Malaria is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in Sudan. The annual malaria cases and deaths are estimated at 7.5 million and 35, 000 respectively. One of the possible factors that have led to this situation is the development of insecticide resistance in the main malaria vector in Sudan, Anopheles arabiensis. This study therefore, was initiated to identify the malaria vectors in Gezira and Sennar states of central Sudan, determine their susceptibility levels to the different classes of insecticides used for malaria vector control, identify mechanisms of resistance, and determine the sporozoite infection rate and the blood meal sources in these populations. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for species identification revealed that An. arabiensis was the only member of the An. gambiae complex present in the study area. The blood meal analysis using ELISA showed high anthropophily with 89.2% feeding on humans. The overall sporozoite infection rate was 2.3 %. WHO susceptibility tests showed complete susceptibility of An. arabiensis to bendiocarb (100% mortality) and multiple resistance to permethrin (54-78%), DDT (55-66%) and malathion (76-78%). The kdr mutation analysis revealed the presence of the West African kdr allele with the majority of specimens being heterozygous (RS). The kdr in DDT/permethrin susceptible specimens were: 15% homozygous for the kdr mutation (RR), 64.2% heterozygous (RS) and 20.8% homozygous for the susceptible allele (SS). Amongst the DDT/permethrin resistant specimens, 13% were SS, 48.7% RS and 38.3% RR. The apparent lack of correlation between kdr and resistant phenotype strongly suggests that other resistance mechanisms are playing a role.

The Republic of South Sudan’s independence on 9 July 2011 revived the possibility of secession as means of self-determination. The purpose of this exploratory study was to analyse and assess the implication of secession on the African environment, with reference to South Sudan. The qualitative research approach enabled the researcher to draw parallels between literature and opinions of experts involved in South Sudan’s secession. Driving the secessionist approach are ideologies and greed of elites and peoples in power, religious differences and the unequal distribution of wealth and resources that exacerbate tensions between the fortunate peoples enjoying opportunities to develop and the excluded, utterly poor peoples just surviving. National and international attitudes sanction or veto the possibility to secede. Although secession could terminate continued disarray, it should only be considered if both states, as parties to the secession, could ensure the delivery of statehood responsibilities to their citizens and neighbouring communities.

Thesis advisor: Rosanna Demarco / For 21 years (1983-2004), the civil war in Sudan concentrated in the South resulting in massive population displacements and human suffering. Following the comprehensive peace agreement in 2005, the government of South Sudan is rebuilding the country's infrastructure. However, the post war South Sudan has some of the worst health indicators, lack of basic services, poor health infrastructure and severe shortage of skilled labor. The maternal mortality ratio for example is 2,054/100,000 live births, currently the highest in the world. Abortion complication leads among causes of admission at the gynecology units. This research contributes nursing knowledge on reproductive health among populations affected by war. The purpose was to explore the experiences of women with abortion complications in the post war South Sudan. Using qualitative descriptive methodology, in-depth interviews were conducted with 26 women following treatment for abortion complications at the gynecology unit of a county hospital. Data was collected from March 2nd to April 26th, 2008. Spontaneous abortion was the most common among study participants. Post abortion care was nonexistent at the community level health facilities, but present at the hospital. The women interviewed were reluctant to reflect in-depth about their experiences with abortion complications. They described the process, signs, symptoms and the events that led to the pregnancy loss, and were more concerned about regaining their reproductive function, a societal expectation of a married woman in South Sudan. A female child in South Sudan is assigned a "special" role in the family and community - that of getting married, attracting a high bride wealth paid as dowry to her parents and delivering children for the husband. Arranged and/or forced early marriage is common. A woman's world view about reproductive health and experiences with abortion complications is therefore influenced by this cultural context. Implications of these findings include the need to develop the nurse midwifery profession in South Sudan. Nurse midwives can lead in providing gender and culturally sensitive reproductive health services including post abortion care. Plans for care must include opportunities to listen to women's perspectives. / Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2010. / Submitted to: Boston College. Connell School of Nursing. / Discipline: Nursing.

Texte remanié de: Dissertation--Berlin--Humboldt-Universität. / Mention parallèle de titre ou de responsabilité : Female genital mutilation. Bibliogr. p. 142-147.

