Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2006. / The entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. Title from title screen of research.pdf file viewed on (May 2, 2007) Vita. Includes bibliographical references.

The Centre for Resource Solutions (“CRS”) in the USA has performed a study on tax incentives for renewable energy. The CRS has found that tax incentives are effective, powerful and highly flexible instruments to encourage the development of renewable energy. They have further identified various types of tax incentives and various guidelines for effective tax incentives. The research question was whether the tax incentives and guidelines as identified by the CRS are internationally acceptable and whether South-Africa can consider these tax incentives and guidelines to design and implement a renewable energy tax incentive policy of an international standard in South-Africa. Chapter 1 contains the background, research question, objectives and methodology of this study. In Chapter 2 the advantages and disadvantages of each type of tax incentive, as identified by the CRS, were analysed through a literature study of international views on these tax incentives. In Chapter 3 the guidelines for effective renewable energy tax incentives, as identified by the CRS, were analysed through a literature study of international views on these tax incentives. Chapter 4 contains the conclusion that the tax incentives and guidelines as identified by the CRS are internationally acceptable and that South-Africa can consider these tax incentives and guidelines to design and implement a renewable energy tax incentive policy of an international standard in South-Africa. Copyright / Dissertation (MCom)--University of Pretoria, 2009. / Taxation / unrestricted

This dissertation examines the relationship between debt and investment-related tax shields using changes in these classes of tax shields scaled by expected operating earnings following the passage of the Economic Recovery Tax Act(ERTA) in 1981. The substitution effect predicts that a negative relationship between changes in the two classes of tax shields will be observed in response to the increased investment-related tax shields offered by ERTA. Debt tax shields should decrease following ERTA since the probability of losing the tax benefit of tax shields would rise as investment-related tax shields increased following ERTA. Firms' probability of losing the deductibility of tax shields is used to segregate the sample into two groups. For the group of firms with a low probability of losing the deductibility of tax shields, the substitution effect is inapplicable and the relation between changes in the two classes of tax shields simply represents the debt securability effect. Since fixed assets can be used as collateral for debt, the debt securability hypothesis predicts a positive relationship between changes in debt and investment-related tax shields after the passage of ERTA. The model developed to segregate debt securability from the substitution effect reveals that, as predicted, the debt securability effect is positive for all firms and that the substitution effect is negative for those firms with a large probability of losing the benefits of tax shields. This reverses the findings of prior research. Controls for pecking order theory effects are introduced into the model to assure that the substitution effect observed is not due to debt ratio as predicted by Myers (1984). The findings described above remain intact except that the debt securability effect does not exist and the substitution effect is weaker for high-debt firms. Furthermore, support is offered for the pecking order theory. These results are robust to alternate specifications of time periods tested, variable definitions, data screening criteria and model specifications.

In this dissertation, I explore the effect of tax incentives on where U.S. multinationals decide to locate their innovative activities worldwide. Research and development (R&D) tax incentives offered by foreign countries and differences between U.S. and foreign tax rates provide opportunities that may influence where multinationals decide to locate their innovative activities. Using firm-level patenting data that identifies the country-specific location of innovations from 1986 to 2000, I examine the relation between innovative activities performed in a foreign country and these tax incentives using the Heckman (1979) two step estimation approach. I find evidence that the foreign percentage of innovative activities is associated with the attractiveness of foreign R&D tax incentives and with an increase in the effect of U.S. R&D allocation rules. In addition, the results suggest that firms in excess foreign tax credit positions decrease the amount of R&D activities in a foreign location with increased foreign tax rates, consistent with income shifting incentives. In contrast, I find that the firms in deficit foreign tax credit positions increase their foreign R&D activities with increasing foreign tax rates. This study is the first to examine and provide evidence of the influence of foreign R&D tax incentives and income shifting incentives on a U.S. multinational’s decision on where to locate R&D activities.

In this dissertation, I explore the effect of tax incentives on where U.S. multinationals decide to locate their innovative activities worldwide. Research and development (R&D) tax incentives offered by foreign countries and differences between U.S. and foreign tax rates provide opportunities that may influence where multinationals decide to locate their innovative activities. Using firm-level patenting data that identifies the country-specific location of innovations from 1986 to 2000, I examine the relation between innovative activities performed in a foreign country and these tax incentives using the Heckman (1979) two step estimation approach. I find evidence that the foreign percentage of innovative activities is associated with the attractiveness of foreign R&D tax incentives and with an increase in the effect of U.S. R&D allocation rules. In addition, the results suggest that firms in excess foreign tax credit positions decrease the amount of R&D activities in a foreign location with increased foreign tax rates, consistent with income shifting incentives. In contrast, I find that the firms in deficit foreign tax credit positions increase their foreign R&D activities with increasing foreign tax rates. This study is the first to examine and provide evidence of the influence of foreign R&D tax incentives and income shifting incentives on a U.S. multinational’s decision on where to locate R&D activities.

