Spelling suggestions: "subject:"utilitarianism"" "subject:"tilitarianism""
1 |
The limits of utilitarianism: on prerogativesand constraints冼偉林, Sin, Wai-lam, William. January 1997 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Politics and Public Administration / Master / Master of Philosophy
|
2 |
Objectivist compatibilist utilitarianismSleigh, Nicholas Campbell 05 1900 (has links)
In this thesis a version of the ethical theory of
utilitarianism is defended. The version defended is called
‘objectivist compatibilist utilitarianism’, or ‘OCtJ’. On this
version, utilitarian metaethics includes the propositions that
there is an objective, intrinsic property of goodness entifying,
motivating, and grounding ethics, and that act and rule
utilitarianism are compatible since under plausible
interpretations both true. While this metaethical theory has
perhaps not been stated explicitly before, theories in this vein
have been popular since the mid—l9th century, and have been
expounded by philosophers such as J.S. Mill and G.E. Moore.
OCU will be defended by examination of six influential
objections to various of its hypotheses. In each case, thorough
conceptual analysis, aided by consultation of relevant scientific
facts about human nature, will reveal that the objection is
seriously flawed. In the process of dispatching these negative
considerations, a comprehensive positive ethical theory will
emerge. Most other currently popular ethical theories are not
comprehensive, but instead take no position (or several, which
amounts to the same thing) on one or more of the major issues
that any comprehensive ethical theory must deal with. OCU thus
emerges as one of only a very few contemporary comprehensive
ethical theories — and on balance the most plausible of the lot.
|
3 |
The limits of utilitarianism : on prerogatives and constraints /Sin, Wai-lam, William. January 1997 (has links)
Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 1998. / Includes bibliographical references (leaf 144-148).
|
4 |
Objectivist compatibilist utilitarianismSleigh, Nicholas Campbell 05 1900 (has links)
In this thesis a version of the ethical theory of
utilitarianism is defended. The version defended is called
‘objectivist compatibilist utilitarianism’, or ‘OCtJ’. On this
version, utilitarian metaethics includes the propositions that
there is an objective, intrinsic property of goodness entifying,
motivating, and grounding ethics, and that act and rule
utilitarianism are compatible since under plausible
interpretations both true. While this metaethical theory has
perhaps not been stated explicitly before, theories in this vein
have been popular since the mid—l9th century, and have been
expounded by philosophers such as J.S. Mill and G.E. Moore.
OCU will be defended by examination of six influential
objections to various of its hypotheses. In each case, thorough
conceptual analysis, aided by consultation of relevant scientific
facts about human nature, will reveal that the objection is
seriously flawed. In the process of dispatching these negative
considerations, a comprehensive positive ethical theory will
emerge. Most other currently popular ethical theories are not
comprehensive, but instead take no position (or several, which
amounts to the same thing) on one or more of the major issues
that any comprehensive ethical theory must deal with. OCU thus
emerges as one of only a very few contemporary comprehensive
ethical theories — and on balance the most plausible of the lot. / Arts, Faculty of / Philosophy, Department of / Graduate
|
5 |
The significance of need : a political conceptionHamilton, Lawrence January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
道德的界限: 效益主義與「苛刻」批評. / 效益主義與「苛刻」批評 / Dao de de jie xian: xiao yi zhu yi yu "ke ke" pi ping. / Xiao yi zhu yi yu "ke ke" pi pingJanuary 2003 (has links)
郭柏年. / "2003年7月". / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2003. / 參考文獻 (leaves 81-83). / 附中英文摘要. / "2003 nian 7 yue". / Guo Bonian. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2003. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 81-83). / Fu Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / 摘要 --- p.i / Chapter 第一章 --- 導論 / Chapter 1.1. --- 故事 --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- 苛刻論證的結構 --- p.5 / Chapter 1.3 --- 本文的方法論和結構 --- p.6 / Chapter 第二章 --- 效益主義是苛刻的道德理論嗎? / Chapter 2.1 --- 效益主義的特性 --- p.10 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- 後果原則 --- p.11 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- 無偏私原則 --- p.12 / Chapter 2.1.3 --- 極大化原則 --- p.13 / Chapter 2.1.4 --- 可比較原則 --- p.13 / Chapter 2.1.5 --- 消極責任 --- p.14 / Chapter 2.2 --- 效益主義如何苛刻? --- p.16 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- 不合理的犧牲 --- p.17 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- 道德異化 --- p.19 / Chapter 2.2.2.1 --- 自我異化 --- p.21 / Chapter 2.2.2.2 --- 與他人的異化 --- p.23 / Chapter 2.3 --- 效益主義的回應 --- p.26 / Chapter 2.4 --- 小結 --- p.30 / Chapter 第三章 --- 道德規範的界限 / Chapter 3.1 --- 常識的道德觀 --- p.32 / Chapter 3.2 --- 道德界域的範圍 --- p.35 / Chapter 3.3 --- 道德理由的凌駕性 --- p.38 / Chapter 3.4 --- 道德規範的要求 --- p.42 / Chapter 3.4.1 --- 道德選擇的多樣性 --- p.44 / Chapter 3.4.2 --- 「行動者的代價」的理論困難 --- p.45 / Chapter 3.4.3 --- 「個人觀點」 --- p.46 / Chapter 3.5 --- 小結 --- p.52 / Chapter 第四章 --- 重構效益主義 / Chapter 4.1 --- 效益主義與後果主義 --- p.53 / Chapter 4.2 --- 赫爾的效益主義 --- p.55 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- 兩層道德思維 --- p.55 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- 兩層道德思維的問題 --- p.59 / Chapter 4.3 --- 滿足式後果主義 --- p.62 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- 放棄極大化原則 --- p.62 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- 滿足式後果主義的問題 --- p.66 / Chapter 4.4 --- 混合理論 --- p.69 / Chapter 4.4.1 --- 無偏私原則與個人觀點 --- p.69 / Chapter 4.4.2 --- 混合理論的問題 --- p.72 / Chapter 4.5 --- 小結 --- p.77 / Chapter 第五章 --- 結論 --- p.78 / 參考書目 --- p.81
|
7 |
The transition to an objective standard of social controlBernard, L. L. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago.
|
8 |
The transition to an objective standard of social controlBernard, L. L. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago.
|
9 |
Empathy for education : a naturalist utilitarian argumentWalters, Timothy January 2016 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
The adjudication of utilitarianism and rights in the sphere of health care /Moore, Harry L., January 1998 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Oklahoma, 1998. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
Page generated in 0.2456 seconds