by Yuan Dingyang. / "September 2004." / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 206-232). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Mode of access: World Wide Web. / Abstracts in English and Chinese.

No description available.

Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), an aphid transmitted luteovirus, is the most widespread and economically damaging virus of cereal crops. The work in this thesis aims to characterise the basis of the naturally occurring resistance to BYDV in cereals in three ways: Firstly, by facilitating the isolation of the Yd2 gene for BYDV resistance from barley by a map-based approach. Secondly, by determining if a BYDV resistance gene in rice is orthologous to Yd2. Thirdly, by establishing if other BYDV resistance genes in non- Ethiopian barleys are allelic to Yd2. It is hoped that the information generated in this study will ultimately assist in the production of BYDV resistant cereal cultivars. A detailed genetic map of the Yd2 region of barley chromosome 3 was constructed, containing 19 RFLP loci, the centromere and the Yd2 gene. Yd2 mapped on the long arm, 0.5 cM from the centromere, and in the mapping population of 106 F2 individuals, perfectly cosegregated with the RFLP loci XYlp, and Xwg889. This map represents the first stage in a project to isolate the Yd2 gene by a map-based approach. The isolation of Yd2 could help to elucidate the molecular mechanism of the Yd2-mediated BYDV resistance, and may allow the production of BYDV resistant cereals by genetic transformation. The RFLP markers mapped closest to Yd2 could also be useful in barley breeding, by enabling selection for both the presence of Yd2 and the absence of agronomically undesirable traits known to be closely linked to Yd2. Genetically Directed Representational Difference Analysis (GDRDA) is a technique based on subtractive hybridisation, which can be used to identify RFLP markers closely linked to a gene of interest. Two GDRDA experiments were performed with the intention of generating additional RFLP markers close to Yd2. However, the first experiment yielded RFLP probes that were not derived from the barley genome, while the second experiment yielded probes that detected repetitive sequences. It was concluded that GDRDA is of limited use in generating further markers close to Yd2. To isolate the Yd2 gene by a map-based approach, a much larger mapping population will need to be analysed to genetically resolve markers tightly linked to Yd2. If the two morphological markers uzu dwarf and white stripe,,j flank Yd2, then they could assist in this task by enabling the visual identification of F2 seedlings resulting from recombination close to Yd2. However, in this study, both morphological markers were found to be located distal to Yd2. Therefore, these two morphological markers can not be used together to facilitate high resolution genetic mapping of the Yd2 locus. It may be possible to use large-insert genomic DNA clones from the relatively small genome of rice to generate further RFLP markers close to the Yd2 gene in barley, provided that the order of orthologous sequences in barley and rice is conserved close to the Yd2 locus. To assess the feasibility of this approach, RFLP probes used to identify loci close to Yd2 were mapped in rice using a segregating rice F2 population. Five of the RFLP loci mapped together and in the same order as RFLP loci mapped close to Yd2 in barley using the same probes. By comparing the location of RFLPs mapped by other researchers in rice using probes mapped close to Yd2, the region of conserved linkage between rice and the Yd2 region was tentatively identified as the central portion of rice chromosome 1. The collinearity shown by orthologous sequences in barley and rice indicated that it may indeed be possible to use rice to assist in generating RFLP markers close to Yd2. Of all the cereals, rice is the most amenable to map-based gene isolation, due to its small genome, well developed physical and genetic maps, and its ability to be genetically transformed with high efficiency. If a BYDV resistance gene that is orthologous to Yd2 could be identified in rice, this gene could be isolated with relative ease, and then used to identify barley cDNA clones corresponding to Yd2 gene by virtue of the sequence homology expected between these genes. To test if a BYDV resistance gene from an Italian rice line is orthologous to Yd2, recombinant-inbred rice lines previously characterised for this gene were analysed using probes mapped close to Yd2 in barley. No genetic linkage was detected between the RFLP loci and the BYDV resistance gene, indicating that the gene is unlikely to be orthologous to Yd2. BYDV resistance alleles at the Yd2 locus which are of a non-Ethiopian origin may show interesting differences to Ethiopian Yd2 resistance alleles. To identify barleys which may contain resistance alleles of Yd2, ten BYDV resistant barleys not known to contain Yd2 were assessed for their resistance to the PAVadel isolate of BYDV in the glasshouse. CI 1179, Rojo, Perry, Hannchen, Post and CI 4228 were found to be the most resistant under these conditions, and were analysed further. If the resistance from these barleys is controlled by alleles of Yd2, RFLP markers close to Yd2 will be expected to cosegregate with the resistance in F2 families derived from crosses between these resistant barleys and the BYDV susceptible barleys Atlas and Proctor. RFLPs suitable for use in these allelism tests were identified using probes mapped close to Yd2. However, time did not permit the analysis of these F2 populations. / Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, Dept. of Plant Science, 1996

Includes bibliographical references. The thesis aims to characterise the basis of naturally occuring resistance to BYDV in cereals in three ways: i. A map-based approach to the isolation of the Yd2 gene for BYDV resistance from barley. -- ii. Determining if a BYDV resistance gene in rice is orthologous to Yd2. -- iii. Establishing if other BYDV resistance genes in non-Ethiopian barleys are allelic to Yd2.

