This study explored how student responses systems are being used in middle school classrooms. The study sought to find out (1) for what purposes middle school teachers used student response systems (SRS); (2) in what subject areas middle school teachers use SRS; (3) if teachers profile of use of the systems were associated with particular characteristics of teachers (i.e., years taught, semesters using SRS technology, professional development experiences); (4) if teachers profile of use of the systems were related to their perceptions regarding the effect of SRS on instruction; and (5) if teachers profile of use of the systems were related to their perceptions regarding the effect of SRS on student learning. A total of 658 middle school teachers using student response systems were contacted to participate in the electronic survey. A total of 121 responded, yielding a response rate of 18.38%. A pre-existing survey, the Student Response System Questionnaire, was used to gather quantitative data for this study. Descriptive statistics were used to report data for purposes teachers used the systems and in what subject areas teachers used the systems. The results from the study show that grades 6-8 teachers are using student response systems across the curriculum and the main purpose is for formative assessment. Analysis of variance tests (ANOVAs) were used to analyze the relationship between profiles of use and continuous data (i.e., how many years the teachers have taught and how many semesters they have used student response technology). There was a significant relationship (F = 3.56, p < .05) between the number of years teachers had taught and their profiles of use. After an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was conducted for the number of semesters teachers had used the SRS as compared to their profile of use, no significance was found. A chi-square test (85.41, p <.01) revealed there was a significant relationship between teachers' profile of use and the amount of technical professional development they have received. A chi-square test (21.83, p <.01) revealed there was a significant relationship between teachers' profile of use and the amount of instructional professional development they had received. An analysis of variance test (ANOVA) was conducted between the teachers' profile of use and their perceptions regarding the effect of student response systems on instruction. This correlation was significant at the .000 level and was therefore significant to this study implying a relationship between the teachers' perceptions regarding the effect of student response systems on instruction and their profiles of use. An analysis of variance test (ANOVA) was also conducted between the teachers' profile of use and their perceptions regarding the effect of student response systems on student learning. This correlation was significant at the .002 level and was therefore significant to this study implying a relationship between the teachers' perceptions regarding the effect of student response systems on student learning and their profiles of use. Ten open response questions were sent out to participating teachers soliciting qualitative data to support the quantitative data from the electronic survey. Eleven teachers responded and themes from their responses are included in the results of this study.

Instructional technologies can be effective tools to foster student engagement, but university faculty may be reluctant to integrate innovative and evidence-based modern learning technologies into instruction. It is important to identify the factors that influence faculty adoption of instructional technologies in the teaching and learning process. Based on Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory, this quantitative, nonexperimental, one-shot cross-sectional survey determined what attributes of innovation (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability) predict the probability of faculty adopting the audience response system (ARS) into instruction. The sample for the study consisted of 201 faculty who have current teaching appointments at a university in the southeastern United States. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the attributes of innovation that predict the probability of faculty adopting the ARS into instruction. The data indicated that the attributes of compatibility and trialability significantly predicted faculty adoption of ARS into instruction. Based on the results of the study, a professional development project that includes 3 full days of training and experiential learning was designed to assist faculty in adopting ARS into instruction. Because the current study only included the faculty at a single local university, future studies are recommended to explore a more holistic view of the problem from different institutions and from other stakeholders who may contribute to the process of instructional technology adoption. The project not only contributes to solving the local problem in ARS adoption, but it is also instrumental in promoting positive social change by fostering evidence-based teaching strategies and innovations that maximize student learning.

The problem with which this investigation was concerned was that of determining the effect of teaching freshman mathematics with the Spitz Student Response System upon a student's anxiety level, attitude and achievement.

