[Truncated abstract] Traditional medicines are used by millions of people throughout the world as their primary source of medical care. A range of materials are in used traditional medicines including plant and animal parts. Even though the traditional medicine trade is estimated to be worth sixty billion dollars annually the trade remains largely unregulated. Unscrupulous practices by vendors to increase their profit margins such as substituting and adulterating expensive material with cheaper varieties go unchecked. This can be dangerous to consumers because some substitutions involve poisonous material. Also, animal parts from endangered species can find their way into traditional medicines, therefore there needs to be a way to identify them in traditional medicines to prosecute poachers. The traditional techniques used for the identification of material used in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) include, morphological, histological, chemical and immunological analysis. However, these techniques have their limitations. This makes applying multiple techniques essential to provide thorough authentication of the material. DNA profiling provides a technique well suited to analysing material used in TCM. DNA profiling is advantageous over other techniques used to authenticate material used in TCM because it requires only a small sample amount, can determine the cultivator, be used on all forms of TCM and potentially distinguish the components of mixtures. ... Therefore, profiles of different species/individual are different and species? can be distinguished. Commercially sold traditional medicines are processed which is likely to degrade the DNA of the sample making extraction and amplification difficult. Here an organic Phenol:Chloroform extraction technique extracted DNA from commercial dried root samples. The extracted DNA was amplifiable using RAPD primers. The RAPD primers used here produced enough polymorphic bands to distinguish different plant species. They were used to distinguish commercial samples that were sold as three different species within the Panax genus, Panax ginseng, Panax quinquefolium and Panax notoginseng and genetically unrelated plant material; Potato and Eleutherococcus senticosus. Liquid samples and mixtures were also profiled with the RAPD primers to determine whether the RAPD primers provide enough distinguishing ability to analyse these forms of TCM. DNA was extracted from the liquid samples, one a ginseng drink and the other an ginseng extractum. However, there was no reliability in the production of PCR products. The analysis of the mixture samples found that not enough polymorphic bands were produced by the RAPD primers used here to identify Panax species within mixtures of two Panax species. While when P. ginseng was mixed with a genetically unrelated sample there was enough polymorphism to differentiate the two samples in the mixture. The results of this research show that RAPD analysis provides a simple and inexpensive technique to begin analysis of materials used in TCM. Using RAPD analysis it is possible to distinguish Panax plant species from each other. However, the RAPD primers used here did not provide enough reproducibility or polymorphism to analyse liquid and mixtures of Panax species plants.

The objective of this study was to identify DNA markers for each of six added C-genome chromosomes in Triticum aestivum L. cv. 'Alceso'-Aegilops caudata L. addition lines using the randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique. DNA from Ae. caudata, T. aestivum, amphiploid of T. aestivum X Ae. caudata, and six disomic addition lines of wheat having a pair of Ae. caudata chromosomes was used as the template for the amplification of RAPD markers with a total of 58 random 10-mer oligonucleotide primers. Two primers, OPC-08 and OPJ-16, produced one intense band each from the amphiploid of T. aestivum X Ae. caudata and Ae. caudata, which was absent in all six addition lines. Each of these two primers produced a chromosome marker that could be tentatively located to the chromosome CA of Ae. caudata. OPJ-02, OPD-12, OPD-02, OPJ-12, OPD-20, and OPJ-14 produced a marker each for CB, CC, CD, CE, CF, and CG, respectively. OPJ-09 produced C-genome chromosome-specific RAPD markers. Also, OPC-05 and OPJ-19 produced RAPDs from both wheat and Ae. caudata genomes.

