Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) developed to induce neuroplasticity. TBS usually consists of 50 Hz bursts at 5 Hz intervals. When applied intermittently, it can lead to facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), although these effects can be variable between individuals. Here, we aimed to determine whether a version of intermittent TBS (iTBS) consisting of 30 Hz bursts at 6 Hz intervals would produce less variable modulation. Nineteen healthy adults underwent single-pulse TMS to assess corticomotor excitability at baseline as reflected in MEP amplitude. 30 Hz iTBS was then administered and MEP amplitude was reassessed at 5-, 20- and 45-mins after the iTBS protocol. Compared to baseline, MEPs were significantly facilitated up to 45-min post-iTBS and most participants exhibited the expected facilitation. These observations suggest that 30 Hz/6 Hz iTBS may provide a sound alternative to induce consistent neuromodulatory effects over the commonly used 50 Hz/5 Hz protocol.

Introduction: Memory is a complex cognitive process formerly linked to mechanisms of brain plasticity that can be estimated in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). Also, cortical thickness in the DLPFC may be a potential proxy measure of brain plasticity as previous literature reports a link between better memory and thicker cortex. However, the link between brain plasticity and memory performance as well as DLPFC thickness remains to be clarified. Methods: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) probed plasticity-like mechanisms in the left DLPFC in 17 cognitively healthy participants. TMS-EEG recordings were performed before and after sham and active iTBS to quantify plasticity via transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potentials (TEPs). Composite memory scores for each domain (verbal episodic, visual episodic and working memory) were obtained using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Anatomical T1 images were acquired by magnetic resonance imaging and processed by open-source software (CIVET) and the Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas to extract cortical thickness of the DLPFC. All statistical analyses (linear mixed model, Tukey's post hoc test and Pearson's correlations) were completed in R Studio. Results: iTBS resulted in increased TEP amplitude P30 (F= 5.239, p = 0.029), as shown by a significant interaction between condition (iTBS, sham) and time (pre- and post-condition). Specifically, Tukey's post hoc test revealed that the P30 increase was near trending significant post-iTBS compared to pre-iTBS for the active condition (p = 0.166) but not for the sham condition (p = 0.294). A trending significant relationship was observed between the magnitude of P30 change post-iTBS and thicker left DLPFC (r = 0.488; p = 0.108). Lastly, no significant relationships between P30 change and memory performance were observed. Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest there could be a relationship between increased capacity for brain plasticity and a thicker left DLPFC. To further investigate these relationships, we plan to recruit additional cognitively healthy participants. Our preliminary findings support the foundation for future clinical studies in which DLPFC thickness could be explored as a predictive factor for response to plasticity-targeting iTBS treatment.

<p>The primary somatosensory cortex (SI) is important for hand function and influences motor circuitry in the primary motor cortex (M1). Areas 3a, 1 and 2 of SI have direct connectivity with M1. Much of our present knowledge of this connectivity and its relevance to hand function is based on animal research. However, less is known about the neural mechanisms that underpin hand function in humans. The present study investigated the influence of SI on corticospinal excitability as well as inhibitory and excitatory neural circuitry within M1 before and after continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS). Additionally, stimulation parameters influence the direction and magnitude of cTBS after-effects. Thus, current direction and frequency of cTBS were manipulated. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first-dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle bilaterally before and after 50 Hz cTBS over left SI. In a second condition, the orientation of cTBS was reversed. Experiment 2 measured MEPs, short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) from the right FDI following a modified 30 Hz cTBS over left SI or M1. The results of Experiment 1 and 2 demonstrate that SI influences M1 circuitry such that MEPs are facilitated following cTBS over SI. However, MEPs are suppressed when the current direction is reversed. CTBS at 30 Hz delivered over M1 suppressed excitatory circuitry that generates MEPs and ICF. The findings from the thesis suggest that SI influences hand motor circuitry and is likely a mechanism by which somatosensory information modulates hand motor function.</p> / Bachelor of Science (BSc)

Chez l’humain, différents protocoles de stimulation magnétique transcrânienne répétée (SMTr) peuvent être utilisés afin de manipuler expérimentalement la plasticité cérébrale au niveau du cortex moteur primaire (M1). Ces techniques ont permis de mieux comprendre le rôle du sommeil dans la régulation de la plasticité cérébrale. Récemment, une étude a montré que lorsqu’une première session de stimulation SMTr au niveau de M1 est suivie d’une nuit de sommeil, l’induction subséquente de la plasticité par une deuxième session SMTr est augmentée. La présente étude a investigué si ce type de métaplasticité pouvait également bénéficier d’une sieste diurne. Quatorze sujets en santé ont reçu deux sessions de intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) connue pour son effet facilitateur sur l’excitabilité corticale. Les sessions de stimulation étaient séparées par une sieste de 90 minutes ou par une période équivalente d’éveil. L’excitabilité corticale était quantifiée en terme d’amplitude des potentiels évoqués moteurs (PEM) mesurés avant et après chaque session de iTBS. Les résultats montrent que la iTBS n’est pas parvenue à augmenter de manière robuste l’amplitude des PEMs lors de la première session de stimulation. Lors de la deuxième session de stimulation, la iTBS a produit des changements plastiques variables et ce peu importe si les sujets ont dormi ou pas. Les effets de la iTBS sur l’excitabilité corticale étaient marqués par une importante variabilité inter et intra-individuelle dont les possibles causes sont discutées. / In humans, various repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols can be used to modulate motor cortical plasticity. These techniques have shed light on the role of sleep in neural plasticity regulation. Recent work has demonstrated that when a night of sleep follows one session of rTMS over the hand motor cortex (M1), the capacity to induce subsequent plasticity by another rTMS session in M1 is enhanced. The present study investigated whether such metaplasticity could also benefit from a day nap. Fourteen healthy participants received two sessions of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) known for its excitatory effects on cortical excitability over M1 spaced by either a 90-minute nap or an equivalent amount of wake. Motor cortical excitability was measured in terms of amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEP), which were assessed before iTBS and after the stimulation. Results show that the first iTBS session did not induce significant change in MEP amplitude. The second iTBS session induced variable plastic changes regardless of whether participants slept or stayed awake. The effects of iTBS on motor cortical excitability were highly variable within and between individuals. The possible causes of such variability are discussed.