The prolonged civil-war and famine in the African nation of Sudan has displaced millions over the last two decades, many of these are women and children. Refugee women who are resettled to the US with their children must make profound adjustments to learn how to live in the American society and culture. Very little is understood about the factors and conditions that affect the health of immigrant and refugee populations who resettle to a host country.This ethnographic study investigates the influences to health and well-being in 10 refugee women from the Dinka tribe of southern Sudan who were resettled with their children to a Midwestern city in the United States (US). The in-depth interviews and participant observation that occurred over the one-year period of the study resulted in an interpretive theory of Well-Being in Refugee Women Experiencing Cultural Transition. Well-being in Dinka mothers is understood through the relationships between three major themes: Liminality: Living Between Two Cultures, Standing for Myself, and Hope for the Future. Liminality: Living Between Two Cultures describes how the women struggled to maintain a delicate balance between their traditional Dinka culture and the new American culture. The theme of Standing for Myself addresses how learning new skills and taking on new roles in the US, led to transformation of the refugee women. The third theme of Hope for the Future emphasizes the Dinka cultural values of communality and religious convictions that gave the women hope for a better future for their families and countrymen.The middle-range theory of transitions was used as a theoretical framework to guide the investigation of well-being of the refugee women and their families during resettlement. The study extends of the theory of transitions to refugee women from southern Sudan by developing a theoretical explanation for how refugee Dinka women attain well-being during transition. The results of this study strongly indicate that `cultural transition' be added as a distinct type of transition significant to understand the health needs of refugee women. The knowledge from this study will lead to the development of culturally competent interventions for resettled refugee families.

The current socio-economic and political landscape of Sudan and South Sudan can be described as one that is war-ridden and deeply divided by religion, culture, ethnicity and ownership over oil. It has been more than twelve months since the secession of Southern Sudan from the North (See Map 1). Despite the secession, general instability continues. To deal with this turmoil, Sudan declared a so-called “state of emergency” in 2012 along its border with South Sudan. The reason for this was the on-going tension between North Sudan and South Sudan over ownership of the oil-rich Abyei area. This conflict over oil is furthermore fuelled by diverse internal divisions among the Sudanese population (North and South). Sudanese diversity is characterized by two opposing antagonistic religious groupings, namely the Arabic North, whose main religious belief is Islam, and the so-called “black Africans” in the South, whose religious belief is mainly Christianity or Animist. In addition to this primary division there are also over 570 ethnic groups in Sudan (North and South). Conflicts and tension between the different ethnic groups is furthermore caused by disputes over natural resources such as water, livestock and land as well as political power and economic gains. Despite the continued conflict the assumption in this study was that the signing and implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) (2005–2011) represented a potential step towards eventual stability. This dissertation therefore focuses, as a case study, on an analytical description of the CPA and its outcomes. Specific reference was made to the role and impact of political mobilization by using an instrumental approach as a framework for analysis. In the above regard, research centred on the following three themes: *Ethnic mobilization as a factor in the political destabilization of Sudan since independence and towards the implementation of the CPA; *Ethnic mobilization as a guideline in the structuring of the CPA; and *Ethnic mobilization and the eventual outcome of the CPA. By addressing the above themes, the study attempted firstly to provide a balanced perspective on the causes of continued instability and conflict in Sudan. Secondly, an attempt was made to provide a future scenario for the possible unfolding of socio-economic and political developments in Sudan and South Sudan. / MA (Political studies), North-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, 2013

This is a study that aims to look at the violence occurring in Sudan and Libya in 2011. It asks the question why there was an intervention in the latter case but not the former. The analysis will use an integrated theoretical framework, looking at national interests, power balance and international norms to explain the behavior and decision-making of states in these particular cases. The fact that so little has been done or said about the conflict in Sudan is troubling, and deserves an explanation, especially considering the very different reaction to similar situations like Libya at the time. This study uses a comparative method to map the differences and similarities between the two cases using both statistical numbers and facts, as well as a content analysis to examine the discourse and media coverage on the two conflicts. The analysis may seem very broad and complex, but the same can be said about world politics in general. It is a very complex thing, and sometimes a complex explanation is required. Very rarely is there just one answer to a question like this, but many different perspectives that are often equally legitimate and important to consider. This is the basis of the method used in this study, to use different perspectives to give a clearer overall image of why states act as they do, and why they make the decisions that they make.

No description available.

Zugl.: Dresden, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2008

Teilw. zugl.: Berlin, Univ., Diss., 1986. / Includes bibliographical references. - Accompanied by 4 folded leaves of plans in pocket inside back cover. - Also published online. - Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 1986.