Self-modeling (SM) involves an observer viewing oneself on an edited video showing desired behaviors (Dowrick, & Dove, 1990). The impact of a SM video on skill acquisition has been frequently explored (e.g., Clark & Ste-Marie, 2006), however, few researchers have investigated SM in competition (Ste-Marie, Rymal, Vertes, & Martini, 2009). Also of limited study has been the underlying self-regulatory mechanisms engaged in alongside a SM video (e.g., Rymal, Martini, & Ste-Marie, 2010). To date, research has not investigated the effects of SM on gymnasts competitive bar performance or how it is used to self-regulate, nor whether SM increases self-regulation. Thus, the purpose here was to investigate the effects of a SM video on gymnasts’ physical performance and self-regulation. Of further interest was to explore the combination of SM and psychological skills training (PST) on competitive performance. Eighteen gymnasts were divided into two groups; SM+PST (n = 10) and SM (n =8). The SM+PST group took part in workshops one month prior to the competitions wherein links between SM and psychological skills were made. The SM group did not do the workshops. Gymnasts competed at four competitions; two received the SM video and two did not. For the video competitions, participants viewed their video three times prior to warm-up and once before competing. After one video competition and one competition that gymnasts did not receive the video, interview sessions were conducted with ten gymnasts. The results of the physical performance data did not show any significant group or condition main effects (all F’s < 1). Imagery ability, however, was a moderating variable. Gymnasts low in visual imagery ability benefitted from the use of the self-modeling video later in the season F(1, 16) = 5.976, p = .026, η2 = .27, (1 – β) = .63, but not early in the season. Through the qualitative analysis of interview questions, it can be said that gymnasts used the SM video as a task analysis strategy before, during, and after their competitive event. Analysis of transcripts also suggested that the SM video encouraged the use of certain self-regulatory processes and beliefs related to the forethought (i.e., before) and self-reflection (i.e., after) phases above and beyond that typically used when competing.

Self-modeling (SM) involves an observer viewing oneself on an edited video showing desired behaviors (Dowrick, & Dove, 1990). The impact of a SM video on skill acquisition has been frequently explored (e.g., Clark & Ste-Marie, 2006), however, few researchers have investigated SM in competition (Ste-Marie, Rymal, Vertes, & Martini, 2009). Also of limited study has been the underlying self-regulatory mechanisms engaged in alongside a SM video (e.g., Rymal, Martini, & Ste-Marie, 2010). To date, research has not investigated the effects of SM on gymnasts competitive bar performance or how it is used to self-regulate, nor whether SM increases self-regulation. Thus, the purpose here was to investigate the effects of a SM video on gymnasts’ physical performance and self-regulation. Of further interest was to explore the combination of SM and psychological skills training (PST) on competitive performance. Eighteen gymnasts were divided into two groups; SM+PST (n = 10) and SM (n =8). The SM+PST group took part in workshops one month prior to the competitions wherein links between SM and psychological skills were made. The SM group did not do the workshops. Gymnasts competed at four competitions; two received the SM video and two did not. For the video competitions, participants viewed their video three times prior to warm-up and once before competing. After one video competition and one competition that gymnasts did not receive the video, interview sessions were conducted with ten gymnasts. The results of the physical performance data did not show any significant group or condition main effects (all F’s < 1). Imagery ability, however, was a moderating variable. Gymnasts low in visual imagery ability benefitted from the use of the self-modeling video later in the season F(1, 16) = 5.976, p = .026, η2 = .27, (1 – β) = .63, but not early in the season. Through the qualitative analysis of interview questions, it can be said that gymnasts used the SM video as a task analysis strategy before, during, and after their competitive event. Analysis of transcripts also suggested that the SM video encouraged the use of certain self-regulatory processes and beliefs related to the forethought (i.e., before) and self-reflection (i.e., after) phases above and beyond that typically used when competing.