by Ng Wing Man. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 156-174). / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / Acknowledgements --- p.iii / Abstract --- p.v / 摘要 --- p.vii / Table of Contents --- p.ix / List of Figures --- p.xiii / List of Tables --- p.xvi / List of Graphs --- p.xvii / List of Abbreviations --- p.xviii / Chapter Chapter 1 --- General Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter Chapter 2 --- Literature Review --- p.3 / Chapter 2.1 --- Human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (hG-CSF) --- p.3 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- Historical background --- p.3 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- Physiological Roles --- p.5 / Chapter 2.1.3 --- Molecular properties --- p.8 / Chapter 2.1.4 --- Biochemical properties --- p.9 / Chapter 2.1.5 --- Comparison to G-CSF of other species --- p.11 / Chapter 2.1.6 --- Biological Activities --- p.12 / Chapter 2.1.7 --- Clinical Applications --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1.7.1 --- Clinical use in myelosuppressive chemotherapy and neutropenic fever --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1.7.2 --- Clinical use in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1.7.3 --- Clinical use in HIV infection --- p.16 / Chapter 2.1.7.4 --- Clinical use in diabetes mellitus --- p.17 / Chapter 2.1.7.5 --- Clinical use in severe chronic neutropenia --- p.18 / Chapter 2.1.7.6 --- Future prospects --- p.18 / Chapter 2.1.7.7 --- Dosages and adverse effects --- p.19 / Chapter 2.1.8 --- Economic value --- p.20 / Chapter 2.2 --- Plant as bioractor --- p.20 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- Medical molecular farming --- p.20 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- Commercial biopharmaceutical proteins --- p.25 / Chapter 2.2.3 --- Transgenic plants producing hematopoietic growth factors --- p.25 / Chapter 2.2.3.1 --- Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) --- p.26 / Chapter 2.2.3.2 --- Interleukin-2 (IL-2) --- p.28 / Chapter 2.3 --- Rice as expression system --- p.29 / Chapter 2.3.1 --- Characteristics --- p.29 / Chapter 2.3.2 --- Advantages of using rice as bioreactor --- p.30 / Chapter 2.3.3 --- Previous studies --- p.31 / Chapter 2.3.4 --- Transformation method --- p.33 / Chapter 2.3.5 --- Super-binary vector --- p.34 / Chapter 2.4 --- Strategies for enhancing protein expression level --- p.36 / Chapter 2.4.1 --- Vacuolar targeting --- p.36 / Chapter 2.4.1.1 --- Protein targeting signals --- p.38 / Chapter 2.4.1.2 --- Binding protein of 80kDa (BP-80) --- p.39 / Chapter 2.4.1.3 --- a-Tonoplast intrinsic protein (α-TIP) --- p.39 / Chapter 2.4.1.4 --- Receptor homology region-transmembrane domain-Ring H2 motif (RMR) --- p.40 / Chapter 2.4.2 --- Fusion with glutelin in rice --- p.41 / Chapter 2.5 --- Hypotheses and aims of this study --- p.43 / Chapter Chapter 3 --- Materials and Methods --- p.45 / Chapter 3.1 --- Introduction --- p.45 / Chapter 3.2 --- Chemicals --- p.45 / Chapter 3.3 --- Bacterial strains --- p.46 / Chapter 3.4 --- Chimeric genes construction --- p.46 / Chapter 3.4.1 --- Protein targeting constructs --- p.51 / Chapter 3.4.2 --- Enterokinase site constructs --- p.60 / Chapter 3.4.3 --- Glutein signal peptide constructs --- p.65 / Chapter 3.4.4 --- Glutelin fusion constructs --- p.70 / Chapter 3.4.5 --- Sequence fidelity of chimeric genes --- p.77 / Chapter 3.4.6 --- Cloning of chimeric genes into rice super-binary vector --- p.77 / Chapter 3.5 --- Rice transformation --- p.79 / Chapter 3.5.1 --- Plant materials --- p.79 / Chapter 3.5.2 --- Agrobacterium transformation --- p.79 / Chapter 3.5.3 --- A grobacterium-mediated transformation of rice --- p.79 / Chapter 3.6 --- Transgenic expression --- p.81 / Chapter 3.6.1 --- Extraction of leaf genomic DNA --- p.81 / Chapter 3.6.2 --- Synthesis of DIG-labeled double-stranded DNA probe --- p.82 / Chapter 3.6.3 --- Southern blot analysis --- p.83 / Chapter 3.6.4 --- Extraction of total RNA from immature rice seeds --- p.84 / Chapter 3.6.5 --- Northern blot analysis --- p.85 / Chapter 3.6.6 --- Protein extraction --- p.86 / Chapter 3.6.7 --- Tricine SDS-PAGE --- p.86 / Chapter 3.6.8 --- Western blot analysis --- p.87 / Chapter 3.6.9 --- Enterokinase