Darbo objektas – UAB „Megaturas“ teikiamos turizmo paslaugos. Tyrimo problema – kaip vartotojai vertina UAB „Megaturas“ teikiamas turizmo paslaugas. Tyrimo tikslas – įvertinti UAB „Megaturas“ teikiamas turizmo paslaugas. Tyrimo uždaviniai: 1. Apibrėžti turizmo produkto sampratą ir struktūrą; 2. Atskleisti turizmo paslaugos pasiūlos ir paklausos teorinį aspektą; 3. Išanalizuoti UAB „Megaturas“ turizmo paslaugų rinkoje situaciją; 4. Išanalizuoti UAB „Megaturas“ teikiamas turizmo paslaugas. Tyrimo hipotezės: 1. UAB ,,Megaturas“ turizmo paslaugų pasiūlos (paslaugų kriterijų) palankesnis vertinimas siejamas su dažnesniu keliavimu su UAB ,,Megaturas“. 2. UAB ,,Megaturas“ turizmo paslaugų pasiūlos (paslaugų kriterijų) palankesnis vertinimas siejamas su didesniu ketinimu ateityje keliauti su UAB ,,Megaturas“. Svarbiausios išvados: Daugelis UAB „Megaturas“ turizmo paslaugų kriterijų vertinami vidutiniškai ir geriau nei vidutiniškai, palankiausiai (vertinimų eilės tvarka, pradedant nuo stipriausiai įvertino): patikimumas; transporto paslaugų punktualumas; toliau – kelionių vadovų profesionalumas; kelionės transporto patogumas; paslaugų kokybė; toliau – personalo malonus aptarnavimas; paslaugų kainos ir kokybės santykis; saugumas; lūkesčių patenkinimas; paslaugų organizavimas; pažintinių kelionių įvairovė. Dažniau keliaujantys su šiuo kelionių organizatoriumi respondentai geriau vertina: jo patikimumą, kokybę, pažintinių kelionių įvairovę, kainos priimtinumą, kainos ir kokybės... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Object of the work is services rendered by JSC “Megaturas”. The problem of the work – how consumers evaluate tourism services of JSC “Megaturas”. The aim of the work is to evaluate services rendered by JSC “Megaturas”. The tasks of the work: 1. To define the concept and structure of tourism product; 2. To reveal theoretical aspect of demand and supply of tourism services; 3. To analyze the situation of services in JSC “Megaturas” market; 4. To analyze services rendered by JSC “Megaturas”. The hypothesis of research: 1. More favorable evaluation of services rendered by JSC “Megaturas” is related to the more often consumption of JSC “Megaturas” tourism services. 2. More favorable evaluation of services rendered by JSC “Megaturas” is related to the greeter intention to consume JSC “Megaturas” tourism services in the future. Main conclusions: Most criteria of services rendered by JSC “Megaturas” were evaluated averagely of better, the most favorable aspects of services rendered by JSC “Megaturas” are: reliability of agency, punctuality of transport services, professionalism of travel guides; comfortably through the journey, quality of services; kindness of service; proportion of services price and quality; safety; satisfaction of expectations; organization of services, variety of journeys. Those respondents who travel with JSC “Megaturas” more often, gave higher evaluations to: reliability; quality; variety of journeys; acceptability of price; proportion of services... [to full text]

Object of research – benefits of inbound tourism and their impact to the state economy. Subject of research – inbound tourism development analysis and estimation. Purpose of research – analyze concepts and definitions of inbound tourism and it’s impact to the state economy as well as for see development perspectives. Research tasks – describe tourism definitions and evaluate rural tourism in it; analyze impact of the inbound tourism on the national economy by defining it’s influence on economical growth and regional development, employment rate and net export; appraise rural tourism development possibilities and trends in odder to gain from inbound tourism advantages. At the end , will be provided the conclusions about the importance of inbound tourism and the impact it makes on national economy and recommendations, which can help to improve the quality or tourism product as well as rural tourism services in order to gain form inbound tourism benefits. Research methods – analysis of scientific literature, logical thought, representation pf graphic data, oral questioning, comparison of information methods.