Sexual conflict is broadly defined as a conflict between the evolutionary interests of the two sexes. Depending on the genetic architecture of the traits involved, it can occur at the level of male-female interactions or take the form of selection acting to change the mean of a shared trait against the sign of its genetic correlation. The aim of my thesis was to use genome-wide expression profiles in the model organism Drosophila melanogaster to provide novel insights in the study of sexual conflict. First, we studied the female post-mating response to partition transcriptional changes associated with reproduction from male-induced effects, which are known to be harmful to females. We found substantial changes in expression of metabolic pathways associated with the activation of reproduction, while male-specific effects were dominated by the onset of an immune response. Changes in female response under different mating strategies was studied using experimental evolution: we found that monogamous females suffered decreased fecundity and their gene expression profiles suggested an overall weaker response to mating. To identify sexually antagonistic genes, we used hemiclonal lines and associated their sex-specific fitness with genome-wide transcript abundance. We confirmed the presence of a negative covariance for fitness and identified a group of candidate genes experiencing sexually antagonistic selection. We then focused on mitochondria, which can enable the accumulation of deleterious mutations with sex-specific effects due to their maternal inheritance, and found few effects on nuclear gene expression in females but major effects in males, predominantly in male-specific tissues. Finally, we used published data to compare intraspecific and interspecific genetic variation for a set of transcripts, to test whether speciation occurs along lines of maximum genetic variance. In conclusion, gene expression techniques can generate useful results in the study of sexual conflict, particularly in association with phenotypic data or when integrated with published datasets.

Abstract Sexual selection results from competition between individuals over access to gametes of the opposite sex. Starting with anisogamy, with females producing larger and fewer gametes than males, females usually invest more in reproduction and thus have lower potential reproductive rates than males. Therefore males are traditionally suggested to compete over females whereas females are choosy. The different evolutionary interests between the sexes result in different selection regimes considering e.g. mating rates. In some species, this conflict is even seen as apparent struggles between males and females over mating decision and/or duration, resulting in antagonistic coevolution with both sexes evolving adaptations to gain more control over the other sex. In this thesis, I studied the role of A. paludum female abdominal spines as an adaptation to reject male mating attempts. I studied both the effect of polyandry and multiple matings on female fecundity to distinguish between the potential material and genetic benefits from mating to females. I also explored the role of various male and female morphological traits on precopulatory sexual selection and the consequent female reproductive output. My results show that female abdominal spines are likely evolved through arms races between the sexes to increase female control over mating decision but according to my studies, female spines are not under active selection. Instead, certain male morphological types were more successful in achieving matings, and mating with these males also increased female fecundity. I found that multiple matings increase female fecundity up to a point, supporting a theory of optimal female mating rate. According to my results, the benefits from multiple mating to A. paludum females result from material origin whereas polyandry per se is even detrimental to female fecundity. / Tiivistelmä Seksuaalivalinta on pohjimmiltaan seurausta yksilöiden välisestä, lisääntymiseen liittyvästä kilpailusta toisen sukupuolen sukusoluista. Seksuaalivalinta on evoluutiomekanismi, joka osaltaan on johtanut sukupuolten välisiin eroihin monissa morfologisissa ja käyttäytymiseen liittyvissä ominaisuuksissa. Sukupuolet eroavat jo siinä, että naaraat tuottavat vähemmän mutta suurempia sukusoluja kuin koiraat. Koska sukupuolet siis investoivat lisääntymiseen jo alkuvaiheessa eri tavalla, niiden välillä on aina jonkin asteinen seksuaalikonflikti. Konfliktin taustalla on sukupuoliin kohdistuva erilainen valintapaine; koiraat saavuttavat usein optimaalisen hedelmällisyytensä suuremmilla parittelujen määrällä kuin naaraat. Joillakin eläinlajeilla seksuaalikonflikti on niin ilmeinen, että se ilmenee koiraan ja naaraan välisinä kamppailutilanteina parittelupäätöksen ja/tai parittelun keston suhteen. Seksuaalikonflikti voi johtaa molemmilla sukupuolilla erilaisiin sopeumiin, jotka lisäävät yksilön kontrollia parittelujen suhteen. Tässä väitöskirjatyössä tutkin naaraan takapäässä sijaitsevien abdominaalisten piikkien merkitystä järvivesimittari A. paludum-naaraiden kyvyssä torjua parittelemaan pyrkiviä koiraita. Tutkin myös polyandrian ja toistuvien parittelujen vaikutusta naaraan hedelmällisyyteen saadakseni selville, lisäävätkö koiraasta johtuvat mahdolliset materiaaliset tai geneettiset tekijät naaraan hedelmällisyyttä. Lisäksi selvitin useiden koiraan ja naaraan morfologisten ominaisuuksien yhteyttä parittelua edeltävään seksuaalivalintaan sekä naaraan hedelmällisyyteen. Tulokseni osoittavat, että naaraan abdominaaliset piikit ovat todennäköisesti kehittyneet seksuaalikonfliktin seurauksena lisäämään naaraan kontrollia parittelupäätöksen suhteen. Niihin ei kuitenkaan nykyisellään näytä kohdistuvan merkittävää valintapainetta. Sen sijaan morfologialtaan tietynlaiset koirastyypit vaikuttavat olevan aktiivisen valinnan kohteena ja parittelu tällaisten koiraiden kanssa lisää myös naaraan hedelmällisyyttä. Toistuvat parittelut saman koiraan kanssa lisäävät naaraan hedelmällisyyttä tiettyyn optimiin asti, mikä tukee teoriaa optimaalisesta parittelujen määrästä. Sen sijaan polyandria itsessään vaikuttaa naaraan hedelmällisyyteen jopa heikentävästi. Niinpä A. paludum-naaraiden saama hyöty useista paritteluista näyttää olevan materiaalista, kun taas polyandriasta saatavia geneettisiä etuja ei tässä tutkimuksessa tullut ilmi.