According to statistics by the Council of Taiwan, the fertility rate in Taiwan is the world's lowest in 2010. The average number of babies born to women of childbearing age life is 0.9 people. In other words, the average number of children per woman is less than 1. In 2023 Taiwan will enter a negative population growth. Taiwan's population structure becomes a declining birthrate, aging society.The future workforce reduction will greatly affect the competitiveness of Taiwan. The most important factor of decreasing fertility in Taiwan is economics.The majority of people think that raising children has become a heavy burden.Except for a few women, due to personal career planning, work and other factors not yet fertility or infertility .The majority of women still want to have her own children.The most people's attitude of giving birth is reserved because of high unemployment rate ,unsound preschool education system and little child-care subsidy . In the empirical study found that there is no relationship between the fertility rates and the amount of maternity allowance.That is maternity grant can not increase fertility rate. If maternity benefits can not be improved the fertility rate,the fertility incentives of tax breaks are smaller to people.There are some shortcomings of tax incentives for increase the birth,such as revenue loss,tax fairness and so on. It is also possible to increase the birth rate had no significant improvement. The government uses tax benefits to increase fertility rate depending on revenue loss and population growth . The amount and range of tax incentives should be calculated carefully in order to make a balance between the revenue loss and population growth.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cleveland State University, 2009. / Abstract. Title from PDF t.p. (viewed on Dec. 11, 2009). Includes bibliographical references (p. 141-153). Available online via the OhioLINK ETD Center and also available in print.

The promotion of Small, Medium and Micro enterprises (SMMEs) has been identified as key strategy of government for employment creation and income generation. For some time now small business owners had to fend for themselves. Small business was neglected and was in the main ignored by government. Since the 1994 democratic process the challenge for the new order has been to create an enabling environment for the small business sector of the economy. The historical neglect and the consequent policy vacuum has had to be re assessed. To this end the 1995 White Paper on a National Strategy for the development and Promotion of Small Business in South Africa was the first major effort by government to design a policy framework targeting the small business sector. The promulgation of the Small Business Act in 1996 and the establishment of the Ntsika Enterprise Promotion agency under the aegis of the Department of Trade and Industry has attempted to provide direction and facilitate the provision of Non Financial support to the Small Business Sector. Various incentive schemes have been developed and put into operation together with a range of tax incentives to help promote Small Business. Eight years have passed since the promulgation of the Small Business Act and the perception that finance for SMMEs has been the greatest stumbling block to development. However the failure of the vast numbers of micro lending agencies have revealed that low levels of entrepreneurship has led to their demise. The provision of meaningful positive incentives need to be measured and their effectiveness needs to be tested. This study will try and identify the incentives available. / Thesis (M.Com.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2004.

