No description available.

Disinfection is the final and very important step of wastewater treatment to maintain healthy ecosystems. Although chlorination is the most prevalent wastewater disinfection method, there are serious safety concerns and ecological problems associated with its use. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of using a HydroFLOW 60i unit for wastewater disinfection, as an alternative to chlorination. The study was performed using two different reactors, namely, a bench-scale laboratory batch reactor, and a continuous flow, pilot unit. Using the batch reactor, it was found out that the HydroFLOW 60i unit is effective to kill bacteria; however, modifications to this mode of operation would be required in order to increase the disinfection efficiency and to decrease the detention time. When the continuous flow system was run using a hydraulic detention time of 10 minutes and a single pass through the HydroFLOW unit, the E. coli removal efficiency was negligible. Further research is needed to determine the most economical and efficient reactor configuration in order to make the HydroFLOW unit competitive with conventional wastewater chlorination.

Finding the most cost-effective and environmental friendly way to treat and disinfect wastewater has been raising concerns around the world. Failure in performing disinfection of wastewater before returning it to the environment could have terrible consequences to human health and the ecosystem. The risks associated to continue with current practices have led to the creation of stringent regulations. In this research the HYDROPATH technology is tested while attaching a HydroFlow 60i unit to a reactor that works as a closed recirculation system. To determine the feasibility of the HydroFlow 60i unit as an alternative method to chlorine, the EPA method 1306 is used being Escherichia coli the unit of quantification. After performing several experiments modifying parameters such as conductivity and detention time, it was concluded that the HydroFlow 60i unit by itself would not able to replace current disinfection technologies, to meet EPA standards of E. coli removal.

No description available.

Wastewater treatment is essential to protecting the environment and human welfare. Although chlorination is widely used, the environmental and health concerns associated with chlorine are growing. Treatment facilities are implementing alternative technologies, though the cost and efficiency associated with these practices leave much room in the wastewater field for innovation. Hydropath Technologies Limited introduced a piece of equipment that uses the properties of a transformer to pass an alternating electric current through the pipe and into the contents of the channel. Hydroflow claims that the charged microorganisms react with the oppositely charged water molecule to force osmosis and kill the cell. Disinfection capabilities of three Hydroflow models with varying voltages are tested using municipal wastewater from the secondary clarifier using Escherichia coli concentration as the unit for quantification. After testing the results surrounding theses experiments cannot support the hypothesis that the Hydroflow technology could replace chlorination for municipal wastewater disinfection.

Abstract This thesis examines three different areas of water treatment technology: the application of organic peracids in wastewater treatment; the removal of organic residues from boiler make-up water; and the use of geopolymers as sorbents. The main advantages of peracids as alternative wastewater disinfectants are their effective antimicrobial properties and high oxidation power, as well the absence of harmful disinfection by-products after their use. Performic, peracetic and perpropionic acids were compared in laboratory-scale disinfection, oxidation and corrosion experiments. From the techno-economical point of view, performic acid proved to be the most effective disinfectant against E. coli and fecal enterococci. However, in the bisphenol-A oxidation experiments, no advantages compared to hydrogen peroxide use were observed. It was also determined that corrosion rates on stainless steel 316L were negligible, while carbon steel seemed unsuitable in terms of corrosion for use with peracids even in low concentrations. Organic compounds in the boiler plant water-steam cycle thermally decompose and form potentially corrosive species. Activated carbon filtration was confirmed to be a suitable method for the removal of organic residue from deionized boiler make-up water. No significant differences in terms of treatment efficiency between commercial activated carbons were observed. However, acid washing as a pre-treatment reduced the leaching of impurities from new carbon beds. Nevertheless, a mixed-bed ion exchanger was required to remove leached impurities, such as silica and sodium. Geopolymers, or amorphous analogues of zeolites, can be used as sorbents in the treatment of wastewater. Metakaolin and blast-furnace-slag geopolymers showed positive potential in the treatment of landfill leachate (NH4+ ) and mine effluent (Ni, As, Sb). / Tiivistelmä Tämä väitöskirja käsittelee kolmea erillistä vedenkäsittelyteknologian osa-aluetta: orgaanisten perhappojen käyttöä jäteveden käsittelyssä, orgaanisten jäämien poistoa suolavapaasta kattilalaitoksen lisävedestä ja geopolymeerien sovelluksia vedenkäsittelysorbentteina. Orgaanisten perhappojen pääasialliset edut verrattuna kilpaileviin tekniikoihin ovat hyvä desinfiointiteho, korkea hapetuspotentiaali ja desinfioinnin sivutuotteiden muodostumattomuus. Permuurahais-, peretikka- ja perpropaanihapon vertailu osoitti permuurahaishapon olevan kemikaaleista tehokkain E. coli - ja enterokokkibakteerien inaktivoinnissa kustannus- ja teknisistä näkökulmista. Hapetuksessa, jossa käytettiin bisfenoli-A:ta malliaineena, ei kuitenkaan havaittu etua verrattuna edullisempaan vetyperoksidiin. Ruostumattoman teräksen (316L) pinnalla ei havaittu merkittävää korroosiota, kun taas hiiliteräs ei sovellu käytettäväksi perhappojen kanssa. Orgaaniset jäämät kattilalaitoksen vesi-höyrykierrossa hajoavat termisesti pienen moolimassan hapoiksi ja aiheuttavat korroosioriskin. Aktiivihiilisuodatuksen todettiin olevan soveltuva menetelmä orgaanisten jäämien poistoon lisävedestä. Aktiivihiililaatujen välillä ei havaittu merkittäviä eroja, mutta happopesu aktiivihiilen esikäsittelynä vähensi hiilestä liukenevien epäpuhtauksien määrää. Geopolymeerit ovat zeoliittien amorfisia analogeja ja niiden ioninvaihtokykyä voidaan hyödyntää vedenkäsittelysovelluksissa. Metakaoliini- ja masuunikuonapohjaisten geopolymeerien todettiin olevan lupaavia materiaaleja malliliuosten, kaatopaikan suotoveden ja kaivoksen purkuveden käsittelyssä poistettaessa ammoniumia, nikkeliä, arseenia ja antimonia.