The paper presents a novel approach to explaining word order variation in the early Germanic languages. Initial observations about verb placement as a device marking types of rhetorical relations made on data from Old High German (cf. Hinterhölzl & Petrova 2005) are now reconsidered on a larger scale and compared with evidence from other early Germanic languages. The paper claims that the identification of information-structural domains in a sentence is best achieved by taking into account the interaction between the pragmatic features of discourse referents and properties of discourse organization.

In the last few decades, there has been increased interest in the incorporation of data from bi- and multilingual individuals in linguistic theory: from second language acquisition and language attrition to heritage varieties and code-switching. This dissertation discusses a range of ways in which code-switching data can provide insight into the mechanisms that underlie linguistic structures. The data will be analysed within the framework of Minimalist Generative syntax and Distributed Morphology.The first part investigates grammatical gender assignment in code- switching between English, a language without grammatical gender, and two languages with grammatical gender: French and Belgian Dutch. These languages have comparable, but different gender systems. French has two genders: masculine and feminine, whereas Belgian Dutch adds a third: neuter. The study in this part of the dissertation compares gen- der assignment strategies in bilinguals with different profiles. In addition, the code-switching data provide evidence against the default status of neuter in Belgian Dutch.The second part focuses on word order and includes two studies: one on verb-second word order in Dutch-English code-switching and one on adverb placement in English-French and Dutch-English code- switching. The verb-second chapter identifies a lacuna in the traditional Generative analysis for verb second and uses the CS data to address this. The chapter on adverb position looks at placement of the adverb between the verb and its direct object, which is allowed in Dutch and French, but not in English. For all domains investigated, it is found that the finite verb predicts word order.Taken together, these studies demonstrate that bilingual data can shine a light on elements of the theory of grammar which remain in the shadows when only monolingual data is used. / Les dernières décennies ont vu croître l’intérêt pour l’intégration à la réflexion en linguistique théorique des données produites par des locuteurs/trices bilingues ou multilingues, que celles-ci concernent l’acquisition d’une langue seconde, l’attrition, les langues d’héritage ou l’alternance codique. Le présent travail développe plusieurs exemples où les données issues de l’alternance codique éclairent les mécanismes qui sous-tendent les structures linguistiques. Les données recueillies sont interprétées dans le cadre de la syntaxe générative minimaliste et de la morphologie distribuée (« distributed morphology »).Dans un premier temps, nous analysons l’attribution du genre grammatical dans l’alternance entre l’anglais, d’une part, et le français et le néerlandais de Belgique, de l’autre. Alors qu’il n’y a pas en anglais de genre grammatical, le français et le néerlandais de Belgique marquent ce genre, mais de façon différente :si le français distingue deux genres, masculin et féminin, le néerlandais de Belgique y adjoint un troisième, le neutre. Dans cette partie de la thèse, nous dressons le profil des stratégies d’attribution du genre auprès de deux types distincts de bilingues et nous établissons également que le neutre n’est pas le genre par défaut en néerlandais de Belgique.Dans un second temps, nous nous penchons sur l’ordre des constituants. Dans une première étude, nous examinons l’ordre des mots avec « verbe second » (V2) dans l’alternance anglais-néerlandais. Nous abordons ensuite le placement de l’adverbe dans l’alternance anglais- français et anglais-néerlandais. Le chapitre consacré à V2 identifie une lacune dans la littérature générative et tire profit des données de l’al- ternance pour y proposer une solution. Le chapitre consacré à l’adverbe s’intéresse au placement de celui-ci entre le verbe et son objet, position licite en français et néerlandais mais pas en anglais. Dans ces deux études, il apparaît que c’est la langue du verbe à la forme finie qui prédit l’ordre des constituants.L’ensemble des recherches ici réunies démontre que les données bilingues mettent en lumière des aspects de la théorie grammaticale qui restent dans l’ombre lorsque le chercheur se limite à des données monolingues. / Doctorat en Langues, lettres et traductologie / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

The present dissertation is a comparative investigation between the Germanic-like structural phenomena found in the left periphery of Old French (OF) clauses and the syntactic phenomena found in the left periphery of Old High German (OHG). The goal of this thesis is to provide evidence that only a synchronic analysis can explain the presence of Germanic-like structures in OF syntax. The reason for this lies in the similarities between the V2 properties found in OF and OHG. The two languages show V2 properties such as V-to-C movement and XP fronting, but also properties which are not found in Modern V2 languages such as a frequent V1 and V3 word order. The corpus I use consists of four OF texts from the 12th and 13th century which correspond to the late OF period. They are composed in different OF dialects from the northern part of France. The poetic texts chosen for this study are Le voyage de Saint-Brandan and Gormont et Isembart. The prose texts are Le Roman de Tristan en prose and Les Miracles de Saint Louis. I coded these OF documents according to certain criteria: main clause type, embedded clause type, finite verb position, first element preceding the finite verb, etc. The results indicate that OF can be considered a true V2-language that shares a certain amount of properties with OHG, namely V-to-C movement, XP fronting, Stylistic Fronting as well as verb-initial clauses. This thesis illustrates that the OF dialects closer situated to the Germanic language border show a higher frequency in Germanic-like syntactic phenomena than the dialects situated further away. A difference between poems and prose texts concerning the presence and intensity of certain syntactic phenomena can also be observed.

