Spelling suggestions: "subject:"scholarly publications"" "subject:"schoolarly publications""
1 |
New Vista to Preserve the Scholarly Output in Higher Education System: Institutional RepositoriesKumar, Raj 09 1900 (has links)
Conferencia realizado del 12 al 14 de setiembre en Lima, Peru del 2012 en el marco del 15º Simposio Internacional de Tesis y Disertaciones Electrónicas (ETD 2012). Evento aupiciado por la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM) y la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). / Institutional repositories emerge as a new approach to manage and maintain effectively the intellectual
assets of an institute through the digital content for scholarly communication. It includes e-prints of
research data, e-learning materials and other forms of institutional intellectual outputs, which are generally
not available or preserved elsewhere. Digital publishing, global networking, new researches, and
improved communication among scholars are driving the demand for broader access. In the present
scenario, IR’s are become an indispensable component for information and knowledge sharing in the
universities and higher education world. The Institutional Repository increased visibility reflects a high
quality of scholarship; this display of value can translate into tangible benefits including the funding from
public and private sources that drives in part from an institution status and reputation. The paper explores
and discusses the conceptual development, benefits, standard, sustainability & funding of Institutional
repositories. Paper has also discussed about the open source software’s and Commercial Digital
Repository Software that are available to create and maintain in institutional repositories. This paper also
tries to explore the contents of IRs and skill requirement for the implantations of the successful
Institutional Repository.
|
2 |
Conducting Online Research Undergraduate Preferences of Sources.Rosalyn Metz 2006 April 1900 (has links)
When students write research papers they use a variety of sources in their paper. These sources range from web pages to research articles. The purpose of this study was to decide whether or not undergraduate students would choose to use scholarly or non-scholarly sources when presented with both types of sources in a set of search results. Twenty Duke University students were recruited for the study. They were given a research topic and asked to perform a search. Both the search results and interface were fabricated by the researcher in order to control the experimental environment. The students were asked to rate the sources found in the results, choose four sources to use for their research scenario, and finally, were asked to explain reasoning behind their choices. The findings concluded that the students in this study were more likely to choose scholarly sources over non-scholarly sources and give these scholarly sources higher ratings.
|
3 |
An Analysis of Educational Technology Publications: Who, What and Where in the Last 20 YearsNatividad Beltrán del Río, Gloria Ofelia 05 1900 (has links)
This exploratory and descriptive study examines research articles published in ten of the top journals in the broad area of educational technology during the last 20 years: 1) Educational Technology Research and Development (ETR&D); 2) Instructional Science; 3) Journal of the Learning Sciences; 4) TechTrends; 5) Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education; 6) Journal of Educational Technology & Society; 7) Computers and Education; 8) British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET); 9) Journal of Educational Computing Research; and 10) Journal of Research on Technology in Education. To discover research trends in the articles published from 1995-2014, abstracts from all contributing articles published in those ten prominent journals were analyzed to extract a latent semantic space of broad research areas, top authors, and top-cited publications. Concepts that have emerged, grown, or diminished in the field were noted in order to identify the most dominant in the last two decades; and the most frequent contributors to each journal as well as those who contributed to more than one of the journals studied were identified.
|
Page generated in 0.1227 seconds