The purpose of this study was to examine principal evaluation as conducted in the public school divisions of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Specifically, the study (1) described principal evaluation policies and procedures currently in place in the school divisions, (2) compared those policies and procedures with "state of the art" ” recommendations in literature, and (3) made recommendations that should prove helpful in the development of principal· evaluation policies and procedures for school divisions. Data for the study were collected from the school divisions of Virginia in two ways. A questionnaire was sent to the chief personnel officer in each division and written policy and procedures were collected from each division. The findings indicated there is a need for updating principal evaluation policy and procedures in many of the public school divisions in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Recent revisions in principal evaluation policy and procedures reported by some of the public school divisions do not evaluate effective leadership. However, it is not necessary for the Virginia Department of Education to develop a principal evaluation prototype since there are a number of excellent principal evaluation programs presently in existence in the school divisions. / Ph. D.

Using the World Bank Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) 2004 data, propensity score matching is utilized to infer a causal impact of private tutoring on the numeracy, literacy, and total outcomes for fourth grade public school students. This research finds that students who self-report that they participate in private tutoring everyday as compared to their peers who never participate in private tutoring scored higher in literacy, numeracy, and total scores. A small Matthew Effect was found as the statistically significant variables used as predictors aligned with socio-economic status. This alignment depicts that the rich become academically richer while the poor become academically poorer. The hybrid public-private education system in Cambodia may be exacerbating inequity for the most marginalized populations.

The search for instructional methodologies which maximize student achievement has been of central concern to educators for many years. Intensified by the recent focus on staff development and school reform initiatives, this search has begun to produce models for school improvement. The majority of the research studies on these models have centered on the academic achievement of inner-city elementary school students in reading and math. One effort to operationalize the research findings has been the instructional model developed by Dr. Madeline Hunter. The few research studies which have been done on her model focus on the effects of teacher training on teacher performance at the elementary level and on student achievement in reading and mathematics. Claims about the effectiveness of teacher training at the secondary level across a wide variety of subject areas and on selected student variables have not been thoroughly substantiated. It was the purpose of this study to determine if the Instructional Effectiveness Model of Madeline Hunter could be applied at the secondary level and to determine what effects the training would have on teacher performance and on selected student variables. This study was conducted employing 14 secondary school teachers, seven in the experimental group and seven in the control group. one class from each teacher's schedule was videotaped prior to and after training. Using the Instructional Skills Observation Instrument each videotape was scored by outside observers. Teachers in the experimental group were also presented with four questionnaires which were used to determine the teacher's perceptions of the content and process of the training sessions. Students in each class (N= 245) were measured in regard to class attendance, number of class discipline referrals, class grade point average, class attitude, and class achievement. In addition, four students from each teacher's class (56 students in total) were interviewed to determine their opinion of how the training affected them. The information obtained from the classroom observations, teacher questionnaires and student interviews was supplemented by ethnographic data. The findings indicated that the teachers in the experimental group did not teach differently than teachers in the control group. The findings also indicated that the selected secondary students of teachers in the experimental group did not differ from selected secondary students of teachers in the control group in overall class attendance, class grade point average, class attitude, and class achievement. There was a significant difference in overall number of class discipline referrals by sex. The correlation between the teacher's performance score as measured on the ISOI and their mean class score on each of the student variables was not significant. The findings from the ethnographic data corroborated the quantitative findings. / Ed. D.

The impetus of this paper is a survey conducted in Taylor County, Florida, by the writer. The survey was more extensive than intensive; for example, fifty people were submitted a questionnaire containing five questions; and were chosen at random to represent a cross section of the people of the county. Several professional people, laborers, housewives, filling station operators are typical examples of people applying to the survey. The five questions or statements submitted pertained to Taylor County schools. / Typescript. / "May 1955." / "A Paper." / "Submitted to the Graduate Council of Florida State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts." / Advisor: Harris W. Dean, Professor Directing Paper. / Includes bibliographical references.

