Ce mémoire s’intéresse aux deux traductions en roumain du roman Kamouraska d’Anne Hébert. La première traduction paraît en Roumanie en 1986 à partir de la version anglaise qu’avait proposée Norman Shapiro en 1973. La deuxième traduction, faite cette fois à partir de la version originale française, paraît en 2008. Notre étude contient une présentation du cadre sociopolitique dans lequel a été faite la première traduction de Kamouraska sous le régime communiste, après quoi nous nous penchons sur le contexte de publication des deux traductions et sur des éléments paratextuels : couvertures, quatrièmes de couverture, préfaces, etc. L’examen des principales caractéristiques du style d’Anne Hébert dans Kamouraska est suivi d’une analyse comparative de quelques extraits significatifs du roman dans la première et la deuxième traductions. Nous présentons ensuite notre version française des deux préfaces aux traductions de Kamouraska : la première est signée par Irina Bădescu, et la seconde, par Cătălin Sturza. La traduction française de ces deux textes vient enrichir notre connaissance de la réflexion critique qui est faite de ce roman partout dans le monde. / Abstract : This M.A. thesis focuses on the two translations of Anne Hébert’s novel Kamouraska into Romanian. Published in Romania in 1986, the first translation was done from the English version that Norman Shapiro proposed in 1973. The second translation, this time done directly from the original French version, was published in 2008. We aim at introducing the political context in which the first translation of Kamouraska was made, more specifically under the Communist regime. We then proceed to present the editorial context of these two translations as well as some of the paratextual elements: covers, back covers, prefaces, etc. A survey of Anne Hébert’s main stylistic features in writing Kamouraska is followed by a comparative analysis of significant excerpts from the novel for the first and the second translation. Afterwards we introduce our French version of the two prefaces to the translations of Kamouraska: the first is signed by Irina Bădescu, and the second by Cătălin Sturza. The French translation of these two introductions enriches the critical understanding that is done of that novel everywhere in the world.

(in English): This Thesis deals with the phenomenon of indirect translation. Since indirect translation is still relatively common in the Czech culture, but at the same time rather understudied, the aim of this Thesis is to describe the phenomenon in more detail and with the help of an actual text analysis to investigate the influence this method has on the final translation. Two texts were chosen for the analysis, both written by the Dutch historian Johan Huizinga, being a characteristic sample of the bibliography of Czech indirect translations of Dutch written works. Compiling this bibliography was one of the tasks of this Thesis. It documents the extent to which indirect translation was used in past and present, and it also shows what kind of texts are most likely to be translated indirectly. Finally, the chosen texts were reduced (using sample method) to fragments that were then analysed in terms of stylistic and semantic shifts. According to the analysis the most common shifts appeared to the stylistic ones, mostly those that result in weakening the original style of the author in favour of the translator's own style. What the semantic shifts concerns, in comparison with the mediating translation they seem to occur twice as often in the mediated translation.