Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support (SWPBIS) is an approach designed to improve the correct implementation, consistent use, and maintenance of evidence-based practices related to behavior, classroom management and school discipline systems. Check-in/Check-out (CICO) is often recognized as a successful intervention in SWPBIS. However, most of the research on the use of CICO has focused on the school setting. This study provided an extension to the literature by examining the effects of the CICO program with homeless children attending an afterschool program. A non-concurrent multiple baseline across participants design was used to evaluate the CICO program effects. Students were exposed to a CICO intervention in which problem behaviors were targeted for reduction and task engagement was targeted for acquisition. Of the five participants selected for the study four participants were exposed to a CICO intervention. Results demonstrated a decrease in problem behaviors and an increase in task engagement for all four participants.

La mise en œuvre de programmes de santé publique complexes est particulièrement délicate en milieu scolaire. Des différences sont fréquemment observées entre ce qui était attendu du programme et ce qui en résulte en réalité. Ces différences sont dues à un certain nombre de facteurs contextuels, en lien avec les caractéristiques propres du milieu, de la communauté et des acteurs concernés. Développer des programmes de prévention efficaces, implique de prendre en compte l’impact de ces facteurs sur le processus d’implantation des projets. Par conséquent, il convient de s’intéresser à deux questions majeures : la première est celle de la transférabilité des programmes, dont les effets sont difficiles à prévoir dans une telle variabilité contextuelle. La seconde question concerne la généralisation à l’échelon régional ou national de la mise en œuvre de tels programmes de prévention en milieu scolaire qui, loin d’être une évidence, est également sujette à de nombreux déterminants variables en fonction des situations. Alors que l’implantation et la mise en œuvre des programmes est un champ largement investigué dans le soin comme dans le management, il s’agit d’un champ de recherche en expansion dans le domaine de la prévention, de l’éducation à la santé et de la promotion de la santé. Cette thèse propose de s’intéresser aux modalités d’implantation des programmes avec un objectif double : une visée épistémique par une réflexion théorique sur les concepts à mobiliser, puis une confrontation empirique de cette approche dans trois études ; une visée transformative s’appuyant sur des propositions d’opérationnalisation de notre approche. Chaque étude contribuera à explorer et expliciter un aspect de l’implantation : des processus générés, aux effets observés, en prenant en compte les facteurs déterminants en jeu. Les résultats de ce travail mettent l’accent sur le fait que les caractéristiques initiales des différents contextes ont un impact majeur sur le processus d’implantation, à différents niveaux de mise en œuvre. Les interactions entre les facteurs sont complexes, elles s’inscrivent dans des boucles d’action-rétroaction. L’introduction d’un programme dans un contexte peut agir comme un révélateur de certaines conditions favorables ou défavorables, un élément perturbateur imposant de nouvelles contraintes, ou, au contraire, un nouvel élan stimulant la motivation des équipes. Il apparaît que les programmes sont « instrumentalisés » par les acteurs pour servir leurs propres objectifs en fonction des conditions de départ. Il s’agit par conséquent de questionner le statut et le potentiel des programmes implantés au sein de contextes d’une extrême complexité. Nous ne prônons pas un changement de paradigme, mais plutôt un déplacement du curseur d’une focalisation sur l’amélioration de la fidélité avec laquelle les programmes sont mis en œuvre, vers un ancrage fort dans les différents contextes. Cette stratégie nous semble particulièrement adaptée à une démarche de réduction des inégalités sociales de santé. Dans cette perspective, nous proposons l’élaboration de « patterns » d’implantation sur la base d’une analyse détaillée des éléments déterminants préexistant dans les contextes considérés. Pour développer cette approche, il est nécessaire de poursuivre les recherches afin d’analyser les combinaisons de facteurs contextuels dans différents types d’écoles comme dans d’autres milieux. / Implementing health-related interventions is challenging in school settings. Discrepancies, between expected and actual programme outcomes, are often reported. They are, at least partly, due to contextual factors in the setting, the community and the stakeholders involved. The impact of these factors sets two challenges for the development of successful health promotion programmes: first, transferability and generalization, as end effects are in reality difficult to predict; second, the scaling up of interventions cannot be taken for granted, as the determinants involved are numerous and variable, depending on situations. While implementation research is substantial in healthcare or management, it is an emerging and growing field in health promotion. This work proposes to produce knowledge on implementation in health promotion, with a twofold approach based on a theoretical reflection, and its confrontation with three empirical studies. Each study contributes to understand a different aspect of implementation, namely the processes involved, the outputs resulting from the process and the influential factors in play. Findings put forward that specific characteristics of the context, which exist prior to implementation, influence the implementation process greatly, on various levels and according to complex loops of interactions. The new programme introduced sometimes acts as a revealer, a constraint, or a motivator. It is used as a tool, a guideline or a vision, depending on initial conditions, expectations and potentiality of the context of implementation. This work also discusses the way in which school stakeholders tend to “instrumentalize” programmes and guidelines for their own purpose. Questioning the design, status and potentiality of programmes is essential. Rather than proposing a paradigm shift, our suggestion is to move towards implementation research and programme design that focus on interactions between contexts and programmes, to reduce health inequities. It is about moving the cursor from evidence-base and fidelity, to a focus on contextual influencing implementation. Implementation patterns, based on a detailed understanding of contextual factors, could serve as guiding directions to support the implementation process, in a transformational change perspective. More research is needed on combinations of contextual factors in different types of school, and other types of settings, to further develop the approach presented in this work.