Orientadores: Charlotte Marie Chambelland Galves, Josep Maria Fontana Méndez / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-19T13:00:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Pinto_CarlosFelipe_D.pdf: 2643369 bytes, checksum: c13cfeeaac0894eb3c85dbf9f9f25e41 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 / Resumo: Esta Tese discute a mudança na ordem de constituintes e no posicionamento do verbo finito na história do espanhol europeu. Fontana (1993) propõe que o espanhol antigo era uma língua V2 simétrica, como o iídiche e o islandês atuais, na qual o verbo se movia para Io e SpeclP era uma posição A-Barra. Zubizarreta (1998) propõe que, no espanhol atual, o verbo também se mova para |o e que SpeclP ainda seja uma posição A-Barra. Neste sentido, se entende que a proposta de Zubizarreta (1998) é a de que as duas fases da língua são estruturalmente idênticas; contudo, o que os dados de Fontana (1993) mostram é que há diferenças estruturais importantes entre elas. O Capítulo 01 se concentra na discussão formal do efeito V2 nas línguas germânicas, que são consideradas as línguas V2 prototípicas, enfatizando: a) qual é o gatilho para o movimento do verbo; b) o que desencadeia a variação na manifestação do efeito V2 nas orações subordinadas fazendo com que algumas línguas apresentem efeito V2 irrestritamente e outras só apresentem efeito V2 nas orações matrizes. É proposta uma análise unificada em que, em ambos os casos, o verbo sempre se move para Co em orações matrizes e que a variação no traço [±asserção] é o responsável pela variação do efeito V2 nas orações subordinadas. O Capítulo 02 apresenta os dados do espanhol antigo e do espanhol atual. O trabalho se concentra em orações finitas e declarativas. Mostra-se que há aspectos que não distinguem superficialmente as duas fases, como a quantidade de constituintes pré-verbais, a posição do sujeito em relação ao verbo simples e a relação do verbo com os advérbios e o objeto direto. Por outro lado, há aspectos superficiais que diferenciam claramente as duas fases, tais como o posicionamento dos clíticos, a ordem O-V e a retomada clítica, a posição do sujeito nos complexos verbais, a ordem XP-V e a posição do sujeito. O Capítulo conclui que a diferença entre as duas fases, com relação às ordens V1, V2 e V>2, é qualitativa e não quantitativa e que o espanhol antigo possuía variação gramatical, apresentando uma gramática semelhante à gramática atual e uma gramática V2. O Capítulo 03 propõe uma análise formal para os fatos discutidos no Capítulo 02. Discute-se a posição do sujeito, propondo que os sujeitos pós-verbais se movem sempre do VP e que os sujeitos pré-verbais podem ter também uma posição dentro do IP. Com relação à ordem O-V e a duplicação clítica, se mostra que a diferença entre as duas fases está relacionada com a noção de operador. Por fim, se discute o movimento do verbo e é proposto que, no espanhol atual, o verbo se mova unicamente para r (tanto em orações neutras como em orações marcadas) e, no espanhol antigo, na gramática V2, o verbo se mova generalizadamente para C\ O Capítulo 04 procura explicar a mudança gramatical de uma fase para a outra, relacionando questões da história interna com aspectos da sócio-história. Assume-se que a aquisição da linguagem é o lugar da mudança lingüística; faz-se um rápido panorama da formação do espanhol e se sugere que o efeito V2 encontrado no espanhol antigo é decorrente de influências germânicas, através do contato de línguas e transmissão lingüística irregular. A perda do efeito V2 é explicada por uma mudança paramétrica devido a uma alteração no input ao qual as crianças dos Séculos XV e XVI eram expostas. O Capítulo termina discutindo uma possível influência do espanhol na perda do efeito V2 no português europeu. As conclusões gerais são as seguintes: a) línguas V2 apresentam sempre movimento do verbo para CP em orações matrizes e têm as orações subordinadas abertas a parametrização (não existe V2 em IP, que é sempre uma projeção A); b) o espanhol antigo e o espanhol atual não são o mesmo