digestion of EK fusion proteins --- p.88 / Chapter 3.7 --- Confocal immunoflorescence studies of rhG-CSF in rice grain --- p.89 / Chapter 3.7.1 --- Preparation of sample sections --- p.89 / Chapter 3.7.2 --- Double-labeling of fluorescence probes --- p.89 / Chapter 3.7.3 --- Image collection --- p.90 / Chapter 3.8 --- Functional analysis of rhG-CSF --- p.91 / Chapter 3.8.1 --- Culture of NFS-60 cells --- p.91 / Chapter 3.8.2 --- MTT cell proliferation assay --- p.92 / Chapter 3.9 --- Bacterial expression of anti-hG-CSF --- p.93 / Chapter 3.9.1 --- pET expression in E. coli --- p.93 / Chapter 3.9.2 --- Purification of His-hG-CSF --- p.97 / Chapter 3.9.3 --- Immunization of rabbits --- p.97 / Chapter Chapter 4 --- Results --- p.99 / Chapter 4.1 --- Construction of chimeric genes for rice transformation --- p.99 / Chapter 4.2 --- "Rice transformation, selection and regeneration" --- p.103 / Chapter 4.3 --- Southern blot analysis --- p.105 / Chapter 4.4 --- Northern blot analysis --- p.109 / Chapter 4.5 --- Western blot analysis --- p.114 / Chapter 4.6 --- Enterokinase digestion of EK fusion proteins --- p.125 / Chapter 4.7 --- Confocal immunofluorescence studies of rhG-CSF in transgenic rice grain --- p.128 / Chapter 4.8 --- Functional analysis of rhG-CSF --- p.132 / Chapter 4.9 --- Bacterial expression of anti-hG-CSF --- p.135 / Chapter 4.9.1 --- Expression and purification of recombinant His-hG-CSF in E. coli --- p.135 / Chapter 4.9.2 --- Titer and specificity of the anti-serum --- p.137 / Chapter Chapter 5 --- Discussion --- p.139 / Chapter 5.1 --- Introduction --- p.139 / Chapter 5.2 --- Fusion of hG-CSF with protein sorting determinants --- p.141 / Chapter 5.3 --- Fusion of hG-CSF with rice glutelin --- p.145 / Chapter 5.4 --- Glutelin signal peptide --- p.146 / Chapter 5.5 --- O-glycosylation --- p.148 / Chapter 5.6 --- Enterokinase digestion --- p.148 / Chapter 5.7 --- Expression level of rhG-CSF --- p.149 / Chapter 5.8 --- Functional analysis of rhG-CSF --- p.151 / Chapter 5.9 --- Future perspectives --- p.151 / Chapter Chapter 6 --- Conclusion --- p.155 / References --- p.156

Two problems hampering efforts to produce salt-tolerant plants through constitutive expression of transgenes include: 1. Spatial control. Particular cell-types must respond specifically to salt stress to minimise the amount of Na⁺ delivered to the shoot; and, 2. Temporal control. Transgenes are typically expressed in plants at similar levels through time, irrespective of the stress encountered by the plant, which may exacerbate pleiotropic effects and means that, particularly in low-stress conditions, costly and/or detrimental metabolic processes may be active, thus reducing yield. To address these issues, Gateway® destination vector constructs were developed combining the GAL4 UAS (upstream activating sequence) with the ethanol-inducible gene expression system to drive inducible cell-specific expression of Na⁺ transporter transgenes (or to silence salt transporter transgenes inducibly and cell-specifically). Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare) GAL4-GFP enhancer trap lines (Johnson et al., 2005: Plant J. 41, 779-789) that express GAL4 and GFP specifically in either the root epidermis or xylem parenchyma (and therefore ‘trap’ cell-type specific enhancer elements) were transformed with this GAL4 UAS – ethanol switch construct, thereby allowing both spatial and temporal control of transgenes. In preliminary experiments, the expression system successfully limited the expression of RFP to specific cell-types after induction with ethanol. Other genes expressed using this system include PpENA1, a Na⁺-extruding ATPase from the moss, Physcomitrella patens, and AtHKT1;1, a Na ⁺ transporter from Arabidopsis thaliana. The two enhancer trap rice lines were also transformed with the GAL4 UAS driving stable expression of AtHKT1;1 and PpENA1 specifically in root epidermal or xylem parenchyma cells. Expression of AtHKT1;1 in root epidermal cells reduced Na⁺ accumulation in the shoots, while expression in the root xylem parenchyma appeared to have little effect on shoot Na⁺ accumulation. Using cryo-scanning electron microscopy (SEM) X-ray microanalysis, the outer cells of the roots of the line expressing AtHKT1;1 in the epidermal cells were found to accumulate higher levels of Na⁺ than the parental enhancer trap line. Additionally, this line had decreased unidirectional ²²Na⁺ influx. Similar results were observed for plants expressing AtHKT1;1 driven by the CaMV 35S / http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url= http://library.adelaide.edu.au/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=1325289 / Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, 2008

