The purpose of this study was to identify a new group of customers of agricultural machinery manufacturers and these customers’ needs and suggestions. The study also sought to offer suggestions to the John Deere Company for dealership education and development programs for John Deere dealerships. The following objectives were used to guide the study: 1) To describe demographics of “large property owners,” 2) To describe “large property owners’” needs and wants for the farm equipment dealership, and 3) To generate suggestions for dealership development to suit the needs of “large property owners.” The need for the study was identified by the John Deere Company to learn more about a new growing market and to prepare the dealerships for adoption of the change. The sampling frame consisted of “large property owners” whose names were randomly selected from county tax rolls of six selected counties in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex area. A mailed instrument was sent to a sample of 1,000 potential participants. Respondents totaled 205, with 174 instruments usable as they were complete or nearly complete. The study revealed important facts about “large property owners,” which were considered while creating a list of recommendations for the John Deere Company. Before “large property owners’” needs could be examined, the John Deere dealerships had to be considered. Two kinds of dealerships can present agricultural equipment of different powers at two different locations: agricultural equipment dealerships and Commercial and Consumer Equipment (C&CE) dealerships. Presenting equipment in two different locations may not suit small farmers’ needs or their desire for convenience. “Large property owners’” needs in a wider range of equipment at one dealership location, more convenient locations, and other characteristics were examined.

Niche market cropping can be a source of economic development to economically depressed rural areas. The thesis takes place in the four counties of Wise, Russell, Scott and Dickenson and this study region is used to develop the ideas of limited regional competition, and product diversity for niche cropping enterprises. These ideas create an identity for the region that reflects upon the farms and the products they produce. This thesis is intended to be a tool for county extension agents and economic development professionals to use in the pursuit of guiding small farmers and land-owners into successful niche cropping enterprises. Case studies within Wise County demonstrate the income potentials of these enterprises. / Master of Landscape Architecture

Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2018-11-29T17:41:33Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2013 - Emerson Dalla Chieza.pdf: 3379954 bytes, checksum: 59d75d0f24fddc7d958c8e981de2274a (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-11-29T17:41:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2013 - Emerson Dalla Chieza.pdf: 3379954 bytes, checksum: 59d75d0f24fddc7d958c8e981de2274a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-10-25 / The objective of this study was to establish an organic management form of corn and Crotalaria juncea intercropping, which allows to optimize production "in situ" by fabaceae plant biomass with nitrogen input to the system, without the competition that presence of green manure can to exercise, follow to compromise the performance of cereal. Three experiments were conducted in the experimental field of Embrapa Agrobiology in Serop?dica - RJ, between of November 2010 to March 2012. The experimental design was randomized blocks with six treatments and four replications (Experiments 1 and 3) or three replicates (experiment 2). The first experiment took place between November 2010 and March 2011 and had the following treatments: T1 - C. juncea seeded seven days before corn crop and managed at 33 days after emergence (33 DAE), T2 ? C. juncea seeded at the same date of corn sowing (29 DAE), T3 - C. juncea seeded 14 days after corn sown (102 DAE), T4 - C. juncea seeded 28 days after corn sown (88 DAE), T5 and T6 - corn cropping alone. Experiment 2: T1 - C. juncea seeds seven days before the corn (43 DAE), T2 - C. juncea seeded at the same date of corn sowing (37 DAE), T3 - C. juncea seeded seven days after corn sown (74 DAE), T4 - C. juncea seeded 14 days after corn sown (67 DAE), T5 and T6 - corn cropping alone. To first and second experiments, T3, T4 and T6 had been received 70 kg ha-1 of nitrogen by castor bean pie. Treatments of the third experiment consisted: T1 and T2 - C. juncea seeded at the same date of corn sowing (30 DAE) at the single row, T3 and T4 ? corn cropping alone at the single row, T5 and T6 - C. juncea seeded at the same date of corn sowing (30 DAE) at the double rows. For T2 and T6 treatments the green manure was managed and removed from the area, and had been added castor bean pie (70 kg of N ha-1). Also T4 received castor bean pie as a N source for corn. Also in the first experiment, for T1 and T2 trataments proceeded up studies of decomposition and release of nutrients from waste C. juncea by litter bags with 8 intervals collections. For the third test is conducted