The work included in this thesis aims at exploring the environmental sensitivity of benefits and costs of sexual selection through a combined empirical and theoretical effort, to increase our understanding of the impact of environmental change on sexually reproducing populations.Can sexual selection promote adaptation to novel environments? Sexual selection for good genes should accelerate adaptation by granting higher reproductive success to individuals of high genetic quality. However, sexual conflict is a frequent outcome of sexual reproduction and may often be detrimental to population fitness. Experimental evolution has shown that the role of sexual selection in adaptation is variable, because of a complex balance between the detrimental and beneficial effects described above.The present thesis is investigating the role of sexual selection in adaptation by focusing on the sex-specific strength of selection and the intensity of intralocus sexual conflict (IaSC) in ancestral and novel environments. The sex-specific strength of selection is a valuable proxy for the benefits of sexual reproduction, since a male-bias in selection caused by sexual selection should allow efficient purging of deleterious alleles with little impact on female fecundity and cost to population fitness.This thesis investigates both sex-specific selection and IaSC across benign and novel environments in two species of seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus and Acanthoscelides obtectus, and includes a theoretical model of the effect of environmental change on of sexual selection. The empirical part of my results indicates that, generally, selection at the adult stage is male biased but that this male bias may be reduced under stress, pointing towards reduced benefits of sexual selection under rapid environmental change. Additional simulations suggest that the frequency dependent nature of sexual selection alone could explain this trend. No empirical support was found for the reduction of IaSC under stress.It is becoming crucial today to understand the impact of environmental change on natural populations. This thesis brings new material adding to our understanding of the role of sexual selection within that particular issue. The outcome of sexual selection is dependent on a variety of mechanisms, such as good genes processes and sexual conflict, which are very likely to be dependent on ecological factors and specificity of the system studied. For that reason, carefully controlled experiments on laboratory systems and mathematical modelling are necessary steps that should ultimately lead to the study of similar questions in natural systems.

Sexual conflict arises in biparental species because of the fitness payoffs of shifting the costs of care onto their partner. The negotiation model asserts that parents actively monitor their partner’s level of investment and adjust their own in response generally resulting in partial compensation when a member of the pair reduces their level of investment. The willingness of one parent to compensate for the other’s change is found to be widely variable. Habitat or resource quality available to pairs may explain such variation. It is predicted that the level of compensation by one partner will increase with decreasing resource quality. I tested this prediction with the biparental burying beetle, <i>Nicrophorus orbicollis</i>. Under natural conditions, burying beetles apply costly social immune molecules to carcasses of small vertebrates to preserve nutritional value for young. The goals of this research were (1) to determine if males immunologically compensate when females are immunologically handicapped; and (2) determine the impact of resource quality on compensation. Changes in lysozyme-like-activity (LLA) and phenoloxidase (PO) production in oral and anal secretions were used to quantify social immune investment. Pairs were provided a mouse carcass of one of three qualities: freshly thawed, aged for 3 days, or aged for 7 days. As expected, female LLA decreased once injected with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) irrespective of carcass quality. Injections caused significant down regulation of oral PO in females. Male LLA increased as the quality of carcasses decreased when paired with handicapped females. Males showed no changes in PO across treatments or carcass types. My results demonstrate that males compensate for a change in maternal investment and the level of compensation increases as resource quality decreases.