Two problems hampering efforts to produce salt-tolerant plants through constitutive expression of transgenes include: 1. Spatial control. Particular cell-types must respond specifically to salt stress to minimise the amount of Na⁺ delivered to the shoot; and, 2. Temporal control. Transgenes are typically expressed in plants at similar levels through time, irrespective of the stress encountered by the plant, which may exacerbate pleiotropic effects and means that, particularly in low-stress conditions, costly and/or detrimental metabolic processes may be active, thus reducing yield. To address these issues, Gateway® destination vector constructs were developed combining the GAL4 UAS (upstream activating sequence) with the ethanol-inducible gene expression system to drive inducible cell-specific expression of Na⁺ transporter transgenes (or to silence salt transporter transgenes inducibly and cell-specifically). Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare) GAL4-GFP enhancer trap lines (Johnson et al., 2005: Plant J. 41, 779-789) that express GAL4 and GFP specifically in either the root epidermis or xylem parenchyma (and therefore ‘trap’ cell-type specific enhancer elements) were transformed with this GAL4 UAS – ethanol switch construct, thereby allowing both spatial and temporal control of transgenes. In preliminary experiments, the expression system successfully limited the expression of RFP to specific cell-types after induction with ethanol. Other genes expressed using this system include PpENA1, a Na⁺-extruding ATPase from the moss, Physcomitrella patens, and AtHKT1;1, a Na ⁺ transporter from Arabidopsis thaliana. The two enhancer trap rice lines were also transformed with the GAL4 UAS driving stable expression of AtHKT1;1 and PpENA1 specifically in root epidermal or xylem parenchyma cells. Expression of AtHKT1;1 in root epidermal cells reduced Na⁺ accumulation in the shoots, while expression in the root xylem parenchyma appeared to have little effect on shoot Na⁺ accumulation. Using cryo-scanning electron microscopy (SEM) X-ray microanalysis, the outer cells of the roots of the line expressing AtHKT1;1 in the epidermal cells were found to accumulate higher levels of Na⁺ than the parental enhancer trap line. Additionally, this line had decreased unidirectional ²²Na⁺ influx. Similar results were observed for plants expressing AtHKT1;1 driven by the CaMV 35S / http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url= http://library.adelaide.edu.au/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=1325289 / Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, 2008

Two problems hampering efforts to produce salt-tolerant plants through constitutive expression of transgenes include: 1. Spatial control. Particular cell-types must respond specifically to salt stress to minimise the amount of Na⁺ delivered to the shoot; and, 2. Temporal control. Transgenes are typically expressed in plants at similar levels through time, irrespective of the stress encountered by the plant, which may exacerbate pleiotropic effects and means that, particularly in low-stress conditions, costly and/or detrimental metabolic processes may be active, thus reducing yield. To address these issues, Gateway® destination vector constructs were developed combining the GAL4 UAS (upstream activating sequence) with the ethanol-inducible gene expression system to drive inducible cell-specific expression of Na⁺ transporter transgenes (or to silence salt transporter transgenes inducibly and cell-specifically). Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare) GAL4-GFP enhancer trap lines (Johnson et al., 2005: Plant J. 41, 779-789) that express GAL4 and GFP specifically in either the root epidermis or xylem parenchyma (and therefore ‘trap’ cell-type specific enhancer elements) were transformed with this GAL4 UAS – ethanol switch construct, thereby allowing both spatial and temporal control of transgenes. In preliminary experiments, the expression system successfully limited the expression of RFP to specific cell-types after induction with ethanol. Other genes expressed using this system include PpENA1, a Na⁺-extruding ATPase from the moss, Physcomitrella patens, and AtHKT1;1, a Na ⁺ transporter from Arabidopsis thaliana. The two enhancer trap rice lines were also transformed with the GAL4 UAS driving stable expression of AtHKT1;1 and PpENA1 specifically in root epidermal or xylem parenchyma cells. Expression of AtHKT1;1 in root epidermal cells reduced Na⁺ accumulation in the shoots, while expression in the root xylem parenchyma appeared to have little effect on shoot Na⁺ accumulation. Using cryo-scanning electron microscopy (SEM) X-ray microanalysis, the outer cells of the roots of the line expressing AtHKT1;1 in the epidermal cells were found to accumulate higher levels of Na⁺ than the parental enhancer trap line. Additionally, this line had decreased unidirectional ²²Na⁺ influx. Similar results were observed for plants expressing AtHKT1;1 driven by the CaMV 35S / http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url= http://library.adelaide.edu.au/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=1325289 / Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, 2008

Poaceae (or Gramineae) belong to the grass family and is one of the largest families among flowering plants on land. They include some of the most important cereal crops such as rice (Oryza sativa), barley (Hordeum vulgare), wheat (Triticum aestivum), maize (Zea mays), and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). The characteristic bushy appearance of grass plants, including cereal crops, is formed by the activities of axillary meristems (AMs) generated in the leaf axil. These give rise to tillers from the basal nodes which recapitulate secondary growth axis and AMs are formed during vegetative development. On transition to flowering the apical meristem transforming to an inflorescence meristem (IM) which produces branches from axillary meristem. These IM gives rise to branches that ultimately bear florets. Vegetative branching/tillering determines plant biomass and influences the number of inflorescences per plant. While inflorescence branching determines the number of florets and hence seeds. Thus the overall activity of axillary meristems plays a key role in determining plant architecture during both vegetative and reproductive stages. In Arabidopsis, research on the plant specific transcription factor LEAFY (LFY) has pioneered our understanding of its regulatory functions during transition from vegetative to reproductive development and its role in specifying a floral meristem (FM) identity to the newly arising lateral meristems. In the FM LFY activates other FM genes and genes for floral organ patterning transcription factors. LFY is strongly expressed throughout the young floral meristems from the earliest stages of specification but is completely absent from the IM (Weigel et al., 1992). LFY expression can also be detected at low levels in the newly emerging leaf primordia during the vegetative phase, and these levels gradually increase until the floral transition (Blazquez et al., 1997; Hempel et al., 1997). In rice, the LFY ortholog-RFL/APO2 is expressed predominantly in very young branching panicles/ inflorescence meristems (Kyozuka et al., 1998; Prasad et al., 2003) while in the vegetative phase RFL is expressed at axils of leaves (Rao et al., 2008). In rice FMs expression is restricted to primordia of lodicules, stamens, carpels and ovules (Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al., 2012). Knockdown of RFL activity or loss of function mutants show delayed flowering and poor panicle branching with reduced number of florets and lower fertility (Rao et al., 2008, Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al., 2012). In some genotypes reduced vegetative axillary branching is also compromised (Rao et al., 2008). On the other hand RFL overexpression leads to the early flowering, attributing a role as an activator for the transition of vegetative meristems to