xiv, 183 p. : ill. (some col.) / Educators are responsible for helping students develop academic and behavior skills and for creating safe environments that promote these outcomes. Achieving these outcomes has become increasingly difficult due to disruptive, anti-social student behavior. Researchers identified Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) as an evidence-based approach, integrating primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions that provide benefit for students, schools, and educational communities. However, an extensive PBIS literature and research review identified a limited application of PBIS in secondary school settings. The purpose of this dissertation was to broaden the scope of research by examining the impact of PBIS on school-wide discipline outcomes and student academic performance in a secondary school setting using case study methodology. The case study was conducted in a large, urban Pacific Northwest high school that expressed interest in improving the general school expectations and positive interactions between students and staff members. Study participants were members of a student cohort from grade 9 to grade 12. The case study provided a descriptive analysis of students’ social behavior outcomes (as measured by Office Discipline Referrals, Suspensions/ Expulsions, and Attendance Rate) and their academic performance (as measured by students’ Grade Point Averages and Course Credits). An ordered time-series display was applied to analyze behavior and achievement outcome trends. Results showed an increase in students’ Grade Point Average, Course Credits, and Attendance Rate and a decrease in students’ Office Discipline Referrals and Suspensions/ Expulsions. This study’s findings are discussed in the context of its impact on students’ social engagement and academic achievement. Evidence of students’ academic and behavior outcomes has the potential to assist in the development of material and approaches to guide, replicate, and extend current PBIS practices to secondary school settings. / Committee in charge: Dr. Gerald Tindal, Chairperson; Dr. Keith Hollenbeck, Member; Dr. Scott Baker, Member; Dr. K. Brigid Flannery, Member; Dr. Nathaniel Teich, Outside Member

Study consists of two parts, theoretical and the research one. The theoretical part is mainly devoted to the achievement motivation and its development. We consider for the theoretical starting point Heckhausen and Rheinberg{\crq}s Extended Model Achievement Motivation which comprises of level aspiration, attribution and reference norm. Influence of the reference norms of teachers (N = 20) on the variables of achievement motivation of their pupils (N = 405). It concerns of the following variables {--} Hope of Success (HS), Passive Fear of Failure (PFF) and Active Fear of Failure (AFF). It was revealed that students of their teachers with preference of individual reference norm will be different from the students of teachers with predominance of social reference norm in the above mentioned motivational characteristics (HS, PFF). No significant diferences were revealed in the variable Active Fear of Failure. It is valid in the sum score and for the school and sport activities. Our results are in line of the international research in this field . Results may be sample specific and should not be generalized.

University officials have identified a problem among secondary preservice teachers (SPTs) who have expressed reluctance to teach in local urban schools. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore the perceptions of SPTs regarding their preparation for and experiences with teaching in urban school settings. Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and Bruner's concept of scaffolding served as the conceptual frameworks that guided this study. Data were collected from 11 SPTs who completed the requirements of their field service experiences in urban schools. Data collection consisted of individual interviews, one focus group interview, and field observations. Findings showed that SPTs desire to make a difference in urban schools, lack confidence in managing culturally diverse classrooms, and desire more faculty guidance in working with diverse populations. SPTs asserted that they need more research-based teaching strategies and urban field experiences. Implications for social change include more collaboration among university faculty, urban school principals, mentor teachers, and community organizations. Findings may be used to prepare SPTs to serve culturally diverse populations, which may improve students' academic achievement in urban classrooms.