Self-modeling (SM) involves an observer viewing oneself on an edited video showing desired behaviors (Dowrick, & Dove, 1990). The impact of a SM video on skill acquisition has been frequently explored (e.g., Clark & Ste-Marie, 2006), however, few researchers have investigated SM in competition (Ste-Marie, Rymal, Vertes, & Martini, 2009). Also of limited study has been the underlying self-regulatory mechanisms engaged in alongside a SM video (e.g., Rymal, Martini, & Ste-Marie, 2010). To date, research has not investigated the effects of SM on gymnasts competitive bar performance or how it is used to self-regulate, nor whether SM increases self-regulation. Thus, the purpose here was to investigate the effects of a SM video on gymnasts’ physical performance and self-regulation. Of further interest was to explore the combination of SM and psychological skills training (PST) on competitive performance. Eighteen gymnasts were divided into two groups; SM+PST (n = 10) and SM (n =8). The SM+PST group took part in workshops one month prior to the competitions wherein links between SM and psychological skills were made. The SM group did not do the workshops. Gymnasts competed at four competitions; two received the SM video and two did not. For the video competitions, participants viewed their video three times prior to warm-up and once before competing. After one video competition and one competition that gymnasts did not receive the video, interview sessions were conducted with ten gymnasts. The results of the physical performance data did not show any significant group or condition main effects (all F’s < 1). Imagery ability, however, was a moderating variable. Gymnasts low in visual imagery ability benefitted from the use of the self-modeling video later in the season F(1, 16) = 5.976, p = .026, η2 = .27, (1 – β) = .63, but not early in the season. Through the qualitative analysis of interview questions, it can be said that gymnasts used the SM video as a task analysis strategy before, during, and after their competitive event. Analysis of transcripts also suggested that the SM video encouraged the use of certain self-regulatory processes and beliefs related to the forethought (i.e., before) and self-reflection (i.e., after) phases above and beyond that typically used when competing.

Self-modeling (SM) involves an observer viewing oneself on an edited video showing desired behaviors (Dowrick, & Dove, 1990). The impact of a SM video on skill acquisition has been frequently explored (e.g., Clark & Ste-Marie, 2006), however, few researchers have investigated SM in competition (Ste-Marie, Rymal, Vertes, & Martini, 2009). Also of limited study has been the underlying self-regulatory mechanisms engaged in alongside a SM video (e.g., Rymal, Martini, & Ste-Marie, 2010). To date, research has not investigated the effects of SM on gymnasts competitive bar performance or how it is used to self-regulate, nor whether SM increases self-regulation. Thus, the purpose here was to investigate the effects of a SM video on gymnasts’ physical performance and self-regulation. Of further interest was to explore the combination of SM and psychological skills training (PST) on competitive performance. Eighteen gymnasts were divided into two groups; SM+PST (n = 10) and SM (n =8). The SM+PST group took part in workshops one month prior to the competitions wherein links between SM and psychological skills were made. The SM group did not do the workshops. Gymnasts competed at four competitions; two received the SM video and two did not. For the video competitions, participants viewed their video three times prior to warm-up and once before competing. After one video competition and one competition that gymnasts did not receive the video, interview sessions were conducted with ten gymnasts. The results of the physical performance data did not show any significant group or condition main effects (all F’s < 1). Imagery ability, however, was a moderating variable. Gymnasts low in visual imagery ability benefitted from the use of the self-modeling video later in the season F(1, 16) = 5.976, p = .026, η2 = .27, (1 – β) = .63, but not early in the season. Through the qualitative analysis of interview questions, it can be said that gymnasts used the SM video as a task analysis strategy before, during, and after their competitive event. Analysis of transcripts also suggested that the SM video encouraged the use of certain self-regulatory processes and beliefs related to the forethought (i.e., before) and self-reflection (i.e., after) phases above and beyond that typically used when competing.

No description available.

The importance of sport psychological skills training is emphasized by the contention that the knowledge obtained through observing an athletes' behaviour within a sporting environment could be used to explain, predict and change behaviour, thereby, enhancing sport performance. Sport psychological factors are being recognized as one of the most significant contributors to sport performance. Three hundred and fourteen provincial netball players (average age = 20.30 ± 3.88 years) from 33 teams who participated in the 2004 South African Inter-Provincial Netball tournament completed the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2), Athletic Coping Skills Inventory-28 (ACSI-28) and Psychological Skills Inventory (PSI). Results from the first article revealed that this population had limited prior exposure to sport psychological skills (SPS) and sport psychological skills training (SPST) programmes in general. The skills to which these players have primarily been exposed to are self-confidence, positive self-talk, team cohesiolspirit, goal-setting and concentration skills. The players further perceive SPST to be very important and expressed a need thereof, especially since 26.43% of the players perceive their ability to be psychologically well prepared for competitions as average or below average. A comparative study between more successful and less successful groups of u/19 and u/21 netball players showed that the more successful group to have significantly better values for cognitive state anxiety (direction), state self-confidence (direction) and peaking under pressure. The more successful group obtained better results in 13 of the 19 tested variables. Eight of these variables (of which three significantly so) are able to accurately (69.44% effective) discriminate between these two groups. Collectively, the SPS levels. information on SPST and the extent to which SPS contribute to performance necessitate a collaborated effort by sport psychologists and netball coaches to develop and implement a consistent, systematic sport-specific SPST programme. / Thesis (M.A. (Human Movement Science))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2007

Thesis (M.A. (Human Movement Science))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2007.