inflorescence meristems (Rao et al., 2008). Thus, RFL shows a distinct developmental expression profile, has unique mutant phenotypes as compared to Arabidopsis LFY thus indicating a divergence in functions. We have used various functional genomics approaches to investigate regulatory networks controlledby RFL in the vegetative axillary meristems and in branching panicles with florets. These regulatory effects influence tillering and panicle branching, thus contributing to rice plant architecture. RFL functions in axillary meristem Vegetative AMs are secondary shoot meristems whose outgrowth determines plant architecture. In rice, AMs form tillers from basal nodes and mutants with altered tillering reveal that an interplay between transcription factors and the phytohormones - auxin, strigolactone underpins this process. We probed the relationship between RFL and other factors that control AM development. Our findings indicate that the derangements in AM development that occur on RFL knockdown arise from its early effects during specification of these meristems and also later effects during their outgrowth of AM as a tiller. Overall, the derailments of both steps of AM development lead to reduced tillering in plants with reduced RFL activity. Our studies on the gene expression status for key transcription factor genes, genes for strigolactone pathway and for auxin transporters gave an insight on the interplay between RFL, LAX1 and strigolactone signalling. Expression levels of LAX1 and CUC genes, that encode transcription factors with AM specification functions, were modulated upon RFL knockdown and on induction of RFL:ΔGR fusion protein. Thus our findings imply a likely, direct activating role for RFL in AM development that acts in part, through attaining appropriate LAX1 expression levels. Our data place meristem specification transcription factors LAX1 and CUC downstream to RFL. Arabidopsis LFY has a predominant role in conferring floral meristem (FM) identity (Weigel et al., 1992; Wagner, 2009; Irish, 2010; Moyroud et al., 2010). Its functions in axillary meristems were not known until recently. The latter functions were uncovered with the new LFYHARA allele with only partial defects in floral meristem identity (Chahtane et al., 2013). This mutant allele showed LFY can promote growth of vegetative AMs through its direct target REGULATOR OF AXILLARY MERISTEMS1 (RAX1), a R2R3 myb domain factor (Chahtane et al., 2013). These functions for Arabidopsis LFY and RAX1 in AMs development are parallel to and redundant with the pathway regulated by LATERAL SUPPRESSOR (LAS) and REGULATOR OF AXILLARY MERISTEM FORMATION1 (ROX1) (Yang et al., 2012; Greb et al., 2003). Interestingly, ROX1 is orthologous to rice LAX1 and our data show LAX1 expression levels in rice panicles and in culms with vegetative AMs is dependent on the expression status of RFL. Thus, we speculate that as compared to Arabidopsis AM development, in rice the LFY-dependent and LFY-independent regulatory pathways for AMs development are closely linked. In Arabidopsis, CUC2 and CUC3 genes in addition to their role in shoot meristem formation and organ separation play a role in AM development possibly by defining a boundary for the emerging AM. These functions for the Arabidopsis CUC genes are routed through their effects on LAS and also by mechanisms independent of LAS (Hibara et al., 2006; Raman et al., 2008). These data show modulation in RFL activity using the inducible RFL:∆GR protein leads to corresponding expression changes in CUC1/CUC2 and CUC3 genes expression in culm tissues. Thus, during rice AM development the meristem functions of RFL and CUC genes are related. Consequent to specification of AM the buds are kept dormant. Bud outgrowth is influenced by auxin and strigolactone signalling pathways. We investigated the transcript levels, in rice culms of genes involved in strigolactone biosynthesis and perception and found the strigolactone biosynthesis gene D10 and hormone perception gene are significantly upregulated in RFL knockdown plants. Further, bioassays were done for strigolactone levels, where we used arbuscular mycorrhiza colonization assay as an indicator for strigolactone levels in wild type plants and in RFL knockdown plants. These data