Cette recherche a eu pour objectif d’explorer les postures d’animateurs et d’animatrices scientifiques quant au dialogue « sciences en/et société » et les moyens qu’ils utilisent pour assurer ce dialogue à travers leurs interventions pédagogiques dans le cadre d’ateliers scientifiques hors scolaires. Six animateurs scientifiques ont été interviewés. Ces entretiens ont permis de recueillir des données riches sur leur compréhension de la nature des sciences, leurs postures pédagogiques en tant que transmetteur, guide ou médiateur du développement de l’alphabétisation scientifique chez les jeunes dans les espaces hors scolaires, ainsi que sur la manière dont ils perçoivent le rôle de leurs interventions pédagogiques dans le cadre du développement de l’alphabétisation scientifique chez les jeunes et de la compréhension qu’ils ont des sciences comme outil d’action sociopolitique, tel qu’entendu dans le dialogue « sciences en/et société ». Les postures épistémologiques, pédagogiques et sociales identifiées sont d’une grande diversité et révèlent des tendances qui s’inscrivent dans des spectres allant de l’empirisme au constructivisme, du divertissement à l’empowerment et de la valorisation de la place des sciences en société à la critique de sa primauté. Plusieurs animateurs scientifiques de notre échantillon ont ainsi eu des postures hybrides et parfois conflictuelles, ce qui met en évidence la valeur potentielle d’interventions éducatives qui donnent aux animateurs scientifiques l’occasion de questionner et de réexaminer de manière critique leurs pratiques. / The purpose of this study was to explore informal science educators’ position on the “science in/and society” dialogue and the means whereby they ensure that dialogue through their pedagogical interventions in out-of-school settings. Six informal science educators were interviewed, leading to rich data in terms of their understanding of the nature of science, their pedagogical positions as transmitters, constructors and mediators of children’s development of science literacy in out-of-school settings, and the manner they perceive the role of their pedagogical interventions in children’s science literacy development and understanding of science as a tool for socio-political action, as called for by a science in/and society dialogue. The epistemic, pedagogical and social positions identified range from empiricism to constructivism, from entertainment to empowerment, and from recognition of the value of science in society to a critique of its pre-eminence, suggesting great diversity among the educators studied. Many of the sampled educators held hybrid and at times conflicting positions, suggesting the potential value of educational interventions that offer a means for informal science educators to question and critically re-examine their current practices.

Cette recherche a eu pour objectif d’explorer les postures d’animateurs et d’animatrices scientifiques quant au dialogue « sciences en/et société » et les moyens qu’ils utilisent pour assurer ce dialogue à travers leurs interventions pédagogiques dans le cadre d’ateliers scientifiques hors scolaires. Six animateurs scientifiques ont été interviewés. Ces entretiens ont permis de recueillir des données riches sur leur compréhension de la nature des sciences, leurs postures pédagogiques en tant que transmetteur, guide ou médiateur du développement de l’alphabétisation scientifique chez les jeunes dans les espaces hors scolaires, ainsi que sur la manière dont ils perçoivent le rôle de leurs interventions pédagogiques dans le cadre du développement de l’alphabétisation scientifique chez les jeunes et de la compréhension qu’ils ont des sciences comme outil d’action sociopolitique, tel qu’entendu dans le dialogue « sciences en/et société ». Les postures épistémologiques, pédagogiques et sociales identifiées sont d’une grande diversité et révèlent des tendances qui s’inscrivent dans des spectres allant de l’empirisme au constructivisme, du divertissement à l’empowerment et de la valorisation de la place des sciences en société à la critique de sa primauté. Plusieurs animateurs scientifiques de notre échantillon ont ainsi eu des postures hybrides et parfois conflictuelles, ce qui met en évidence la valeur potentielle d’interventions éducatives qui donnent aux animateurs scientifiques l’occasion de questionner et de réexaminer de manière critique leurs pratiques. / The purpose of this study was to explore informal science educators’ position on the “science in/and society” dialogue and the means whereby they ensure that dialogue through their pedagogical interventions in out-of-school settings. Six informal science educators were interviewed, leading to rich data in terms of their understanding of the nature of science, their pedagogical positions as transmitters, constructors and mediators of children’s development of science literacy in out-of-school settings, and the manner they perceive the role of their pedagogical interventions in children’s science literacy development and understanding of science as a tool for socio-political action, as called for by a science in/and society dialogue. The epistemic, pedagogical and social positions identified range from empiricism to constructivism, from entertainment to empowerment, and from recognition of the value of science in society to a critique of its pre-eminence, suggesting great diversity among the educators studied. Many of the sampled educators held hybrid and at times conflicting positions, suggesting the potential value of educational interventions that offer a means for informal science educators to question and critically re-examine their current practices.