Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ana Paula Cazarini Ribas de Oliveira.pdf: 917745 bytes, checksum: 349021c52a86f3e4e8e51d7761e20155 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-05-21 / This work for the Master´s degree has the aim of analyzing the topic of the parents´ responsibility for the damage caused by their children under majority. It is based on the Civil Code from 2002 that introduced two important changes: the straight responsibility of parents and in case they are not able of doing it or do not have enough possessions for satisfying this duty, the law hold responsible the incapable for the compliance with the obligation for the reparation of the victim. Such changes concerning the constitutional principles of the human being´s dignity, solidarity, equality, liberty and psychophysics integrity, the principle of the whole reparation for the damage suffered by the victim and the principle of the whole protection of the rights for the minor, according to the Child and the Teenage Statute combine with the aim of the general civil responsibility, allow the law to give the rules, that the matter is based on, a different comprehension concerning its content and covering. It is said that parents are responsible by the damage caused by their minor children because they were given cause, therefore they must afford the duty that might appear, independently of their marital status whether they are married (the fact or the right), separated, divorced or even if they were removed from the family power or whether it had been suspended. In any case, there will be solidarity between parents for the compliance with the obligation for the reparation. In this context, hypotheses that move away the parents´ responsibility are reduced. The chances of the victim to obtain the reparation for the damage suffered increase at the same time that there is the guarantee for more protection to the minor who might have his own property reached in case parents neither answer to the obligation of the reparation nor are responsible for it / Esta dissertação de mestrado tem por escopo analisar o instituto da responsabilidade civil dos pais pelos danos causados por seus filhos menores sob o enfoque do Código Civil de 2002, que introduziu, nesta seara, duas importantes modificações: fixou a responsabilidade objetiva dos pais e responsabilizou o incapaz pelo cumprimento da obrigação de reparar a vítima, caso os pais não sejam responsáveis ou não tenham bens suficientes para satisfazer esta obrigação. Tais alterações, associadas aos princípios constitucionais da dignidade da pessoa humana, da solidariedade, da igualdade, da liberdade e da integridade psicofísica; ao princípio da reparação integral do dano sofrido pela vítima e ao princípio da proteção integral dos direitos do menor, fixados pelo Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente, combinados com a finalidade da responsabilidade civil geral, permitem atribuir às regras que regem a matéria uma interpretação diferente quanto ao seu conteúdo e alcance. Sustenta-se que os pais são responsáveis pelos danos causados por seus filhos menores porque lhes deram causa, devendo suportar os ônus daí decorrentes, independentemente do estado civil, ou seja, se casados (de fato ou de direito), separados ou divorciados entre si e ainda que sejam destituídos do poder familiar ou tenham este poder suspenso. Em qualquer desses casos haverá solidariedade, entre os pais, pelo cumprimento da obrigação de reparar. Neste contexto, as hipóteses que afastam a responsabilidade dos pais são reduzidas, aumentam as chances de a vítima obter a reparação de seu dano, integralmente, ao mesmo tempo em que se garante maior proteção ao menor, que poderá ter seu próprio patrimônio alcançado se os pais não satisfizerem a obrigação de reparar ou não forem por ela responsabilizados

Enfin, le droit international dispose d’un ensemble de règles relatives à la responsabilité des organisations internationales pour fait internationalement illicite. Après 10 ans de travail, la Commission du droit international est parvenue, en 2011, à élaborer un projet d'articles codifiant les règles en la matière. La tâche était pourtant délicate : assujettir ces entités dont la nature et le fonctionnement sont différents des Etats, à un ensemble de règles unique dans le domaine de la responsabilité internationale. L’objet de cette étude porte sur l’œuvre de codification effectuée par la Commission dans le projet d’articles. Il s’agit plus précisément d’analyser les techniques de codification utilisées par la Commission dans l’élaboration des règles applicables : s’agit-il d’une codification stricto sensu de la pratique ou bien de l’élaboration de nouvelles règles relevant du « développement progressif » du droit international ? La réponse apportée à cette question suppose préalablement de définir les sources de la codification en ce qui concerne chacune des dispositions du projet d’articles, en se demandant si elle concrétise une pratique bien établie des organisations internationales, ou au contraire une transposition des règles du projet d’articles sur la responsabilité de l’Etat, adaptées aux particularités des organisations internationales. L’autorité du projet d’articles ne semble pas, à l’heure actuelle, faire l’unanimité, et dans ce contexte, la présente étude portant sur le rapport entre codification et développement progressif dans l’œuvre de codification de la CDI permet d’apprécier l’autorité substantielle propre à chacune des dispositions du projet d’articles. D’autant qu’on ne sait absolument pas si une convention de codification sera adoptée, qui pourra ériger les dispositions du projet d’articles en normes juridiquement obligatoires. / The international law has finally a set of rules on the responsibility of the international organizations for internationally wrongful acts. After 10 years of work, the International Law Commission was able in 2011 to elaborate a draft articles codifying the rules on the matter. However the task was difficult: subject these entities, whose nature and functioning is different from States to a single set of rules in the field of international responsibility. The purpose of this study focuses on the work of codification made by the Commission in the draft articles. This is specifically to analyze the techniques of codification used by the Commission in the elaboration of the applicable rules: is it a codification sticto sensu of the practice or a creation of new rules under the "progressive development" of the international law? The answer to this question presupposes to define the sources of codification in each of the provisions of the draft articles concerned, wondering if it embodies a well-established practice of international organizations, or rather a transposition of the rules of the draft articles on States responsibility, adapted to the features of international organizations. At present the authority of the draft articles does not seem to have unanimity, and in this context, the present study on the relation between codification and progressive development in the codification work of ILC can appreciate the substantial own authority of each provisions of the draft articles. Especially that no one knows if a codification convention will be adopted, which will set the provisions of the draft articles up as legally binding norms.