A new damping technology, the Viscoelastic Coupling Damper (VCD), has been developed at the University of Toronto for reinforced concrete (RC) coupled wall high-rise buildings. These dampers are introduced in place of coupling beams to provide distributed supplemental damping in all lateral modes of vibration. This thesis presents an analytical investigation of the application of VCDs in a high-rise case study building located in a region of high seismicity. A parametric study has been conducted to determine the optimal number and placement of the dampers to achieve enhanced seismic performance without compromising the wind response of the structure. Nonlinear time history analyses have been carried out in order to compare the seismic performance of a conventional coupled wall building to alternative designs incorporating VCDs. Results highlight the improved performance of VCDs over RC coupling beams at all levels of seismic hazard. A design procedure for seismic-critical buildings is proposed.

A new damping technology, the Viscoelastic Coupling Damper (VCD), has been developed at the University of Toronto for reinforced concrete (RC) coupled wall high-rise buildings. These dampers are introduced in place of coupling beams to provide distributed supplemental damping in all lateral modes of vibration. This thesis presents an analytical investigation of the application of VCDs in a high-rise case study building located in a region of high seismicity. A parametric study has been conducted to determine the optimal number and placement of the dampers to achieve enhanced seismic performance without compromising the wind response of the structure. Nonlinear time history analyses have been carried out in order to compare the seismic performance of a conventional coupled wall building to alternative designs incorporating VCDs. Results highlight the improved performance of VCDs over RC coupling beams at all levels of seismic hazard. A design procedure for seismic-critical buildings is proposed.

<p>U radu su analizirani uticaji parametara: klase dukktilnosti,<br />projektnog seizmičkog dejstva i spratnosti na seizmički odgovor AB<br />okvira projektovanih prema evropskim normama EN 1992 - 1 i EN 1998 -<br />1.Odgovor konstrukcije, dobijen primenom nelinearnih statičkih i<br />dinamičkim metoda, je razmatran na globalnom, spratnom i lokalnom<br />nivou. Procena stanja je sprovedena pre svega direktnim poređenjem<br />zahteva rotacije tetiva stubova i greda okvira sa kapacitetom za dva<br />granična stanja prema EN 1998 - 3. Pored toga, upoređeni su zahtevi sa<br />kapacitetom u pogledu duktilnosti krivina kritičnih poprečnih<br />preseka i zahtevi odnosa međuspratnog pomeranja i spratne visine sa<br />tipičnim vrednostima za očekivani nivo oštećenja konstrukcije.</p> / <p>The paper analyzed influence of parameters: ductility class, design seismic<br />actions and the number of story on seismic response of RC frames designed<br />according to EN 1992-1 and EN 1998-1. Seismic response, obtained using<br />nonlinear static and dinamic methods, at global, storey and local levels was<br />discussed. Assessment was carried out primarly by direct comparison chord<br />rotation RC frames columns and beams demands with a capacity of two limit<br />states according to EN 1998-3. In addition, curvature ductility critical regions<br />demands and capacitiy and inter storey drift demands and tipical values for<br />expected level of structural damage, were compared.</p>

This research evaluates the seismic demands for a three-span curved bridge crossing fault-rupture zones. Two approximate procedures which have been proved adequate for ordinary straight bridges crossing fault-rupture zones, i.e., the fault-rupture response spectrum analysis (FR-RSA) procedure and the fault-rupture linear static analysis (FR-LSA) procedure, were considered in this investigation. These two procedures estimate the seismic demands by superposing the peak values of quasi-static and dynamic bridge responses. The peak quasi-static response in both methods is computed by nonlinear static analysis of the bridge under the ground displacement offset associated with fault-rupture. In FR-RSA and FR-LSA, the peak dynamic responses are respectively estimated from combination of the peak modal responses using the complete-quadratic-combination rule and the linear static analysis of the bridge under appropriate equivalent seismic forces. The results from the two approximate procedures were compared to those obtained from the nonlinear response history analysis (RHA) which is more rigorous but may be too onerous for seismic demand evaluation. It is shown that the FR-RSA and FR-LSA procedures which require less modeling and analysis efforts provide reasonable seismic demand estimates for practical applications.