The importance of sport psychological skills training is emphasized by the contention that the knowledge obtained through observing an athletes' behaviour within a sporting environment could be used to explain, predict and change behaviour, thereby, enhancing sport performance. Sport psychological factors are being recognized as one of the most significant contributors to sport performance. Three hundred and fourteen provincial netball players (average age = 20.30 ± 3.88 years) from 33 teams who participated in the 2004 South African Inter-Provincial Netball tournament completed the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2), Athletic Coping Skills Inventory-28 (ACSI-28) and Psychological Skills Inventory (PSI). Results from the first article revealed that this population had limited prior exposure to sport psychological skills (SPS) and sport psychological skills training (SPST) programmes in general. The skills to which these players have primarily been exposed to are self-confidence, positive self-talk, team cohesiolspirit, goal-setting and concentration skills. The players further perceive SPST to be very important and expressed a need thereof, especially since 26.43% of the players perceive their ability to be psychologically well prepared for competitions as average or below average. A comparative study between more successful and less successful groups of u/19 and u/21 netball players showed that the more successful group to have significantly better values for cognitive state anxiety (direction), state self-confidence (direction) and peaking under pressure. The more successful group obtained better results in 13 of the 19 tested variables. Eight of these variables (of which three significantly so) are able to accurately (69.44% effective) discriminate between these two groups. Collectively, the SPS levels. information on SPST and the extent to which SPS contribute to performance necessitate a collaborated effort by sport psychologists and netball coaches to develop and implement a consistent, systematic sport-specific SPST programme. / Thesis (M.A. (Human Movement Science))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2007

Sport psychological skills play an important role in sport performance. Evidence further suggests that the psychological skill levels may be influenced by the particular playing position. One hundred and eighty u/19 rugby players from the PUK Rugby Institute (average age: 18.79 +- 0.28 years) were tested during the 2003-2005 rugby seasons by means of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2), Psychological Skills Inventory (PSI), Athletic Coping Skills Inventory-28 (ACSI-28), as well as a questionnaire dealing with psychosocial factors influencing participation and performance in rugby. Players from the 2004 and 2005 seasons (n=120) were first divided into two groups (top- and lower ranked players) of 60 players each. Effect size results (practical significance) revealed moderately significant differences between the two groups, with the top ranked players outscoring their lower ranked counterparts in self-confidence, general coping resources, coping with adversity, average psychological skills score, as well as the effect of team members/team spirit, coaches and financial aspects on participation and performance. These results confirm that sport psychological skill levels and related psychosocial factors can distinguish between rugby union players of different participation levels. Secondly, the total subject group (n=180) was divided into seven positional groups (props, hookers, locks, loose trio, half-backs, centres and back three). These groups were compared by means of effect sizes (practical significance) for each of seven sport psychological skills as measured with the PSI. Moderate (46) and large (20) practically significant differences were reported for the 147 inter-positional comparisons. The results show that the half-backs and hookers consistently outperformed the other three positional groups, while the props, locks and back three often showed the lowest skill levels. While these results are discussed in reference to practical implications for future position specific sport psychological skills training sessions, they clearly show that sport psychological skill levels differ from one position to another. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Human Movement Science))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2006.

In spite of the number of participants in soccer, it would appear that there is no specific physical, motor, anthropometric and sport psychological profile by which soccer players can be evaluated to determine whether they comply with the specific requirements of soccer. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine which physical, motor performance, anthropometric and sport psychological variables distinguish soccer teams of different participation levels. Fifteen Uniwest (classed as successful), twelve Vaal Triangle Technikon (classed as less successful) and sixteen North-West Sports Academy players (classed as the developmental team) were subjected to a test battery that consisted of 8 physical and motor tests as well as 14 anthropometric measurements. Only two teams (Uniwest and Vaal Triangle Technikon) completed the CSAI-2, AMSSE, ACSI-28 and PVI sport psychological questionnaires. The results of the stepwise forward discriminant analysis showed that isokinetic dorsi and plantarflexion peak torque, together with right hamstring flexibility, agility, muscle mass percentage, speed over 5m and abdominal muscle strength, were the physical, motor performance and anthropometric test variables which significantly (p ≤0.05) and accurately (94.74%) distinguish between soccer teams of different participation levels. The results of the sport psychological variables revealed that goal directedness, concentration, optimal performance under pressure, goal setting, performance motivation and activation control are the variables that have an 86.1 1% success rate in discriminating between successful and less-successful soccer players. In conclusion, although the potential of a physical, motor performance, anthropometric and sport psychological test battery to discriminate accurately between soccer players of different participation levels can not be discounted, it appears that the successful soccer team will not necessarily achieve better test battery results than players of other participation levels. The successful group only obtained significantly better results in 4 variables (speed over 5, 10 and 20m as well as striving for success) when compared to the less successful group, who achieved significantly better results in 16 variables. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Human Movement Science))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2005.