The face of North America's public education system is changing. Across the United States, hundreds of thousands of students have migrated away from traditional public school into charter schools. While both are considered public schools, often that is where the similarity ends. Claims and counter claims have been made about the virtues and advantages of a charter school versus the traditional public school. This study, focused on the nation's sixth-largest school system in Broward County, Florida, compares comments from stakeholders involved in charter programs to feedback from those still involved in the traditional public system. Three hypotheses are evaluated including: whether traditional schools are not adequately serving the needs of students; whether charter schools are better at serving student needs; or people believe that charter schools are doing a better job at serving the needs of students. Evidence suggests that while each model of education has its advantages and disadvantages, neither clearly provides a ""better" opportunity for students. Conclusions are that consumer perceptions are driving the shift in enrollment. This is attributed to the narrative about "choice" created by charter school advocates that aligns with American ideologies of liberty, freedom and independence. Ultimately, it is argued that the deconstruction of the traditional public education system is part of a larger effort to shift selected rights and privileges out of the public sphere and back into private control. For traditional public schools to regain momentum, they must learn to control the narrative and ultimately public policy and public opinion about our nation's public schools. / by Merrie Elyn Meyers. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2013. / Includes bibliography. / Mode of access: World Wide Web. / System requirements: Adobe Reader.

Submitted by Maria de Lourdes Mariano (lmariano@ufscar.br) on 2017-01-18T17:39:26Z No. of bitstreams: 1 NOGUEIRA_Danielle_2015.pdf: 13929503 bytes, checksum: 6c1c668a5af79ad2dc2030614419188d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Maria de Lourdes Mariano (lmariano@ufscar.br) on 2017-01-18T17:39:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 NOGUEIRA_Danielle_2015.pdf: 13929503 bytes, checksum: 6c1c668a5af79ad2dc2030614419188d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Maria de Lourdes Mariano (lmariano@ufscar.br) on 2017-01-18T17:39:43Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 NOGUEIRA_Danielle_2015.pdf: 13929503 bytes, checksum: 6c1c668a5af79ad2dc2030614419188d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-18T17:39:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 NOGUEIRA_Danielle_2015.pdf: 13929503 bytes, checksum: 6c1c668a5af79ad2dc2030614419188d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-02-12 / Não recebi financiamento / This study aims to understand the sense made by teachers about the external evaluation called SARESP (São Paulo State System of School Performance Evaluation) in a priority public school in São Paulo?s countryside. Theoretical support are used some authors who are dedicated to assessing the theme as Freitas, Barriga and Luckesi. In order to understand the meanings produced by teachers, this research opt for the qualitative methodology, case study, in which I propose to analyze the speeches of the subjects involved in this school context for understanding the relationship between the events described and the school failed, Since the school is considered a priority for the Secretary of Education of São Paulo (SEE-SP) due to low results obtained in SARESP. In this analysis I appropriate the concept of sense and meaning proposed by Vygotsky to understand from their comments, to the methodological construction of the research I appropriate to Lüdke, André and Certeau and discussion about school failure and use as a reference Esteban Patto. The data and analysis from the theoretical framework and statements of the teachers, signal the blame teachers for the results of this assessment creating a network of guilty that begins by category, but evolves in the use of their tactics to a larger share of blame for the Portuguese language and mathematics teachers. In the culprits game apex is the student himself in the individualization of failure, institutionalized as intellectual deficient. The data also led us to the need to understand what becomes the intellectual deficiency, understood as an element of materiality of school failure in this dissertation / Esta pesquisa tem por objetivo compreender os sentidos produzidos pelos professores sobre a avaliação externa SARESP (Sistema de Avaliação do Rendimento Escolar de São Paulo) em uma escola prioritária da Rede Estadual do interior de São Paulo. Como suporte teórico é utilizado alguns autores que se dedicam a temática da avaliação como Freitas, Barriga e Luckesi no campo da avaliação. A fim de compreender os sentidos produzidos pelos professores, nessa pesquisa opto pela metodologia qualitativa e estudo de caso, no qual me proponho à análise das falas dos sujeitos envolvidos nesse contexto da escola para entender a relação entre a avaliação externa e o fracasso escolar. Nessa análise me aproprio do conceito de sentido e significado proposto por Vigotsky para a compreensão das falas dos sujeitos; para a construção metodológica da pesquisa me aproprio de Lüdke, André e Certeau; e para discussão sobre o fracasso escolar utilizo como referencial Esteban e Patto. Os dados obtidos e sua análise, a partir do referencial teórico e das falas dos professores, sinalizam a responsabilização dos professores pelos resultados dessa avaliação criando uma rede de culpados que se inicia pela categoria, mas evolui no uso de suas táticas para uma parcela representada pelos professores de Língua Portuguesa e Matemática. No ápice do jogo de culpados se encontra o próprio aluno na individualização do fracasso, institucionalizado como deficiente intelectual. Os dados também nos levaram à necessidade de compreender o que vem a ser a deficiência intelectual, compreendida como um dos elementos da materialidade do fracasso escolar nesta dissertação