validate higher strigolactone signalling in RFL knockdown plants. To probe the relationship between RFL and the strigolactone pathway we created plants knocked down for both RFL and D3. For comparison of the tillering phenotype of these double knockdown plants we created plants with D3 knockdown alone. We observed reduced tillering in plants with knockdown of both RFL and D3 as compared to the tiller number in plants with knockdown of D3 alone. These data suggest that RFL acts upstream to D3 of control bud outgrowth. As effects of strigolactones are influenced by auxin transport we studied expression of OsPIN1 and OsPIN3 in RFL knockdown plants. Their reduced expression was correlated with auxin deficiency phenotypes of the roots in RFL knockdown plants. These data in conjunction with observations on OsPIN3 the gene expression modulation by the induction of RFL:∆GR allow us to speculate on a relationship between RFL, auxin transport and strigolactones with regard to bud outgrowth. We propose that the low tillering phenotype of RFL knockdown plants arises from weakened PATS, consequent to low levels of PIN1 and PIN3, coupled with moderate increase in strigolactones. Taken together, our findings suggest functions for RFL during AM specification and tiller bud outgrowth. RFL functions in panicle branching Prior studies on phenotypes of RFL knockdown or loss of function mutants suggested roles for RFL in transition to flowering, inflorescence meristem development, emergence of lateral organs and floral organ development (Rao et al., 2008; Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al., 2012). It has been speculated that RFL acts to suppress the transition from inflorescence meristem to floral meristem through its interaction with APO1 (Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al., 2012). The downstream genes regulated by RFL in these processes have not yet been elucidated. To identify direct targets of RFL in developing panicles we adopted ChIP-seq coupled with studies on gene expression modulation on induction of RFL. For the former we raised polyclonal anti-sera and chromatin from branching panicles with few florets. For gene expression modulation studies, we created transgenics with a T-DNA construct where an artificial miRNA against 3’UTR specifically knocked endogenous RFL and the same T-DNA had a second expression cassette for generation of a chemically inducible RFL-ΔGR protein that is not targeted by amiR RFL. Our preliminary ChIP-seq data in the wild type panicle tissues hints that RFL binds to hundreds of loci across the genome thus providing first glimpse of direct targets of RFL in these tissues. These data, while preliminary, were manually curated to identify likely targets that function in flowering, we summarize here some key findings. Our study indicates a role of RFL in flowering transition by activating genes like OsSPL14 and OsPRMT6a. Recent studies indicate that OsSPL14 directly binds to the promoter of OsMADS56 or FTL1, the rice homologs of SOC1 and FT to promote flowering (Lu et al., 2013). As RFL knockdown plants show highly reduced expression of OsMADS50/SOC1 and for RFT1 (Rao et al., 2008), and we show here RFL can bind and induce OsSPL14 expression we suggest the RFL¬OsSPL14 module can contribute to the transition of the SAM to flowering. Further, OsSPL14 in the young panicles directly activates DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE1 (DEP1) to control panicle length (Lu et al., 2013). Thus RFL-OsSPL14-DEP1 module could explain the role of RFL in controlling panicle architecture (Rao et al., 2008; Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al., 2012). Thus RFL plays a role in floral transition and this function is conserved across several LFY homologs. Our data ChIP-seq in the wild type tissue and gene expression modulation studies in transgenics also give molecular evidences for the role of RFL in suppression of floral fate. The direct binding of RFL to OsMADS17, OsYABBY3, OsMADS58 and HD-ZIP-IV loci and the changes in their transcript levels on induction of RFL support this hypothesis. Once the transition from SAM to FM takes place, we speculate RFL represses the conversion of inflorescence branch meristems to floral fate by negatively regulating