No description available.

作者 黃慧英. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學硏究院哲學部. / Manuscript (cops. 2 & 3 reprint copies) / Includes bibliographical references: leaves 239. / zuo zhe Huang Huiying. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue yan jiu yuan zhe xue bu. / Chapter 第一章 --- 前言 / Chapter 第二章 --- 朱子的形上學 / Chapter 第三章 --- 朱子對易（涉及天道與人道關係部分）的理解及的理解及注釋 / Chapter 第四章 --- 朱子對中庸的理解及注釋 / Chapter 第五章 --- 朱子如道德哲學之甲´ؤ´ؤ道德存有論 / Chapter 第六章 --- 朱子的道德哲學之乙´ؤ´ؤ道德實踐論 / Chapter 第七章 --- 朱子與孟子的重要分歧 / Chapter 第八章 --- 朱子的道德哲學與形上學的關係

手稿本. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學. / Shou gao ben. / Includes bibliographical references: p. 518-541. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue. / 自序 / Chapter 第一章 --- 朱熹生平事畧 / Chapter 第二章 --- 朱子有關詩經學之著作 / Chapter 第一節 --- 朱子早期之詩經學著作 / Chapter （一） --- 毛詩集解 / Chapter 第二節 --- 朱子後期之詩經學著作 / Chapter （一） --- 詩集傳 / Chapter （二） --- 詩序辨說 / Chapter （三） --- 詩風雅頌 / Chapter （四） --- 文公詩傳遺說 / Chapter 第三章 --- 朱子論孔子删詩及詩與樂 / Chapter 第一節 --- 論孔子删詩 / Chapter 第二節 --- 論詩與樂 / Chapter 第四章 --- 朱子主廢詩序之理由及其理論之建立 / Chapter 第一節 --- 朱子以前唐宋學者之反對詩序運動 / Chapter 第二節 --- 朱子疑序之因由 / Chapter 第三節 --- 朱子攻詆詩序之論據 / Chapter （一） --- 詩大小序 / Chapter （二） --- 詩序作者 / Chapter （三） --- 論詩序之紕繆 / Chapter 第四節 --- 朱子辨序之依據 / Chapter 第五節 --- 朱傳與毛詩序於詩經解題不同之比較 / Chapter 第五章 --- 朱子之淫詩說 / Chapter 第一節 --- 朱子以前指國風有淫詩者 / Chapter 第二節 --- 朱子所指為淫詩者實為三十篇而非二十四篇 / Chapter 第三節 --- 朱子以國風三十篇為淫詩之理由 / Chapter 第六章 --- 朱子解詩引用之各家詩說 / Chapter 第七章 --- 二南說 / Chapter 第八章 --- 釋六義 / Chapter 第一節 --- 釋風雅頌 / Chapter 第二節 --- 釋賦比興 / Chapter 第九章 --- 朱子論詩經之音韻及讀法 / Chapter 第一節 --- 論詩經之音韻 / Chapter 第二節 --- 論詩經之讀法 / Chapter 第十章 --- 朱子對詩經之分類及篇次章句之改移 / Chapter 第一節 --- 風雅頌之分類 / Chapter 第二節 --- 詩經篇次之更移 / Chapter 第三節 --- 詩篇章句之增減 / Chapter 第十一章 --- 論詩經之篇名 / Chapter 第十二章 --- 朱子解詩之態度及方法 / Chapter 第一節 --- 解詩之態度 / Chapter 第二節 --- 解詩之方法 / Chapter 第十三章 --- 朱子詩經學之影響及其批評（上） / Chapter 第一節 --- 時人與門人之態度 / Chapter 第二節 --- 反對朱子之馬端臨 / Chapter 第三節 --- 元明兩代信從朱熹詩說之學者 / Chapter 第四節 --- 清代反對朱子詩說之學者 / Chapter 第十四章 --- 朱子詩經學之影響及其批評（下） / Chapter 第一節 --- 由「衛宏作詩序」討論 / Chapter 第二節 --- 由「朱子所判淫奔詩」討論 / 後語 / 引用及參考書目

