Au sein d’un même espace muséal, qui est exclusivement dédié à l’art contemporain nous constatons la présence simultanée de formes traditionnelles d’art à côté d’installations. Il nous semble que ces œuvres d’art sont trop différentes pour être réunies sous la même appellation Art Contemporain. Dans cette étude nous analysons les présupposés philosophiques de la Modernité et de la Postmodernité, puis après avoir disqualifié la postmodernité, nous prenons l’Exposition à la Kunsthalle de Bern, en 1969, Quand les attitudes deviennent forme, comme date de naissance de l’art contemporain, et les œuvres qui y sont présentées comme la forme paradigmatique de l’art contemporain. La caractéristique essentielle des œuvres d’art contemporain,c’est qu’elles sont créées in situ et qu’elles peuvent être démontées et réinstallées. Ceci pose des problèmes de persistance d’identité dans le temps, à travers ces différents intervalles temporels. Nous analysons la théorie endurantiste des objets tridimensionnels et la théorie perdurantiste des objets quadridimensionnels. Nous adoptons comme principe méréologique de composition des parties temporelles, le principe installation réinstallation, qui permet de justifier la persistance d’une mêmeté de ces Œuvres d’art Contemporain au cours du temps. / Within the same museum space, which is exclusively dedicated to contemporary art, we find traditional forms of art beside installations. It seems to us that these works of art are too different to be labelled: Contemporary Art.In this study we analyze the philosophical assumptions of Modernity and Postmodernity and after having disqualified postmodernity, we claim that the Exhibition at the Kunsthalle in Bern, in 1969, When attitudes become form, is the birth date of art contemporary, and those works represent the paradigmatic form of contemporary art.The essential characteristic of contemporary art works (OAC) is that they are created in situ and can be dismantled and reinstalled. There is a problem of persistence of identity over time, during these different intervals of time. We analyze the endurantist theory of three-dimensional objects and the perdurantist theory of four-dimensional objects. We adopt the mereorological principle of composition of the temporal parts, the principle installation resettletment , which justify the persistence of a sameness of these contemporary art works through time .

Author's name: Bc. Zuzana Biľová School: Charles University, Prague Ústav pro dějiny umění Celetná 20, 110 00 Praha 1 Program: Masters program Title: Institutional acceptance of concept art across Europe Consultant: PhDr. Márie Klimešová, Ph.D. Number of pages: 96 + appendix Number of attachments: 4 Year: 2011 Key words: conceptual art, Harald Szeemann, Documenta 5, When attitudes become form, conceptual art in former CSSR This thesis refers to the problems that arise from the definition of conceptual art and the sole development of this term. Through two main exhibitions that were in the beginning and in the end of the conceptual art, I am trying to look closer at the institutional acceptance of this movement in Europe. I have reconstructed a complex description of the preparation, evolution and the process of the so-called exhibition "When attitudes become form", that is seen as the first conceptual art display on the European continent. The exhibition was held in Bern in 1969 and it had served as a main concept for its curator, Harald Szeemann, for the organization of international exhibition called "Documenty 5" that confirmed the domination of conceptual art but marked the beginning of its ideological downturn. My work closely analyses this second project, however, it mostly deals with the...

The thesis examines the evolving realtions of the aesthetic and conceptual aspects in exhibition-making after the 'conceptual turn' that took place in the late-1960s and instigated key transformations in the aesthetic condition of art and contemporary curatorial practice. Drawing on a broadly construed and variously manifested conceptualism pervading the growing field of curating since 1990s, the thesis focuses on investigating the relation between the aestheti and conceptual dimensions of three exhibitions that have had a significant impact on the postconceptual development of curating. In doing so, it aims to construct an alternative genealogy that reaffirms the significance of the aesthetic element, and so to reconstruct curatorial practice from the perspective of an Aesthetics of Curating. This trajectory unfolds a non-unitary Curatorial Aesthetics that emerges and develops together with the conceptual shift offering a revisionist perspective to dominant practices and discourses today that tend to devalue or repress aesthetic modes of production. The driving force of the thesis is neither to affirm aestheticism nor simply reversing the received positions. Instead, the investigation of aesthetics - as the poetics of an exhibition and a philosophical understanding of the experience offered - provides a reading that contests the emphasis placed upon conceptualism in order to revise those relations and established assumptions, and enable us to understand contemporary aspects of curating that have been downgraded. The thesis focuses on three case-studies, which mark important shifts in the conceptual development of curating from 1969 to 2007: When Attitudes Become Form: Works-Processes-Concepts-Situations-Information (Live in Your Head), curated by Harald Szeemann. Kunsthalle Bern (1969); Les Immateriaux, co-curated by Jean-Francois Lotard and Thierry Chaput, Centre George Pompidou, Paris (1985); Documenta 12, under the artistic directorship of Roger Buergel and chief curatorship of Ruth Noack, Kassel (2007). By exploring the different ways in which these exhibitions accommodate, engage with, and define aesthetic experience in relation to their conceptual modes, the study provides an alternative account of Curatorial Aesthetics that attains its transformative potential and political efficacy in the present through the invention of new sensations that incite new modes of thinking and acting.

No description available.