A presente pesquisa destina-se a estudar os incentivos tributários. Espécie de norma tributária indutora, os incentivos tributários ainda não receberam a atenção devida por parte dos estudiosos do direito tributário. Atento ao volume cada vez maior de recursos envolvendo incentivos tributários, assim como a necessidade de se conferir maior transparência e responsabilidade na gestão do gasto público, esse trabalho dedica-se a estudar essa ainda pouco explorada figura, extremando-a de figuras parecidas, com as quais não raras vezes é confundida. Embora não haja uma conceituação constitucional ou legal expressa, é possível afirmar que os incentivos tributários são hipóteses de desoneração tributária, que importam em derrogações às regras gerais de tributação, com o não ingresso de recursos nos cofres públicos, de forma a estimular condutas dos contribuintes, com a finalidade de se atingir fins e objetivos constitucionais. Em virtude de sua natureza híbrida, os incentivos tributários se sujeitam a limitações constitucionais tributárias e econômicas, assim como às limitações orçamentário-financeiras. O principal instrumento de compatibilização entre os incentivos tributários, capacidade contributiva, isonomia e cânones da ordem econômica é o princípio da proporcionalidade. Poder Legislativo, Tribunal de Contas e Poder Judiciário devem fiscalizar e controlar essa espécie de desoneração tributária. O Controle a cargo Poder Legislativo (no âmbito do Poder Legislativo federal) tem deixado muito a desejar, tanto no que concerne ao controle dos limites orçamentário-financeiros, quanto no que diz respeito ao controle dos limites constitucionais tributários e econômicos. O Controle que cabe ao Tribunal de Contas (foi analisado o Tribunal de Contas da União) tem mostrado alguma evolução. Contudo, a análise de alguns julgados do TCU demonstra que há muito a melhorar, especialmente no que concerne à investigação da legitimidade e economicidade. A LRF ostenta caráter de norma geral no que tange aos requisitos para a concessão de incentivos tributários. Eventual descumprimento desses preceitos por leis locais revela verdadeira inconstitucionalidade, passível de controle pelo Poder Judiciário. A atuação do Poder Judiciário, em especial do STF, no controle dos incentivos tributários tem sido bastante tímida e pouco transparente. Na maior parte dos casos, o STF tem se limitado a reafirmar o caráter discricionário dos atos oriundos do Poder Legislativo e Executivo, negando-se a examiná-los. Os pedidos de extensão de incentivos tributários também não tem obtido sucesso, pois o STF faz aplicação irrestrita da cláusula do legislador negativo. Uma solução conciliadora seria o judiciário se valer da declaração de inconstitucionalidade sem a pronúncia de nulidade, permitindo a extensão dos incentivos tributários àqueles casos em que a ilegalidade não reside no incentivo em si mesmo, mas na sua não aplicação aos contribuintes em mesma situação. Muito embora existam limites bem definidos, é possível afirmar que o controle dos incentivos tributários precisa evoluir muito. / This research aims to study the tax incentives. Sort of inducer tax rule, the tax incentives have not already received the correct attention by tax law scholars. Keeping an eye on the increase of resources involving the tax incentives, and realizing the necessity of bringing more transparency and responsibility in the management of public expenditure, this work intend to study this little explored figure, distinguishing from other similar figures, which has been many times confused with. Although there has not been a constitutional or legal expressed meaning, it is possible to affirm the tax incentives are kinds of tax exemption, which implies derogation from general rules for taxation, with the not entering of resources into public purse, in order to get constitutional purposes and objectives. Due to this hybrid nature, the tax incentives are subject to constitutional and economic limitations, as well as budget and financial limitation. The main instrument of compatibility between the tax incentives, the ability to pay, equality and the economic order canons is the principle of proportionality. Legislative Power, Court of Auditors and Judiciary must supervise and control this kind of tax exemption. The control made by the Legislative (within the federal scope) has much been lacking, both in terms of controlling the budget and financial limits, and in terms of controlling the constitutional tributary and economic limits. The control by Court of Auditors (the Court of Auditors of Union was analyzed) seems to have some evolution. However the analysis of some Courts judgments reveals that it has much to improve, mainly concerning the investigation of legitimacy and economy. The LRF shows character of general rule in terms of requirement for granting tax incentives. Eventual non-compliance of this precepts by local rules reveals true unconstitutionality, which can be controlled by Judiciary. The actions of the Judicial Power, especially the STF actions, upon the tax incentives control have been fairly timid and lacking in transparency. In many cases, the STF has been limited to the reaffirmation of discretionary character of the acts performed by Legislative and Executive powers, but refusing the analysis of them. The requests of tax incentive extension have been unsuccessful, because of the large unrestricted application of negative legislator clause by STF. A conciliatory solution would be the Judiciary using the declaration of unconstitutionality without nullity pronunciation, allowing the tax incentives extension to that cases which the illegality is not in the incentive itself, but in the act of not applying the incentive extension to the taxpayers who are in the same situation. Although there are clear limits, it is possible to affirm that the tax incentives control still needs to evolve.

