Cell motility has been found to play a role in many important body functions as well as the embryogenenis of mulitcellular organisms like vertebrates. From a physics point of view the interesting questions behind every motion are: Why is it moving? Where do the forces come from? Today we know that the motility of many cells is dependent on an active polymer network. Actin, one of the most abundant proteins in the body, is constantly polymerized, being moved around and depolymerized in motile cells. Until now, only forces outside the cell like traction forces could be measured. The direct measurement of the force generated by polymerizing actin filaments has only been measured by our lab and the lab of M. Radmacher. In these measurements fish keratocytes were used. Whereas I did these experiments, for the first time, on mammalian cells. To measure forward forces on neuronal growth cones I stabilized the SFM, as measurement times went up from minutes to hours. Furthermore measurements had to be performed at 37°C instead of room temerature, this induced drifts of the substrate. I incorporated an optical trap into the microscope to track the motion of the substrate. A feedback loop moved the SFM cantilever to minimize relative motion of substrate and cantilever. For keratocytes I directly measured the forces produced by actin polymerization and, to my knowledge for the first time, the forces associated with the retrograde actin flow using a SFM. The result was that both actin and myosin play important but different roles in motility. For actin it turned out that considering just the polymerization was not enough. Actin depolymerization and the resulting entropic forces are a completely new physical effect in actin based cell motility. With this new force in the force balance I can explain all effects observed in my experiments without introducing any new biochemical feedback loops. Finally I showed that neuronal growth cones are very soft and weak structures. They are at least one order of magnitude softer and weaker as for example fibroblasts or cells forming the blood vessel walls. As neurons are usually located in soft environments this does not impede their normal outgrowth. It could even serve as a safety mechanism that prevents cell from growing into wrong areas like breaching the blood-brain-barrier, on a physical level. For a neuron the wall of a blood vessel feels like a brick wall for us.

Cell motility has been found to play a role in many important body functions as well as the embryogenenis of mulitcellular organisms like vertebrates. From a physics point of view the interesting questions behind every motion are: Why is it moving? Where do the forces come from? Today we know that the motility of many cells is dependent on an active polymer network. Actin, one of the most abundant proteins in the body, is constantly polymerized, being moved around and depolymerized in motile cells. Until now, only forces outside the cell like traction forces could be measured. The direct measurement of the force generated by polymerizing actin filaments has only been measured by our lab and the lab of M. Radmacher. In these measurements fish keratocytes were used. Whereas I did these experiments, for the first time, on mammalian cells. To measure forward forces on neuronal growth cones I stabilized the SFM, as measurement times went up from minutes to hours. Furthermore measurements had to be performed at 37°C instead of room temerature, this induced drifts of the substrate. I incorporated an optical trap into the microscope to track the motion of the substrate. A feedback loop moved the SFM cantilever to minimize relative motion of substrate and cantilever. For keratocytes I directly measured the forces produced by actin polymerization and, to my knowledge for the first time, the forces associated with the retrograde actin flow using a SFM. The result was that both actin and myosin play important but different roles in motility. For actin it turned out that considering just the polymerization was not enough. Actin depolymerization and the resulting entropic forces are a completely new physical effect in actin based cell motility. With this new force in the force balance I can explain all effects observed in my experiments without introducing any new biochemical feedback loops. Finally I showed that neuronal growth cones are very soft and weak structures. They are at least one order of magnitude softer and weaker as for example fibroblasts or cells forming the blood vessel walls. As neurons are usually located in soft environments this does not impede their normal outgrowth. It could even serve as a safety mechanism that prevents cell from growing into wrong areas like breaching the blood-brain-barrier, on a physical level. For a neuron the wall of a blood vessel feels like a brick wall for us.

