The first part of the article proposes a theoretical-doctrinaire analysis about the sanctioning authority of the Public Administration and explains the sanctioning authority of the Supervisory Agency for Government Procurement. On the other hand, the second part of the article examines the definitions related to the personal liability concerning government procurement issues. Finally, the article explains the strict liability in this respect. / En la primera parte del artículo se propone un desarrollo teórico-doctrinario sobre la potestad sancionadora administrativa de la Administración Pública. Asimismo, se desarrolla una explicación en relación a la potestad administrativa sancionadora del Organismo Supervisor de las Contrataciones del Estado. En la segunda parte del artículo se analizan los conceptos sobre la responsabilidad subjetiva en materia de contrataciones con el Estado,terminando con explicar acerca de la responsabilidad objetiva en la misma materia.

Les États ont l’obligation juridique de protéger les personnes et leurs propriétés. Cette obligation juridique a pour fondements, les conventions internationales. Mais, les États ou autres personnes de droit public, se comportent comme des personnes de droit privé, ils contractent des contrats internationaux, des contrats d’État, the state contracts, commerciaux, d’investissements, de marchés publics, d’import-export, etc., et ignorent les attributs d'un État de droit à caractère universel. Lesdits États ne parviennent pas à respecter leurs engagements internationaux à savoir, la reconnaissance et la protection des droits fondamentaux ou le respect des principes judiciaires universels. La recherche du profit personnel ou la prise illégale d’intérêt des personnes de droit public, ne subordonne pas la protection des droits de l’Homme, de sorte que; les personnes faibles sont lésées, les personnes lésées sont des Civils non armés, des enfants, du fait d'acte internationalement illicite, les véritables coupables ne sont jamais inculpés. L’ingérence a son sens, mais le règlement pacifique semble mieux caractériser les principes judiciaires et de droit internationalement universel, lorsque la partie faible à caractère universel devient victime d'actes internationalement illicites ou des systèmes coloniaux ou néocoloniaux irréguliers de sorte que le mimétisme des institutions juridiques françaises par les États francophones d'Afrique, et le mimétisme des institutions juridiques américains par les États anglophones d'Afrique, perd son sens universellement réel. En effet, l’État de Droit est devenu une simple phrase, de sorte que le droit universel a un challenge. / The States have legal obligations to protect the persons and their properties. That legal obligation is based on the international Conventions. But The States or the officials behave like the private persons, they contract The State Contracts, etc.., and, Those States breach the attributes or the feature, or the characteristics, of the rule of law of Universal Nature. they fail to perform the universal law or the universal principles. To seek personal profit do not surbordinate the protection of the Human Rights. Thus, the weak people have their universal law violate, those who are not strong, children and unarmed civilians are the victims of the internationally wrongful act or the internationally wrongful act of the state, and the real authors are never accused. The interference has its meaning in the rule of law, but the peaceful settlement of conflicts seems to be better characterize the judicial principles and international law, when weak people with an universal character becomes victim of internationally wrongful acts or victims of the irregular colonial or neocolonial systems, so the mimicry of French legal institutions by the French-speaking States of Africa, or the mimicry of American legal institutions by the English-speaking States of Africa, is the mimicry that loses its universally real meaning. Indeed, the rule of law has become a simple sentence, so that the universal right has a challenge.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-29T13:32:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Raquel de Melo Marinho.pdf: 1051221 bytes, checksum: de9ca91bf4bc36b06dcd7cb34694ace6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-12-21 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / This study result from a work with adolescents who commit infractional act and are inserted at social educative system. It is a work out of the responsibility idea, that is understanding, by a lot of people, like a expected effect in the application and performing a social educative measure. For that we get opinions about the subject with the academics of the laws of the childhood and adolescence in the Brazil and with academics of the psychoanalyse, because it refer a subject surround with the Law and the Crime and can contribute with the criminology, precisely about the conception of a human being and the responsibility. Finally we promoted, from some practical experiences with the tennagers, a dialog between law and psichoanalytic, about the differents notions of responsability / Este estudo resulta de um trabalho junto a adolescentes autores de ato infracional, inseridos no sistema socioeducativo. Trata-se de uma investigação sobre a idéia de responsabilidade, que é entendida, por muitos, enquanto o efeito esperado na aplicação e cumprimento de uma medida socioeducativa. Para tanto, buscou-se opiniões a respeito do tema entre os teóricos do direito da infância e adolescência no Brasil e também da psicanálise, visto que essa última refere-se a um sujeito às voltas com a Lei e o Crime e pode, pois, colaborar com a criminologia, precisamente quanto a uma certa concepção de homem e de responsabilidade. Ao final, tentou-se promover, a partir de algumas experiências práticas com os jovens, um diálogo entre o direito e a psicanálise, acerca das diferentes noções de responsabilidade