Τρεις ευρέως χρησιμοποιούμενες μέθοδοι τυποποίησης, μια βιοχημική (API20NE), μια φαινοτυπική (SDS-PAGE) και μια μοριακή (RAPD) χρησιμοποιήθηκαν για την ταυτοποίηση και ταξινόμηση 160 περιβαλλοντικών ψευδομονάδων που απομονώθηκαν από το υδάτινο περιβάλλον της Νοτιοδυτικής Ελλάδας και συγκεκριμένα από εμφιαλωμένα νερά (46%), νερά δικτύου ύδρευσης (16%), κολυμβητικών δεξαμενών (9%) και θαλασσών (29%). Οι ψευδομονάδες ταυτοποιήθηκαν με βάση το βιοχημικό τους αποτύπωμα δια μέσου του συστήματος ΑΡΙ20ΝΕ, και στη συνέχεια υποβλήθηκαν σε ηλεκτροφόρηση των ολικών πρωτεϊνών τους (SDS-PAGE) και σε ανάλυση του γενετικού τους υλικού με τη μέθοδο RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNAs) με χρήση δύο διαφορετικών δεκαμερών εκκινητών (primers). Το σύστημα API20NE ταυτοποίησε το 88% των στελεχών διακρίνοντας 14 ομάδες-είδη, ενώ η SDS-PAGE ταξινόμησε το 98.1% σε 20 ομάδες και η RAPD το 94% των στελεχών σε 22 και 34 ομάδες, με εκκινητή τον OPA-13 και τον OPD-13 αντίστοιχα. Η ταξινόμηση προέκυψε με εφαρμογή της ανάλυσης κατά συστάδες (cluster analysis) των αποτυπωμάτων (πρωτεϊνικών και γενετικών) που παρήγαγαν τα στελέχη. Τα 20 στελέχη που δεν ταυτοποιήθηκαν σε επίπεδο είδους με το API20NE, ταξινομήθηκαν με την SDS-PAGE σε ποσοστό 100%, ενώ με την RAPD σε ποσοστό 90%. Οι τρεις μέθοδοι συγκρίθηκαν ως προς την επαναληψιμότητα (reproducibility), την ικανότητα τυποποίησης (typeability) και τη διακριτική ικανότητα (discriminatory power). Την μεγαλύτερη επαναληψιμότητα έδωσαν το API20NE και η RAPD με τον εκκινητή OPA-13, την μεγαλύτερη ικανότητα τυποποίησης η SDS-PAGE, ενώ τη μεγαλύτερη διακριτική ικανότητα έδωσε η RAPD με τον εκκινητή OPD-13. Η πλέον σωστή ταξινόμηση, όπως προέκυψε από τη διακριτή ανάλυση, επιτεύχθη με τη μέθοδο SDS-PAGE. Η παρούσα εργασία αποδεικνύει ότι τα βιοχημικά συστήματα ταυτοποίησης (όπως το API20NE) μπορούν να χρησιμοποιηθούν με αξιοπιστία μόνο για αδρή αναγνώριση των περιβαλλοντικών ψευδομονάδων. Πληροφορίες σε βάθος για την ταυτότητα και τη φύση τους μπορούν να εξαχθούν με τη περαιτέρω εφαρμογή ηλεκτροφορητικών και μοριακών μεθόδων. Δεδομένης της ευρείας διασποράς, της ετερογένειας και της, έστω και δυνητικής, παθογόνου δράσης των ψευδομονάδων, είναι σημαντικό, από πλευράς δημόσιας υγείας, ο προσδιορισμός της ταυτότητάς τους να γίνεται με συνδυασμένη εφαρμογή βιοχημικών, ηλεκτροφορητικών και μοριακών μεθόδων ώστε να καθίσταται δυνατή η αναγνώριση στελεχών που μπορούν να αποτελέσουν αιτιολογικούς παράγοντες ασθενειών, ιδιαίτερα σε ομάδες υψηλού κινδύνου. / Three broadly used typing techniques, one biochemical (API20NE), one phenotypic (SDS-PAGE) and one molecular (RAPD), were employed for the identification and taxonomy of 160 environmental pseudomonas isolated from the aquatic environment in Southwestern Greece. In particular, the isolates were obtained from bottled waters (46%), potable waters (16%), waters from swimming pools (9%) and seawaters (29%). The isolates were identified by the system API20NE and then subjected to whole-cell protein electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Random Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPD) using two 10-mer primers. The API20NE system identified 88% of the whole bacterial population and classified them in 14 species, while SDS-PAGE classified 98.1% of the isolates in 20 groups and RAPD classified 94% of the strains in 22 groups using the primer OPA-13 and 34 groups using the primer OPD-13. The classification was achieved by applying cluster analysis in the protein or RAPD fingerprints of the isolates. Twenty isolates that could not be identified by the API20NE system, at least to the species level, were classified by the SDS-PAGE and the RAPD in a percentage of 100% and 90%, respectively. The reproducibility, typeability and discriminatory power of the three methods were compared to evaluate their application. The API20NE and the RAPD assay with primer OPA-13 showed better reproducibility in comparison with the other methods; the higher typeability was achieved by the SDS-PAGE assay while the higher discriminatory power was that obtained by the RAPD method with the primer OPD-13. The SDS-PAGE gave the higher percentage of “correctly classified” isolates, as it was assessed by discriminant analysis. This study shows that the rapid identification systems, such as the API20NE, may be reliable only for a rough characterization of environmental Pseudomonas. In order to acquire further information about their identities, other phenotypic and molecular techniques have to be applied. Given the ubiquity, heterogeneity and pathogenicity, either established or potential, of the environmental pseudomonas it is important, from a public health point of view, to monitor the identities of environmental Pseudomonas isolates using the combination of specific methods, so as to be possible for strains, which can serve as causative agents of diseases, especially in high risk population, to be recognizable.