During the seven years when Clarice Lispector published her chronicles in the newspaper Jornal do Brasil (1967 1973), she republished several novels from books which had been put into print prior to her work in the newspaper, as well as first versions of texts that would be later re-edited in other communication vehicles. This aim of this paper is to outline those publications and analyze the effects from this constant self-plagiarism on Lispectors work in the newspapers and books. We establish that these repetitions are due, on one hand, to the authors negligence regarding her activities in the newspaper, once we assume that there is no effort from Clarice to produce original chronicles. On the other hand, she seemed to be more interested on publishing some texts than others, what would point some kind of explicit literary choice and a need for reaffirming and re-reading her own texts by republishing them. The analysis of the changes performed between the publications reveals what reformulations were made and, in the case of the texts which had suffered almost no changes, how does this fact establish an interest on reaffirming their importance, by exposing them to different audiences. We believe that the \"self-plagiarism\", by revealing the author\'s quest for the comprehension of her own work, points out to the major problematics of Clarician\'s creative processes. / During the seven years when Clarice Lispector published her chronicles in the newspaper Jornal do Brasil (1967 1973), she republished several novels from books which had been put into print prior to her work in the newspaper, as well as first versions of texts that would be later re-edited in other communication vehicles. This aim of this paper is to outline those publications and analyze the effects from this constant self-plagiarism on Lispectors work in the newspapers and books. We establish that these repetitions are due, on one hand, to the authors negligence regarding her activities in the newspaper, once we assume that there is no effort from Clarice to produce original chronicles. On the other hand, she seemed to be more interested on publishing some texts than others, what would point some kind of explicit literary choice and a need for reaffirming and re-reading her own texts by republishing them. The analysis of the changes performed between the publications reveals what reformulations were made and, in the case of the texts which had suffered almost no changes, how does this fact establish an interest on reaffirming their importance, by exposing them to different audiences. We believe that the \"self-plagiarism\", by revealing the author\'s quest for the comprehension of her own work, points out to the major problematics of Clarician\'s creative processes.

During the seven years when Clarice Lispector published her chronicles in the newspaper Jornal do Brasil (1967 1973), she republished several novels from books which had been put into print prior to her work in the newspaper, as well as first versions of texts that would be later re-edited in other communication vehicles. This aim of this paper is to outline those publications and analyze the effects from this constant self-plagiarism on Lispectors work in the newspapers and books. We establish that these repetitions are due, on one hand, to the authors negligence regarding her activities in the newspaper, once we assume that there is no effort from Clarice to produce original chronicles. On the other hand, she seemed to be more interested on publishing some texts than others, what would point some kind of explicit literary choice and a need for reaffirming and re-reading her own texts by republishing them. The analysis of the changes performed between the publications reveals what reformulations were made and, in the case of the texts which had suffered almost no changes, how does this fact establish an interest on reaffirming their importance, by exposing them to different audiences. We believe that the \"self-plagiarism\", by revealing the author\'s quest for the comprehension of her own work, points out to the major problematics of Clarician\'s creative processes. / During the seven years when Clarice Lispector published her chronicles in the newspaper Jornal do Brasil (1967 1973), she republished several novels from books which had been put into print prior to her work in the newspaper, as well as first versions of texts that would be later re-edited in other communication vehicles. This aim of this paper is to outline those publications and analyze the effects from this constant self-plagiarism on Lispectors work in the newspapers and books. We establish that these repetitions are due, on one hand, to the authors negligence regarding her activities in the newspaper, once we assume that there is no effort from Clarice to produce original chronicles. On the other hand, she seemed to be more interested on publishing some texts than others, what would point some kind of explicit literary choice and a need for reaffirming and re-reading her own texts by republishing them. The analysis of the changes performed between the publications reveals what reformulations were made and, in the case of the texts which had suffered almost no changes, how does this fact establish an interest on reaffirming their importance, by exposing them to different audiences. We believe that the \"self-plagiarism\", by revealing the author\'s quest for the comprehension of her own work, points out to the major problematics of Clarician\'s creative processes.