studies agronomic performance of corn and nitrogen losses through ammonia volatilization to waste C. juncea, castor bean pie and cattle manure through static cameras semi open. When corn sown simultaneously, regardless of the time of sowing, C. juncea did not affect the yield of cereal, promoted the addition of nitrogen to the system able of promoting positive balances for this nutrient. When the green manure was sown 7 days before or 14 days after sowing corn in the summer period, exerted a negative influence on growth and yield of maize. The waste C. juncea showed high rates of decomposition and nutrient release, with half-life for N less than 14 days. Were found discrepant emission rates for ammonia and castor bean pie residue C. juncea, with accumulated losses of about 46 and 14 %, respectively. The arrangement in double rows corn planting did not influence the yield of cereal. The results post the consortium in corn and C. juncea sown simultaneously as a promising culture system, capable of producing corn grain above the average yield of Rio of Janeiro state. / O objetivo geral deste trabalho foi estabelecer uma forma de manejo org?nico do cons?rcio entre as culturas de milho e Crotalaria juncea, que possibilite otimizar a produ??o ?In situ? de biomassa vegetal pela fabaceae, com aporte de nitrog?nio ao sistema, sem que a presen?a do adubo verde exer?a competi??o capaz de comprometer o rendimento do cereal. Foram conduzidos tr?s experimentos no campo experimental da Embrapa Agrobiologia em Serop?dica ? RJ, entre os meses de novembro de 2010 e mar?o de 2012. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos ao acaso, com seis tratamentos e quatro repeti??es (experimentos 1 e 3) ou tr?s repeti??es (experimento 2). O primeiro experimento ocorreu entre novembro de 2010 e mar?o de 2011 e teve os seguintes tratamentos: T1?C. juncea semeada sete dias antes da cultura do milho e manejada aos 33 dias ap?s emerg?ncia (33 DAE); T2?C. juncea semeada simult?nea ao milho (manejo aos 29 DAE); T3?C. juncea semeada 14 dias ap?s o milho (manejo aos 102 DAE) + 70 kg N ha-1; T4?C. juncea semeada 28 dias ap?s o milho (manejo aos 88 DAE) + 70 kg N ha-1; T5-milho em monocultivo e T6-milho em monocultivo + 70 kg N ha-1. Experimento 2 (abril a setembro de 2011): T1?C. juncea semeada sete dias antes da cultura do milho (manejo aos 43 DAE); T2?C. juncea semeada simult?nea ao milho (manejo aos 37 DAE); T3?C. juncea semeada sete dias ap?s o milho (manejo aos 74 DAE) + 70 kg N ha-1; T4?C. juncea semeada 14 dias ap?s o milho (manejo aos 67 DAE) + 70 kg N ha-1; T5- milho em monocultivo e T6?milho em monocultivo+ 70 kg N ha-1. Os tratamentos do 3? Experimento (novembro de 2011 a mar?o de 2012) consistiram em: T1-C. juncea semeada simult?nea ao milho em fila simples com manejo aos 30 DAE e a biomassa da C. juncea mantida na ?rea; T2?C. juncea semeada simult?nea ao milho em fila simples com manejo aos 30 DAE com remo??o da parte a?rea de C. juncea e aplica??o de 70 kg N ha-1 via torta de mamona; T3- milho monocultivo em fila simples; T4 ?milho monocultivo em fila simples + 70 kg N ha-1; T5- C. juncea semeada simult?nea ao milho em fila dupla com manejo aos 30 DAE e a biomassa da C. juncea mantida na ?rea; T6 ? C. juncea semeada simult?nea ao milho em fila dupla com remo??o da parte a?rea de C. juncea e aplica??o de 70 kg N ha-1. Para todos os experimentos, o nitrog?nio aplicado em cobertura teve como fonte a torta de mamona. Nos dois primeiros ensaios foram realizados estudos morfofisiol?gicos dos cultivos a partir da an?lise funcional do crescimento de plantas, al?m do balan?o monet?rio e balan?o aparente de nitrog?nio. Tamb?m no experimento I, para T1 e T2, procederam-se estudos de decomposi??o e libera??o de nutrientes dos res?duos de C. juncea via sacolas de decomposi??o, com 8 intervalos de coletas. Para o terceiro ensaio procederam-se estudos de desempenho agron?mico do milho, an?lise econ?mica e balan?o de nitrog?nio. Tamb?m foram feitos estudos das perdas de nitrog?nio via volatiliza??o de am?nia para res?duos de C. juncea, torta de mamona e esterco bovino, atrav?s de c?meras est?ticas semi abertas em oito intervalos de coleta. Quando semeada simultaneamente ao milho, independente da ?poca de semeadura, a C. juncea n?o comprometeu o rendimento do cereal, promoveu a adi??o de nitrog?nio ao sistema capaz de promover balan?os positivos para este nutriente. Quando o adubo verde foi semeado 7 dias antes ou 14 dias ap?s a semeadura do milho, no per?odo de ver?o, esse exerceu influ?ncia negativa no crescimento e na produ??o de gr?os do milho. Os res?duos de C. juncea apresentaram elevadas taxas de decomposi??o e libera??o de nutrientes, com tempo de meia vida para N de menos de 14 dias. Foram encontradas discrepantes taxas de emiss?o de am?nia para torta de mamona e res?duos de C. juncea, com perdas acumuladas de cerca de 46 e 14%, respectivamente. O arranjo em fileiras duplas de plantio de milho n?o influenciou no rendimento do cereal. Os resultados encontrados postam o cons?rcio em milho e C. juncea semeados simultaneamente como um promissor sistema de cultivo, capaz de proporcionar produ??o de gr?os de milho acima da m?dia produtiva do estado do Rio de Janeiro.