No description available.

Animals display considerable phenotypic variation in their mating traits, and this variation can have important consequences for the evolution of dimorphic traits between the males and females within a species. In chapter 1, I outline the current state of our understanding of plasticity in reproductive phenotypes, and argue that more work needs to be done to connect the gap between plasticity in mating traits and the outcomes of sexual conflict. Across my four data chapters, I used the fruit fly as a model organism in series of experiments that attempt to better understand how plasticity in mating traits influences the fitness outcomes of both males and females. In chapter 2, I experimentally manipulated the outcome of a fighting experience, and found that males who win a previous fight have higher precopulatory reproductive success, but losers perform better in post-copulatory areas. In chapter 3, I manipulated the amount of competition that a male experiences and found that females mated to males who experience competition produce more early-life offspring but live shorter lives compared to females mated to males that experience no competition. In chapter 4, I manipulated the intensity of sexual conflict that a female experiences and found that males mated to females who experience high conflict have lower pre- and post-copulatory reproductive success compared to males mated to females who experience low conflict. In chapter 5. I manipulated the degree of sexual aggression that a female experiences, and found that females that experience harassment and mating from a male that displays high sexual aggression is subsequently less choosy compared to females that experience a less aggressive male. Finally, in chapter 6, I discuss the significance of my results as they relate to the evolution of reproductive traits in males and females. / Dissertation / Doctor of Science (PhD) / Considerable phenotypic variation exists both within and across species. Within species, one source of this variation is phenotypic plasticity, the ability for an individual to alter its phenotype based on environmental influences. When it comes to sex, both males and females in many species exhibit striking variation in their reproductive behaviour as a result of plasticity. However, the causes and consequences of this variation are not well understood. Throughout my doctoral dissertation, I used the fruit fly as a model to explore how various social experiences such as fighting, competition, sexual harassment, and mating shape the subsequent reproductive behaviour of males and females, and quantified the evolutionary consequences of this variation. The results of my studies have important implications for understanding the evolution of various behavioural strategies such as aggression and mate choice.

<p>Natural and sexual selection and sexual conflict are forces shaping the evolution of reproductive behaviour, while constrained by factors like environment, physiology and life-history trade-offs. Parental care is costly both in terms of time and energy. In fish, filial cannibalism is a strategy for caring males to compensate for some of the energy loss. Human impact like eutrophication also alters the basics for animals living in that environment. It is fundamental to any species to adjust its behaviour to a changing environment. Studying sand goby males, I found trade-offs both regarding parental care allocations, like ventilation vs. predator defence, and investment in present vs. future reproductive success. Paternal sand gobies exposed to water with low oxygen levels increased their fanning effort but did not compensate by eating more eggs, even though an increased current parental effort should affect future reproductive success negatively. Investigating if patterns of filial cannibalism change with time of season, I found no correlation. Theory predicts that it should pay more to eat eggs early, when future mating potential is higher than late in the season. However, as early hatching fry are likely to gain higher fitness through larger size the next breeding season, this may provide an opposing selection pressure. In species with male care the only way a female can affect the level of post-spawning care is by choosing a good mate. A female preference to spawn in nests that already contain eggs of other females has been interpreted as a means to avoid filial cannibalism through a dilution effect or to decrease the costs of search time. Yet, in my study females did not avoid filial cannibalism by preferring large clutches to small ones. Oxygenation of the eggs might be a key factor, since both large and small females preferred spawning in nests with small clutches. Thus, as in most animals, trade-offs clearly govern the reproductive behaviour of sand gobies.</p>