The technological improvements and a generation with increased interest in using technology to aid in their learning. Cause a need for a change in the educational approaches or already established methodologies. The modern educational approach hints a move from the traditional passive learning approach, where the students are passive listeners, into an active learning approach, where the students access the information beforehand. Therefore, classroom time is used to elaborate on complex subjects through an active discussion during the lectures. Student Response Systems (SRS) aims to integrate technological tools with the educational environment, thereby improving the students' participation and engagement. The purpose of this thesis is to study the factors influencing the students' engagement when using SRS in a flipped classroom environment. Furthermore, to what extend can the SRS facilitate the students' active participation in the discussion within an educational context. The research is performed at Linnaeus University in a course at a Master level course. A pre-study was conducted, consisting of observing the course later to form the interview question from the acquired knowledge. Afterward, interviews were conducted with 7 of the participating students. The results of the study might provide additional knowledge for the teachers to decide upon an approach to implement the use of SRS with the flipped classroom approach.

The purpose of this project is two fold: (a) to evaluate the technology (hardware and software) of the student response system (SRS) used at Brigham Young University (BYU) and (b) to evaluate which instructional methods being used with the SRS students' feel are most helpful. In the past, the student response systems supported by BYU have not fully met the needs of professors and problems with the systems have limited professors' uses of the SRS. Ten professors were randomly selected to participate in the evaluation using a stratified random sampling technique. The data collection methods consisted of classroom observations, interviews with the ten selected professors, focus groups with students in the professors' classes, a student survey, and a professor survey. Data were collected throughout Winter semester 2007. The new system, iClicker, functioned well for the majority of professors. Some technical problems were encountered, but professors were typically able to resolve them as they gained more experience with the system. The most frequently stated problem for professors was with iGrader, which limited some professors' uses of the system. Students, however, experienced few technical problems with their clickers. The most frequent problem cited from students was the clicker shutting off easily. Students were generally positive about the helpfulness of the instructional methods professors were using. The instructional method students found most helpful was receiving immediate feedback. They also felt their comprehension of course material, attendance to lecture, attentiveness/engagement during lecture, participation in lecture, and achievement in the course had increased from using the SRS. However, a significant factor in students' perceptions of the clicker's helpfulness was the cost of purchasing the clicker. The least positive students felt that the cost of purchasing the clicker outweighed the benefits of using a student response system. These students rated the instructional methods as less helpful and rated their comprehension, attendance, engagement, participation, and achievement increasing less than those that felt the cost was worth the benefit.

Secondary students with specific learning disabilities often have challenges with academic engagement and performance within the general education setting. Opportunity to respond strategies, such as student response systems, have shown promise in supporting academic engagement for students without disabilities. However, there are few studies examining the relationship between student response systems and academic engagement for older students with specific learning disabilities. The purpose of this study was to pilot the use of Google classroom as a student response system on academic participation and disruptive behavior for high school students with specific learning disability. While the study began as a multiple baseline across participants single-subject research design, the design was changed due to school closures as a result of COVID-19. A high-school student with specific learning disability participated in a study using an AB non-experimental design. The student response system resulted in an abrupt change in academic participation for the participant. The student and teacher perceived the intervention to be effective and appropriate for increasing participation and decreasing disruptive behavior. This study contributes to a limited body of research on student response systems for secondary students with specific learning disabilities.

Technology is enjoying an increasingly important role in many collegiate pedagogical designs. Contemporary research has become more focused on the ways that technology can contribute to learning outcomes. These studies provide a critical foundation for educational researchers who seek to incorporate and reap the benefits of new technologies in classroom environments. The aim of the present study is to empirically assess how combining an active, collaborative learning environment with a classroom response system (colloquially called “clickers”) in a postsecondary setting can influence and improve learning outcomes. To this end, the study proposes an instructional design utilizing two feedback response-formats (clickers and flashcards) and two response methods for answering in-class questions (collaborative peer instruction and individual). The theoretical bases that provide the academic structure for the five instructional conditions (control, clicker-response individual, clicker-response peer instruction, flashcard-response individual, and flashcard-response peer instruction) are the generative learning theory and social constructivism. Participants were 171 undergraduate students from an Educational Psychology subject pool from a large Southwest university. The researcher used a two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with two treatments (response format and collaboration level) as the between-subjects factors; students’ posttest scores as the dependent variable; and pretest scores as the covariate. Results showed no significant main effects; however, the study produced statistically significant findings that there was an interaction effect between the use of clickers and a peer instruction design. To follow up the interaction, the researcher conducted tests of the simple effects of response format within each collaboration condition, with the pretest as the covariate. Results showed that for students who collaborated, clickers were better than flashcards, whereas when students worked individually, there was no difference. This study builds upon existing studies by using a stronger empirical approach with more robust controls to evaluate the effects of a variety of instructional interventions, clicker and flashcard response systems and peer instruction on learning outcomes. It shows that clicker technology might be most effective when combined with collaborative methods. The discussion includes implications, limitations, and directions for future research. / text

