Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-04-03T22:18:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 KathianaIsabelleLimaDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1068273 bytes, checksum: ff4fe369086a2126bdbfbc33f23b71ec (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-04-10T21:53:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 KathianaIsabelleLimaDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1068273 bytes, checksum: ff4fe369086a2126bdbfbc33f23b71ec (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-10T21:53:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 KathianaIsabelleLimaDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1068273 bytes, checksum: ff4fe369086a2126bdbfbc33f23b71ec (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-06-16 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / O objetivo deste estudo ? analisar a aplica??o e a efetividade, no Brasil, dos Protocolos sobre Coopera??o Jur?dica C?vel no ?mbito do MERCOSUL em face do Direito Interno Brasileiro. O Protocolo de Medidas Cautelares de Ouro Preto e o Protocolo de Las Le?as sobre coopera??o e assist?ncia jurisdicional em mat?ria civil, comercial, trabalhista e administrativa celebrados no ?mbito do MERCOSUL disciplinam as regras e mecanismos da Coopera??o entre os pa?ses membros, especialmente o Protocolo de Las Le?as, no que diz respeito ao reconhecimento/homologa??o e a execu??o das senten?as e laudos arbitrais estrangeiros. Do estudo, constata-se que a coopera??o jur?dica c?vel no ?mbito do MERCOSUL n?o prevalece em territ?rio brasileiro pela m? interpreta??o das regras presentes nestes instrumentos, com ?nfase para o artigo 20 do Protocolo de L?s Le?as, que trata da Efic?cia Extraterritorial das Senten?as e Laudos Arbitrais provenientes dos Estados Partes do MERCOSUL. A falta de aplica??o deste dispositivo pelo judici?rio afeta a efic?cia pretendida dentro do territ?rio brasileiro. Em suma, isto se deve ao posicionamento adotado pelo STF e STJ na medida em que pontos importantes dos Acordos Internacionais n?o est?o sendo observados no Brasil, o que vai de encontro a um dos princ?pios da Constitui??o Federal, em seu artigo 4?, par?grafo ?nico, que ? a busca pela integra??o da Am?rica Latina, isto por apego extremado ? Soberania Nacional, o que se reflete na falta de seguran?a jur?dica. / The objective of this study is to analyze the application and effectiveness in Brazil of the Protocols on Civil Legal Cooperation within MERCOSUR in the face of Brazilian Domestic Law. The Precautionary Measures Protocol of Ouro Preto and the Las Le?as Protocol on cooperation and judicial assistance in civil, commercial, labor and administrative concluded within MERCOSUL discipline rules and mechanisms of cooperation among member countries, especially the Las Le?as Protocol, with regard to the recognition / approval and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards. The study notes that the civil legal cooperation MERCOSUL does not prevail in Brazil by the misinterpretation of these rules in these instruments, with emphasis on Article 20 of the Las Le?as Protocol, which deals with the Extraterritorial arbitration awards and Effectiveness Reports from the Member States of MERCOSUL. The lack of legal device by applying affects their effectiveness within the Brazilian territory. In short, this is due to the attitude adopted by the STF and STJ in that important points of international agreements are not being observed in Brazil, which goes against one of the principles of the Federal Constitution, in its article 4, sole paragraph, which is the quest for integration in Latin America by extreme attachment to national sovereignty, which reflects the lack of legal certainty.