We investigate unitarisability of groups by looking at induced actions on the cone of positive operators.

Thompson’s groups F, T, and V represent crucial examples of groups in geometric group theory that bridge it with other areas of mathematics such as logic, computer science, analysis, and geometry. One of the ways to study these groups is by understanding the geometric meaning of their actions. In this thesis we deal with Thompson’s group T that acts naturally on the unit circle S1, that is identified with the segment [0, 1] with the end points glued together. The main result of this work is the explicit construction of the Schreier graph of T with respect to the action on the orbit of 1/2. This is done by careful examination of patterns in how the generators of T act on binary words. As a main application, the nonamenability of the action of T on S1 is proved by defining injections on the set of vertices of the constructed graph that satisfy Gromov’s doubling condition. This gives an alternative proof of the known fact that T is nonamenable.

We want to take a look at the first cohomology group H^1(G, l^2(G)), in particular when G is locally-finite. First, though, we discuss some results about the space H^1(G, C G) for G locally-finite, as well as the space H^1(G, l^2(G)) when G is finitely generated. We show that, although in the case when G is finitely generated the embedding of C G into l^2(G) induces an embedding of the cohomology groups H^1(G, C G) into H^1(G, l^2(G)), when G is countably-infinite locally-finite, the induced homomorphism is not an embedding. However, even though the induced homomorphism is not an embedding, we still have that H^1(G, l^2(G)) neq 0 when G is countably-infinite locally-finite. Finally, we give some sufficient conditions for H^1(G,l^2(G)) to be zero or non-zero. / Master of Science

Cette thèse se propose d'étudier sous divers points de vue les groupes d'automorphismes d'immeubles. Un de ses objectifs est de mettre en valeur les différences autant que les analogies entre les immeubles affines et non affines. Pour appuyer cette dichotomie, on y démontre que les groupes d'automorphismes d'immeubles non affines n'ont jamais de paire de Gelfand, contrairement aux immeubles affines. Dans l'autre sens, pour souligner l'analogie entre immeubles affines et non affines, on définit une nouvelle notion de bord combinatoire d'un immeuble. Dans le cas des immeubles affines, ce bord s'identifie au bord polyédral. On relie la construction de ce bord à d'autres constructions déjà existantes, par exemple, la compactification de Busemann du graphe des chambres. La compactification combinatoire est également isomorphe à la compactification par la topologie de Chabauty de l'ensemble des chambres, sous des hypothèses de transitivité. On relie aussi le bord combinatoire à un autre espace, généralisant une construction de F. Karpelevic pour les espaces symétriques : celle du bord raffiné d'un espace CAT(0).On démontre alors que les points du bord paramètrent les sous-groupes moyennables maximaux de l'immeuble, à indice fini près. Enfin, on prouve que l'action du groupe d'automorphismes d'un immeuble localement fini sur le bord combinatoire de ce dernier est moyennable, fournissant ainsi des résolutions en cohomologie bornée et des applications bord explicites. Ceci donne aussi une nouvelle preuve que ces groupes satisfont la conjecture de Novikov. / The object of this thesis is the study, from different point of views, of automorphism groups of buildings. One of its objectives is to highlight the differences as well as the analogies between affine and non-affine buildings. In order to support this dichotomy, we prove that automorphism groups of non-affine buildings never have a Gelfand pair, contrarily to affine buildings.In the other direction, the analogy between affine and non-affine buildings is supported by the new construction of a combinatorial boundary of a building. In the affine case, this boundary is in fact the polyhedral boundary. We connect the construction of this boundary to other compactifications, such as the Busemann compactification of the graph of chambers. The combinatorial compactification is also isomorphic to the group-theoretic compactification, which embeds the set of chambers into the set of closed subgroups of the automorphism group. We also connect the combinatorial boundary to another space, which generalises a construction of F. Karpelevic for symmetric spaces : the refined boundary of a CAT(0) space.We prove that the maximal amenable subgroups of the automorphism group are, up to finite index, parametrised by the points of the boundary. Finally, we prove that the action of the automorphism group of a locally finite building on its combinatorial boundary is amenable, thus providing resolutions in bounded cohomology and boundary maps. This also gives a new proof that these groups satisfy the Novikov conjecture.

No description available.

This is an expository thesis which addresses the requirements for an operator algebra to be similar to a <em>C</em>*-algebra. It has been conjectured that this similarity condition is equivalent to either amenability or total reductivity; however, the problem has only been solved for specific types of operators. <br /><br /> We define amenability and total reductivity, as well as present some of the implications of these properties. For the purpose of establishing the desired result in specific cases, we describe the properties of two well-known types of operators, namely the compact operators and quasitriangular operators. Finally, we show that if A is an algebra of compact operators or of triangular operators then A is similar to a <em>C</em>* algebra if and only if it has the total reduction property.

This is an expository thesis which addresses the requirements for an operator algebra to be similar to a <em>C</em>*-algebra. It has been conjectured that this similarity condition is equivalent to either amenability or total reductivity; however, the problem has only been solved for specific types of operators. <br /><br /> We define amenability and total reductivity, as well as present some of the implications of these properties. For the purpose of establishing the desired result in specific cases, we describe the properties of two well-known types of operators, namely the compact operators and quasitriangular operators. Finally, we show that if A is an algebra of compact operators or of triangular operators then A is similar to a <em>C</em>* algebra if and only if it has the total reduction property.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.