張家輝. / 論文(哲學碩士) -- 香港中文大學硏究院歷史學部, 1997. / 參考文獻: leaves 169-175. / Zhang Jiahui. / 論文提要 --- p.i / 圖表索引 --- p.iv / 引論 --- p.I / Chapter 第一章 --- 分析架構：當代詮釋學 --- p.1 / Chapter 1. --- 詮釋多元化的呼喚 / Chapter 2. --- 「創造的詮釋學」理論 / Chapter 第二章 --- 中國儒學的「道統」觀念 --- p.21 / Chapter 1. --- 儒家道統說的涵義及其發展 / Chapter 2. --- 硏究道統觀證成的幾種模式 / Chapter 3. --- 朱熹的歷史地位 / Chapter 第三章 --- 「集大成」的朱熹 --- p.46 / Chapter 1. --- 整個文化大傳統即是道統 / Chapter 2. --- 朱熹對先秦及北宋諸儒的繼承 / Chapter 第四章 --- 錢穆的詮釋視界及其形成背景 --- p.72 / Chapter 1. --- 錢穆與無錫世界 / Chapter 2. --- 東西文化優劣比較與和合性 / Chapter 第五章 --- 「別子爲宗」的朱熹 --- p.87 / Chapter 1. --- 廣義的道統觀 / Chapter 2. --- 第一期：初訪朱子世界 / Chapter 3. --- 第二期：「道德形上學」之建立與朱子的不透 / Chapter 4. --- 第三期：牟氏朱子學的「轉出」 / Chapter 5. --- 第四期：貞定圓教模型 / Chapter 第六章 --- 牟宗三的詮釋視界及其形成背景 --- p.133 / Chapter 1. --- 熊十力與唐君毅對牟宗三的影響 / Chapter 2. --- 從心理角度透視牟宗三的「開出說」 / Chapter 3. --- 小結 / 總結 --- p.164 / 參考書目 --- p.169

The art of reading and its application to knowledge acquisition and innovation by elites have been largely neglected by historians of print culture and reading in late imperial China (1368-1911). Unlike most studies, which are concerned more with the implied reader and individual reading experience, the present study assumes that the actual reader and the social, cultural and epistemic dimensions of reading practices are the central issues of a history of reading in China. That is, while the art of reading was internalized by the individual, his learning and application of it had social, cultural and epistemic features. At a time when secular reading practices in Renaissance England were informed by Erasmian principles, Ming literati, regardless of their different philosophical stances, were being trained in an art of reading proposed by Zhu Xi (1130-1200), whose Neo-Confucian philosophy had been esteemed as orthodox since the fourteenth century. Transformations and challenges in interpreting and applying his art did not hinder its general reception among elite readers. Its common employment determined the practitioner’s epistemic frame and manner of knowledge innovation. My dissertation consists of five chapters bracketed with an introduction and conclusion. Chapter One discusses Zhu’s theory of reading and the implied pattern of acquiring and innovating knowledge, based on a careful reading of his writings and conversations. Chapter Two describes the transmission of Zhu’s theory from the thirteenth to the seventeenth centuries. During its transmission, Zhu’s art was reedited, rephrased, and even readapted by both government agencies and individual authors with different intentions and agendas. Chapter Three focuses on the reception of Zhu’s theory of reading by 1500 and argues that the moral end of reading eventually triumphed over the intellectual one in early Ming Confucian philosophy. Chapter Four explores the affinity of Ming philosophers of mind with Zhu’s theory in their reading concepts and practices from 1500 to the mid-seventeenth century. Despite their attempts to separate themselves intellectually from the Song tradition, Ming philosophers of mind followed Zhu’s rules for reading in their intellectual practices. Chapter Five outlines the reading habits and knowledge landscape based on a statistical survey of extant Ming imprints. Despite some deviations, the Ming reading habits and knowledge framework largely accorded with Zhu’s theory and its Ming adaptations. The continuity of reading habits from Zhu’s time to the seventeenth century, I conclude, inspires us to rethink the Ming apostasy from the Song tradition. The particularity of scholarly knowledge acquisition and innovation in Ming-Qing China by the eighteenth century was not invented by Ming-Qing scholars but anticipated by Zhu through his theory of reading. With respect to late imperial China, the history of reading, together with the history of knowledge, is yet to be fruitfully explored. With this dissertation, I hope to be able to make a contribution to the understanding of the East Asian orthodox habit of reading as represented by Zhu’s admirers. By placing my investigation in the context of the history of knowledge, I also hope to contribute to the understanding of the relationship of reading to the way that knowledge evolved in traditional China. Intellectual historians tended to consider the Ming Confucian tradition as having broken off from the Cheng-Zhu tradition, but at least in reading habits and practices Ming elite readers perpetuated Zhu’s theory of reading and the knowledge framework it implied.