Este trabalho tem por objetivo verificar se há impacto das republicações das demonstrações contábeis das empresas com ações negociadas na Bovespa no período de 2000 a 2010, no preço de suas ações. O estudo parte do pressuposto de que o mercado Brasileiro de ações é semiforte. A metodologia utilizada nesta pesquisa foi em parte qualitativa ao descrever a amostra e suas características assim como quantitativa na forma dos testes de diferenças de média. Os resultados dos testes mostram que ao se analisar toda a amostra como um único grupo, os retornos anormais encontrados não mostraram diferença significativa em comparação com os valores esperados calculados, mas quando analisados em segmentações distintas pelo tipo de motivação à republicação, foram encontrados evidências de que há diferença significativa entre as amostras das republicações das demonstrações contábeis voluntárias e obrigatórias. Assim como também foram encontrados evidências de que pode haver diferença significativa entre as amostras segmentadas pela natureza do erro apresentado com justificativa para a republicação da demonstração contábil, tanto nos casos de mensuração, quanto classificação e reconhecimento. A mesma evidência é apresentada nos gráficos das médias dos retornos anormais calculados para este estudo. / This work aims to check for impact of restatements of the companies whose shares are traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange in the period from 2000 to 2010, in its stock price. The study assumes that the Brazilian stock market is semistrong. The methodology used in this research was qualitative in part to describe the sample and its characteristics as well as in the form of quantitative tests of differences in average. The test results show that to analyze the entire sample as a single group, the abnormal returns showed significant difference found in comparison with the expected values calculated, but when analyzed in distinct cleavages by the kind of motivation to republication, were found evidence that there is significant difference between the samples of republications of voluntary and mandatory financial statements. So how were also found evidence that there may be significant differences between the segmented samples by the nature of the error made with justification for the republication of the financial statement, both in case of measurement, classification and recognition. The same evidence is presented in the graphs of the averages of the abnormal returns calculated for this study.

Este trabalho tem por objetivo verificar se há impacto das republicações das demonstrações contábeis das empresas com ações negociadas na Bovespa no período de 2000 a 2010, no preço de suas ações. O estudo parte do pressuposto de que o mercado Brasileiro de ações é semiforte. A metodologia utilizada nesta pesquisa foi em parte qualitativa ao descrever a amostra e suas características assim como quantitativa na forma dos testes de diferenças de média. Os resultados dos testes mostram que ao se analisar toda a amostra como um único grupo, os retornos anormais encontrados não mostraram diferença significativa em comparação com os valores esperados calculados, mas quando analisados em segmentações distintas pelo tipo de motivação à republicação, foram encontrados evidências de que há diferença significativa entre as amostras das republicações das demonstrações contábeis voluntárias e obrigatórias. Assim como também foram encontrados evidências de que pode haver diferença significativa entre as amostras segmentadas pela natureza do erro apresentado com justificativa para a republicação da demonstração contábil, tanto nos casos de mensuração, quanto classificação e reconhecimento. A mesma evidência é apresentada nos gráficos das médias dos retornos anormais calculados para este estudo. / This work aims to check for impact of restatements of the companies whose shares are traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange in the period from 2000 to 2010, in its stock price. The study assumes that the Brazilian stock market is semistrong. The methodology used in this research was qualitative in part to describe the sample and its characteristics as well as in the form of quantitative tests of differences in average. The test results show that to analyze the entire sample as a single group, the abnormal returns showed significant difference found in comparison with the expected values calculated, but when analyzed in distinct cleavages by the kind of motivation to republication, were found evidence that there is significant difference between the samples of republications of voluntary and mandatory financial statements. So how were also found evidence that there may be significant differences between the segmented samples by the nature of the error made with justification for the republication of the financial statement, both in case of measurement, classification and recognition. The same evidence is presented in the graphs of the averages of the abnormal returns calculated for this study.