This work’s subject is the locative in the present-day administrative language. The locative’s samples are picked from the sessional stenographs of Lithuania’s Republic of Seimas and „Valstybės žinios“. There was reached to explore in what typical, antypical and specifical moments is used the locative in the present, administrative language, what locative’s accounts are nonstandard and what reasons of the locative’s substandard usage. There are used the present and the current inside locatives in the present, administrative language. The division of the accounts of the current inside locative is unequal. The current inside locative is used to point the accounts of place, time, manner, state and determinative in the spoken, administrative word. However this one is used to point the accounts of place, time, manner and determinative. The current, inside locative is operated for the accounts of purpose, manner and state both in the spoken and written, administrative word. The most common usage of the locative is met in the pointing of place both in the spoken and written language. This locative is more rarely used as the account of time and determinative. The current, inside locative is quite rarely used as the account of manner, and the usage of state is treated as exceptional. The administrative language has and its own usable ways of expression. Primarily we can mention words’ combinations with the current, inside locative which in the spoken language are not created but... [to full text]

Šiame darbe tiriamas Gervėčių šnektos daiktavardis. Rašant šį darbą rasta labai reta ir niekur tarmėse neužfiksuota vyriškosios giminės kai kurių daiktavardžių vienaskaitos naudininko galūnė –au. Ją turi ne visų kamienų daaiktavardžiai. Sistemiškai šią galūnę turi a, ia, iia kamienų daiktavardžiai: vé jåu, kìšk’åu, laukáu. V. Mažiulio nuomone, tai yra pati seniausia baltiška šių kamienų daiktavardžių vienaskaitos naudininko galūnė. Galinis au buvo suvienbalsintas ir paverstas –ō: sūnau> sūnō. Šis ō dėsningai virto į –uo: sú nuo. Galima stebėtis V. Mažiulio įžvalgumu, nes dar tada nebuvo žinomos formos su galūne –au. Izoliuotose šnektose neretai išlieka labai archajiškų formų. Tokia kaip tik ir yra Gervėčių šnekta. Minėta vienaskaitos naudininko galūnė –uo (vilkuo, låũkuo). Gervėčių šnektoje taip pat turima kaip paralelinė. Dėmesio verti ir Gervėčių snektos postpozicijos vietininkai. Išlaikytas pats senasis lokotyvas: laukúosu, ruñko.su. Šalia jo turimi ir visi keturi postpozicijos vietininkai, nors aliatyvo ir adesyvo pasitaiko tik liekanų. Gervėčių šnektoje yra vartojamas ir pašalio einamasis vietininkas (aliatyvas), tačiau vartojimo atvejai jau reti. Juo pasakoma, kad veikėjas ar veiksmasartėja (juda) prie tos vietos (asmens), kuri išreikšta šio linksnio forma. Šnektoje pašalio vietininkas įdomus dar ir tuo, kad vietoj galūnės priebalsio p turi k: ainù danilìk, zidorìk „Einu pas Danilą, Izidorių “. Pašalio vietininkas... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / The noun of Gervečiai dialect is analyzed in the project. While writing the project, a very rare and in none dialect recorded ending of the dative case of some singular nouns of the masculine gender, i.e. -au, was found. Not all the nouns possess it. Systemically this ending is present in the nouns of the stems a, ia, iia: vé jåu, kìšk’åu, laukáu. In the opinion of V. Mažiulis, it is the oldest Baltic ending of the dative case of singular nouns of the aforesaid stems. The inflexional diphthong au was made monophthong and turned into -ō: sūnau>sūnō. This ō naturally turned into -uo: sú nuo. We may wonder about V. Mažiulis’ perspicacity as then the forms with the ending -au were not known yet. However, very archaic forms often survive in isolated dialects. Such is the dialect of Gervečiai. The aforementioned ending of the singular dative case -uo (vilkuo, låũkuo) is also possessed by Gervečiai dialect as a parallel one. The postposition locative cases of Gervečiai dialect are also worth attention. The oldest locative has been preserved: laukúosu, ruñko.su. Near it all four postposition locatives are present though only the remains of the aliative and adesive are encountered. The locative case of by-place (aliative) is used in Gervečiai dialect, too, but the cases of use are already rare. It states that the character or action approaches (moves to) the place (person) which is expressed by the form of this case. The locative case of... [to full text]