Performance is key to survival. From day-to-day foraging events, to reproductive activities, to life-or-death crises, how well an organism performs these tasks can determine success or failure. Selection, therefore, both natural and sexual, act upon performance, and performance demands on individuals shape a population’s morphological and physiological trait distributions. While studies of morphological adaptations to ecological pressures implicitly center on the idea that responses to selection improve performance via changes in morphology, the relationships between morphology, performance, and fitness are not always well understood. In this dissertation, I investigate these relationships explicitly, as well as determine the effects that different ecological and genetic contexts have on selection and how populations respond to performance pressures. Using a model of lizard locomotor performance, I address three issues that may impact selection on performance that are often overlooked in performance studies. First, performance is not a static trait. Rather, individuals possess a range of performance abilities or intensities that can be expressed as needed. Using a novel, individual-based, quantitative genetic simulation model, I demonstrate the effects of variable performance expression and genetic constraints on how a population experiences and responds to selection on sprint and endurance performance. Second, sex differences in performance are expected in sexually dimorphic species, but empirical evidence for this is lacking. To this end, I measured and analyzed multivariate morphology and performance in Anolis carolinensis to identify sex-specific patterns in functional morphology and functional trade-offs within a broad suite of performance traits. Third, intralocus sexual conflict should constrain the evolution of the multivariate performance phenotype in both sexes. By extending the simulation model to include correlated trait inheritance between sexes and sex-specific selection on certain performance traits, I demonstrate the extent to which this sexual conflict constrains performance evolution. In combining studies of natural populations with simulation studies of selection, this dissertation embraces the complexity of performance to address the multiple contributing factors and constraints on performance evolution, and demonstrates the importance of accounting for such complexity when studying animal performance.

<p>The evolutionary goal of individuals is reproduction and sexual selection favours traits improving reproductive success. When males invest less than females in offspring, males have potentially a higher reproductive rate than females. This typically results in sex-specific reproductive strategies of male-male competition and female choice of mating partner. Under polyandry, sexual selection can continue after copulation as sperm competition and cryptic female choice. This thesis focuses on male and female pre- and post-copulatory reproductive strategies in the promiscuous red junglefowl, <i>Gallus</i> <i>gallus ssp.</i>, and its domestic subspecies the domestic fowl, <i>Gallus gallus</i> <i>domesticus</i>. Males impose high re-mating rates on females, which triggers female resistance in copulations. In addition, when sexual harassment increases, females re-mate at times of day when male mating propensity is lower, to avoid intense sexual harassment. Males allocate sperm supplies differentially according to (i) variation in female polyandry and own competitive ability, (ii) earlier sperm investment in a female, and (iii) female reproductive quality, signalled by female comb size. Males also perform ‘aspermic’ copulations (i.e. copulations with no semen transfer), which inhibit polyandry and in turn reduce sperm competition. In mating opportunities with relatives, males do not avoid inbreeding. However, females avoid inbreeding before copulation through kin recognition and after copulation by selecting against related males’ sperm. These results show that selection on males to re-mate at higher rates than females and copulate indiscriminately according to partner relatedness, trigger counteracting female responses, creating the potential for sexual conflict over fertilisation. Teasing apart pre- and post-copulatory strategies and the contribution of each sex therefore becomes crucial in order to understand the evolution of reproductive strategies and the mechanisms affecting paternity.</p>

Natural and sexual selection and sexual conflict are forces shaping the evolution of reproductive behaviour, while constrained by factors like environment, physiology and life-history trade-offs. Parental care is costly both in terms of time and energy. In fish, filial cannibalism is a strategy for caring males to compensate for some of the energy loss. Human impact like eutrophication also alters the basics for animals living in that environment. It is fundamental to any species to adjust its behaviour to a changing environment. Studying sand goby males, I found trade-offs both regarding parental care allocations, like ventilation vs. predator defence, and investment in present vs. future reproductive success. Paternal sand gobies exposed to water with low oxygen levels increased their fanning effort but did not compensate by eating more eggs, even though an increased current parental effort should affect future reproductive success negatively. Investigating if patterns of filial cannibalism change with time of season, I found no correlation. Theory predicts that it should pay more to eat eggs early, when future mating potential is higher than late in the season. However, as early hatching fry are likely to gain higher fitness through larger size the next breeding season, this may provide an opposing selection pressure. In species with male care the only way a female can affect the level of post-spawning care is by choosing a good mate. A female preference to spawn in nests that already contain eggs of other females has been interpreted as a means to avoid filial cannibalism through a dilution effect or to decrease the costs of search time. Yet, in my study females did not avoid filial cannibalism by preferring large clutches to small ones. Oxygenation of the eggs might be a key factor, since both large and small females preferred spawning in nests with small clutches. Thus, as in most animals, trade-offs clearly govern the reproductive behaviour of sand gobies.