This study investigated how formative assessment implemented in a fifth grade mathematics classroom with a student response system and a student self-evaluative tool affected student self-assessment. Data were collected through individual student and focus group interviews, self-assessment sheets, and teacher reflections. Formative assessment is a low stakes classroom assessment that is an assessment for learning. This study used a student response system to convey feedback from the formative assessment to both students and teacher during instruction. The student self-assessment sheet was implemented to provide a more dynamic level of feedback for students than what could be provided through the student response system alone

O desenvolvimento tecnológico vem impactando o campo da educação de múltiplas maneiras. Entretanto, a educação tradicional parece estar estagnada sob vários aspectos. No ensino superior de ciências contábeis, há diversas evidências. Com base nesse cenário, apresenta-se o Sistema de Resposta do Estudante (SRE), um recurso tecnológico que, em sua versão mais recente, consiste de dispositivos pessoais e um software interconectados pela internet usados para que os alunos possam responder questões propostas pelo docente e para que haja feedback instantâneo. Nesse sentido, o presente estudo objetivou verificar o impacto do SRE no desempenho acadêmico e na satisfação dos alunos de ciências contábeis. Foi conduzido um quase-experimento, dividido em duas partes, com alunos da disciplina de Contabilidade de Entidades Diversas de uma instituição de ensino superior pública brasileira. Ao todo, 55 alunos participaram do quase-experimento, separados em duas turmas (A e B). A Parte 1 do quase-experimento ocorreu no 1º bimestre do ano letivo de 2016 da instituição, tendo a Turma A como grupo de controle a Turma B como grupo de tratamento. A Parte 2, por sua vez, foi realizada no 2º bimestre, com a inversão dos grupos de tratamento e de controle. No início da pesquisa, foram aplicadas provas com o intuito de verificar o conhecimento prévio do conteúdo. Outros dados foram coletados por meio dos documentos da disciplina e de um questionário que compreendeu questões sobre o perfil socioeconômico dos discentes e acerca do uso (14 questões) e satisfação (10 questões) com o SRE. Em ambos os bimestres, os testes t (sig. > 0,10) e Mann-Whitney (sig. > 0,10) não indicaram que o emprego do SRE tem efeito positivo estatisticamente significativo sobre o desempenho acadêmico dos alunos. Complementarmente, analisou-se o impacto do SRE na performance discente em conjunto com fatores individuais, acadêmicos e socioecômicos por meio de modelos de regressão. Os resultados reforçaram que o SRE não exerce influência significativa sobre o desempenho acadêmico (sig. > 0,10). Em relação à satisfação discente, as estatísticas descritivas apontaram que os alunos gostaram de usar a tecnologia (média = 9,59; dp = 0,93), o SRE tornou a aula mais divertida em comparação com o ensino tradicional (média = 9,55; dp = 1,14) e houve satisfação com o equipamento (média = 9,28; dp = 1,61). Além disso, o teste U de Mann-Whitney sinalizou que não houve diferença de percepção entre as Turmas A e B em se tratando de satisfação com o SRE. Ambas as turmas mostraram padrão similar de satisfação. Da mesma forma, pela matriz de correlação de