tipo de gramática, mesmo que superficialmente possam produzir enunciados semelhantes / Abstract: This Thesis discusses the change in the order of constituents and in the position of the finite verb in the history of the European Spanish. Fontana (1993) proposes that the Old Spanish was a symmetrical V2 language, just like Current Yiddish and Icelandic, in which the verb would move to Io and SpeclP would be an A-Bar position. Zubizarreta (1998) proposes that in Current Spanish the verb movement is also to r and that SpeclP is still an A-Bar position. In that sense, it is understood that both phases of Spanish are structurally identical; however, what Fontana (1993)'s data show is that there are important structural differences between them. Chapter 01 focuses on the formal discussion of the V2 phenomena in the Germanic languages, which are considered to be the prototypical V2 languages, emphasizing: a) which is the trigger to the movement of the verb; b) what unleashes the variation in the manifestation of the V2 effect in the embedded clauses, making some languages present the V2 effect unrestrictively and some others only present the V2 effect in the matrix clauses. A unified analysis is proposed where in both cases the verb always moves to Co in matrix clauses and that the variation of feature [±assertion] is responsible for the variation of the V2 effect of the embedded clauses. Chapter 02 presents the data of both Old and Current Spanish. The work focuses in finite and declarative clauses. It is shown that there are aspects which do not distinguish the two phases superficially, like the pre-verbal constituents, the position of the subject according to the simple verb and the relationship among adverbs and the direct object. On the other hand, there are superficial aspects which clearly differentiate both phases, as the position of the clitics, the O-V order and the clitic resumption, the position of the subject in the complex verbs, the XP-V order and the subject position. This chapter concludes that the difference between both phases in relation to the V1, V2 and V>2 orders is qualitative and not quantitative and that the Old Spanish possesses grammatical variation, presenting an alike grammar to the current grammar and the V2 grammar. Chapter 03 proposes a formal analysis of the facts discussed in Chapter 02. It is discussed the position of the subject, suggesting that the post-verbal subjects always move to VP and that the pre-verbal subjects can also have a position within IP. In relation to the O-V order and the clitic doubling, it is shown that the difference between the two phases is related to the notion of operator. To sum up, it is discussed the movement of the verb and it is proposed that in the Current Spanish the verb moves only to T (as long in neutral clauses as in marked clauses) and that, in Old Spanish, in the V2 grammar, the verb moves generally to Co. Chapter 04 tries to explain the grammatical change from one phase to the other, relating questions of intern history with social-historical aspects. It is assumed that the acquisition of language is the place of the linguistic change; there is a brief overview of the formation of Spanish and it is suggested that the V2 effect found in the old Spanish comes from Germanic influences through the contact of languages and through the irregular linguistic transmission. The loss of the V2 effect is explained by a parametric change due to an alteration in the input in which children of the XV and XVI centuries were exposed. The chapter finishes with a discussion of a possible influence of the Spanish in the loss of the V2 effect in the European Portuguese. The general conclusions are the following: a) V2 languages always display verb movement to CP in matrix clauses and they have embedded clauses opened to parametrization (there is not V2 in IP, which is always an A projection); b) Old Spanish and Current Spanish have not the same type of grammar, although superficially both can make similar utterances / Doutorado / Linguistica / Doutor em Linguística