OsYABBY3, HD-ZIP class IV and OsMADS17 that can promote differentiation. These hypotheses indicate a diverged function for RFL in floral fate repression. Arabidopsis LFY is known to activate the expression of AGAMOUS (AG), whose orthologs in rice are OsMADS3 and OsMADS58. Our studies confirm conservation with regard to RFL binding to cis elements at OsMADS58 locus that is homologous to Arabidopsis AG. But importantly we show altered consequences of this binding on gene expression. We find RFL can suppress the expression of OsMADS58 which we speculate can promote a meristematic fate. Further, we also present the abnormal upregulation of floral organ fate genes on RFL downregulation. These data too indicate functions of RFL, are in part, distinct from the role of Arabidopsis LFY where it works in promoting floral meristem specification and development. These inferences are supported by our data that rice gene homologs for AP1, AP3 and SEP3 are not directly regulated by RFL, unlike their direct regulation by Arabidopsis LFY during flower development. We also report the expression levels of LAX1, FZP, OsIDS1 and OsMADS34 genes involved in meristem phase change and IM branching are RFL dependent. This is consistent with its role in the suppression of determinacy, thereby extending the IM activity for branch formation. But as yet we do not know if these effects are direct. Together, our data report direct targets of RFL that contribute to its functions in meristem regulation, flowering transition, and suppression of floral organ development. Overall, our preliminary data on RFL chromatin occupancy combined with our detailed studies on the modulation of gene expression provides evidence for targets and pathways unique to the rice RFL during inflorescence development. Comparative analysis of genes downstream to RFL in vegetative tillers Vs panicles Tillers and panicle branches arise from the axillary meristems at vegetative and reproductive stages, respectively, of a rice plant and overall contribute to the plant architecture. Some regulatory factors control branching in both these tissues - for example, MOC1 and LAX1. Mutants at these loci affect tillers and panicle branch development thus indicating common mechanisms control lateral branch primordia development (Li et al., 2003; Komatsu et al., 2003; Oikawa and Kyozuka, 2009). Knockdown of RFL activity or loss-of-function mutants cause significantly reduced panicle branching and in few instances, reduction in vegetative axillary branching (Rao et al., 2008; Ikeda- Kawakatsu et al., 2012). We took up the global expression profiling of RFL knockdown plants compared to wild type plants in the axillary meristem and branching panicle tissue. These data provide a useful list of potential targets of RFL in axillary meristem and branching panicle tissue. The comparative analysis of the genes affected in the two tissues indicates only a subset of genes is affected by RFL in both the vegetative axillary meristems and branching panicle. These genes include transcription factors (OsSPL14, Zn finger domain protein, and bHLH domain protein), hormone signalling molecules (GA2 ox9) and cell signalling (LRR protein) as a set of genes activated by RFL in both tissues. On the other hand, these comparative expression profiling studies also show distinct set of genes deregulated by RFL knockdown in these two tissues therefore implicating RFL functions have a tissue-specific context. The genes deregulated only in axillary meristem tissue only include D3- involved in the perception of strigolactone, OsMADS34 speculated to have a role in floral transition and RCN1 involved in transition to flowering. On the other hand, the genes – CUC1, OsMADS3, OsMADS58 involved in organ development and floral meristem determination were found to be deregulated only in panicle tissues of RFL knockdown plants. These data point towards presence of distinct mechanisms for the development of AMs as tillers versus the development of panicle axillary as rachis branches. Overall, these data implicate genes involved in transition to flowering, axillary meristem development and floral meristem development are controlled by RFL in different meristems to thereby control plant architecture and transition to flowering.