A presente pesquisa destina-se a estudar os incentivos tributários. Espécie de norma tributária indutora, os incentivos tributários ainda não receberam a atenção devida por parte dos estudiosos do direito tributário. Atento ao volume cada vez maior de recursos envolvendo incentivos tributários, assim como a necessidade de se conferir maior transparência e responsabilidade na gestão do gasto público, esse trabalho dedica-se a estudar essa ainda pouco explorada figura, extremando-a de figuras parecidas, com as quais não raras vezes é confundida. Embora não haja uma conceituação constitucional ou legal expressa, é possível afirmar que os incentivos tributários são hipóteses de desoneração tributária, que importam em derrogações às regras gerais de tributação, com o não ingresso de recursos nos cofres públicos, de forma a estimular condutas dos contribuintes, com a finalidade de se atingir fins e objetivos constitucionais. Em virtude de sua natureza híbrida, os incentivos tributários se sujeitam a limitações constitucionais tributárias e econômicas, assim como às limitações orçamentário-financeiras. O principal instrumento de compatibilização entre os incentivos tributários, capacidade contributiva, isonomia e cânones da ordem econômica é o princípio da proporcionalidade. Poder Legislativo, Tribunal de Contas e Poder Judiciário devem fiscalizar e controlar essa espécie de desoneração tributária. O Controle a cargo Poder Legislativo (no âmbito do Poder Legislativo federal) tem deixado muito a desejar, tanto no que concerne ao controle dos limites orçamentário-financeiros, quanto no que diz respeito ao controle dos limites constitucionais tributários e econômicos. O Controle que cabe ao Tribunal de Contas (foi analisado o Tribunal de Contas da União) tem mostrado alguma evolução. Contudo, a análise de alguns julgados do TCU demonstra que há muito a melhorar, especialmente no que concerne à investigação da legitimidade e economicidade. A LRF ostenta caráter de norma geral no que tange aos requisitos para a concessão de incentivos tributários. Eventual descumprimento desses preceitos por leis locais revela verdadeira inconstitucionalidade, passível de controle pelo Poder Judiciário. A atuação do Poder Judiciário, em especial do STF, no controle dos incentivos tributários tem sido bastante tímida e pouco transparente. Na maior parte dos casos, o STF tem se limitado a reafirmar o caráter discricionário dos atos oriundos do Poder Legislativo e Executivo, negando-se a examiná-los. Os pedidos de extensão de incentivos tributários também não tem obtido sucesso, pois o STF faz aplicação irrestrita da cláusula do legislador negativo. Uma solução conciliadora seria o judiciário se valer da declaração de inconstitucionalidade sem a pronúncia de nulidade, permitindo a extensão dos incentivos tributários àqueles casos em que a ilegalidade não reside no incentivo em si mesmo, mas na sua não aplicação aos contribuintes em mesma situação. Muito embora existam limites bem definidos, é possível afirmar que o controle dos incentivos tributários precisa evoluir muito. / This research aims to study the tax incentives. Sort of inducer tax rule, the tax incentives have not already received the correct attention by tax law scholars. Keeping an eye on the increase of resources involving the tax incentives, and realizing the necessity of bringing more transparency and responsibility in the management of public expenditure, this work intend to study this little explored figure, distinguishing from other similar figures, which has been many times confused with. Although there has not been a constitutional or legal expressed meaning, it is possible to affirm the tax incentives are kinds of tax exemption, which implies derogation from general rules for taxation, with the not entering of resources into public purse, in order to get constitutional purposes and objectives. Due to this hybrid nature, the tax incentives are subject to constitutional and economic limitations, as well as budget and financial limitation. The main instrument of compatibility between the tax incentives, the ability to pay, equality and the economic order canons is the principle of proportionality. Legislative Power, Court of Auditors and Judiciary must supervise and control this kind of tax exemption. The control made by the Legislative (within the federal scope) has much been lacking, both in terms of controlling the budget and financial limits, and in terms of controlling the constitutional tributary and economic limits. The control by Court of Auditors (the Court of Auditors of Union was analyzed) seems to have some evolution. However the analysis of some Courts judgments reveals that it has much to improve, mainly concerning the investigation of legitimacy and economy. The LRF shows character of general rule in terms of requirement for granting tax incentives. Eventual non-compliance of this precepts by local rules reveals true unconstitutionality, which can be controlled by Judiciary. The actions of the Judicial Power, especially the STF actions, upon the tax incentives control have been fairly timid and lacking in transparency. In many cases, the STF has been limited to the reaffirmation of discretionary character of the acts performed by Legislative and Executive powers, but refusing the analysis of them. The requests of tax incentive extension have been unsuccessful, because of the large unrestricted application of negative legislator clause by STF. A conciliatory solution would be the Judiciary using the declaration of unconstitutionality without nullity pronunciation, allowing the tax incentives extension to that cases which the illegality is not in the incentive itself, but in the act of not applying the incentive extension to the taxpayers who are in the same situation. Although there are clear limits, it is possible to affirm that the tax incentives control still needs to evolve.