. Each math and reading CLT met weekly to engage in dialogue around student data. An important finding is that the subject elementary school made RTI implementation decisions around what was best for their students, which allowed for a more flexible and adaptable approach. The system utilized targeted individual student needs and helped to ensure that ALL students had access to the necessary supports that would help to ensure student success. / Doctor of Education / As schools continue to face increasing demands, including how to meet the needs of students with diverse academic backgrounds, they have been charged with exploring new ways and methods of ensuring that students are successful in their attempts to access the general education curriculum. Response to Intervention, more commonly referred to as RTI, has become more widely used in school systems as they continue to work to ensure student success for all. RTI is seen as a tool to help accurately identify students who have a learning disability (Ciolfi and Ryan, 2011), however more research is needed in order to have a better understanding of how schools implement RTI, as well as how they utilize the data collected and monitor student progress. This qualitative case study analyzes how one subject elementary school implemented RTI, how they utilized data, as well as how they monitored the progress of their students.

The purpose of this study was to identify components of Response to Intervention (RTI) groups associated with increased student growth on progress monitoring tests. The relationship between student growth scores and fidelity of implementation scores, types of groups, types of interventionists, group setting, group time, and various demographic groups were examined. Seven hundred fifteen students enrolled in reading and math groups in an RTI program at 8 schools in an Upper East Tennessee school system participated in this study. Ten research questions and null hypotheses were analyzed using Pearson correlations, independent t tests, and one-way Analyses of Variance. Results indicated significant gains for RTI students in every type of reading and math intervention group and every demographic population. These results contradicted current nationwide studies on RTI in which students made limited gains in intervention.