Thèse de doctorat : Études germaniques : Paris 12 : 2003. / Titre provenant de l'écran-titre. Bibliogr. f. 479-516. Index.

No description available.

Mémoire de maîtrise - Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 2003. / Bibliogr.: f. 99-100.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--York University, 1999. Graduate Programme in Social and Political Thought. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 225-231). Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/yorku/fullcit?pNQ43428.

Thesis--Marburg. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 180-197).

Diss. : Philosophie : Augsburg : 1979. - Bibliogr. p. 197-206. Index. -

This study is an interpretation of the social and political thought and methodology of Karl Popper, one of the most heralded yet controversial philosophers of our time. The goal has been to provide a more coherent, accurate, and systematic account of Popper's thought and of its relevance to students of politics and society than currently exists by, first, emphasizing certain historical and contextual factors in connection with the structure and development of his ideas which rule out certain contemporary misunderstandings of his thought, and secondly, by allowing Popper's own formulations to take precedence over those of his commentators, regardless of their sympathies and estimate of Popper's massive intellectual legacy. It is my principal argument that the unity of Popper's philosophy lies in its moral dimension, his life long determination to conserve the intellectual foundations of hope and progress that human autonomy requires--the distinctively Kantian belief that mind can and should be decisive in practical affairs no less than in the struggle with nature, the twin pillars of the Enlightenment and modern liberalism alike. Given the nature of our times--a century of "total" wars, endless crises, and one intellectual revolution after another--such an endeavour is no small achievement. I have tried to capture the propositional cutting-edge of my interpretation of Popper's thought in the keywords of the subtitle of this study: that, without the belief in the possibility of objective truth--knowledge that is independent of whether we wish to acknowledge its existence or not, there is little hope in the future prospects of the "open societies" of the Western world, and that one of the gravest errors of the liberalism of the past was its underestimation of the need to institutionalise its best interests against the threat of many forms of illiberal power known in our time, particularly of the "unintended" variety. I accordingly argue that Popper's vision is best characterised as a combat-toughened conception of reality, and of the corresponding rationality necessary to survive, let alone to live well, as the Western tradition of political theory has held to be desirable. / Arts, Faculty of / Political Science, Department of / Graduate

余子恆. / 複印本. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學, 1988. / Fu yin ben. / Includes bibliographical references: leaves 176-190. / Yu Ziheng. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 1988.

Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學. / Ms. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 191-195). / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue. / 序言 --- p.1-6 / 導言 --- p.7-12 / Chapter 第一章 --- 分界問題及歸納法問題之歷史淵源 --- p.13-42 / 前言 --- p.13-14 / Chapter （一） --- 康德三分界問題 --- p.15-27 / Chapter （二） --- 休謨之歸納法問題　 --- p.28-42 / Chapter 第二章 --- 分界問題及歸納法問題之解決 --- p.43-94 / 前言 --- p.43 / Chapter （一） --- 哲學是什麼及哲學家的責任　 --- p.44-47 / Chapter （二） --- 知識論的概念 --- p.48-53 / Chapter (i) --- 知識論是什麼 --- p.48-50 / Chapter (ii) --- 心理主義之消除 --- p.50-53 / Chapter （三） --- 分界問題 --- p.54-78 / Chapter (i) --- 波柏爾的分界標準 --- p.54-64 / Chapter (ii) --- 分界標準所引起的困難 --- p.64-68 / Chapter (iii) --- 邏輯實証論的分界標準 --- p.68-71 / Chapter (iv) --- 波柏爾對於邏輯實徵論的分界標準之批判 --- p.71-78 / Chapter （A） --- 可否証性與可檢証性 --- p.71-75 / Chapter (B) --- 意義問題 --- p.75-78 / Chapter （四） --- 归納法問題　 --- p.79-94 / Chapter 第三章 --- 客观知識論之原素　 --- p.95-156 / 前言 --- p.95 / Chapter （一） --- 形而上實在論 --- p.96-104 / Chapter （二） --- 科學的目的 --- p.105-115 / Chapter （三） --- 真理論 --- p.116-126 / Chapter （四） --- 三個世界´ؤ´ؤ沒有認知主體的知識論 --- p.127-147 / Chapter （五） --- 批判主觀知識論 --- p.149-156 / Chapter 第四章 --- 關於客觀知識論的討論 --- p.157-190 / 前言 --- p.157 / Chapter （一） --- 關於知識概念的討論　 --- p.160-170 / Chapter （二） --- 關於分界標準可否証性的討論 --- p.171-180 / Chapter （三） --- 關於歸納法問題的討論 --- p.181-183 / Chapter （四） --- 關於三個世界問題的討論 --- p.184-190 / 参攷書籍 --- p.191-195

Habil.-Schr.--Innsbruck--Universität, 1998. / Bibliogr. p. 655-673.