Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-04-01T19:48:14Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CarlaSuelySouzaDePaula_DISSERT.pdf: 3141640 bytes, checksum: 8df6c9fbfa7e48bbca781e99274b243d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-04-07T20:31:55Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CarlaSuelySouzaDePaula_DISSERT.pdf: 3141640 bytes, checksum: 8df6c9fbfa7e48bbca781e99274b243d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-07T20:31:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CarlaSuelySouzaDePaula_DISSERT.pdf: 3141640 bytes, checksum: 8df6c9fbfa7e48bbca781e99274b243d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-30 / A educa??o interprofissional ainda representa um grande desafio para a educa??o em sa?de. O objetivo deste estudo foi implementar a Visita Interprofissional da Cardiologia (VIC) como estrat?gia de ensino da educa??o interprofissional na gradua??o e p?s-gradua??o da Universidade Federal do Rio grande do Norte (UFRN). Trata-se de um estudo tipo pesquisa-a??o, explorat?rio, prospectivo realizado de mar?o de 2013 a novembro de 2014, no Servi?o de Cardiologia do Hospital Universit?rio Onofre Lopes (HUOL), envolvendo profissionais da ?rea da sa?de (m?dicos, psic?logos, fisioterapeutas, odont?loga, assistentes sociais, farmac?uticos, enfermeiros e nutricionistas) e estudantes de gradua??o e p?s-gradua??o dos cursos de sa?de da UFRN. O estudo ocorreu em tr?s etapas: Planejamento da atividade interprofissional, Implementa??o da atividade ?Visita Interprofissional de Cardiologia (VIC)? e Avalia??o da atividade, sendo a ?ltima realizada atrav?s de grupos focais. Ap?s dois meses de planejamento, iniciamos a etapa de implementa??o onde foram realizadas 60 reuni?es, envolvendo 1324 participantes, sendo discutido um caso cl?nico por sess?o. Ap?s apresenta??o de cada caso, houve discuss?o interprofissional, ressaltando a especificidade de cada profissional para melhoria do cuidado integral com paciente em quest?o. Os grupos focais foram avaliados pela An?lise Categorial de Bardin onde emergiram cinco categorias: Reconhecimento da participa??o em atividades interprofissionais pr?vias, Vis?o conceitual de atividades interprofissionais, Impactos da VIC na assist?ncia, Contribui??es da VIC na forma??o e Desafios da manuten??o da VIC. O processo de planejamento e implementa??o da VIC atingiu os objetivos, embora a participa??o de alguns profissionais da sa?de ainda n?o tenha sido sistem?tica em fun??o da sobrecarga de atividades de alguns profissionais, como os da enfermagem, bem como dificuldades na concilia??o de hor?rios. A VIC foi considerada uma experi?ncia exitosa, sendo bastante elogiada e reconhecida como iniciativa positiva para a melhoria da assist?ncia prestada ao paciente cardiopata. Foi observado, pela an?lise dos grupos focais, que a VIC ? uma estrat?gia que impacta positivamente tanto a assist?ncia quanto o ensino, contudo, permanecem algumas dificuldades importantes, como a falta de recursos humanos e a dificuldade de alguns profissionais para se integrarem sistematicamente. / The interprofessional education still represents a great challenge for the health education. This paper aims at implementing the Interprofessional Cardiology Visit (VIC, acronym in Portuguese) as a teaching strategy for the interprofessional education in the undergraduate and graduate courses of UFRN (Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, acronym in Portuguese). It is a prospective and exploratory study held from March 2013 to November 2014, in the cardiology department of HUOL (Portuguese acronym for Onofre Lopes University Hospital), including health professionals from the mentioned hospital (doctor, psycologist, physiotherapist, dentist, social assistant, nutritionist, pharmacist and nurse), undergraduate and graduate students from the health courses of UFRN. The study happened in three parts: interprofessional activity planning; Implementation of the activity ?Interprofessional Cardiology Visit (VIC)?; and Activity evaluation, this last one was made through focus groups. The process of planning and implementation of the VIC was described during the implementation phase: 60 meetings in which 1324 participants discussed one specific patient per meeting. After each case presentation, an interprofessional discussion was held, pointing out each professional?s specific point of view towards improving the overall care of that discussed patient. From the focus group analysis, five categories emerged: Recognition of previous participations in interprofessional activities; Conceptual vision of interprofessional activities; Impacts of the VIC to the patient?s care; Contributions of VIC to the professional training; and Challenges of VIC continuation. The making and planning of VIC process has reached its goals, despite of some health professional?s participation not being systematic due to work overload, such as the nurses? case, as well as schedule difficulties. The VIC was praised as a successful experience and considered an initiative with positive impact for improving the care of patients with heart diseases. It is clear, from analyzing the discourses, that the VIC is a strategy which positively impacts both the care and the teaching. However, some difficulties remain, such as the lack of human resources and the challenge of making it systematic.