Chez l’humain, différents protocoles de stimulation magnétique transcrânienne répétée (SMTr) peuvent être utilisés afin de manipuler expérimentalement la plasticité cérébrale au niveau du cortex moteur primaire (M1). Ces techniques ont permis de mieux comprendre le rôle du sommeil dans la régulation de la plasticité cérébrale. Récemment, une étude a montré que lorsqu’une première session de stimulation SMTr au niveau de M1 est suivie d’une nuit de sommeil, l’induction subséquente de la plasticité par une deuxième session SMTr est augmentée. La présente étude a investigué si ce type de métaplasticité pouvait également bénéficier d’une sieste diurne. Quatorze sujets en santé ont reçu deux sessions de intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) connue pour son effet facilitateur sur l’excitabilité corticale. Les sessions de stimulation étaient séparées par une sieste de 90 minutes ou par une période équivalente d’éveil. L’excitabilité corticale était quantifiée en terme d’amplitude des potentiels évoqués moteurs (PEM) mesurés avant et après chaque session de iTBS. Les résultats montrent que la iTBS n’est pas parvenue à augmenter de manière robuste l’amplitude des PEMs lors de la première session de stimulation. Lors de la deuxième session de stimulation, la iTBS a produit des changements plastiques variables et ce peu importe si les sujets ont dormi ou pas. Les effets de la iTBS sur l’excitabilité corticale étaient marqués par une importante variabilité inter et intra-individuelle dont les possibles causes sont discutées. / In humans, various repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols can be used to modulate motor cortical plasticity. These techniques have shed light on the role of sleep in neural plasticity regulation. Recent work has demonstrated that when a night of sleep follows one session of rTMS over the hand motor cortex (M1), the capacity to induce subsequent plasticity by another rTMS session in M1 is enhanced. The present study investigated whether such metaplasticity could also benefit from a day nap. Fourteen healthy participants received two sessions of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) known for its excitatory effects on cortical excitability over M1 spaced by either a 90-minute nap or an equivalent amount of wake. Motor cortical excitability was measured in terms of amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEP), which were assessed before iTBS and after the stimulation. Results show that the first iTBS session did not induce significant change in MEP amplitude. The second iTBS session induced variable plastic changes regardless of whether participants slept or stayed awake. The effects of iTBS on motor cortical excitability were highly variable within and between individuals. The possible causes of such variability are discussed.

La stimulation magnétique transcrânienne répétée (SMTr) est une technique de neuromodulation utilisée dans le traitement de la dépression majeure. La stimulation thêta-burst intermittente (STBi), une forme spécifique de SMTr, bénéficie d’un temps de stimulation plus court. Ses mécanismes d’action et sa durée optimale de stimulation restent toutefois inconnus. En effet, en clinique, la durée standard de STBi tend à être allongée dans l’espoir d’augmenter les effets thérapeutiques. Cette hypothèse n’a cependant jamais été vérifiée empiriquement. Le présent mémoire vise ainsi à mieux comprendre les mécanismes neuronaux de la STBi du cortex dorsolatéral préfrontal gauche et à déterminer la durée optimale de stimulation parmi les trois durées les plus fréquemment utilisées : 600 (standard), 1200 et 1800 impulsions. La question est explorée chez 14 participants neurotypiques. Chaque participant a pris part aux trois conditions expérimentales lors de trois sessions distinctes. L’activité cérébrale induite a été mesurée par l’utilisation combinée de la stimulation magnétique transcrânienne et l’électroencéphalographie, via les potentiels évoqués par la SMT (PÉS) et les perturbations spectrales liées à l’évènement (PSLE). Ces mesures ont été comparées avant et après chaque condition à l’aide d’un modèle linéaire mixte. Pour l’ensemble des mesures de l’activité corticale, aucune différence significative n’a été obtenue entre les trois durées. Spécifiquement, la STBi a induit une réduction de l’amplitude de la majorité des PÉS et des PSLE de la bande thêta. Ainsi, le protocole STBi standard engendre une modification de l’activité cérébrale comparable aux durées prolongées, dénotant l’importance de répliquer cette étude auprès d’une population clinique. / Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a neuromodulation technique used as a treatment of major depressive disorder. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a specific kind of rTMS, offers a reduced stimulation duration. Yet, its mechanism of action and optimal duration are still largely unknown. In clinical settings, standard duration is often increased with the expectation of increasing therapeutic effects. However, this hypothesis has never been tested. This master thesis aims to provide better understanding of neuronal mechanism associated with iTBS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of healthy participants and to determine the optimal stimulation duration over the three more commonly used durations in clinical practice: 600 (standard), 1,200 and 1,800 pulses. This was explored in 14 neurotypical participants who experienced each of the three conditions during three different sessions. The induced brain activity was measured combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography, via TMS evoked potentials (TEP) and event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP). These measures were compared before and after each condition using a mixed linear model. For the three durations, no significant difference was found in all cortical activity measures. Specifically, after iTBS, the amplitude of most of the TEPs, as well as of the ERSP of theta band, are reduced. Therefore, the iTBS standard protocol induces a modification of cortical activity which is similar to longer durations, showing the importance of replicating this study on a clinical population.