No description available.

The specialized role of the solicitor general has been a topic of much discussion and research within the past, but the task of the solicitor as amicus curiae has been overlooked. A content analysis of Court majority opinions and their corresponding solicitor general amicus briefs for the terms of 1987, 1995, and 2003, allows us to examine the flow of language from brief to opinion, as well at its possible incorporation into legal doctrine and the creation of law. Through implementing Crawdad Text Analysis System© software, the percentage of identical language contained in each corresponding set of documents is reported in the form of a resonance score. Invitation amicus briefs, which are extremely rare and have not been present much within past literature, were also examined in the same manner. Findings show small to medium resonance scores between amicus and Court opinions, with averages between 26 to 33 percent. Invitation amicus have a higher percent of language overlap with averages from 31 to 43 percent. The way the Court implements language contained in amicus briefs shows that the Court might not be as independent as scholars such as Dahl had previously thought.

Studies of the Supreme Court consistently show that the Office of the Solicitor General enjoys remarkable success before the Supreme Court, both at the certiorari stage and at the merits stage. These studies offer a variety of explanations for Solicitor General success, but fail to portray accurately the Office of the Solicitor General and to account for variations in governmental success. This paper seeks to continue the exploration of governmental success. By looking at the Office of the Solicitor General as a series of individuals with distinct characteristics rather than as a single entity, and by accounting for various situational dynamics, I attempt to explain the variations in executive success.

No description available.

A study in the effects of the solicitor general on judicial deference to the executive branch at the state court level. There has been significant research done into the development of judicial deference, but it almost always takes place at the Supreme Court. Similarly, the Solicitor General’s success rate has only been analyzed at the federal level. Recently there has been a trend of states creating Solicitor General Offices in order to gain the advantage perceived at the federal level. By comparing the level of deference state courts give to their executive branch over two time periods I determine that although the Solicitor General does impact deference, the impact isn’t immediate. The states with the strongest level of deference were the states that have had Solicitor Generals for a significant amount of time before the analysis. States where the office was created I between the two time periods do experience heightened deference, but at a lower level. This paper seeks to fill the gap in judiciary research where the majority of the focus is on the Supreme Court, which although very important does not give a comprehensive understanding of the US judicial branch.

<p>To gain confidence in that a dynamic real-time system behaves correctly, we test it. Automated verification & validation can be used to conduct testing of such systems in an effective and economic way.</p><p>An event monitor can be used as a part of a test oracle to monitor the system that is being tested. The test oracle could use the data (i.e., the streams of events) derived from the tested system, to determine if an executed test case gave a positive or negative result. To do this, the test oracle compares the streams of events received from the event monitor with the event expressions derived from the formal specification, and decides if the executed test case has responded positive or negative. Any deviations between observed behaviour and accepted behaviour should be reported by the test oracle as a negative result. If the executed test case gave a negative result, the monitor part should signal this to the reporter part of the test oracle.</p><p>This work aims to investigate how the event expressions can be derived from the formal specification, and in particular, how the event specification language Solicitor can be used to represent these event expressions.</p><p>We also discuss the need for parameterized event types in Solicitor, and any other event specification languages used in event monitoring. We also show that support for parameterized event types is a significant requirement for such languages.</p>

To gain confidence in that a dynamic real-time system behaves correctly, we test it. Automated verification &amp; validation can be used to conduct testing of such systems in an effective and economic way. An event monitor can be used as a part of a test oracle to monitor the system that is being tested. The test oracle could use the data (i.e., the streams of events) derived from the tested system, to determine if an executed test case gave a positive or negative result. To do this, the test oracle compares the streams of events received from the event monitor with the event expressions derived from the formal specification, and decides if the executed test case has responded positive or negative. Any deviations between observed behaviour and accepted behaviour should be reported by the test oracle as a negative result. If the executed test case gave a negative result, the monitor part should signal this to the reporter part of the test oracle. This work aims to investigate how the event expressions can be derived from the formal specification, and in particular, how the event specification language Solicitor can be used to represent these event expressions. We also discuss the need for parameterized event types in Solicitor, and any other event specification languages used in event monitoring. We also show that support for parameterized event types is a significant requirement for such languages.

No description available.

No description available.

Ce mémoire traite du blanchiment d’argent. Précisément, il propose une réflexion sur la question suivante : les avocats, cabinets d’avocats et notaires du Québec devraient-ils être assujettis à la Loi sur le recyclage des produits de la criminalité et le financement des activités terroristes? Pour en arriver à une réponse, nous dressons d’abord une définition du recyclage des produits de la criminalité et en analysons l’historique. Puis, nous étudions la pièce maitresse de la stratégie canadienne de prévention du blanchiment d’argent, soit la Loi sur le recyclage des produits de la criminalité et le financement des activités terroristes. Par la suite, nous examinons la question de l’assujettissement des avocats, des cabinets d’avocats et des notaires du Québec en exposant le risque de blanchiment d’argent chez ces professionnels, les multiples tentatives du législateur canadien de légiférer en la matière et une analyse de la décision récente de la Cour suprême du Canada sur ce sujet. Enfin, nous offrons des solutions à l’assujettissement de ces professionnels afin d’éliminer le risque de voir leurs services utilisés à des fins illégitimes. / This thesis focuses on money laundering. Specifically, it reflects on the following question: should lawyers, law firms and Quebec notaries be subject to the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act? In order to obtain an answer, it first sets out to seek a definition of money laundering and examines its history. Furthermore, the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act is analyzed in great detail. Finally, the question whether lawyers, law firms and Quebec notaries should be included in the scope of the Act is studied by exposing the risk of money laundering with these professionals and by undertaking an examination of the Canadian legislator’s multiple attempts to include them as well as an analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on that matter. In conclusion, it proposes solutions to include these legal professionals in order to eliminate the risk that their services will be used for illicit purposes.