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2018-09-26T10:03:29Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Marcela Araujo de Mello Lemos.pdf: 5272715 bytes, checksum: 7059c0319546ce9da11db6e50706835e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-26T10:03:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Marcela Araujo de Mello Lemos.pdf: 5272715 bytes, checksum: 7059c0319546ce9da11db6e50706835e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-08-17 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq / The study aims to analyze geography curriculum of São Paulo state, as product of the 2008 São Paulo Faz Escola program, from SARESP evaluation applied to elementary school between 2009 and 2013. To achieve this goal, the following documents were consult as a primary source: Curricular Proposal of São Paulo State (2010), Array of Reference for Evaluation – SARESP (2009), SARESP Educational Reports (2009, 2010 and 2013) and Geography Notebooks for Teachers (2014). Finally, the Students Newspaper (2008) as secondary source. This research justifies the relevance when considering that the São Paulo Faz Escola program, created by the government of São Paulo state in 2008, aimed at improving the quality of education in accordance with the proposals linked to the interests of the major international institutions, like the World Bank. Therefore, the hypothesis is that SARESP is an assessment designed to shape the curriculum. This hypothesis confirmed when noticed the poor quality of the items produced for evaluation, containing conceptual errors and incompatibility between the skill and the theme of the question. In addition, the Array of Reference for Evaluation containing the guidelines for the SARESP was a document prepared and published before the Curricular Proposal of São Paulo, configuring this curriculum as assessed conformed to the reports of international institutions / O presente trabalho tem como objetivo analisar o currículo de Geografia do estado de São Paulo, constituído no programa São Paulo Faz Escola, de 2008, a partir da avaliação SARESP de Geografia aplicada para o Ensino Fundamental II, entre os anos de 2009 e 2013. Para atingir este objetivo, foram consultados os seguintes documentos como fonte primária: Proposta Curricular do Estado de São Paulo (2008 e 2010), Matriz de Referência para Avaliação – SARESP (2009), Relatórios Pedagógicos do SARESP dos anos de 2009, 2011 e 2013 e os Cadernos do Professor de Geografia de 2014 e Jornais do Aluno de EF II que datam de 2008, como fonte secundária. Justifica-se, então, a relevância desta pesquisa ao se considerar que o programa São Paulo Faz Escola, criado pelo governo do estado de São Paulo em 2008, teve como objetivo a melhoria da qualidade da educação de acordo com as propostas ligadas aos interesses dos grandes órgãos internacionais, como Banco Mundial. Sendo assim, levanta-se como hipótese a ideia de que o SARESP é uma avaliação elaborada para modelar o currículo. Esta hipótese foi confirmada, quando se percebeu a baixa qualidade das questões produzidas para a avaliação, contendo erros conceituais da disciplina e incompatibilidade entre a habilidade e o tema da questão. Além disso, a Matriz de Referência para Avaliação contendo as orientações para o SARESP foi um documento elaborado e publicado antes da Proposta Curricular do Estado de São Paulo, configurando este currículo como avaliado e que obedece aos ditames do mercado internacional