Spearman dos itens de satisfação, verificaram-se significantes relações, com destaque para a correlação que indica que quanto maior a satisfação discente com o SRE, maior tende a ser a satisfação com a disciplina (coef. = 0,2331; sig. < 0,10). Nesse sentido, constatou-se que o SRE não aumenta a performance acadêmica, mas colabora para o desenvolvimento da satisfação discente de modo geral. / Technological development has impacted the field of education in many ways. However, a traditional education seems to be stagnated in many aspects. In higher accounting education, there are several evidences. Based on this scenario, the Student Response System (SRS) is presented, which is a technological tool that, in its most recent version, consists of personal devices and a software interconnected by the internet, so that students are able to answer questions proposed by the professor with instant feedback. In this sense, the present study aimed to verify the impact of the SRS on academic performance and satisfaction of the accounting students. It was conducted a quasi-experiment, divided into two parts, with students enrolled in the Accounting for Diverse Entities discipline of a Brazilian higher education institution. In all, 55 students participated in a quasi-experiment, separated into two classes (A and B). The Part 1 of the quasi-experiment occurred in the first two-months of the 2016 institutional calendar, with Class A as control group and Class B as treatment group. The Part 2, in turn, was performed in the second two-months period, with an inversion of the treatment and control groups. At the beginning of the research, initial tests were applied with the students in order to verify the previous knowledge of the content. Other data were collected through class documents and a questionnaire that included questions on socioeconomic profile of the students and about the use (14 questions) and satisfaction (10 questions) with the SRS. In both parts of the quasi-experiment, the t (sig. > 0.10) and Mann-Whitney (sig. > 0.10) tests did not indicate that the use of SRS has a statistically significant positive effect on students\' academic performance. Additionally, the impact of SRS on student performance was analyzed in conjunction with individual, academic and socioeconomic factors through regression models. The results reinforce that the SRS does not have a significant influence on the academic performance (sig. > 0.10). Regarding student satisfaction, descriptive statistics revealed that students liked to use the technology (mean = 9.59; sd = 0.93), SRS made classes funnier than traditional teaching (mean = 9.55; sd = 1.14), and there was satisfaction with the equipment (mean = 9.28; sd = 1.61). In addition, the Mann-Whitney test showed that there was no difference between Class A\'s and Class B\'s perception in terms of satisfaction with SRS. Both groups felt satisfied similarly. Likewise, Spearman\'s correlation matrix of satisfaction items showed significant relationships, with emphasis on the correlation that indicates that the higher the student satisfaction with the SRS, the greater the satisfaction with the discipline tends to be (coeff. = 0.2331, sig. < 0.10). In general, it was verified that SRS does not increase academic performance, but it contributes to the development of students\' satisfaction.

