No description available.

The main aims were to: explore whether there is a relation between doctors’ ability to identify patients’ worry and wish for information and self-efficacy with regard to communicating with patients about difficult matters; describe which cues doctors consider when estimating patients’ worry and wish for information, and investigate whether there is a relation between patients’ satisfaction with doctors’ care and patients’ psychosocial function. Eleven doctors and 69 patients (of which 36 patients participated in the longitudinal study) with carcinoid tumours participated. Doctors’ self-efficacy, and ability to identify patients’ worry/wish for information were investigated at patients’ first admission. Doctors were interviewed about which cues they considered when estimating patients worry/wish for information. Patients’ satisfaction with care (CASC SF 4.0) and psychosocial function (EORTC QLQ-C30, HADS) were measured longitudinally, during the first year after diagnosis. Doctors reported higher self-efficacy when showing good ability to identify patients’ wish for information, than when showing less good ability, overestimated patients’ worry and underestimated patients’ wish for information. Doctors considered patients’ verbal behaviour and body language together with knowledge and experience when estimating patients worry and wish for information. Patients who met doctors showing good ability to identify their wish for information, reported a higher cognitive function than patients who met doctors showing less good ability. At all assessments patients expressed high satisfaction with doctor’ care and patients’ satisfaction did not change over time. Patients’ satisfaction with doctors’ care were related to their psychosocial function shortly after the first three admissions to specialist care. Patients with carcinoid tumours in some respects reported a worse HRQoL than the general Swedish population. Fatigue, diarrhoea, limited possibilities to work/pursue daily activities, and worry that the illness will get worse were among the most prevalent, and worst, aspects of disease- and treatment related distress.

BACKGROUND: The correlates of legally significant outcomes that have been identified in people with mental disorders are of limited value in understanding the mechanisms by which these outcomes occur. AIMS: To describe the relationships between mental disorder, impaired psychosocial function, and three legally significant outcomes in a representative sample of the US population. METHODS: We used a population survey, the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC-III, sample size 36,309), to identify people who self-reported serious trouble with the police or the law over the past 12 months and two lifetime outcomes, being incarcerated and engaging in violence to others. DSM-5 categories were generated using the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5. Psychosocial function was assessed using social and role-emotional function scores of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2. RESULTS: Participants with mental disorder, but not people with no diagnosis, who reported serious trouble with the police or with the law during the previous 12 months reported significantly worse psychosocial function than those who did not report such trouble. The size of the statistical effect varied by diagnosis, moderate for some forms of mental illness and for alcohol abuse and nonsignificant for drug abuse and the personality disorders. Effect sizes were largest for diagnoses where legally significant outcomes were least common. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of impaired psychosocial function, for instance in disrupting family and social networks that would otherwise protect against these legally significant outcomes, warrants further investigation in studies with longitudinal designs.