yes / The behaviour of seismic-resistant buildings relies heavily upon the inclusion of energy dissipating devices. For concentrically-braced frames, this function is accomplished by diagonal bracing members whose performance depends upon both cross-sectional properties and global slenderness. Traditionally preferred rectangular hollow sections are susceptible to local buckling, particularly in cold-formed tubes, owing to the residual stresses from manufacture. This paper explores the response of hollow and concrete-filled circular tubes under cyclic axial loading. The uniformity of the circular cross-section provides superior structural efficiency over rectangular sections and can be further optimised by the inclusion of concrete infill. A series of experiments was conducted on filled and hollow specimens to assess the merit of the composite section. Comparisons were drawn between hot-finished and cold-formed sections to establish the influence of fabrication on member performance. Two specimen lengths were utilised to assess the influence of non-dimensional slenderness. Parameters such as ductility, energy dissipation, tensile strength and compressive resistance are presented and compared with design codes and empirically derived predictions.

Design of retaining structures depends upon the load which is transferred from backfill soil as well as external loads and also the resisting capacity of the structure. The traditional safety factor approach of the design of retaining structures does not address the variability of soils and loads. The properties of backfill soil are inherently variable and influence the design decisions considerably. A rational procedure for the design of retaining structures needs to explicitly consider variability, as they may cause significant changes in the performance and stability assessment. Reliability based design enables identification and separation of different variabilities in loading and resistance and recommends reliability indices to ensure the margin of safety based on probability theory. Detailed studies in this area are limited and the work presented in the dissertation on the Optimum design of retaining structures under static and seismic conditions: A reliability based approach is an attempt in this direction. This thesis contains ten chapters including Chapter 1 which provides a general introduction regarding the contents of the thesis and Chapter 2 presents a detailed review of literature regarding static and seismic design of retaining structures and highlights the importance of consideration of variability in the optimum design and leads to scope of the investigation. Targeted stability is formulated as optimization problem in the framework of target reliability based design optimization (TRBDO) and presented in Chapter 3. In Chapter 4, TRBDO approach for cantilever sheet pile walls and anchored cantilever sheet pile walls penetrating sandy and clayey soils is developed. Design penetration depth and section modulus for the various anchor pulls are obtained considering the failure criteria (rotational, sliding, and flexural failure modes) as well as variability in the back fill soil properties, soil-steel pile interface friction angle, depth of the water table, total depth of embedment, yield strength of steel, section modulus of sheet pile and anchor pull. The stability of reinforced concrete gravity, cantilever and L-shaped retaining walls in static conditions is examined in the context of reliability based design optimization and results are presented in Chapter 5 considering failure modes viz. overturning, sliding, eccentricity, bearing, shear and moment failures in the base slab and stem of wall. Optimum wall proportions are proposed for different coefficients of variation of friction angle of the backfill soil and cohesion of the foundation soil corresponding to different values of component as well as lower bounds of system reliability indices. Chapter 6 presents an approach to obtain seismic passive resistance behind gravity walls using composite curved rupture surface considering limit equilibrium method of analysis with the pseudo-dynamic approach. The study is extended to obtain the rotational and sliding displacements of gravity retaining walls under passive condition when subjected to sinusoidal nature of earthquake loading. Chapter 7 focuses on the reliability based design of gravity retaining wall when subjected to passive condition during earthquakes. Reliability analysis is performed for two modes of failure namely rotation of the wall about its heel and sliding of the wall on its base are considering variabilities associated with characteristics of earthquake ground motions, geometric proportions of wall, backfill soil and foundation soil properties. The studies reported in Chapter 8 and Chapter 9 present a method to evaluate reliability for external as well as internal stability of reinforced soil structures (RSS) using reliability based design optimization in the framework of pseudo static and pseudo dynamic methods respectively. The optimum length of reinforcement needed to maintain the stability against four modes of failure (sliding, overturning, eccentricity and bearing) by taking into account the variabilities associated with the properties of reinforced backfill, retained backfill, foundation soil, tensile strength and length of the geosynthetic reinforcement by targeting various component and system reliability indices is computed. Finally, Chapter 10 contains the important conclusions, along with scope for further work in the area. It is hoped that the methodology and conclusions presented in this study will be beneficial to the geotechnical engineering community in particular and society as a whole.