O desenvolvimento tecnológico vem impactando o campo da educação de múltiplas maneiras. Entretanto, a educação tradicional parece estar estagnada sob vários aspectos. No ensino superior de ciências contábeis, há diversas evidências. Com base nesse cenário, apresenta-se o Sistema de Resposta do Estudante (SRE), um recurso tecnológico que, em sua versão mais recente, consiste de dispositivos pessoais e um software interconectados pela internet usados para que os alunos possam responder questões propostas pelo docente e para que haja feedback instantâneo. Nesse sentido, o presente estudo objetivou verificar o impacto do SRE no desempenho acadêmico e na satisfação dos alunos de ciências contábeis. Foi conduzido um quase-experimento, dividido em duas partes, com alunos da disciplina de Contabilidade de Entidades Diversas de uma instituição de ensino superior pública brasileira. Ao todo, 55 alunos participaram do quase-experimento, separados em duas turmas (A e B). A Parte 1 do quase-experimento ocorreu no 1º bimestre do ano letivo de 2016 da instituição, tendo a Turma A como grupo de controle a Turma B como grupo de tratamento. A Parte 2, por sua vez, foi realizada no 2º bimestre, com a inversão dos grupos de tratamento e de controle. No início da pesquisa, foram aplicadas provas com o intuito de verificar o conhecimento prévio do conteúdo. Outros dados foram coletados por meio dos documentos da disciplina e de um questionário que compreendeu questões sobre o perfil socioeconômico dos discentes e acerca do uso (14 questões) e satisfação (10 questões) com o SRE. Em ambos os bimestres, os testes t (sig. > 0,10) e Mann-Whitney (sig. > 0,10) não indicaram que o emprego do SRE tem efeito positivo estatisticamente significativo sobre o desempenho acadêmico dos alunos. Complementarmente, analisou-se o impacto do SRE na performance discente em conjunto com fatores individuais, acadêmicos e socioecômicos por meio de modelos de regressão. Os resultados reforçaram que o SRE não exerce influência significativa sobre o desempenho acadêmico (sig. > 0,10). Em relação à satisfação discente, as estatísticas descritivas apontaram que os alunos gostaram de usar a tecnologia (média = 9,59; dp = 0,93), o SRE tornou a aula mais divertida em comparação com o ensino tradicional (média = 9,55; dp = 1,14) e houve satisfação com o equipamento (média = 9,28; dp = 1,61). Além disso, o teste U de Mann-Whitney sinalizou que não houve diferença de percepção entre as Turmas A e B em se tratando de satisfação com o SRE. Ambas as turmas mostraram padrão similar de satisfação. Da mesma forma, pela matriz de correlação de Spearman dos itens de satisfação, verificaram-se significantes relações, com destaque para a correlação que indica que quanto maior a satisfação discente com o SRE, maior tende a ser a satisfação com a disciplina (coef. = 0,2331; sig. < 0,10). Nesse sentido, constatou-se que o SRE não aumenta a performance acadêmica, mas colabora para o desenvolvimento da satisfação discente de modo geral. / Technological development has impacted the field of education in many ways. However, a traditional education seems to be stagnated in many aspects. In higher accounting education, there are several evidences. Based on this scenario, the Student Response System (SRS) is presented, which is a technological tool that, in its most recent version, consists of personal devices and a software interconnected by the internet, so that students are able to answer questions proposed by the professor with instant feedback. In this sense, the present study aimed to verify the impact of the SRS on academic performance and satisfaction of the accounting students. It was conducted a quasi-experiment, divided into two parts, with students enrolled in the Accounting for Diverse Entities discipline of a Brazilian higher education institution. In all, 55 students participated in a quasi-experiment, separated into two classes (A and B). The Part 1 of the quasi-experiment occurred in the first two-months of the 2016 institutional calendar, with Class A as control group and Class B as treatment group. The Part 2, in turn, was performed in the second two-months period, with an inversion of the treatment and control groups. At the beginning of the research, initial tests were applied with the students in order to verify the previous knowledge of the content. Other data were collected through class documents and a questionnaire that included questions on socioeconomic profile of the students and about the use (14 questions) and satisfaction (10 questions) with the SRS. In both parts of the quasi-experiment, the t (sig. > 0.10) and Mann-Whitney (sig. > 0.10) tests did not indicate that the use of SRS has a statistically significant positive effect on students\' academic performance. Additionally, the impact of SRS on student performance was analyzed in conjunction with individual, academic and socioeconomic factors through regression models. The results reinforce that the SRS does not have a significant influence on the academic performance (sig. > 0.10). Regarding student satisfaction, descriptive statistics revealed that students liked to use the technology (mean = 9.59; sd = 0.93), SRS made classes funnier than traditional teaching (mean = 9.55; sd = 1.14), and there was satisfaction with the equipment (mean = 9.28; sd = 1.61). In addition, the Mann-Whitney test showed that there was no difference between Class A\'s and Class B\'s perception in terms of satisfaction with SRS. Both groups felt satisfied similarly. Likewise, Spearman\'s correlation matrix of satisfaction items showed significant relationships, with emphasis on the correlation that indicates that the higher the student satisfaction with the SRS, the greater the satisfaction with the discipline tends to be (coeff. = 0.2331, sig. < 0.10). In general, it was verified that SRS does not increase academic performance, but it contributes to the development of students\' satisfaction.