Cell polarity is required for asymmetric division, a mechanism to generate cell diversity by distributing fate determinants unequally to daughter cells. The establishment of polarity requires the evolutionarily conserved partitioning-defective (PAR) proteins as well as the actin cytoskeleton. In Caenorhabditis elegans one-cell embryos, the PAR proteins are segregated into an anterior (PAR-3, PAR-6) and a posterior (PAR-1, PAR-2) corticaldomain. The formation of PAR polarity correlates with anterior-posterior differences in the contractile activity of the cortex, known as "contractile polarity". It is thought that regulation of contractile polarity controls the establishment of PAR polarity, but detailed evidence to support this idea is lacking. To investigate how modulation of the actomyosin cytoskeleton affects polarity establishment, the acto-myosin cytoskeleton was perturbed by RNA-mediated interference (RNAi) of two Rho GTPases, CDC-42 and RHO-1. To examine how Rho GTPases are implemented in actin remodeling, it is important to analyze how their activity is controlled and how different activities affect polarity formation. The role of two putative Rho GTPase regulators, the Rho GTPase exchange factor (GEF) ECT-2 and the Rho GTPase activating protein (GAP) K09H11.3 were analyzed with respect to polarity formation. The formation of polarity was analyzed by using GFP-labeled proteins, and several different tracking methods were used to investigate the establishment of contractile and PAR polarity in more detail.This study demonstrates that both RHO-1 and CDC-42 are involved in polarity establishment in C. elegans embryos. But importantly, both act by different mechanisms. RHO-1 organizes the acto-myosin cytoskeleton into a contractile network, and therefore is essential for the formation of contractile polarity. The organization of the acto-myosin cytoskeleton is critical to ensure proper PAR protein distribution. Furthermore, a balance of RHO-1 activity by the GEF ECT-2 and the GAP K09H11.3 appears to be important for cortical contractility, for PAR protein domain size and for mutual exclusion of the PAR proteins. Although CDC-42 was shown to be a universal regulator of the actin cytoskeleton, CDC-42 acts downstream of contractile polarity. CDC-42 is required for linking PAR-6 to the cortex. In the absence of RHO-1 and ECT-2, PAR-6 and CDC-42 are not localized to the anterior cortex. This suggests that RHO-1, by organizing the actomyosin cytoskeleton into a contractile network, regulates the segregation of CDC-42 to the anterior cortex, and concomitantly PAR-6 localization. This study shows that the distribution of PAR is related to cortical activity and supports the model that the actin cytoskeleton plays an important role in polarity establishment.

Cell polarity is required for asymmetric division, a mechanism to generate cell diversity by distributing fate determinants unequally to daughter cells. The establishment of polarity requires the evolutionarily conserved partitioning-defective (PAR) proteins as well as the actin cytoskeleton. In Caenorhabditis elegans one-cell embryos, the PAR proteins are segregated into an anterior (PAR-3, PAR-6) and a posterior (PAR-1, PAR-2) corticaldomain. The formation of PAR polarity correlates with anterior-posterior differences in the contractile activity of the cortex, known as "contractile polarity". It is thought that regulation of contractile polarity controls the establishment of PAR polarity, but detailed evidence to support this idea is lacking. To investigate how modulation of the actomyosin cytoskeleton affects polarity establishment, the acto-myosin cytoskeleton was perturbed by RNA-mediated interference (RNAi) of two Rho GTPases, CDC-42 and RHO-1. To examine how Rho GTPases are implemented in actin remodeling, it is important to analyze how their activity is controlled and how different activities affect polarity formation. The role of two putative Rho GTPase regulators, the Rho GTPase exchange factor (GEF) ECT-2 and the Rho GTPase activating protein (GAP) K09H11.3 were analyzed with respect to polarity formation. The formation of polarity was analyzed by using GFP-labeled proteins, and several different tracking methods were used to investigate the establishment of contractile and PAR polarity in more detail.This study demonstrates that both RHO-1 and CDC-42 are involved in polarity establishment in C. elegans embryos. But importantly, both act by different mechanisms. RHO-1 organizes the acto-myosin cytoskeleton into a contractile network, and therefore is essential for the formation of contractile polarity. The organization of the acto-myosin cytoskeleton is critical to ensure proper PAR protein distribution. Furthermore, a balance of RHO-1 activity by the GEF ECT-2 and the GAP K09H11.3 appears to be important for cortical contractility, for PAR protein domain size and for mutual exclusion of the PAR proteins. Although CDC-42 was shown to be a universal regulator of the actin cytoskeleton, CDC-42 acts downstream of contractile polarity. CDC-42 is required for linking PAR-6 to the cortex. In the absence of RHO-1 and ECT-2, PAR-6 and CDC-42 are not localized to the anterior cortex. This suggests that RHO-1, by organizing the actomyosin cytoskeleton into a contractile network, regulates the segregation of CDC-42 to the anterior cortex, and concomitantly PAR-6 localization. This study shows that the distribution of PAR is related to cortical activity and supports the model that the actin cytoskeleton plays an important role in polarity establishment.